.jpg.8081a54a3b74a5d1823dfac966666137.jpg)
.jpg.594f0ef23288ec5ab04539b2f8a8dbd4.jpg)
Dragon Slayer
-
Posts
1,074 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
28
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Dragon Slayer
-
-
-
3
-
-
Kommen, have a shower.
-
-
1
-
1
-
-
2 hours ago, Desperate Dan said:
...so, here we are.
Hello all.
I am experiencing the world as a male in my 40s with a female significant other and a father of 2 young children. Live in Scotland and have what would be described as a comfortable life.
I think too much, always have... refuse to follow illogical rules and I hate being told what to do.
The illusions of the system has been shattered... it's all nonsense...
Trapped inside the 9-5 system, mortgage, job, bills, tax tax tax and more tax...
So, becoming more aware everyday but remain a reluctant slave...
Summary of beliefs
JFK- killed by the cult
Mandela - remember him dying in prison
9/11 -controlled demolishion
London Red Bus explosion- the UKs 9/11
Covid - Real Bioweapon in form of weaponised virus + weaponised gene therapies plus they wated COmmon Vaccine ID
Fully believe consciousness creates reality and perception moulds consciousness...
Lots of other stuff...
A few lucid dreams of spiritual events that have impacted my everyday life...
smile and wave boys, smile and wave.
Cars, not football
Dan
Hi mate.Welcome. Agree with all you said apart from Mandela. I was in the country when he was released. I've just hit 50, and it seems my age group 50+ recall that aswell. A puzzling thing this Mandela effect..
-
1
-
-
Whatever cult or secret society our overlords and minions immerse themselves in, they all believe in dehumanizing and depopulating us.
In case you missed it, here is George Bernard Shaw (a Fabian).
-
2
-
-
Regardless of the options we supposedly have, we are lorded over by self-entitled, unaccountable, chinless in breds.
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
2
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
-
The PTB are cleaning house now.
-
13 minutes ago, SoundOfSilence said:
There is not enough information at the moment to draw any conclusions as to who was involved in the assassination of Charlie Kirk All that we can say is that official narrative is ridiculous.
Why is the official account ridiculous?
1. There is no way Charlie Kirk was shot with a thirty aught six round. For gun enthusiasts this is known as the Springfield cartridge. It is a monster projectile leaving the barrel with 3,000-foot pounds of force. Or put another way, it would lift a 3,000-pound object one foot in the air. Over a distance of 150 yards, it loses none of its original power. At 150 yards it will pass through a 1/2-inch-thick steel plate like butter. It would have blown Charlie Kirk's neck apart before passing through anyone and anything behind him. The round is used for big game hunting like a moose or a grizzly bear.
Kirk wasn't hit by any high-powered rifle. It was a lower caliber round.
2. Originally there was no autopsy, then there was an autopsy, and the bullet was discovered just beneath the skin by his neck. Yeah, a human neck and skin will stop a Springfield round! The human neck is hollow with a lot of Cartlidge. It's not that strong. No way!
3. The CCTV footage was wide enough to catch the alleged shooter in position and taking the shot. Yet, we are only shown footage of him running across the roof a few seconds afterwards. What is the FBI hiding?
4. The so-called confession note left for the alleged shooter's furry boyfriend was clearly written by Chat-GPT. It used the language of law enforcement, not college kids.
5. The security detail is problematic. There is no reaction to the gun fire. As if it was expected.
6. At the time of the lethal shot the security detail were looking at Charlie Kirk. Why? They should be watching the crowd. You don't watch the protected person.
7. When Kirk was hit, instead of rendering aid the security detail went into a well-rehearsed drill and started breaking down the crime scene and removing evidence. Such as camera flashcards. A very odd priority.
At this stage we can say is that whoever was behind had the security detail on their side.
Possible motives would include:
Israel: Charlie Kirk was starting to question the Israeli lobby on the stand down on 6 October (or whenever it was). Kirk was very influential among young voters, and the Israel lobby couldn't tolerate Kirk pushing people away. Israeli donors had cancelled donations a few days before the assassination.
Against Mossad being involved is the poor cover up and the fact the patsy wasn't killed. I think Mossad would have done a better job.
Though that is not to say Israeli donors, independent of Mossad, weren't involved.
Insiders with Turning Point: Candace Owens had reported that a lot of money had gone missing and Kirk was suspicious. The fact it was not a very good coverup may indicate that it is a group below intelligence services.
But, at this stage, there is no evidence of who was behind it.
We know it wasn't a lapel mic gun. That suggestion is absurd. I think it is Stew Peters that came up with that lemon. How do we know it is absurd?
Because when a bullet leaves a gun there is recoil. If you've fired a bolt action rifle, you'll know all about it. The lapel mic would have recoiled and ripped straight through his t-shirt. Even with a 22 round. Which is all that would fit.
At this stage I would go as far as to say definite coverup, the patsy wasn't the shooter, and an inside job.
But I have no idea what he was shot with, by whom, and who took out the contract.
Welcome back SoS.
-
1 hour ago, pi3141 said:
Alice Weidel, chair of Germany’s Alternative for Germany (AfD) party, gave a bold speech at CPAC Hungary 2025, claiming that the media and political elites “fear us like no other party — with good reason.” Speaking before Prime Minister Viktor Orbán and other conservative leaders, Weidel warned of rising censorship, opposition surveillance, and democratic backsliding in Germany.
Great speech. Her background includes Goldman Sachs and 6yrs in China though..
-
8 hours ago, Velma said:
This is concerning the US but could equally happen in the UK.
John Guandolo, a former FBI special agent stated on the Real America (propaganda) Network, (which hosted Charlie Kirk) when discussing a “terror plot” in the USA that, “we know Hamza bin Laden, son of Osama, in 2021 became the military commander and a year later, the Emir of al Qaeda.” He and three of his brothers “are all in on the plot.”
The plan, according to this “insider” who seems to know a lot about it, is to blow up soft targets like hospitals and clinics. They have police uniforms, fire-fighter, rescue and utility uniforms apparently, to accomplish this primary attack, after which there will be a secondary attack, when there are no hospitals left in these cities to take the wounded.
Where have I seen that operation before?
Anyway, al Qaeda have a thousand soldiers in the US, Guandolo claims, and that’s not including Hamas, the Muslim Brotherhood, Hezbollah or the Iranian IRGC forces. He was asked when this attack was due and he replied, “imminent!” There are many bin-Ladens and some were flown out of the country on 9/11 when all flights were grounded and their brother was the World’s Most Wanted man. The gist of it is, bin Laden is back!
Whatever happens, I’m sure it will be “good for Israel.”
I'm more worried about MI5/6, CIA and Mossad. They occasionally keep me awake at night, not the fictional terror groups.
-
1
-
-
6 hours ago, J47 said:
i think the substack, guy may be giving these clowns too much credit, though it's difficult to tell, but from pure optics/theatrics, most of Boris/Starmer's shit looks laughable/transparent and so fucking stupid, it's either a ruse or they really are like, their scumbag goons behind them, that thick
I am really not sure anymore, seeing starmer, never answer a question again, in an interview just confirms this, the only time, he gets into his prefect mode is when no one is challenging him( as he in incapable of answering any fucking question) His prefect mode, when talking about, D ID and how you won't have a job unless you consent to it, is the exact same tone he took when he gaslit an entire nation, many of whom were protesting( and not rioting) regarding southport, dismissing all of them as far right, said it didn't matter why they were protesting and laughably claiming, it was not protest,( many were just protesting) and not rioting
I am just not too convinced, the shadow players are always as nessecarily as smart, as some on the forum give them credit for
god knows at this point
Although I am no big fan of him, Dominic Cummings alluded to the fact in a (rare to find) interview. To the fact that nobody in the house of commons has any power whatsoever. The most powerful is the PM and his Private Secretary (was McSweeney). They are all handed a script by PTB, and must not deviate. The whole thing is a Theatre, and probably the same all over the Western world. Bread and Circuses.
-
3
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
-
-
-
A HUMOUR THREAD
in Humour
Posted