DarianF

Show me the intermediate fossils! Some more on transitional forms... @kj35 @peter regarding your points above, check out these videos.

@Morpheus If you will, tell me more about the orphans of the 1840-1860 that you mentioned above. That's something I don't know about at all (or maybe I heard about it and forgot) but let me know what you've uncovered.

Fair enough.

I really can't mate I'm sorry. I gave up looking for it a while ago. But if I ever randomly come across it somewhere, I'll definitely let you know. Regarding these dark age periods, then sudden explosions of knowledge, there's probably not just one explanation. Maybe it's just a whole bunch of different things that come together at the right time? I don't know. There could be more to it. It's a fascinating thing to study, either way. I love the work of Graham Hancock (I know some people don't like him, but I think guys like him are really important in the ongoing investigations).

Drop everything, abandon your family, follow a crazy preacher through the desert. Yeah, great plan.

That's why they don't want anyone left on earth unvaccinated, because they want to destroy the possibility of having a scientific control group. When you vaccinate everyone, you have no control group left to study. The heart (and other issues) become normalised and detractors have no valid scientific way to measure or prove the problem. It's a cluster fuck of epic proportions.

I watched a documentary years back, that was an investigative piece about what was lost in the Great Library, and they made the point that if all that knowledge had not been lost, we could have been at least 100 or 200 years more technologically advanced than we are now. I think that's definitely possible. There would have been stuff there from Archimedes and people like that. Anyway, can't remember what the documentary was called, but it was really good. It was on VHS so no idea where I misplaced it.

Someone posted this article the other day ( https://www.jpeds.com/article/S0022-3476(22)00282-7/fulltext# ). This quote caught my attention more than any other part: "We have since established a clinical protocol for serial CMR performance in these patients consistent with the 2021 American Heart Association (AHA) statement that stressed the risk of sudden cardiac death, particularly with exercise, while active inflammation is present; our patients were restricted from exercise on discharge. Repeat CMR was performed within 3-6 months to guide next clinical decision-making steps." Think about it. How many athletes are dropping dead because no one is warning them of the dangers of exercise following mRNA injection? They probably are having un-diagnosed heart inflammation and just go about their normal training, then BANG. They suddenly drop. This would be a legitimate scientific explanation for the athletes we see dropping dead (and how many don't we see or hear about?) The criminals behind this - who know what is happening - the need to be punished to the full extent of the law.

Yours is much better than mine. lol.

The amount of people who have come to me all excited, like little happy puppies, and told me how great it is the government is giving their freedom back soon, is disgusting. "Oh my god, isn't it awesome, next week I don't have to wear a mask outside, only inside. And I don't need to take a PCR test at work, I can take a RAT test and home myself. Oh my god, this is so awesome." Fucking makes me vomit.

The question is, was it really destroyed or was it stolen and hidden? Probably a bit of both I think.

On the contrary, I would say it's a disgrace to science how this whole covid thing has been handled. It's anti-scientific. If proper science was being done, we would have proper vaccine safety data and we wouldn't be using these shitty PCR tests to fake cases. Pfizer and these other cunts have perverted the proper scientific process. That is NOT a black mark on science itself, it's a black mark on bad political actors and other criminal elements.

@Morpheus PS. In addition to the potential suppressed parts of the Bible, can you imagine how much ancient knowledge was lost in the Great Library of Alexandria? I'm not talking just religious texts. Texts and knowledge from all fields. Incredible loss.

That's a very good point. How much have the books of the bible been edited and or/completely hidden away. That's not something we can really debate, because who the hell knows. We don't have the evidence available to assess.

Well, if you typed all that up on a mobile that quickly, I'm impressed. Thanks for the effort. And now I do understand where you're coming from much better, and I'm not so much of an arsehole that I would try to rationalise away your experience here. If that's the experience you had and it was so profound for you personally, who am I to argue or criticise. Thanks for sharing. Most appreciated. Either way, I'm glad you're doing better now after your trauma.

Their freedoms were illegally stolen by governments that had no right to take them in the first place, and these freedoms have been repackaged and handed back out like little dog treats to retrain the retarded masses, and they think this is somehow a victory for their freedom. Clown world.

Or fake apologies

No rush mate, no rush. Please don't feel any pressure. I'm on a laptop with a puppy trying to bite my fingers as I type

I'm not sure I understand the connection. This is the study of sound and vibrations, correct? How does it prove intelligent design? Please elaborate.

Thanks Ink, I'll check that out. Sorry if I've missed some of your earlier points.

Which is why I prefer secular humanism as a model. https://secularhumanism.org/what-is-secular-humanism/

What is the evidence you are referring to?

1. "I was a staunch atheist and now, yes I believe in God." That's an unusual transition. I would like to know, if you don't mind, how did you go from atheism to god? What evidence were you presented with as an atheist that changed your mind? Was it sudden or gradual? I'm not taking the piss here, I'd really be interested. Because I have met heaps of religious people who have turned to secularism or atheism and the transition is pretty obvious and standard. But the other way around? That's more rare. 2. "Yet it is the people of religion who cause all the world's problems because of their fear of the "RULE book". Absolute nonsense and it is the perpetual yard stick that you constantly use to berate people of faith." Not all things bad caused by religion, but many problems have been and are caused by people with conflicting holy books. 3. How about your faith? Scientism. Stick there bud, that's your thing. It has all the answers supposedly. Science does not have all the answers, but that's the whole point of science. It is a way of understanding nature and reality. Without science, there would be many things we wouldn't know. It's a great tool for human advancement. And things we don't know, science is the best bet for finding out. For example, we don't know for sure there are other advanced civilizations out there in the universe, but science allows us to hypothesise, speculate, and formulate a plan for finding out. We understand now about radio waves and how we can build a radio telescope to listen for other civilisations. You're not going to discover another civilization in the universe by reading a religious text written before modern science existed. That's all it is. A way of increasing our knowledge of the universe. Of course we don't know everything, but at least we now have a way of finding out.

This is a great point. This is where I don't think the interjection of god is required at all in this type of moral discussion. Religious or not, we can all agree on these basic things. Don't hurt people, don't take actions that cause harm in society in general, etc. These are basic principles that I don't think you need any type of god to figure out. Any rational and decent human being, religious or non religious, can agree on such things. As I said above, these types of things are natural for a social species to survive on a long term basis. Where I draw the line is people saying morals come from the Bible or the Quran, like these books are an original source. Obviously, human morality that supports social cohesion predates the texts by a very long time. They are survival mechanisms.