Jump to content


  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Enforcement

  1. Yes, there were two military planes controlled remotely.


    The planes hitting the tower created the drama needed to make the idiot sheeple demand the solution which surprise surprise was more surveillance and removal of freedoms and more tax payer funded war.

  2. 12 minutes ago, Comedy Time said:


    I am ok with their explanation and suspect that insider trading knew in advance. There IS no way to debate this. You either believe it or don't. It doesn't interest me. I like puzzles and things that require thought, not some dumb yes or no issue.



    No. Google it!


    An unusually high number of put options could suggest some people new something was going to happen resulting in a fall in value.


    We have seen something similar pre the "scamdemic" along with a masse exodus of CEOs.

  3. 2 hours ago, Comedy Time said:

    He was a no planer and you claim military planes. How is his version "sense"?



    I won't. I will agree that your version is beyond ridiculous, nukes are ridiculous, space weapons are ridiculous, no planes are ridiculous. When I find a version that fits better than the explanation given, maybe I'll entertain it.


    The general one with planes has the buildings collapsing at the points of impact. Magic explosives again.




    So again you indicate that you agree with the official version of events even though in an earlier post you claim you don't.


  4. The protests will achieve precisely nothing.


    Think back to the miners strike and the  poll tax protests.


    They have already used the same tactics they used back then once and of course the media are lying like they did back then.


    The police will stir up trouble both as riot police and undercover fake protesters and the media (which 99% of idiots believe) will brand them all as far right thugs.





  5. 1 minute ago, Comedy Time said:

    I believe mostly the official story

    As you have said several times before so you are the liar saying I'm a liar.

    Discussing things with you is bizzar it's almost as though you are gaslighting yourself.

    Are you ok man?

  6. 1 minute ago, Comedy Time said:


    I don't care what you think it is, it doesn't apply to any of this discussion. 


    Cognitive dissonance refers to a situation involving conflicting attitudes, beliefs or behaviors. This produces a feeling of mental discomfort leading to an alteration in one of the attitudes, beliefs or behaviors to reduce the discomfort and restore balance.




    You are a liar. And tell me, since you "just got here" how you would know this.


    I am, and have always been a "they let it happen" believer. 






    Yes and you have stated many times that you believe the official version of events that resulted in the collapse of the towers.

    Are you Ok man? you forget your own argument and contradict yourself more than anyone I have ever known.

  7. 3 minutes ago, Comedy Time said:

    Cognitive dissonance is really not what you think it is!

    You don't know what I know it is.


    Your faulty perceptions are your faulty perceptions.

    4 minutes ago, Comedy Time said:

    I don't support the official theory

    You are on record, more than once, saying that you do support the official account of events.



  8. The planes were military and remote controlled.


    Continued support of the official narrative comes from a position of both conformation bias and cognitive dissonance and is beyond ridiculous.

    • Like 1
  9. I was reading an article a few weeks ago that said that face masks being used was a big part of monarch mind control.

    At the very least the mask is a symbol of fear and also dehumanises as they cover most of the face and increases the sense of isolation due to no facial expressions being visible.

    • Like 1
  • Create New...