.jpg.8081a54a3b74a5d1823dfac966666137.jpg)
.jpg.594f0ef23288ec5ab04539b2f8a8dbd4.jpg)
Comedy Time
-
Posts
794 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Comedy Time
-
-
Just now, Lord Humungus said:
maybe it's your demeaning and arrogant attitude?
Really? How about months of this activity PRODUCES the attitude? Where is the dignity in believing something whilst deliberately winding up other posters by ignoring their input?
I can show you several hundred completely neutral posts that got completely ignored. But I think people like you tend to only see the end result and make false assumptions.
Nice to take it into more personal shit territory again though...just for a change
-
2 minutes ago, Macnamara said:
So flight UA93 was a fighter jet crashing headfirst into a solid slab of concrete?
And there was me thinking it was a commercial flight crashing obliquely into the earth....
Sometimes sarcasm works brilliantly. That wasn't one of those instances. The fighter jet hitting concrete is a perfect comparison for a diving plane hitting a solid ground. The result is pretty similar.
Obliquely or not, it is an immovable object and that increases the chances of debris bouncing in that direction.
-
10 minutes ago, Grumpy Owl said:
Which means we have reached an impasse then.
Not while there are fence sitters and people who may fall into this mad abyss of ignorance. I just look at the pros of reaching those people, rather than the cons of getting wound up by such evasive and ignorant people.
-
12 minutes ago, alexa said:
There is no point in replying anymore, there is no getting through to you Globalists.
You never reply, you are afraid to. I find your actions to be truly pathetic. I point out the big post you avoided and you carry on avoiding it. So many posts avoided that show your ridiculous claims to be insane.....and you run away from every one of them.
12 minutes ago, alexa said:You have been well and truly indoctrinated with lies & Hollywood.
Any one of my other incarnations may have fired a perfectly apt and well worded insult your way, but in this case I will just shake my head at a religious noise maker highlighting indoctrination - that has to be the ultimate in hypocrisy and delusion.
12 minutes ago, alexa said:If they said the moon is made of polystyrene you'd believe it.
If they said some long haired hippy walked on water you'd believe it. If they said his mum got pregnant without having a bunk up you'd believe it.
Personally I like evidence and you a) ignore it all b) never provide any c) believe copious amounts of dipshittery.
-
49 minutes ago, kj35 said:
The point was it is very much more accessible than mars. More serviceable. The semantics of rocket technology were a little above my knowledge. That said....moon rocket technology versus mars rocket technology? Hmmm. I would suggest most people can see the one needs much more complex fuel, food, medicine, human biology consideraration than the other? And yet it is mars we are trying to colonise ..not the moon.
Colonise Mars ....pie in the sky. They need to overcome enormous hurdles. Not least that Mars has no magnetosphere and consequently doesn't stop solar radiation. Plus stopping it for the really long journey time.
The food and stuff would be dead easy in comparison.
-
2 hours ago, alexa said:
I'm not unreachable with the evidence, the evidence tells me what I see and feel, and I don't feel the earth moving and have seen a total eclipse.
Unreachable. You just completely bloody ignored that whole post!!
Don't bother replying....seriously. The number of posts you do this to is both pathetic and absurd.
The "evidence" is the things you are afraid to address....nobody could ever notice constant motion. You notice changes. The eclipse is a tiny moon moving in front of a big distant sun.
-
1 hour ago, alexa said:
It's so obvious that the sun and the moon are the same size when the moon eclipses the sun.
Really not being personal here, but what stops you from researching this subject properly? Why are you so unreachable with evidence? The Moon at its CLOSEST appears to have the same angular diameter as the Sun. But that doesn't mean they are the same size!
This is what the Moon does over the course of one month....
Here is a size comparison for its eliptical orbit, nearest and farthest....
So....the Moon is able to change size, 100% irrefutable. This MUST be a distance from the ground issue on the mad flat earth model. There can be no other explanation!
If it changes size so dramatically through its distance above the Earth, why the crap doesn't it change size when it is low on the horizon. Basic, basic trigonometry tells us it must be a MASSIVE distance away when "setting"!
Do you even know there is a thing called an Annular Eclipse? When the Moon is at its smallest and farthest.
-
On 8/31/2020 at 3:39 PM, kj35 said:
The moon takes, what??three days and could be serviced by shuttles like the space shuttle program and could also be serviced by the existing ISS program.
No. To get to the Moon, you need something light enough to be accelerated from here and slowed down when it gets there. The shuttle simply cannot do either.
-
2 minutes ago, gregory-peccary said:
Yep. And why shouldn't the aliens be odd?
Hmmm..... Whatever, extremely patient aliens ok.
2 minutes ago, gregory-peccary said:Have a read of 'Who Made The Moon' - I posted the link to the pdf earlier in this thread.
Yeah I read it years ago.
2 minutes ago, gregory-peccary said:The moon IS a very strange object, the odds against it being the size it is and the distance it is are astronomical!
Happily the universe is very big so the chance of it happening somehow by chance become fairly high!
Sounds about right....The chances of life and all the things that come together make it likely that it doesn't occur very often....being one of the places where it did happen, in a universe of such unimaginable size makes it inevitable.
-
On 10/6/2020 at 8:59 AM, Reet Hard said:
The best way to deal with shills & narcisists trying to gaslight and bait is no response.
Or respond , don't react - give them no supply.
Stick to the argument even when they don't because then that shows them up for what they are.
Of course one of the reasons it's done is to paint everyone who is awake as an abusive lunatic so don't take the bait as tempting as it is.
There were a few great posters who provided a lot of great analysis walked away as a result.
If the shills (and we all know who they are) are allowed to behave as they do and throw there abusive comments around and no on reacts to it - who does it paint in a bad light for all the internet to see?
Who loses credibility for all the internet to see - us or them?
Listen to Uncle Reet Hard Yo!
I think the best way to deal with these mysterious people is by debating them out of the park with logic, critical thinking, cited evidence, carefully thought out detailed posts and most of all totally honest responses. That always works for me. I try not to rise to the bait and let the moderators deal with all the abusive posts I receive. Credibility is not really an issue unless you think the general internet comes here and trawls through buried posts.
-
27 minutes ago, alexa said:
LOGICALLY!
Nothing you type falls into that category.
27 minutes ago, alexa said:How can the earth possibly be traveling around the sun, putting it politely, this absolutely absurd.
I would spend hours educating you as to how planets/solar systems/stars formed but you would not understand it and would revert back to the writings of ancients and say they quoted the magic sky wizard.
Gravity. The Earth and all planets are in freefall in space. They are falling towards the Sun at a speed roughly equal to their orbital speed. The variance causes an elliptical orbit.....
27 minutes ago, alexa said:And the sun and the moon are definitely the same size
Really they aren't. Are all the Radio enthusiasts around the world lying when they bounce radio off the Moon? It's a quarter of a million miles away. Proven so many times it's painful to watch you ignore this!
-
21 minutes ago, alexa said:
Why can't I edit ?
The same reason you can't do a lot of stuff, you have trouble understanding and working things out. It took me about 5 seconds to work it out. There are 3 dots top right corner of your post. Report/share and if you are the poster, for 1hr edit.
-
1
-
-
40 minutes ago, wideawake said:
I don't have the link here but if debris were spread over miles, it can only mean that it was destroyed in the air. There are reports of people seeing a fighter jet in that area at the time.
Yes, I am aware of the details surrounding UA93, but your conclusion is not accurate. If it hits the deck at 550mph then bits are going to fly off considerable distances. Plus there is the impact crater.
It may have just been clipped by the fighter plane to disable it, or Bush ordered it to be brought down. I cannot rule that out but as I say think it less likely.
-
4 minutes ago, wideawake said:
Or it exploded in the air before hitting the ground?
I didn't immediately dismiss that, but it seems less likely.
-
17 hours ago, kj35 said:
I don't think the moon is natural. And a lot of mainstream science supports the theory.
There is no support at all in mainstream science.
There is a lot of mainstream support that establishes at as being there billions of years ago...specimen paper....
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/07/140730133129.htm
Tidal evidence from 3 billion years ago...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/956126.stm
Very odd aliens if they drove it here and parked it up billions of years before man arrived.
-
On 10/8/2020 at 3:50 PM, singhz312 said:
That contradicts the tower impacts then? No pieces falling down are seen like in this video? LOOOL..
Sigh......no it contradicts nothing. The wall on the crash test was specifically designed to produce a dead stop impact. Ie. Its resistant force exceeded the incoming kinetic energy. On the Twin Towers, the wall was not sufficient to resist massively more kinetic energy.
And like most people I am encountering.....you completely ignore the point being demonstrated!
For Shankesville, the plane hitting the ground WOULD be the same as the dead-stop plane crash.....therefore the same result - smashing into tiny bits and thrown great distances.
-
1 hour ago, Enforcement said:
Don't be silly please - compartmentalisation.
Don't be incredibly daft....explain fully how any single person in that post are not just a tad suspicious about what they have done .....ya know ....given that 4 planes just splattered all over the general vicinity.
Your base claim requires all of that and more.
Here, example.....you lot can you dispose of that UA plane over There and get me some bits. Burn them and mangle them. Oh and do the same with the passengers.
What crazy "compart-totally-mental" world would fail to notice!
-
3 hours ago, Enforcement said:
Yes, there were two military planes controlled remotely.
The planes hitting the tower created the drama needed to make the idiot sheeple demand the solution which surprise surprise was more surveillance and removal of freedoms and more tax payer funded war.
Why did you just repeat your claim?
Now we need:
- A team to dispose of the planes and the bodies
- A team to burn and mangle the bodies to sprinkle DNA all over the area, or a team to fake the analyses.
- We still need a team to place tiny body parts everywhere.
- A team to drive around dropping bits of plane around the area, including a massive plane engine in full view of spectators!
- A team to do this at the Pentagon with cameras on helicopters and emergency services arriving any time soon.
- A team to control the military aircraft. Paper trails to be destroyed accounting for the aircraft.
- ALL paper trails paying any personnel to be deleted and financial reimbursements hidden.
That makes zero sense.
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=6719039&postcount=1
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=9725182&postcount=11
-
1 hour ago, alexa said:
What do you actually mean by this ???
It was written in English, how can it confuse you?
Apollo is the subject matter. Total ignorance of it, means they know nothing about it. You agree with them and you too know nothing about it. If there was anything specifically captivating about those 4 rather useless people talking, point me to it and I'll explain why they are wrong.
I don't anticipate you being able to understand.
-
17 minutes ago, alexa said:
They and you have one thing in common. Total ignorance of the subject mater.
-
1
-
-
4 minutes ago, Grumpy Owl said:
https://www.virology.ws/2020/05/07/there-is-one-and-only-one-strain-of-sars-cov-2/
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/lab/grows-virus-cell-culture.html
"SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, was isolated in the laboratory and is available for research by the scientific and medical community."
-
43 minutes ago, Enforcement said:
The CDC is not independent, it is a vaccine selling company which sells over $4billion of vaccines every year.
The WHO is run by a former terrorist.
Either you are wilfully ignorant or hilariously naive.
Which is it?
Nice false dichotomy. They have isolated the virus in numerous places. I'm guessing that you will say they are all lying because it makes such a nice conspiracy.
Who says that the WHO boss with his questionable past means that CDC haven't isolated a virus? How are the two linked?
Who says that companies that create vaccines aren't capable of isolating the thing they attempt to create a vaccine for?
You're either intrinsically entrenched in a belief system or incapable of seeing anything that contradicts it. Oh wait...that's the same thing!
-
6 minutes ago, Grumpy Owl said:
Yes, that is absolutely correct.
But the point is that surely no-one really knows exactly what COVID is, especially since the specific coronavirus that supposedly causes it has never been isolated.
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/lab/grows-virus-cell-culture.html
-
14 minutes ago, cosmicporpoise1.618 said:
Not much of a change, and most of the time, it's the same size.
Even with that very, very slight variation, you think it's natural for it to be the same size most of the time?
Look at you .....wrong and now moving the goalposts. It Is most certainly more than a "slight" bloody change! It isn't the same size it varies quite significantly and if you cannot see that you are being wilfully blind.
The Moon is unusually big but to reach the conclusion it isn't natural because you think it is the same size as the Sun has been disproven. Clearly it varies.
The Flat Earth/Globe Earth Discussion Thread
in Space & Universe
Posted
You are lying. I have not repeatedly insulted anyone. Kindly take your off topic personal crap elsewhere.