Jump to content


  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Michael

  1. Beauty for me is when i look into nature and see a self organized organism, that branches out in all different directions, that seems seperated for the observer from the outside, but really is a unite whole.

    Beauty for me is to welcome and apprichiate the little things in life that make you happy, that are easily overlooked, but still are important.

    Beauty can be to simply sit in your garden and listen to birds singing.

    It can be to smoke a joint with your best friend and have the best time by simply apprichiating each others company.

    The world in itself is a wonderous place that is a complete mystery to me, because i really dont know what it is, except what i have learned about it. I dont know if that what i learned holds any reality.


    Ive learned that by letting thoughts passing by that nature in itself is an unexplainable phenomen and my existence can not be defined by any means. But im still here and reminding myself of this simple fact gives me most of the time great confidence and a spark of awe, for it to be even possible.


    • Like 2
  2. At first i had a hard time to wrap my head arround a deliberate carried out "blackout" scenario, as it directly combats order and control.

    But the more i think about it, it doesent need to last for too long, just long enough that people scream for security (cyber-security).

    Its the old Problem/Solution tactic.

    One needs to keep in mind that most people wont put up with Covid19 restrictions forever, because right now they are still under the illusion that these restrictions will eventually come to an end. (Because thats what they were promised by the MSM).

    To justify this "new normal" for at least this generation, they need different kind of threats, that renew that fear.


    My advice is to be prepared for it in the best way possible without going over board with it. That means dont waste money on stuff that would become useless if "blackout" does not come in the near future. Just use it on what you would need otherwise anyway.


    We just cannot ignore it, because acting when its upon us, is simply too late. Most people do not understand what it means to be without power for more than a couple of hours, let alone weeks. Our system is entirely dependend on it, without it, nothing works.

    • Like 2
  3. 4 hours ago, scowie said:


    The problem I have with that article is that it is still promulgating the concept of the "virus".


    I recommend this other globalresearch article: https://www.globalresearch.ca/dr-stefan-lanka-2020-article-busts-virus-misconception/5719146


    Does it though?

    I think the article is pretty open minded towards the possibility of a no-virus.


    " Dr. Kaufman submits, moreover, that the particles scientists say they are looking at through their electron microscopes are perhaps not the virus at all but are, rather, exosomes being produced by the body. These exosomes, containing the same genetic material as a virus, are naturally produced by the human body as a defense mechanism in response to an external attack by a toxin emanating from our polluted environment."

  4. On 11/23/2020 at 5:39 PM, HistoryIsComplex said:

    It bugged the hell out of me before COVID how MSM continually "celebrated" the rich and famous - everyone from the Kardashians to Musk and Bezos.


    In a world where Millions starve to death from poverty every YEAR, they kept cheering on Millionaires and Billionaires who actually do very little for the world, for humanity.



    I'd like to know people's thoughts on this - After COVID is "over", will the ELITE once again be "celebrated" like in the 2010s, or has popular opinion shifted in the opposite direction?


    I.e. will people say things like "I lost my job, my savings and future during the Pandemic, and Bezos made 100 Billion Dollars extra during the exact same time. WTF!" ?






    I think they locked themself in a point of no return and reality will look very different for two main reasons:


    a) If they do not accomplish their agenda now, they probably never will get such a chance for a very long time, if ever. That means that from my standpoint they canot back down and simply let the "pandemic" fizzle out without hitting "important " thresholds.

    They have however some room to react and act accordingly to new situations, which they already planned out in "think tank" papers.


    b) There are a lot more people now that are aware of the corruption that runs the system, which they never were aware of to this extend. People that lost their jobs,friends and so on wont simply go back to life without taking notice and doing something about it.


    In terms of admiring the rich and wealthy is mainly comming from those that also still support the Covid narrative, as they simply do not know whats going on and think the rich want to save the world.

    Then there are people, that understood some things but not all of it. For instance: They think Bill Gates is the evil guy, but Elon Musk is the good guy. They are still mislead, still cannot see clearly.


    Edit: I forgot to say, that the elite will either be more powerful, or they will completly fall. There is no in between anymore, no transition state (transformation takes place unnoticed). Its either them or us.

  5. Exactly how i see it.

    Those that say yes to lockdown are in part responsible for all the suffering that occurs as a result.

    This is no game, these are actual human lives that get destroyed.

    Seriously, get a grip and see that this is more important than to actually admit that you were wrong about something, if you believe this Covid narrative.

    Tens of thousands of health professionals that do and did ther job for 10+/20+/30+ and even 40+ years do not all of a sudden jump on a "Conspiracy Theory" train to look cool or to impress anyone. If thats what you think these people are, you are a lost human being that never will understand anything.

    No one will risk their livlyhood, job and future for a simple argument, for a simple standpoint that has no basis in reality at all.

    • Like 1
  6. 8 hours ago, Terence said:

    Could some of you great minds please direct me to some more reading on the fact that there is no isolate of this shit? 

    Many thanks 



    "To date, not a single team of scientists has isolated and purified the SARS-CoV-2 RNA virus. Some researchers claim to have done so. But when their findings are scrutinized, they fall short. Just as Randomized Controlled Trials are required to do accurate studies of the efficacy and safety of medical devices like face masks or products such as prescription drugs, so, too, is there a major benchmark that must be satisfied if one is to prove that he has indeed correctly identified and isolated a virus. That benchmark has been, since 1890, a set of principals known as the Koch postulates, named after famed German physician and bacteriologist Robert Koch. All researchers must apply his four postulates if they are to prove or disprove a cause-and-effect relationship between a pathogen and a particular clinical disease.


    For example, in February 2020, Chinese and Dutch researchers published studies purporting to show that they had isolated the SARS-CoV-2 virus by satisfying all of the Koch postulates. Four months later, however, freelance writer Armory Devereux and molecular biologist and researcher Rosemary Frei revealed the truth about those studies in an Off-Guardian article. Their heavily investigated and well-documented piece confirms that the Chinese and Dutch researchers did not fulfill Koch’s third postulate, which involves replicating or cloning the DNA to form a new copy of the virus and then injecting that new copy into a significant number of living hosts (usually lab animals) with the intent to reproduce the same discrete diagnostic symptoms associated with the virus. In fact, Frei discovered, after reviewing numerous research papers from all over the world, that not a single group of scientists was able to replicate or clone the DNA to form a new copy of the virus. In short, they failed to meet Koch’s third postulate.


    Another team of investigative journalists, Torsten Engelbrecht and Konstantin Demeter, wrote an equally comprehensive article on the same subject for Off-Guardian. They, too, concluded that there is not a single research paper out there demonstrating that the SARS-CoV-2 virus has been successfully isolated and finally purified. In addition, Engelbrecht and Demeter discovered that “there is no scientific proof that those RNA sequences are the causative agent of what is called COVID-19.”


    In other words, by not successfully fulfilling all of Koch’s postulates, scientists have thus far not proven the existence of any new coronavirus. This is why molecular biologist Dr. Andrew Kaufman has suggested in numerous interviews—on The Highwire and The Last American Vagabond and elsewhere—that the current coronavirus is not a new disease. Dr. Kaufman submits, moreover, that the particles scientists say they are looking at through their electron microscopes are perhaps not the virus at all but are, rather, exosomes being produced by the body. These exosomes, containing the same genetic material as a virus, are naturally produced by the human body as a defense mechanism in response to an external attack by a toxin emanating from our polluted environment. This would be a possible explanation as to why the “pandemic” started in China’s Wuhan province. This area of China is one of the most polluted places on earth. In Wuhan, the ecosystem in all its glorious biodiversity has been utterly destroyed by man-made pollutants and the heavy use of glyphosate in industrial farming.


    Besides pollution, there is yet another plausible explanation as to why this particular coronavirus (if it exists, which some reputable experts highly doubt) may have possibly started in Wuhan. The internationally funded Wuhan Institute of Virology, which has proven financial tiesto the US government and is known for its poor safety standards, was involved in dangerous gain-of-function research to make bat viruses more lethal to humans. Several disturbing studies conducted by the lab “successfully” combined animal and human virus traits in ways that made them more dangerous to humans. This description of the institute’s research raises many questions. At present, there is not enough evidence to prove whether a pathogen was either intentionally released by the lab or was accidentally leaked into the environment. And, even if a virus was intentionally released into the environment as a bioweapon, the developers of this weapon did not do a good job. As we will see in the last fiction versus fact (below), this coronavirus has had virtually the same global infection fatality rate as the average seasonal flu. If anything, the influenza virus of 2017 was far more lethal than this year’s coronavirus.

    Finally, this brings us to the multi-billion-dollar question on the virus isolation issue: If scientists have not properly identified the virus or the RNA gene sequences associated with the virus, how on earth are the vaccine companies developing a mRNA vaccine against a novel coronavirus, and what exactly will be in this vaccine? Perhaps this is why the initial vaccine trials conducted by biotech company Moderna, the US vaccine front-runner, and AstraZeneca, which leads the British Oxford Vaccine Group, have been unsatisfactory."


    Source: https://www.globalresearch.ca/what-truly-verifiable-facts-surrounding-covid-19/5721128

    • Thanks 1
  7. 1 hour ago, shadowmoon said:

    Had 2 masked people turn their backs on me in the street earlier today & when their little grandson turned to look at me they dragged him back round..


    Will the English will ever recover their sanity.?



    The insanity was just hidden. It was there all along.

    People that act in that way now, would have acted on pretty much everything else the same way, as long as they get convinced by the people in power thats what they have to do.

    Its not so much what they do, its more what mindset you got to have to commit to it and its exactly that mindset that existed beforehand.

    • Like 1
  8. Here are some pictures of the Berlin Protest on 18.11.2020.


    All in all i wanted to thank each and everyone that took their time to take a day off work to get there and showed presence at such an important day.

    But i think that there should have been millions in light of what has transpired. (Less than on August 01 and August 29).

    This is about our freedom. We shall never bow to the tyranny.







    • Like 2
    • Thanks 2
  9. 2 minutes ago, Illmatic said:

    A dark day.


    Not because of the people who came to exercise their constitutional rights as democratic citizens, not because of their heart, their spirit, their laughter and song shared together in the face of oppression, but because in the end there were many, but not nearly enough of them.


    As I watched hundreds of peaceful people blasted with water cannons and pepper sprayed for the crime of coming together to decry the erosion of their democracy, via a Covid "enabling act" far too similar to that of the National Socialist party in 1933, it became more obvious than ever that this "crisis" is not what it seems. 


    By the time the act was brought to President Steinmeier for signiature at the Bellevue Palace the numbers had shrank from tens of thousands to hundreds, but still it was deemed appropriate to barricade the building with endless police vans, cops in riot gear and even the previously deployed water cannons in wait just out of sight as a token of intimidation.


    Suddenly, another reality was becoming clear: a tiny group of people were gathered in that building to rubber-stamp a hugely significant decision which would affect the lives of everyone in this country, but the public have absolutely no part to play in it, no voice and no say. Not only that but they are bullied, attacked, harassed and defamed for daring to even attempt it. As the late great George Carlin once said, "It's a big club, and you ain't in it".


    A dark day, because as I trudged my way slowly back to the train station a strange energy lingered in the air, almost like a sinister electricity, a gathering of ominous black clouds over not only Germany but all of Europe and maybe even the world. It felt as if we were the keepers of a small flame battered by icy winds and the bleak night drawing in from all sides. A symbol of hard times on the way, times which will require tough minds, open hearts and resilient souls.




    I will show footage tomorrow,  (i was there in person.)


    We knew from the getgo that the corrupt politicans will vote for the bill, but we had to make a stand anyways.


    • Like 1


    @Concerned Citizen

    thx for the videos

    I listend to this whole podcast and it all sounds well researched, except for one thing (which i do not blame Fuellmilch for, as he is a lawyer and only handled individual cases. He did not as of yet drew the big picture, even though he is well aware of the UN and the WEF (World Economic Forum).


    Here is the section i disagree with:

    Starting with: 49:07

    Interviewer: "Do you have any idea who those are or not yet?"


    Fuellmilch: "Well we know some of the people who invested their money are the same ones who invested their money into these cooperations, plus the media.

    One of them is Bill Gates, but there is others, like huge cooperations or funds like a Black Rock for example.

    All those players that come to mind may have something to do with this.

    However, there is no reason to be afraid, again there is nothing to fear but fear itself because there is not a kind of monolithic antagonist on the other side, but there is different intrests that are competing with each other and there are some people on the other side that dont seem to know what they are doing."


    Again, as a lawyer he has to deal with hard proof to get anywhere, but and here is the big but, we know that its not about money only, because if you follow the money, you will eventually end up at a point where money is controlled throughout and they in turn do not only have finances in mind.

    There are people that push agendas that go well and beyond the idea of money. Money isnt doing anything by itself. It needs to be invested to get intrests out of it, whatever that may be.

    Real physical goods, certain rights and so on which all lead to the one and only: control.

    But it doesent stop there either. We also know that society shall be shaped into a specific form, which can be seen by the WEF, The Rockefeller Foundation, Bilderberger and so on.

    They all talk about the transformation of human society.

    Thats not only control, thats also an idea,  a certain way of life.

    There are also Eugnestics, which cannot be denied because such organisations exist even now, just not under its obvious name (they did but got changed).

    So there are people that see themself above others due to their heritage and not only because of the money status.

    So it is not enough to simply follow the money to sort out the people in responsibility.

    Its not only some cooperations that compete against each other.There are people that have one common goal and they are in the complete dark. They are not front mans, which should be obvious. (Some of them might appeared on the screen).

    The NWO also clearly is on the move since 100 years. Thats no conspiracy, thats whats hapening, because officials openly talked about it and there is enough evidence to back that up. There is a clear plan that did not originate in 2020, but is older than a century.

    We will never get to the bottom of things if we are stuck with the idea of some investment bankers that seek a certain life style, im sry but thats only true on the surface.


    The rest of this speech i agree on completly.




  11. @lake


    I went over it and it matches 1:1  the original post.



    “At a cycle threshold (ct) of 25, about 70% of the samples remained positive in the cell culture (i.e. they were infected): in a ct of 30, 20% of the samples remained positive; in a ct of 35, 3% of the samples remained positive; and at a ct above 35, no sample remained positive (infectious) in cell culture (see diagram).
    This means that if a person has a positive PCR test at a cycle threshold of 35 or higher (as in most laboratories in the USA and Europe), the chances of a person being infected are less than 3%. The probability of a person receiving a false positive is 97% or higher ”.
    iv. What follows from these studies is simple - the possible reliability of the PCR tests performed depends, from the outset, on the threshold of amplification cycles that they support, in such a way that, up to the limit of 25 cycles, the reliability of the test will be about 70%; if 30 cycles are carried out, the degree of reliability drops to 20%; if 35 cycles are reached, the degree of reliability will be 3%.


    Thx for the pdf.



    • Like 2
  12. @lake


    Thank you a lot.

    Now all we need to know is how much influence this court has.

    Im honest, i dont think it will overthrow all the illegal actions that take place arround the world regarding covid, but its a start.

    We now have a court that actually and finally admits that the PCR test is absolutly unsuitable.

    • Like 1
  • Create New...