Jump to content

Comedy Time

  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Comedy Time

  1. Where did you get all that from? The virologists say they have isolated it, conspiracy theorists who are not virologists suggest lots of things but the bottom line is the claim must be that they are lying. Prove it. You could have that as a daily test. But again Hanlon's razor.
  2. Spoken like a true conspiracy theorist. No it isn't. Ditto. The PCR test is probably as accurate as you can get without the test taking longer than the bloody recovery! Bullshit! I'm not "acting" like anything. I just don't hold the same faith as you do in "alternative" websites! I've seen enough of them to get the gist and I simply don't have time or the inclination to go through and waste my time showing why they are not accurate.....only to have the recipient of my response to ignore it. Who said I was ignoring that ? And your pissy attitude is quite something. I don't recall it being raised in any post I have responded to. The same issues here are almost identical to those raised decades ago for HIV it works both ways. Hanlon's razor. Google it. Look this one up as well... "Circular reasoning" I don't acknowledge the PCR test is a fraud, YOU do. I don't claim the death certificates are a fraud, YOU do. It is just as likely that there are many deaths not attributed to this virus that are caused by it. All those people suddenly dying is faaake is it? All those crazily overworked NHS nurses were complaining about nothing huh? https://centerforinquiry.org/blog/the-covid-19-empty-hospital-conspiracies/ https://bylinetimes.com/2020/10/01/myths-misinformation-nhs-coronavirus/
  3. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xRhOMp38xk
  4. I agree. I don't think there IS an epidemic or pandemic yet. It is a very bad flu virus that hasn't gone out of control. Yet. I don't understand the blanket denial of this virus rather than the more realistic one of those who claim it's ferocity is exaggerated. I have no problem with the latter - kind of, but the former is a bit daft.
  5. Well to be fair, you've had a good go with your Nazi stuff huh? But how about this example...
  6. No, nice try though. https://www.virology.ws/2010/01/22/kochs-postulates-in-the-21st-century/
  7. NO I DID NOT. I replied x number of minutes after he posted - when YOU looked at my post, that was how long ago it was. Unless you clicked it the split second I posted it. We ain't on page 330 yet, so no idea what you are talking about. Is this some daft obscure freemasonry shite?
  8. No, yours is (but what for I have no idea). It said "33 minutes ago" when YOU looked at my reply - go look now! Page number 330? Again I don't know what you are talking about, it's 329 at the moment isn't it?
  9. Listen. YOU are the one claiming it doesn't exist. People who work on viruses say it does. They have isolated it and there are numerous places stating the same thing. All you are doing is saying they are lying. Take the fast tracked untested vaccine for this? I'd rather inject putrid pisswater into my veins. Does that clarify my position?
  10. There are numerous study teams telling the world they have isolated it and are working on a vaccine for it. If they are lying YOU need to prove that. It's hardly a realistic request that they stuff it out for you to look at to verify they have done it. YOU are claiming it is a negative, you need to show why they are lying and more importantly why. I mean, why is is so unlikely that they can isolate another coronavirus? We've moved the goalposts slightly. You said it hadn't been isolated, I gave you links that it had, you claimed they weren't valid methods and failed to demonstrate why. You need to reread that. It says there is no gold standard for diagnosis. It doesn't say what you claimed, that the actual methodology for isolating the virus was not a gold standard. You said "RT-PCR is not considered the gold standard by virologists. " Edit: detecting something (diagnosis) is not the same as isolating it for further testing. A test to isolate RNA when Sars-2 is RNA - now either show a reason why that is not valid or accept that the method works and they have isolated the virus. Or prove they are lying.
  11. No it isn't. Some of them are fine for people who haven't time to go hunting for shrubbery. Cool, I have a friend who took some herbal remedies for cancer and one who took them for period pains and nodules on their ovaries. Both cured. But sadly it doesn't work for everyone. Fine. No problem. Your "alternative" site didn't impress. I don't know, why not go ask one? I'm just pointing out THIS one and as for HCQ I await proof to the contrary and will NOT dismiss it if it stands up to scrutiny. I can't debate everything dude. I hate vaccines, not because they don't work to create herd immunity, because they do in general. The concept that they offer immunity is often misunderstood - they work by raising the protection against infection percentage overall and lowering the R number. However I have long since wondered about the long term genetic effects on the immune system down through multiple generations. So slow tracked vaccines bother me for that reason. Imagine what I think of the implications for fast tracked ones that cannot possibly have been tested adequately. Fast tracked anything is asking for trouble. Thalidomide was probably the nastiest bastard drug ever approved.
  12. You didn't address the point I made. Why would they admit this? And the reference you pointed to was for the original 2019 batch isolates. It makes more sense to work with original strains of a virus rather than potentially mutating versions of it. Citation please. Why do you repeat your claim already addressed? The virus has been proven to exist and saying it hasn't is very much a King Canute statement.
  13. That isn't Occam as such. If the claim is that these people are fabricating and lying, then why would they admit something they didn't need to and why devise a test that any virologist would be able to identify as not valid? I would like someone to answer that if possible, because so many conspiracies crop up without considering truly obvious things.
  14. Why would they admit they have none when they could just lie? Is there not the possibility that they just used them all? If you think the method invalid, why don't virologists? And why don't they just lie about that too? It makes no sense to frame your argument around things that have a logical alternative and where the supposed perpetrators can simply deceive a bit better. It isn't difficult for either of those 2. Sars-2 is a single stranded RNA betacoronavirus and as such using a method specifically designed for RNA is not invalid. Why do you think it so?
  15. I actually had to read your post a few times to understand what you are claiming here. It's almost as though you think the method used to isolate the virus is invalid because of some odd reason. RT-PCR is a method to isolate RNA. Why did you highlight the reference when it is not used in the paper. These are not citing references they are external links for corroboration. Your example shows reference is number 5...not 4. Why did you reference an early CDC release? https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/lab/grows-virus-cell-culture.html SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, was isolated in the laboratory and is available for research by the scientific and medical community.
  16. @alexa And the dishonest evasion continues. When can we expect you to "cover" this or tell us why it doesn't count?
  17. Because in going to look for the words "geosynchronous orbit" you might actually learn something instead of blundering through life with a complete absence of knowledge. One that somebody with poor understanding should get. Pick two points. One is below the target speed - ISS 93 minutes. One is above it - the Moon 27.32 days. The target is one day, it lies between the two distances. Duhhhhhhh.
  18. Half past seven on a Wednesday. Google it, learn something. Clue: Close up ISS takes 93 minutes. Far away Moon takes 27.32 days. Somewhere in between. Explain the bloody picture of the satellite dishes.
  19. and @greatdayforfreedom https://www.icgeb.org/the-sars-cov-2-virus-has-been-isolated-and-the-full-genome-sequenced-at-icgeb-trieste-italy/ https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaotolaryngology/fullarticle/2768620 https://www.virology.ws/2020/05/07/there-is-one-and-only-one-strain-of-sars-cov-2/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32080990/ https://sunnybrook.ca/research/media/item.asp?c=2&i=2069&f=covid-19-isolated-2020#.XmsmoGqClHs.twitter
  20. https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/principia-scientific-international/ Duck noise needs imagination.
  21. Very good question. The higher up the satellite orbits the slower it moves....that is just orbital mechanics. For example the Moon has a speed of 2,300 mph, whilst the ISS moves around at 17,500 mph. There is a point where this orbital period matches Earth's rotation. Geosynchronous orbits. BUT, these appear to move too because they simply come back to the same point daily , so a specialist type of geosynchronous orbit is needed. Geostationary. A geosynchronous orbit parked on the equator, It appear in the same spot all the time. https://www.n2yo.com/satellites/?c=34
  22. So if you actually do a reductive comparison of two frames on the CCTV footage you get a plane and you dude are ignoring the big obvious list! The plane had 3 times more kinetic energy than a Tomahawk.
  23. I accept nothing really. It all seems so very vague. Said by whom? It could just as easily be way worse with many just quickly recovering. All very vague as I said. https://www.icgeb.org/the-sars-cov-2-virus-has-been-isolated-and-the-full-genome-sequenced-at-icgeb-trieste-italy/ https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaotolaryngology/fullarticle/2768620 https://www.virology.ws/2020/05/07/there-is-one-and-only-one-strain-of-sars-cov-2/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32080990/
  24. I'm not going to dig my heels in here. If evidence is convincing I will take it on board. BUT If this is some sort of fakery.....it has convinced a whole lot of doctors and the horror of the swamped NHS was not imaginary. I know people who dealt with it. The way it is being dealt with is clumsy and badly thought out....but I didn't vote for Bozza so .... I accept no blame. It IS irrelevant in terms of you dismissing well thought out objections because you think they are from evil.com. Address the content....even evil arseholes can sometimes be accurate.
  • Create New...