dollazNdiamond
-
Posts
32 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by dollazNdiamond
-
-
17 minutes ago, Comedy Time said:
Name the false assumptions and correct them.
The flat earth society and the people who make all the online noise tell us the Sun is 30 miles across(guffaw) and 3000 miles away(ludicrous). If that is wrong what should it be!?
the fes are handled by the same people who do you
you are arguing with yourself
stop baiting me to answer your posts from other threads
this thread is fake moon landing
are you a boomer? did you watch on your tv nixon call the astronots on the moon?
again you only bring irrelevance
-
1
-
-
-
sorry for posting to wrong thread
mods please move to antarctica thread
edit i think i fixed
-
42 minutes ago, Comedy Time said:
You people are all the same. Not one of you has the integrity to respond properly. You're just making noise!
I posted numerous rebuttals to your daft claims and you come back with gibberish about seeing stars through the Moon. Comedy time.
I posted some simple maths putting the setting sun 85000 miles away. And you are afraid to answer. Flat earthers are the joke of the planet.
your denial of stars seen through the moon is comedy time
your maths are based on false assumptions
funny too how you constantly whine about ad homs
-
14 hours ago, Comedy Time said:
Why are you continually avoiding large parts of my posts?
because of irrelevancy
you believe stars can be seen through something that spaceships have landed on hahahaha
-
7 minutes ago, Grumpy Owl said:
Of course they don't.
Would you be happy to get on a flight from Australia to South America, knowing if it was forced to make an 'emergency landing' on Antarctica, that there would be little to no chance of a successful rescue, due to the inhospitable climate and environment?
and an emergency landing in the ocean makes sense? that was an original thought that you were insulting flat earthers about?
9 minutes ago, Grumpy Owl said:That's the main reason why flights don't go directly over the south pole, and this has been covered already in the existing Flat Earth topic.
i read the whole thread and saw no logical reason at all except for the fact that there is no underside of a ball to fly over
and it looks like the thread is locked
-
-
2 minutes ago, Comedy Time said:
Tedious. The guy is driven by nonsense memes and refuses to debate properly. Address the content being posted?
you are being destroyed by memes
your handlers are pulling their hair out
-
1
-
-
-
On 9/19/2020 at 2:07 PM, Comedy Time said:
How strange, you believe the words of a phoney website "news outlet" quoting a man who walked on the Moon and went into space. Selective much.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/buzz-aldrin-tweeted-we-are-all-in-danger-it-is-evil-itself/
-
5 minutes ago, Grumpy Owl said:
If you actually look really closely you can just about make out the outline. The shadowed part of the moon is the same colour as the sky because of the way that light refracts.
If that explanation works for you i guess
i am far more interested in the stars that are seen through her
-
stars have been seen through the moon many times across the ages and is why those flags exist
-
you can't see through rock
-
On 9/19/2020 at 4:05 PM, Grumpy Owl said:
I think that perhaps it is not being faked, because there are so many videos that show this.
i have not seen one that has not been faked
On 9/19/2020 at 4:05 PM, Grumpy Owl said:I think that perhaps it is not being faked, because there are so many videos that show this. The sun doesn't fully set during the height of summer in Antarctica for exactly the same reason it doesn't during the height of summer in the Arctic Circle. Don't forget equally there are some three months of darkness, I suppose this is somehow faked too.
Thanks for the confirmation that Antarctica exists, unless you or your friend are lying of course.
I've always had a bit of a fascination with Antarctica since I was young. One of the first books I downloaded and read when I first got my Kindle a few years ago now was "South" by Ernest Shackleton, describing his ill-fated attempt to cross the continent.
And that's why you don't get many 'tourists' just rocking up for a 'holiday'.
I think it is indeed possible that Antarctica was very different thousands of years ago, the poles have shifted before in the past, so Antarctica would have been on the equator. When the poles do shift, the ice caps would melt, which will be the cause of these 'Biblical floods' as the oceans rise, then new ice caps form at the 'new' poles, potentially quite rapidly too.
Who really knows what is buried under the ice and snow of Antarctica, us 'ordinary folk' will probably never know, perhaps the remnants of some ancient civilisation.
it exists as a wall to hold our ocean water
people can go there and no one has claimed otherwise
-
6 minutes ago, Comedy Time said:
You can't see through it. You can land on something solid and NASA didn't lie.
nasa lies about everything
this was posted because seeing stars through rocks is not possible
-
1
-
-



Antarctica
in Nature Of Reality
Posted
straw man
you are arguing with yourself again
the insane claim is on you
prove that antarctica is on the bottom of a ball