Jump to content


  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Michael

  1. 3 hours ago, Maedros said:

    Brilliant! Did so, got it! Thanks a lot, I would give you a like but I'm all out for the day. 

    In case you are intrested and use windows as your operating system, just click on the video on the main page.

    Then use right click, go to page information.

    Then go to the tab that says Media.

    Scroll down until you see Video and copy the link.

    Now use a download software like Jdownloader and paste that link and download it.


    Thats how you basically can download all videos on the internet.

    • Thanks 1
  2. 2 hours ago, ItsTheTruthThough said:

    This is terrifying. 5g culling, tsunamis, asteroids - (where is this supposed to hit?) 

    Who thinks that realistically this is actually going to happen and this soon?

    Remember, without clear evidence comming from muliple different sources, no matter from which side it comes from or who states it, dont simply belief anything.

    I mean im here to talk about things we know, not about things that we dont know.

    In the past there were a multitude of doomsayers regarding the end of the world by the year 2000 and the year 2012. Nothing happend.

    We should really focus on things that have a very high chance of being truthful.

    Im not saying either of these events couldnt happen, im just saying the clear evidence for that is simply not there. (again this means a multitude of professional opinions throughout different sources).

    Everyone can claim something these days.

    It is important to think for yourself. To go back to blind belief as many do by beliefing the official media is not the answer.

  3. 5 minutes ago, Golden Retriever said:


    Sadly the turnout was high also, a whopping 82.5% voted for a transsexual.





    Yes, we are still a small minority.

    Its a reflection of the human psychy. In some ways its good to know where the planet as a whole stands right now.

    Its sad, but also important to know.

    I rather have this information, than to keep living under human fellas, not knowing how they tick.

    Now i know for certain.

    I rather watch reality into the eye, than being uncertain about it my whole life.

    You can be proud of yourself to clearly see whats happening, not many can do that. So see it as a positive, because it is really something positive.

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  4. I know this might sound hard, but forget about the politicans, whoever they may be, they wont save you from what is comming.

    Elections are redundand. Yes of course it gives you good insight on where the general population might stand, which is some useful information and i get why this is frustrating, because it makes ignorance visible, but that ignorance which just surfaced already was at present long before any specific action happend.


    The only way out of this disaster is when the general majority (over 50%) of the population refuses to cooperate with criminals. It is the only way, period.

    No one else will stand for your rights, except the people that inhabite this world. Never rely on autorities to do the job for you.


    So how to turn people?

    My belief is, that it cannot be done by reasoning from the outside. I have plenty of proof for that on first hand experience. You can give a person an apple and they will tell you its something else. Thats how far it got.

    This world needs to go to complete and utter shit, before some might rethink their position. Its not a path i want to go, but i fear there is no other way out of it.


    I mean look at it. There are millions and millions that rather wait for the new console gaming experiences, while everything arround them crumbles into dust. Its absolute bizzarre. Sure it is good to keep some positive things going in your life to not completly loose it over this situation but my god some are braindead beyond any comprehension.


    My most favorite Scene of the Gladiator sums up what we are dealing with here:


    • Like 5
  5. 3 minutes ago, scowie said:


    I think the slaughter of millions in 1918-19 with a meningitis vaccine, and subsequent cover-up, might have been worse (at least, so far):



    Just sayin' 😏

    The economic damage and the destruction of peoples livlyhood worldwide, plus the irrepairable psychological damage on children and young adults, which cannot be cured is already so high that i would agree that on a global scale the damage is already greater than we have ever seen.

    This is not something that goes away. Its damage on the humand pschy that cannot be simply fixed. Children will be traumatized for life, not to speak of all those that already died thorugh these meassurments, commited suicide, or were/are victims to abuse while the lockdowns happend/happen.

    This is not something on a more local scale. It is happening everywhere on this planet and thus the consequences are way more severe.

    You cant escape it, travel somewhere else. Its forced on each and everyone.

    I dont think something of this magnitude ever happend in this short amount of time and i think its not comparable.


    Im not even considering the implications all of this has for the short and long term future, besides those sideeffects. The agenda for total control is now in full rollout and will become worse by the hour. If its underrestimated, we are doomed. Its a direct attack on peoples sovereignty and freedom.

    • Like 2
  6. Their conclusions are the following: 


    • The corona crisis must be renamed the “Corona Scandal”
    • It is:
      • The biggest tort case ever
      • The greatest crime against humanity ever committed
    • Those responsible must be:
      • Criminally prosecuted for crimes against humanity
      • Sued for civil damages
    • Deaths
      • There is no excess mortality in any country
      • Corona virus mortality equals seasonal flu
      • 94% of deaths in Bergamo were caused by transferring sick patients to nursing homes where they infected old people with weak immune systems
      • Doctors and hospitals worldwide were paid to declare deceased victims of Covid-19
      • Autopsies showed:
        • Fatalities almost all caused by serious pre-existing conditions
        • Almost all deaths were very old people
        • Sweden (no lockdown) and Britain (strict lockdown) have comparable disease and mortality statistics
      • US states with and without lockdowns have comparable disease and mortality statistics
    • Health
      • Hospitals remain empty and some face bankruptcy
      • Populations have T-cell immunity from previous influenza waves
      • Herd immunity needs only 15-25% population infection and is already achieved
      • Only when a person has symptoms can an infection be contagious
    • Tests:
      • Many scientists call this a PCR-test pandemic, not a corona pandemic
      • Very healthy and non-infectious people may test positive
      • Likelihood of false-positives is 89-94% or near certainty
      • Prof. Drosten developed his PCR test from an old SARS virus without ever having seen the real Wuhan virus from China
      • The PCR test is not based on scientific facts with respect to infections
      • PCR tests are useless for the detection of infections
      • A positive PCR test does not mean an infection is present or that an intact virus has been found
      • Amplification of samples over 35 cycles is unreliable but WHO recommended 45 cycles
    • Illegality:
      • The German government locked down, imposed social-distancing/ mask-wearing on the basis of a single opinion
      • The lockdown was imposed when the virus was already retreating
      • The lockdowns were based on non-existent infections
      • Former president of the German federal constitutional court doubted the constitutionality of the corona measures
      • Former UK supreme court judge Lord Sumption concluded there was no factual basis for panic and no legal basis for corona measures
      • German RKI (CDC equivalent) recommended no autopsies be performed
      • Corona measures have no sufficient factual or legal basis, are unconstitutional and must be repealed immediately
      • No serious scientist gives any validity to the infamous Neil Ferguson’s false computer models warning of millions of deaths
      • Mainstream media completely failed to report the true facts of the so-called pandemic
      • Democracy is in danger of being replaced by fascist totalitarian models
      • Drosten (of PCR test), Tedros of WHO, and others have committed crimes against humanity as defined in the International Criminal Code
      • Politicians can avoid going down with the charlatans and criminals by starting the long overdue public scientific discussion
    • Conspiracy:
      • Politicians and mainstream media deliberately drove populations to panic
      • Children were calculatedly made to feel responsible “for the painful tortured death of their parents and grandparents if they do not follow Corona rules”
      • The hopeless PCR test is used to create fear and not to diagnose
      • There can be no talk of a second wave
    • Injury and damage:
      • Evidence of gigantic health and economic damage to populations
      • Anti-corona measures have:
        • Killed innumerable people
        • Destroyed countless companies and individuals worldwide
      • Children are being taken away from their parents
      • Children are traumatized en masse
      • Bankruptcies are expected in small- and medium-sized businesses
    • Redress:
      • A class action lawsuit must be filed in the USA or Canada, with all affected parties worldwide having the opportunity to join
      • Companies and self-employed people must be compensated for damages
  7. On 10/15/2020 at 11:29 PM, serpentine said:

    And how long will this new world order last?


    A thousand years?

    We dont know how long it will last, but i like you to take this Quote to heart, which is essential regarding this matter:


    “Remember that all through history, there have been tyrants and murderers, and for a time, they seem invincible. But in the end, they always fall. Always.”


    Mahatma Ghandi

    • Like 3
  8. Well, your brains are wired differently, simply because you grow up under different circumanstances, with different enviroments and different experiences.

    The summary of all of that then in turn is called "me".

    However there are similarities in every human brain.

    There also needs to be the realization, that the "thinking mind", is only operating on a surface level. You do not know from where each and every thought arises from, unless you try to trace back the thought to its origin. If you do that you will be lead at your first step what we call "subconciousness".

    To me the term itself is misleading, due to counciousness has nothing beside it, but it is a term used to make you understand what we are dealing with when it comes to the difference of "thinking" and what "controls it".


    Point being, a belief, no matter what belief it is, is already engrained into the subconcious and is therfor hidden under the ever talking thinking mind, which makes up your whole world. Beliefs in themself can be manipulated, because essentially all knowledge that you have of this world and everything else is trough outside knowledge, meaning it is information that you aquired at a certain point in your life and hold it.

    Now, if you have an open mind, meaning you never take anything for granted, you already developed a mindset, that makes it easier for you to change that subcouncious and thus will be more likely to be more critical to whatever comes from the outside.


    Many simply do not do that. They take specific infomrmation and put it into a box immediatly. Be it positive, negative, truthful or else.

    So when the official media says something they already believe it, because it comes from that source and they never learned that the official media is capable of deceivinh and lying.

    When someone comes along and counters what the official media says, they immediatly are in a defensive state, because they fear that THEY get attacked. They then do not see information as information, but a direct attack to their ego nature, meaning "I".

    In such a defensive state its next to impossible to get something through and this is why i always say:


    If the time comes for an individual to realize, to wake up, it is done by themself.

    A horse can only be brought to the river, it needs to drink by itself. It simply cannot be forced to do so.


    • Like 1
  9. 3 hours ago, rideforever said:


    The guy who owns that site is called David Sorensen ... who is not working with any medical doctors organisations at all.  He has no authority to speak for them whatever and Sorensen does not know their real understanding of the situation.  Sorensen is taking liberties.

    He should shut the fuck up.  He just looks like a weirdo, says he had an encounter with God ... now he is doing this bullshit.  It is not his position to talk for anyone, Sorensen will just fuck things up.



    The Doctors groups can speak for themselves.

    I didnt watch the full podcast from "Ärzte für Aufklärung", but they state, that the numbers seen in the official media, combined with scientific facts do not add up at all.

    Furthermore they codemn the idea of using the population as labratory rats, meaning testing vaccines on humans that didnt went through their usual cycle of 10+ years, which is a necessary time frame, because negative effects cannot be seen immediatly and take their time.

    Then they talk about being involved into the demonstrations which they say is a cause for each and everyone.


    But i get your point. There are many people right now in the resistance that think this can serve them as some sort of ego-boost, as if they own the truth or some BS.

    This resistance will break under our fingernails with such a behaviour, because it needs to be bigger than a personal agenda. It is a giant effort of the whole community where everyone counts and everyone is important. If this is not understood, we wont have a chance.


    For now i am grateful for every coverage that exposes the lies of the media and those in control of this scamdemic if its truthful. (We dont need fake news to combat fake news. We need to be always as truthful as possible, because thats what matters)

  10. It doesent matter what the WHO says. They know why they did it, they know the outcome.

    Admitting something like they do now, only further tries to sell you the idea we have a real threat at hand.

    The only threat there is are these "elite" people, psychopaths by nature.


    When they say something it only has the purpose of pushing the agenda along.


    It might be that a complete lockdown would result into a high risk of pushback and they try to find different means for the same goal.

    It might be that lockdowns are comming anyway and this is just PR speech.


    Their goal is to destroy independent livelihoods, never forget that.

    We know that because they already admitted it and shown it in practice.

    They simply dont care, whatever they say to sell their narrative.


    The term "new normal" should be enough information for anyone in doubt.

    They are criminals and always will be criminals.

  11. 2 hours ago, Mitochondrial Eve said:


    Perhaps just ignoring the silly rules is the best strategy.


    I actually believe its the only way forward. To absolutly stop with whatever they come up with and to not give in.

    We had some big and small protests over the last months and one current theme that occured was that people, despite protesting against these restrictions, wearing masks and kept social distance, to avoid that the police cleared the field. (in my country)

    Thats not how it works. It wont change anything in the long run.

    Of course, the positive is that it makes people aware that there is a growing resistance, but you have to deny all regulations they come up with to be taken seriously.


    They simply wont care if one accepts even the slightest thing.

  12. So on the main page the Sun Magazine brought out an article which i want to discuss.

    It reads:


    "Why do our doom merchant and increasingly desperate scientists believe plunging us into lockdown again is the solution to this ongoing coronavirus pandemic?

    And when will Boris Johnson – once a great libertarian – stand up to the discredited boffins Chris Whitty and Patrick Vallance by refusing to curb our basic freedoms any further for measures that simply will not work?

    The World Health Organisation’s special envoy on Covid-19 last week warned there is only one result that comes from locking down entire populations – and it’s certainly not eradicating the disease.


    David Nabarro said: “Lockdowns just have one consequence that you must never ever belittle, and that is making poor people an awful lot poorer.”

    That poverty is coming to the UK – and fast. The Centre for Economics and Business Research today predicts almost three million folk will be unemployed by Christmas.

    That’s just the beginning and the reason why we can no longer live in a Covid bubble.

    Yet, in October, seven months after the peak of this new disease exported by China, the government is today pushing ahead with plans to lock down some of our biggest cities.

    And the worst is yet to come, with waves of the always-deadly flu set to collide with Covid over winter.


    No one is denying the virus is a serious problem that requires genuine changes to some of the ways we live, like the wearing of masks and some sensible social distancing measures.

    But, with no guarantee of a vaccine, it is implausible to think that lockdowns that were first used for three weeks to protect the NHS are a sensible way forward.

    We must remember that even in March and April, when Covid was an unknown threat, our health service was not overwhelmed. We have learnt so much since then, both in terms of how to treat the illness and how to manage the NHS.


    My fear is that, rather than being an effective tool, the increasingly draconian and nonsensical regulations announced by the Prime Minister today that divide England into three tiers will encourage us to become a nation of liars.


    Is anyone seriously going to believe four blokes in their 50s having dinner at the pub are really part of the same household, for example?

    Will people really stop inviting their friends over for a drink when they’re allowed to catch a packed tube home at 10pm when the ridiculous nationwide curfew kicks in?

    Why is it OK to work in an office surrounded by people all day but it’s not OK to visit relatives from another household?

    None of this makes sense anymore.


    The cure has now become far worse than the disease."


    First the obvious trojan horse.

    The article basically talks about the non-sensical meassurments. We here in germany have the same topic thrown arround on our official media, that the meassurments are in-consequent, because they vary from region to region.


    I want to phrase an important sentence from David Icke:

    Problem - Solution


    They peddle back, admit the non-sensical regulations, only to sell you the idea that there need to be stricter on a nationwide scale.


    This is how backwards the psychology works:

    "Is anyone seriously going to believe four blokes in their 50s having dinner at the pub are really part of the same household, for example?"


    Translation: The 4 blokes should not meet at a pub, because they obviously are not part of the same household.


    "Will people really stop inviting their friends over for a drink when they’re allowed to catch a packed tube home at 10pm when the ridiculous nationwide curfew kicks in?"


    Translation: People should stop inviting their friends


    "No one is denying the virus is a serious problem that requires genuine changes to some of the ways we live, like the wearing of masks and some sensible social distancing measures."


    Of course we are denying it, because there is strong evidence that the virus doesent even exist or as seen isnt dangerous at all. Pick one of the two.

    This means: Masks and social distancing are not required and not mandatory and should be removed instantly.

    But they want you to get used to this idea of wearing them.


    But, with no guarantee of a vaccine, it is implausible to think that lockdowns that were first used for three weeks to protect the NHS are a sensible way forward.


    Again some big nonsense. They want to sell you the idea that the vaccine is the saving grace. It is not. They didnt even isolate the virus, they dont even know what they are testing, they therfor not even can offer a vaccine.


    As seen they are now mixing some truths with lies and this is a typical psychological attack, well known. Two steps forward, one step back. Creating an artificial problem, admitting that problem, wait for the puplic to ask for a solution, offer a solution.


    Dont fall for this nonsense





    • Thanks 2
  13. On 9/29/2020 at 4:18 AM, John Connor said:

    Not sure if it's been mentioned here or not, but Max Igan has also been banned from youtube.


    I know youtube has a comments section,  but I expect comments to get taken away soon.
    Same reason mainstream NEWS media doesn't have any comments section.
    Same reason Netflix doesn't have a comments section.
    They are making it very hard to communicate with each other.  Expect it to get worse.


    Tbh i think they do it in a case by case basis.

    Communication is also an important factor to gather data. Without data (information) they are blind.

    If you delete all comments, you delete information. Of course this is already done, but in a controlled manner and it will get worse.

    To completly shut it down has side effects and could potentially give way to other platforms, which people then will use to speak their mind.

    It is more important to them to keep you on their platforms, but with cencorship and the like.


    Of course, i cannot say this for certain, anything is possible at this point, but outright deletion of the comment section on all fronts is to me unlikely.

    It is different of course on platforms that never started with a comment section. But youtube always had one, so i have my doubts on that one.


    And lets get real here. Youtube comments barely make an impact most of the time. If you really are intrested in seeking the truth, there is no way arround to get yourself informed properly through different means. A sheep wont rethink its own belief by reading a silly youtube comment. Its actually the other way arround. It tries to confirm its own belief.


    If a video that could be potentially dangerous for them gathers too much traction they still can censor/delete it.

    Look at corbettreport. His channel despite speaking out for 14 years, his youtube channel is still not deleted. (its censored through alghoritms, but not deleted).

  14. 8 hours ago, Staeld said:

    You have to hand it to Sky News Australia for speaking out. This entire segment is warning about the great reset.



    I mean its good that they talk about it, but they also make it seem as if this is an idea that came up due to the fabricated crisis.

    The Great Reset is basically another word for NWO (New World Order), which is a plan/agenda that is already in the making for at least a century.

    The only difference now is  that they come out with it, because they need people get used to this idea, since the meassurments will be more and more extreme by the day.


    What does the dude that lost his business say? He or she is of course angry and searches for answers. There will be a lot of these, because if your plan is to destroy each and every independent livelyhood, you will eventually face an ever growing angry mob. (which they pointed out and already know about)


    Yes, it is good that an official news channel talks about it, but they are still not speaking the whole truth. If they would, youtube bans it in a matter of seconds (for a popular video that reaches a big audience).


    Edit: I refered to youtube because Mitochondrial Eve already posted this video in this thread

  15. On 10/6/2020 at 4:49 PM, FVCK BILLY G4TES said:

    At risk of sounding defeatist here,  I like this idea but if you start mentioning key issues like Rothschild & Zionists on there you get nuked off there by moderators. Reddit is owned by the same people who are trying to enslave us.


    Also ever since Qanon came out, I have my suspicions that Government agencies are on there. I think if you were to actually start spreading the truth you would need a Disk burner. Get as much solid, fact based evidence you can and burn, then distribute house to house with a flyer to compliment, detailing the contents of disk.


    I think that's the only way to pragmatically spread truth. Has it's downsides tho. Mass production is expensive and it could have legal ramifications depending on subject matter. Popo will shut you down if you're caught so there is planning required and maybe a group effort to get something like that done.


    Just an idea but the internet has become a sewer of rats and government plants. You could cut it out entirely and go straight to the people, drop disk through the letterbox, bob's your uncle.


    The system of reddit already caters to a sheep mentality.

    If you are in line with the overall sentiment on any given thread, you get upvoted.

    If you swim against the river, you get downvoted and your comment basically disappears.


    In that way you soly get to see what the majority can agree on and thus all informations you receive elvolves arround herd mentality.

    The very thing we are trying to escape from in the first place.

    That doesent mean that agreeing on something is bad, but it punishes you for having your own unique opinion.


    The same is true on youtube and all the other social platforms.


    That is why i think reddit is not a good platform to discuss these things. If people want to do it, go ahead, try your best, i do not have the energy to beat arround the bush to avoid threads to be deleted or comments to be downvoted.

    • Like 1
  16. Well, i always was intrested in personalities that the majority of puplic seems to demonize and look up what he is saying and how they even came to this conclusion.

    For instance, i didnt know about David Icke at all until recently(7 months), but because people seem to assosiate a guy that talks about lizard people, i got intrested.

    Not because lizard people made sense, but because how he wanted to seriously explain that it makes sense.

    Until now i have yet to see him speak about lizard people (he might have had, but maybe not) and instead he talks common sense on everything that is going on right now, also pointing out that labels were given to him, which he never used. For example the label to support terrorism and  the like.


    So it came true what i already expected. The media writes some headlines and the majority thinks thats what the person is like. Most people do not read any further or research if all those claims even are true. Its enough if you write big headlines with big letters and thats it.


    However, Icke said what i knew for a long time anyway. It isnt something new, its just that he has a certain way of transporting information, which i find fascinating.


    9/11 for instance (which i first hand lived through) never made sense to me and there is plenty for reason for it. But it wasnt until the Syrian War where i could connect the dots for myself. It was to me just US policy and their strive for military control on the planet, circling arround russia.

    Russia has 3 abroad military bases, the Us has 1000. Alone those numbers should make you think.

    Anyways based on 9/11 we have all these justifications for the wars in the middle east and since then the word "terrorism" is in peoples mind as it never was before.


    But lets not get into details about it, its a long list to go through regarding this matter, but there is plenty of information on the web about this topic.

    I highly advice Corbet from the Corbett report, as he provides all sources to his claims and not just throws information out there.


    Point is, Icke is not a personality wildly know in germany, as it might be in the Uk (we have other people talking about the same topics). Its just the way he speaks and brings it together with spirituality which i find fascinating.

  • Create New...