Jump to content


  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Michael

  1. 22 minutes ago, Michi713 said:

    @MichaelOut of curiosity.  If it’s not too intrusive, when you enter a store without a mask and almost everyone else has them, how do you feel?

    No problem, i gladly answer it.

    To me its a mix between sadness, self respect and unease.


    Sad, to see others afraid or in complete obedience to criminals

    Self Respect, because i am not complying to something a guy in a suit orders me to do

    Unease because you feel and know that others think of you as someone who is careless


    Out of curiosity: How do you feel?

    • Like 1
  2. 6 minutes ago, metak88 said:


    It's means one customer per 10 square meters of sales area. Their usual BS. Social distance of roughly 1.5m (radius) around the person gets you around 10m2.

    The 1,5 m radius rule was always in place since the restrictions started earlier this year. This is specifically highlighted as different.

    Again, a shop that has 100m2 cannot have more than 10 persons. ( no matter if the distance is meant or if the maximum amount of costumers are meant, the former includes the latter)

    The 1,5 radius rule allows way more people in the shop.

    They wouldnt say that these are new rules, if everything is kept as it was.


    This is the second lockdown and it will only get worse from here.

  3. Merkels „Lockdown Light“ - Infografik


    I think this should be enough. The exact information i couldnt find in english, but its of course all there in german.

    I highlighted your request and it says as i said: Keeping 10m2 distance to any person.




    Edit: Okay i must admit the wording is very vague. If a shop lets say, has 100m2, a maximum of 10 persons can enter.

    But honestly one can read this one way or the other.

    If i get further information on it, i report

  4. 5 hours ago, MatriarchFox said:

    In South Africa at the moment, we have an advocacy group rallying to separate the Western Cape (throughout history, a part of Africa that has been sought after and coveted due to it's ideal location between the West and the East, as well as, on your way to the elusive Antarctica.) from the rest of South Africa and make it an independent sovereign state. Sounds innocent enough... but here are some red flags I spotted and I would like to know this community's opinions:


    1. As far as I can tell, this is a faceless group. I have not been able to pinpoint any one individual behind this idea. I may be wrong...

    2. When asked questions about how the governing of this new "sovereign state" will be handled, this is their answer: "We see hundreds of questions like these. We are not a political party. We have no intention to govern. Questions like these will be answered by the citizens of a free Cape via the government they elect."

    3. Their flag strongly resembles the American Confederate flag, red & blue with a white cross.

    4. The suggested action of separation is based on the flaws of the current unfit government (We all know what politicians are, puppets... So the flaws of our current government, all the corruption and inabilities, that was part of the plan to pave the way for this radical action.... right?)


    I innately feel like something is wrong here... especially since this bombshell was dropped on us during 2020... is this part of the plan? Get a foothold in South Africa by creating a "sovereign state" which is actually controlled from without. A structured planned coup is not unheard of throughout history.


    Any thoughts?

    You mean this?



    Lets look at their solutions:


    "Our purpose is to establish genuine democracy in the Cape, handing political power to the people of the Cape and removing it from Pretoria. In legal terms this right which we are seeking is referred to as ‘self-determination’.

    To return political power to the people of the Cape we are committed to obtaining a referendum, in which every registered voter in the Cape will get to vote, asking the Cape people whether they would prefer to remain as a part of South Africa and be governed from Pretoria, or whether they would rather break away from South Africa and establish a new independent country: Cape of Good Hope, which they would then govern for themselves.

    As a group we do not propose specific policies beyond handing political power to the people of the Cape, the Cape peoples themselves must elect political leaders who will govern the Cape and make decisions on their behalf, as their elected representatives.

    We will however, as is legally required in the formation of a new country, develop a ‘Bill of Rights’ in co-ordination with other groups seeking Cape independence.

    Contained within it will be an absolute rejection of racism in all forms, including the classification of people by race, and any policy which would be premised upon such classification. It will also contain an immigration policy, consistent with international norm and best practices, which will ensure that the upliftment of Cape citizens is prioritised, whilst inward migration is controlled and limited to those who can contribute to the development and well-being of our new country.


    I higlighted the section you should be very curious about. Whenever they come out and say: combat racism, they create the exact opposite.

    Secondly,the said "we do not propose specific policies beyond handing political power to the people of the cape."

    Well, they just did with the last phrase.


    Obviously i didnt do any big digging yet, but things that sound to good to be true, are mostly not true and other motives drive the boat. Thats my first observation.


    • Like 1
  5. 8 hours ago, Michi713 said:


    A study is cited where children had to eat a vegetable they disliked.  After they had eaten the vegetable, the experimenter told half of the children they will be eating much more of the vegetable in the future.  The other half were not told this.  The group that expected to eat more of the yucky vegetable succeeded in convincing themselves it was not so bad.  

    The cognition of disliking wearing a face diaper is dissonant with “I will inevitably have to wear the mask a lot in months/years to come.”  To reduce the dissonance some people convinced themselves it is not such a big deal.  




    The test with the children is a good example. However, in my eyes this can also be looked at from a different angle.

    Lets say you are afraid of spiders. Now consequently you avoid those little animals and keep being afraid of them.(this can have many reasons)

    But if you then simply start to hold them in your hands for a while and see how you react, you get less and less scared of them simply because you condition your mind differently. If you face the "threat" directly, it becomes less and less scary.

    Same with food. You might simply not like some specific food and keep that all your life and avoid it. But if you start to embrace that food, you might discover its not as bad as you made it out to be.


    So it can be looked from a different angle and still can mean what you desribed.

    Of course your example is also completly right, as thats how psychology works. If you know you have to do something not for a short period, but a long period, you consequently try to familiarize yourself with the problem and accept it. The difference between what i said is that one is done out of free choice, the other is forced.


    In your second example: “I will inevitably have to wear the mask a lot in months/years to come.”  To reduce the dissonance some people convinced themselves it is not such a big deal, i can confirm this firsthand.


    A couple of months ago, i went to a hardware store and they asked me if i am exempt from wearing a face mask (because i never wear them anyway). So i said yes, i have a certificate for that. She then said, that i have to show it to the reception before entering the store, which i did.

    The lady there then asked out of curiosity why i would not wear it. She meant you are just here briefly, surely wearing a mask for such a short time in the store cannot be a big deal. I kept silent.


    My sister also told me, that she doesent care about mask wearing anymore. She said, she got used to it and its no big deal for her anymore. Its normal for her now.

    And i screamed inside of me and thought: Thats exactly the point where they want you to be,.....facepalm. But obviously i could not told her that as she doesent want to hear it.



    • Like 2
  6. 2 hours ago, Michi713 said:

    How many true believers have you encountered in your town? 

    Its hard to say.

    Someone that wears a mask is either compliant because he/she fears consequences is afraid or is doing it because everyone is doing it.

    From my personal experience there are a lot that think Covid is real, a couple that know whats up but comply anyway (they dont want trouble) and in both these instances they feel saver because everyone is doing it. (be it invisible or afraid of others or for others)


    So in either case, i bookmark it as "fallen into the trap".

    When i go into town (i live on the country side) and without meaning it arrogant or special i never encountered anyone since these 7 months that refuses the mask.

    None, not one soul.

    There are some people i know that dont do it, but i never encountered them in town myself.

    So from pure observation, there are 99,9% of these people.

    • Like 1
  7. Again, nothing suprising here, this is what is about to happen starting on Nov.2, Monday.


    Every theater,every gym, every event has to close

    Bars close, Restaurants only delivery, No tourism allowed in hotels (means they are now finished)

    Stores now have the weird rule to keep 25m2 distance to any person.

    You will not be allowed to leave your home unless its for something important (like work or buying food)

    Police/Military now dont need any reason anymore to enter any home at will

    Military now controls elementary schools in Bavaria to ensure rules are followed (masks, open windows etc)


    And the sheeps are sleeping and sleeping and sleeping and sleeping.

    Call it now: They will come back when all is in the dumpster and say: I didnt know anything, its not my fault. (some will forever be lost no matter what happens though)

  8. 54 minutes ago, I Am Jacks Free Spirit said:

    Hello, everyone, new member here.


    I'll likely get round to posting a new member hello message eventually but this topic has spurred me into signing up and posting right away because I feel like I have something useful to contribute to this conversation:


    Anyone remember Rose/Icke 1?  Or maybe it was interview no.2, whatever but it was back in March or April when this was all kinda new - specifically it was the interview that the BBC etc latched on to as the one where Icke "allegedly" drew the link between 5G and Covid....


    When I was watching that interview at the time I remember thinking, crikey, Rose has purposefully led Icke down the garden path here to get him to say something that can be used as a "soundbite", so that it could be pinned on Icke as saying "5G causes Covid!" even though, really, that's not what I believe David truly meant at all... my interpretation was that he meant that the health symptoms surrounding problematic 5G mirror the symptoms being "claimed" to be Covid, therefore, later down the road, if 5G starts causing problems with health en masse they will just say "you've got Covid" - THAT'S NOT THE SAME AS SAYING 5G CAUSES COVID!!  


    Also, there was later that thing where a large excerpt of one of the Rose/Icke interviews ended up being broadcast on TV, not that I saw it I think it was only on a TV channel you can get in London locality?  But for Icke to end up on TV like that seemed a bit suspicious to me - especially since this was after the BBC jumped on the "Icke says 5G causes Covid" story, and then conveniently the interview was available on freeview or sky (?) ACTUAL TV not just the internet (somehow therefore making it more "true") - while at the same time just cementing the belief that because David is mad for the 5G thing then therefore EVERYTHING ELSE he says is also mad, thus publically discrediting all of his theories at once.


    I still haven't answered the poll as I'm not even sure what I think... I'm just sharing my views and look forward to more discussion

    As you said, Icke never said or meant that 5G causes Covid. He cleared that up a couple of times in his talks.

    That has several reasons:

    The first and most obvious is that it would actually confirm that Covid19 is real, which he denies.

    (from my standpoint, real or not became irrelevant, as its either a mild flu which got rebranded as Covid19, or it is a new virus but somehow has the symptoms of every flu anyway)

    The second is that 5G cannot cause virus infection, which of course David knows. Its mainly used to make him look like a fool.

    5G trough its higher radiation can cause more illness with a lot of side effects and thus this in turn can be used to blame it on Covid19, which is what David Icke said and meant. (and you meant for that matter)

  9. 3 minutes ago, Ethel said:

    I rather think he is a game player, which I can't really be bothered with. That being said, I could be wrong.

    Shall i add it as a poll option?


    Opinions differ, so i would be fine with that.

    Its just after this speech there are for me no other options i could think of.

    • Like 1
  10. We are at a point where we need to stop buying into nonsense.

    I cannot belief what Brian is talking here. More testing? Mate are you serious?

    I think thats sadly it, but i need to scratch him forever. There is no excuse to go back to general media nonsense which has been exposed as nothing but propaganda time and time again by health professionals all over the world.

    Unless he is still in denial that this is a purposly orchestrated agenda which cannot be more visible and clear as it is now, he must be a shill. No other options at this point.

    • Thanks 1
  11. 30 minutes ago, Seeker said:

    What happens if someone over 80 refuses? My grandmother who is in her 80s has said she will not have the vaccine, or any flu vaccine. What will the consequences be? They can’t strap her down and force it at this stage of tyranny 

    Tbh i think they force it on you passivly, meaning you will get a health passport (as reported), which then is required to go shopping,go to work, fly,attend events and so on.

    If you dont get a vaccine you cant do all this stuff anymore.

    Obviously you still can send everything you need via mail to your home, which is a workarround at first.

    But you will be left out of society.

    So whats left will be a small minority, because obviously you need to work to make money and money to buy food. Many cannot dismiss that even when they are against vaccines.

    Is it apllied immediatly everywhere? I dont know

    Is it step by step? I dont know that either

    Anything is possible at this point.

    • Like 3
  12. 21 minutes ago, Ecki Divad said:


    The way I would put it is that the ideas are less important than who is pushing them.  I watched The Wave film yesterday and while I don't agree with what the film says about Nazi Germany, as I view the Nazis more favourably than most, I agree with the film's general message that authority can be abused and that people should retain their individuality and scepticism.  I am familiar with Germany as a country and there is something in the culture that enabled an extreme authoritarian sort of movement to arise there that perhaps would not exist, or would not be as effective, in, say, Britain.  I would not want it myself, and a British version would be different, but at the same time, I recognise there were merits to what was done in Nazi Germany.


    A lot of this is about how you interpret history.  I agree that the War was terrible, however I don't accept Hitler started it or wanted it.  I don't agree with the simple characterisation of Nazi Germany as 'bad' or 'immoral'.  I don't believe it is as simple as that.  It's not to say Hitler or the other people in authority were good people, but I believe there was more to it than just the usual motive of seeking power.  They wanted power and importance for themselves, true, but I think they also wanted to raise up Germany and remove from German society unhealthy influences, which also exist today and we see around us.  You can criticise this and say they went about it the wrong way, and I will go some way to agreeing with you.


    The difference, in my mind, is that Nazi Germany was an attack on forces hostile to the German nation/folk, whereas Leftist Germany is an attack on the German nation/folk.  That's a simplification of course, and as you say, there was an ideological zeal to National Socialism that, in the end, left the German people as grist to the mill.  However, I maintain there's a fundamental difference - ends should not be confused with means.


    Yes, of course history cannot be simplified because eventually everything is a result of the events that came before it.

    Hitler would have never gained that power if germany wasnt pressured into a tremendous debt that caused the german population to suffer.

    Without the events of WW1, WW2 would not have happend the way it did.

    So obviously there was a problem and people looked for a solution (sounds familiar).

    Obviously im not going into all of the details, as this is a complicated matter, but nevertheless the methods have similarities.

  13. 58 minutes ago, Ecki Divad said:

    It's not Nazi Germany, it's Leftist Germany.  The Nazis would never have done this.  They were nationalists who cared about the German people.

    It doesent matter what name you give it, when the methods are the same.

    And Nazi germany didnt care about the german people, at all. Unless you still believe in that propaganda from 80-90 years ago.

    They let them rot on the battlefield, used cildren in an already lost war in the battle of berlin, made experiments on the disabled and killed jews that have a german background in concentration camps. The gestapo could enter any private space if they got ticked of.

    Its the same method. Take a minority and blame them for everything. Same here, the people that do not obey these restrictions get blamed for the ongoing lockdown.

    Old people were transfered into care homes, left to die and they wrote: its covid19.

    Its fascism, pure and simple fascism.

    Hanging yourself up by a name, doesent do it. I dont care who does it. I care what they do and what they do is a crime.

    • Like 1
  14. As it is in my belief, there can be things done, but every individual needs to take responsiblity for its thoughts/actions and its consequences.

    Right now many have given up all of those combined.

    Can a mind be changed by force? Of course not. A mind needs to come to its own conclusions. Everyone on this planet takes responsibilty for what is happening in each and every given moment. Individuals soly wake up if they look insanity into the eye, but the keypoint is, for some that point is only reached when immediate death of themself is apperent and not before.

    So in a sense, everyone has its own limit on how far they go and what they accept.

    Right now we are at the very beginning of that process and it is a long way down the road from one extreme until the other extreme weights it out.


    You cannot simply say: All the people that go for protest now, should not go protest, because whats it gonna do anyway.

    Well, its an expression of those that reached their limit and they do not accept it. Its part of the whole, part of what needs to be done to outweight the other extreme.

    Doing nothing and say: Well, nothing matters wont help anyone.

    There are only a handful of "masters" that said: The best course of action is to give up doership, which is a state that applies for those that have nothing left to fear.

    But as long as you are accepting the "I" as your master, meaning ego-I, you have to take responsibilities.


    "Nothing really matters" is a supreme state but its impractical as long as this state is not realized. Someone in deep depression does not get helped if you tell him or her, just go meditate. One must factor in the individual. Its like an onion. To get to the core, one must get rid of each and every layer one by one. The way to get there is already included in the supreme.

    Yes, there is no way and not a way. No right and wrong, no this or that. But as long as a path is taken, the path must be followed. Only then when each and every idea about yourself, the world and everthing in between is dropped, non-doership applies itself. Before that, doership is required.


    The stick that helps to burn the fire is required, until it burns itself in the end.

  15. So it happend, as expected.

    In germany there are now regions where mask wearing is mandatory when you leave your house.

    Secondly german citizens are now asked to manage a contact diary, meaning to write down with who they met, what the purpose was and when.


    A reminder: In restaurants and bars it is already mandatory to write down your personal informations. If you either fail to do so or give wrong personal data, the police can fine you between 500 and 1000 €. That rule is already in place for a couple of months.


    It is also mandatory to wear a mask when you enter the restaurant/bar until you get to your table. You only can take it off there, but must wear it as soon as you leave your table.


    It wont be for long now, that mask wearing will be mandatory throughout the entire state as soon as you leave your private space.


    Second reminder: It is not allowed to have more than 10 persons gather in your private space. The police/military can enter your house or appartment unquestioned if they think that you break that rule. Let that sink in again: The police/military can enter your house/appartment unquestioned.


    I know this sounds ridicolous, but i wouldnt be in the least suprised if they order masks in your privat home as well. I mean they already gave masks to 2+ years olds, so they dont stop at complete and utter insanity anyway. We already have 3 children that died under the mask.


    Third reminder: First aid is not given due to Covid19. One of the children was in need of first aid, which was not given. That child as a result died on the way to the hospital.

    (which is basically failure to render assistance and thus murder)


    Again, thousands and thousands of doctors that know their field and have done their work for 20-40 years spoke out that mask usage is dangerous and does not prevent from virus spreading. That means: Masks are useless and soly kill people psycologically and physically.


    We are already living the middle stage of Nazi Germany and many dont realize shit. Boy, i am angry at sheeps. It makes my blood boil.




    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1
  16. On 10/19/2020 at 11:17 PM, TheAwakened said:

    why can't they just fuck off with all these technological advancements... Its actually pissing me off now, when will they stop?!

    Its going expontential.

    Every year that goes by technology is pushed faster and faster.

    No one really asks what for, they just think its good that it does.

    Faster internet speed? For what?

    Internet access in the middle of the desert? For what?

    Creating more and more AI systems? For what?

    They say it makes life easier, as every advertisment in existence always tells you that you need it for you to feel better, make your life easier.

    They say technology gives you more time, which in reality is the exact opposite, you have less time.

    They say social media brings people together, in reality in drives people apart as they become less connected in Real Life. Texting one lined messages on media to get some likes from your 1000 imaginary "friends" that you barely know and are soly there to boost your ego, is not connecting humans at all.

    They say AI can help you. Yes they can help you to loose your job in the future when you get replaced by a machine.

    If there is any doubt about the insanity that is unfolding, just watch Elon Musk talk. They talk about their plans quite openly in the puplic. Its all out there, from the horses mouth.

    Unless humans somehow put a break into it, technology will always advance into one direction and never backwards.

    Step by step the human part gets left out. How many do you know that can life without a smart phone? Its sucessfully implemented, accepted as normal.


  17. "New Infections" = aka tested positive with a test that doesent test

    "Consipracy Theorist" = aka everyone that dares to challenge the mainstream medias narrative

    "We are in this together", said the dude with millions in a bank and lives inside a multi million dollar mension

    "Such and such politican has now Covid19", aka that politican just takes some vacation and helps to keep the narrative going, because apperently when someone famous gets it, its more real

    "Second Wave", you mean that second wave that got followed up by the non existent first wave? Gotcha

    "Masks save lives", aka a virus that is a 1000 times smaller than hair that cannot go through a mask? Gotcha

    "Masks save lives the second", aka masks actually take lifes and already did big time, Congratulations

    "Right Wing Protesters" aka the people that fight for our rights on the streets

    "New normal", well,.....start to define what normal even means, im waiting

    "Flatten the curve again" ,...oh...oh thats some really genius selling tactic, im blasted away

    "Hotspot" aka we need to keep the Covid Story going even when no one is dying. We need to build a bridge into the colder times of the year until we finally get our desperate deaths and can get to our second/third lockdown.

    "New strategies to fight the virus", what strategies? you mean the fake ones that get exchanged by new fake ones? Gotcha

    "Crisis", aka our own created problem, that actually is no problem, but is sold as a problem

    "2020 is a bad year", yes a number that got created by humans that has no reality inside reality, besides in our minds now is considered the culprit. Wait, the dude on the Andromeda Galaxy surely does his math in earth years. The year 2020 is to blame.

    "2020 is a bad year the second." According to the script, yes

    "2020 is a bad year the third" You have no idea what they have in store in 2021, get your fireworks ready

    "Superspreader", aka Super Duper Propaganda Bullshit



    • Like 2
  18. 3 minutes ago, zaxatron said:

    The Real Rukshan, author of this video, has commented as follows:


    What really happened when Victorians came out to lawfully exercise their human rights. What the mainstream media won’t show you, the independent media will.

    ABC news is reporting that “About 200 to 300 people were estimated to have attended the rally” Have a look at all the footage to see if this mistruth adds up. Who is the mainstream media lying on behalf of and why are they suppressing this type of real news and information from the general public?

    Everything I filmed was for the protection of myself and the Victorian people as it is unclear if the police and the State Labor government are acting in violation of multiple laws themselves based on the conflicting statements of Assistant Commissioner Cornelius on 22.10.2020 and Daniel Andrews on 23.10.2020.

    I think i will make a video in the future where i just take the main stream media reports and compare it with real footage.

    200-300 people, my god are they desperate for lies. Actually if you think about it, they locked themself into a point of no return.

    People that start to know whats going on, never ever will trust the government and those above them anymore. They will start to question where else they got lied to, which they might never have asked otherwise and they will teach their children about this so they might know.

    This has just begun and so has our resistance. They will have a lot people to lock up (millions for the matter) if they want to go through with this agenda.

    I will never bow before the elite. They will never tell me what i have to do.

    They wont get out of this mess. This is going into the history books and they will loose in the end.

    • Like 1
  19. I just wanted to know how you guys deal with the world we live in?

    I sometimes have these days where i hardly can keep focus on my work or enjoy my free time because i get reminded time and time again, how corrupt everything is and at what lenghts people in power go to archieve their goals.

    And dont get me started on general media, which i only sometimes watch, to know where they are planning to go and where we stand. Most of the time i have to stop watching it after 30 seconds in, because its unbearable. Its absolutly impossible to sit through one of their videos or articles without throwing up or getting sick.

    The amount of dishonesty and lies are hard to get through, i wonder who really can watch it fully....

    Sometimes i remind myself that all will be well in the end, but its still hard to stay with that mindset.

    There is just a thing in me that wants justice for all the crimes that are comitted. I simply do not want these people to get away with this.

    So its hard, really hard at times to be at peace with myself and allow me to enjoy some destraction, to forget for a moment whats happening, to not get consumed by it.



  20. What i have learned throughout my life is that people usually feel best in their home country. Of course there are some exceptions, but the vast majority likes to be where they grew up. When we see the movements to europe from the middle east and africa, those people soly move, because they are out of perspectives in their home country. (Hunger, war, etc,...)


    If none of these problems would be at the present, they would stay right where they are. If you look at history, thats what you are seeing too.

    So what im saying is, that people love their traditions, their language, their rituals, their sourroundings and so on, which is incredible important.

    Mixing cultures on a forced basis (and in large numbers) as it is happening right now, only damages the uniqueness of each and every country.

    Things that work in Islam and for islamic people in one part of the world, might not work on another part.

    There is simply too much human diversity to bring it all together under one hood. (if you do, there will always be conflicts)

    One needs to respect every culture, even if thats not your own and let them life how they see fit.

    No one should force religious, political or enviromental agendas on people.


    And in that uniqueness, while respecting that, you still can have a unified world, as everyone is respected for their heritage and belongings.

    Every country should govern itself and it is the people of that country which should decide what can or cant be done.

    So if you elect a person and that person does not fullfill his/her promise to serve the people, he/she should be replaced immediatly.

    Corruption needs to be stopped point blank at its origin. No more excuses or workarrounds. Politicans also should never have immunity.

    They are soly put into place to organize and do as the puplic wants, because it is the puplic, the people that inhabitate the world in large and not some few people that think what is best.


    Trading with different cultures can be done soly, if you do not destroy their economy for your own benefit. So if there is trading, both parties benefit likewise.

    If all of this is respected, there would be no need for war, hunger or any other problem we have right now.

    • Like 1
  • Create New...