.jpg.9e99ff3727a52b51047711c51028c847.jpg)
.jpg.e0850aef2895b3e8c638a24da2b8f92e.jpg)
Comedy Time
-
Posts
794 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Comedy Time
-
-
5 minutes ago, Newbiebrbr said:
Keep defending the government.
I'm sure defending the government is going to give a leg up on the tower of social credits once that's here in the UK.Wrong!! I am not defending the shitty government and your argument is like someone going nah nah na nah naaaah.
I am pointing out discrepancies and poor methodology in these alternate claims. They aren't all wrong, far from it....try reading the flow of that exchange instead of knee jerk comments.
-
5 minutes ago, wideawake said:
I don't think it's comedy time, have fun. I won't play your game
I know, because I am kicking your arse.
-
7 hours ago, amy G said:
Another amazing Sunset tonight:
This was filmed in infrared with no added effects at all.Amazing. Like a five year old at Christmas with their new toy.
Relevance factor zero. Tell me again about the sun full size disappearing over the horizon.
Once again the BEST case scenario with the LOWEST possible distance to horizon....
Using disappearance angle of 0.001 degrees:
If on the equator at Zenith the Sun is at Everest height (as if!!), the second it disappears 90 degrees to zenith it is 286,000 miles away. Basic trigonometry.
If on the equator at Zenith the Sun is at the 3000 miles Flaterfers height (as if!!), the second it disappears 90 degrees to zenith it is 172 MILLION miles away. Basic trigonometry.
The trouble with you Bb is that instead of doing the "I majored in mathematics" you claimed you had done - which is obviously bullshit, you choose to point that silly camera at things without working out the real issues.
-
8 hours ago, wingwang said:
Not really. You have pseudo isolation and then there's real isolation. Take your pick.
False dichotomy. Koch's postulates are not gospel.
Despite the importance of Koch’s postulates in the development of microbiology, they have severe limitations, which even Koch realized. For example, he believed that cholera and leprosy were caused by microbes, but could not fulfill all four postulates. Furthermore, Koch knew that the putative agent of cholera, Vibrio cholerae, could be isolated from both sick and healthy people, invalidating postulate #2.
Many viruses do not cause illness in all infected individuals, a requirement of postulate #1. An example is poliovirus, which causes paralytic disease in about 1% of those infected. Further compromising postulate #1 is the fact that infection with the same virus may lead to markedly different diseases, while different viruses may cause the same disease. Postulates #2 and #3 cannot be fulfilled for viruses that do not replicate in cell culture, or for which a suitable animal model has not been identified.
-
16 hours ago, oddsnsods said:
There are several different estimates on mortality rates.
And you chose the inaccurate Facebook one. From your link, which is from the "evil" WHO...
"The WHO believe Covid-19 kills 0.6 per cent of all patients or one in every 167. Although it sounds minimal, it means Covid-19 is six times deadlier than the flu and almost as twice as fatal as polio."
If the methodology by which you dismiss counter evidence is "because it's from the mainstream" - then your method is just a little bit flawed.
16 hours ago, oddsnsods said:Why does Google show fact checker sites when doing any search that may contradict the offical narrative?
Why does Google have the authority to decide what is & what isnt truth? When most of these fact checker sites are financed by the very people who the claims are aimed against.
Take it up with Google. I imagine they don't hold the same sites as you do in high esteem. I don't agree with their policy.
16 hours ago, oddsnsods said:Its a wizard of Oz senario.. how else can you expose the psyop or break the spell, that everyone is under?
Then don't label me as "infected" when I do the same. If you think I watch it and lap it up then you are mistaken.
16 hours ago, oddsnsods said:Its trauma based mindcontrol to keep you in a state of fight or flight.
I suppose there is an element of truth to that in general terms, but since the matter is deemed as "nothing to worry about" that is not valid here.
16 hours ago, oddsnsods said:Thats all the news is 24/7 so you will easily summit to any demands.
Yes, I can agree in theory with that. The news generally will dictate the reaction from the public at large.
16 hours ago, oddsnsods said:Read between the lines, coz everything is censored yes thats a fact.
I don't have a problem with reading between the lines or that some things are censored or shutdown. You weren't reading at all simply because it comes from the MSM. So effectively you only cherry pick things FROM the MSM that support your case and ignore things that don't.
Please don't insult "anyone's" intelligence by saying that is not the case.
16 hours ago, oddsnsods said:Im not going to take anything CNN puts out as legit as they put out countless amounts of proven bullshit. I gave you examples. Ive seen cases of nurses that have been debunked on this thread or the previous pre hack thread as actors or links to government. So excuse me if I cant be bothered to drag it all up again
I've just spent a couple of hours searching this thread and there are examples of empty wards etc. But again you are cherry picking things that agree with you and labelling fake those that do not.
16 hours ago, oddsnsods said:Snopes wanky fact check doesnt debunk nothing neither does your BBC fake news paedo apologist news corp.
She could be real but doesnt mean shes not acting or shedding crocodile tears you simpleton.
Righto, so Snopes is all wrong and so is the BBC because of "reasons". She could be real huh and I am a "simpleton" for not realising she could be acting. But you aren't one for not realising that all your examples could be from people selling books and lying to get attention?
Cherry picking again.
16 hours ago, oddsnsods said:You automatically take their words as truth because the fear mongering lying horror show media tells you its true.
And YOU automatically take all the opposite as truth because you are a conspiracy theorist. I don't automatically take anything as truth, I assimilate data and form a logical opinion that fits what the data tells me. I modify that opinion as the data may or may not change.
You should try that.
16 hours ago, oddsnsods said:Your bullshit is tiring & cluttering up the thread.
My "bullshit" is observational contradictions to what is being presented. None of you people are questioning a single thing being shown. What you are doing is lapping it all up into a "coronavirus" memory store then when quizzed about it, it becomes a huge thing because of "all" that evidence presented.
I actually don't want to limit this thread at all, or disrupt it, but really!! WHY aren't any of you truth seekers questioning things being presented by your own side?
Example... Empty hospital beds/ full beds and sobbing nurses. Former stored, latter is fake
16 hours ago, oddsnsods said:Go read about Brigade77
Which bit, the official one or the conspiracy "read between the lines" one? I asked where they are on this thread!
16 hours ago, oddsnsods said:No dodge, Barack Obama doesnt control world Health.
Again you haven't listened to any interview with BG or know anything about the topic.
It is a complete dodge. You quote an advisory script from the government employed buffoons but failed to answer this....
I dare you to imagine just for a second that there IS a nasty disease out there and the public aren't taking it seriously. What would YOU do?
16 hours ago, oddsnsods said:No dodge gimpy.
This isnt meant to be North Korea.
Yes it was, insult noted yet again. Regardless of the agreed draconian result. He didn't photograph what you said he did!!
He actually photographed the sealed off section of A&E that was closed.
16 hours ago, oddsnsods said:They did & they are still doing it.
Theres tons of evidence also, thats been provided non stop for months now. You are insulting everyones intelligence.
I cannot actually believe how you can so badly miss the point I am making!
You claim the figures show x,y,z (cherry picking again of course). I said why don't they fake them, you know the ones that YOU think are incriminating. It would be a piece of cake for them to do so. You aren't the spokesperson for "everyones intelligence" sic.
16 hours ago, oddsnsods said:Start a thread for any questions you have with me on this topic coz you clutter the thread with discussion, most are well past.
No, I am highlighting inconsistencies with your approach, relevant to the topic. Don't flatter yourself concerning me "asking you questions", many are asked to show how your method is biased.
-
7 hours ago, Diesel said:
Sure...
Agreed. Only a light source quite some distance produce parallel shadows ie. the sun. A studio light would produce divergence as shown in the above photo
Ok, so all the "examples" on the internet where the rays appear to converge are caused by 1 or both of two things. Variation in the terrain, such as craters or small undulations or by the object itself not being vertical.
Anyway, back to your example. It's perspective and variable terrain. The LM shadow is being cast in roughly the same direction as the undulating ground where the rocks are casting theirs.
Terrain and angle make the shadows change - very brief video:
Seal the deal? Mythbusters analysed that very photo..
-
55 minutes ago, Diesel said:
Please explain how the shadows in Apollo Landing Photos converge at different angles when compared to shadows under direct sunlight that run in parallel.
Certainly. Just one small request first...(after you provide a specific example)...
Draw the light diagram from ANY light source that does this. Because nearfield light sources produce shadows that DIVERGE. Only when it gets quite some distance does the divergence angle come close to the parallel of the sun. There is NO studio single source light that illuminates such a vast area evenly.
-
1 minute ago, Lord Humungus said:
Sorry, I had you on ignore. If you can link me to the post or thread I will read it.
Previous page...only one with multiple images.
-
14 minutes ago, FrankVitali said:
Kindly stop linking to Snopes and other fact checkers. Its obvious they are bs and who funds them.
Who me ? Use @userid command or quote. Kindly stop saying something is "obvious" when that only applies to people unable to address their content. Which fact checking website do you use? Or should we take alternative websites as written?
-
39 minutes ago, Lord Humungus said:
At least FE'ers are friendly and polite. Those "Globe-alists" are a nasty and toxic.
I was polite enough to post a reply to you about crepuscular rays and other sun evidence. You weren't polite enough to respond.
-
21 minutes ago, alexa said:
I don't care if they say there were a thousand landings, it still wouldn't change the truth that we have never landed on the moon.
You didn't know. And please, must I repeat myself? You and the truth are not best friends. You have been misled by the oldest deceit in human history.....religion. And now you are being mislead by some of the newest....tin-foil-hattery.
Now present a piece of evidence or find another thread to dump your nonsense into?
I've seen some cast iron world-ain't-flat posts totally ignored by you with no excuses, so if I offered you anything on this thread it would get the same result. I can prove beyond doubt that we landed on the Moon to a rational intelligent person, or somebody prepared to look at things objectively. Not you though, you have proven yourself unreachable by any debate.
-
16 minutes ago, Jode said:
It doesnt matter about "beliefs" does it.
Sure it does. If there are conflicting beliefs that don't work with each other, there is no common ground.
16 minutes ago, Jode said:What matters is the evidence suggests lockdowns is a huge over reaction. I believe there is a virus doing the rounds - I'm not convinced it's a novel virus,
Evidence suggests a second one is an over reaction. But evidence suggested the first one was way too late.
16 minutes ago, Jode said:but I managed to be on this forum for months without attacking anyone else's beliefs and without having mine attacked....
Yeah about that. Your extremely blinkered views are not seeing MY beliefs being attacked? Really? I'm not attacking beliefs, I am discussing what I believe to be problems supporting them.
16 minutes ago, Jode said:Prehaps your level of discourse is the problem? Because you sound like a......
Or perhaps people who have really strong beliefs resent them being challenged and will defend them at all costs. I don't have arrogance in general but sometimes the odd thing sneaks out in defiance. I am quite ok being arrogant on occasion, pretty much exclusively on subjects I fully understand though. Certainly not in this thread - I am totally open to the ideas being presented, just not nearly convinced. There are gaping holes in the theories, but also in the main narrative.
p.s. that isn't the cue to drag this thread through another off topic series of posts aimed at poor old me.
-
2 hours ago, oddsnsods said:
Mr Google full fact there are lots of different studies.
Nothing like Fergusons estimates that got us in lockdown.
Ferguson whos never got it right, yet government & media take his word as gospel.
https://www.cebm.net/covid-19/global-covid-19-case-fatality-rates/
Uhuh, so when you quote the bare minimum bullshit facebook story that's ok then? You are deliberately misrepresenting and doing the same as the people you criticise.
2 hours ago, oddsnsods said:If you watch the news you are infected. Youre infected mate big time.
Yet pretty much every picture you are posing comes from a conspiracy theorist watching the news. So you are watching the news but it doesn't count because they are cherry picking stuff and not watching all of it? Is that right?
2 hours ago, oddsnsods said:Kids who have been tested positive (fraudulent test) for Covid without symptoms (illness) develop Kawsaki disease.
Yet Kawaski UK at the time reported there were no more cases than usual..now changed their story to say Covid might trigger Kawasaki.
The media virus shows children in hospital & parents crying.
Now admit no child without serious illness has died.
How can this be possible in a pandemic??
Shit news reporting? As I said, from what is presented, nothing to worry about was the message. Why are you still blabbing on about this?
2 hours ago, oddsnsods said:Alternative stuff is censored heavily, you cant find an alternative, you have to read between the lines..
Loss of smell is a symptom for those infected with the media mind virus, so they cant smell the bullshit.
Flu can linger for months. "long covid" is another buzzword for the media to feast on.
Uhuh. Read between the lines. You ignored the content in that link. That's not reading between any lines.
2 hours ago, oddsnsods said:Genuine CNN crisis actor..might even be a nurse.
Total conspiracy shit.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-43140105
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/american-three-terrorist-attacks/
The nurse is real, you couldn't find any bullshit about her could you, so you rake up some other daft stuff.
2 hours ago, oddsnsods said:Keep the public in a constant state of fear & send out Brigade77 army of shills for a psywar?
Thats the virus we are talking about, you get it now.
Self supporting conspiracy. Yes I get it. Brigade of shills huh? Where are they all on this thread? I know I'm not one and there ain't an awful lot of people taking any of you lot to task!
2 hours ago, oddsnsods said:Ask BillGates he knew the exact script from the start.
So did Barack Obama. Inevitable is inevitable. This was always likely to happen. But nice dodge....
That is a genuine question.
A man breaks into a hospital in the middle of a genuine pandemic, putting people's lives at risk...what would YOU do?
2 hours ago, oddsnsods said:You think he should be locked up for 12 weeks for filming an empty hospital then, its boring to fuck replying to an apologist who isnt interested in reality on a conspiracy forum.
You seem to mainly read what I type...so what went wrong here?
What would YOU do? Then....
"Tell him off and say stop being so naughty. Prison was a bit extreme, but a fine would have been about right."
Nice dodge again. He photographed sealed off closed A&E areas.
2 hours ago, oddsnsods said:You havent read my reply.
And you just ignored MY stats. Serious question - try not to dodge:
These people are according to you going to extraordinary lengths to fake a pandemic. Why didn't they fake the death stats? I mean you posted stuff about death certificates and attributing deaths to covid19, so how did all this come out and why didn't they just quietly fudge the death stats...not my ones....YOUR ones. There seems to be an awful lot of foul ups going on here. I say incompetence, you say fakery. There does exist some middle ground.
2 hours ago, oddsnsods said:Jog on then fake news.
No, don't be like that. I'm not jogging on - you've 3 times complained I didn't answer your post. Which one?
-
13 minutes ago, wideawake said:
I already did answer so... pay attention
No, really you didn't.
Let's recap. You said your version of events explained everything that happened. I asked how the columns bent in and you said this....
"I don't care how they bent. A missile can bend them inwards just as easy as a plane."
Now excuse me for pointing it out but a) You don't know and B) missiles don't make plane shaped holes and it involves all the no plane shite to occur with the video footage.
So try again...and we're only on item number one.
-
7 minutes ago, wideawake said:
yeap
Ok, start with explaining the holes in the buildings. Inwards columns........
On 10/13/2020 at 11:35 AM, wideawake said:The planes were remote controlled or they were missiles. I suspect the latter.
Good job you know what you believe huh?
-
19 minutes ago, oneantisworthtenofyou said:
The hairs are standing up on the back of my neck with alarm & suspicion!
I won't post Vic and Bob holding handbags and going ooooh....but seriously you don't think it valid that although there is massive differences in belief between the various conspiracies, not ONE of you argues about it with each other?
19 minutes ago, oneantisworthtenofyou said:Are your wonderings "scientific" professional or just for shits and giggles?
I never do anything on this forum for the latter and the former is wrong too. My question is because there are 3 main beliefs doing the rounds (and I suspect subsets), so why is there no discussion between the different versions of this?
19 minutes ago, oneantisworthtenofyou said:i wonder how many folk on this thread think the virus is a red herring real or not planned or not
it's a slight of hand an opportunists wet dream none of it matters
I don't think it was planned but it certainly creates some unpleasant opportunities.
19 minutes ago, oneantisworthtenofyou said:the focus should be on the vaccine and financial destruction of personal enterprise
the lockdown and introduction of unprecedented levels of state control over human movement
and the lack of privacy that will ensue
I agree 100% with that.
19 minutes ago, oneantisworthtenofyou said:i find following the money tends to be the most interesting path to follow
this virus thing is boring i am still waiting for someone to fall over and collapse in the street
like in china that would make it more interesting
I would be interested in what you have on that.
-
49 minutes ago, wideawake said:
No problem dude. You believe what you want, you ignore what you want.
Do you actually know what you believe happened? Does it explain everything that happened? THAT should be your starter for 10.
-
48 minutes ago, alexa said:
I hope so, this is how I found out the truth
You and truth are like shit and sugar lumps. You ignore everything. Tell me about the picture with all the satellite dishes pointing off Earth.
In your own time. God knows this information, he wants you to use your brain.
-
14 minutes ago, wideawake said:
not him, the one you linked to
But YOUR pilots are doing similar stuff and you continue to avoid valid posts with a lot of arm waving.
-
21 minutes ago, wideawake said:
Experienced pilots FLY PLANES.
So the ones spouting shite on pilotsfortruf aren't real then.
-
16 minutes ago, wideawake said:
Because it is BS.
Yeap, again as I said, it was BS so nothing to talk about there.
Well, if they were videos fitting the government's official story, Jewtube would still have them there.
Yes, how can he be an expert? Because he said so? lol
A real experienced pilot doesn't spend his days on CNN (the most trusted news), CBS, writing blogs, in magazines, etc like he supposedly did. Experienced pilots FLY PLANES.
OK... Is that the "new normal"?
I don't care how they bent. A missile can bend them inwards just as easy as a plane.
How do you explain the US not invading Saudi Arabia if most "terrorists" were Arabs?
Why the PNAC document that come out 1 year before 9/11, describes EXACTLY the New Pearl Harbor as mentioned by your favorite Boy George Bush (as DI calls him)? It could not have been planned, could it?
There's more to this story then just a missing black box and you seem blind to it all except a few aspects of it that can't be proven, like paper trail.
Having to wear a mask these days aren't meant to cover your eyes but to cover your mouth and nose...
Loads of evasion dude. Well done.
I'll summarise what you just wrote...
"Yeah, what you posted is all BS innit, he isn't a pilot because of reasons innit, I don't know how the columns bent like that innit, could be a missile with magic plane shape producing properties innit, about your list....oh look over here diversion diversion diversion."
What are you afraid of? The video shows a plane. Discuss. The other video shows plane parts. Discuss. My list details the problems. Discuss them. The pilot explains the situation - prove he isn't a pilot.
And you....arm waved it all away. Truthers huh.
-
5 minutes ago, Jack said:
Do you think that it's just "over hyped"?
I'm seeing lots of evidence to suggest it. So it certainly seems that way.
-
Just now, alexa said:
You really do remind me of someone else I used to know of, he also thought he knew all there was to know about the Apollo 69 moon landing which by the way was so daft & badly filmed. How anyone can believe this crap is beyond me.
Ah bless I keep reminding you of someone. You think there was only one landing? You think the video is the only evidence?
Everything is beyond you.
Type something specific and I shall address it.
-
54 minutes ago, wideawake said:
Because it's all BS.
Wow, you're great at debate. Wave it all away with a sweep of the hand.
54 minutes ago, wideawake said:3 times you linked "facts" about 9/11 that I looked at and 3 times it was all BS.
Three times you ignored them. Wave those arms around.
54 minutes ago, wideawake said:You even retracted your statement reference to videos at airports.
That's what honest people do. You should try it. I retracted it because videos that were there 15 years ago have now gone.
54 minutes ago, wideawake said:Then you come up with an "expert pilot" who spent more time on CNN and writing blogs than flying planes and it just so happened to be right after 9/11 to debunk "conspiracies" and push the official narrative. Quite an expert.
That is called an ad hominem argument. You ignore his testimony because it contradicts your own bullshit. The pilots-for-truf also spoke out just after 911, but their shite is ok is it?
54 minutes ago, wideawake said:So it is understandable that I seem unable to debate what you are putting up. You will go to any length to push the official story... Why is that?
Dude, you've got that arse backwards. I go to normal lengths to disprove bullshit stories.
You just totally ignored the post I made. Are you that afraid to debate honestly?
1. Video 1 - The plane parts everywhere. Proven.
2. Video 2 -A visible plane from pixel reduction. Proven. I tried it myself and got a similar result.
3. A list of the people who had to be in on it is massive. Obvious and proven.
And a question that you are running away from.
4. How did the columns bend inwards from an explosion at the impact point?!
Fake Moon Landings
in Space & Universe
Posted
Mythbusters used a light some distance away from the miniature setup. It was basically one light source as it must be, but far enough away so that the angle was close to parallel. There is not a light source in existence apart from the Sun that can evenly light massive areas of terrain whilst still maintaining single crisp shadows that follow parallel paths.
Find me another Apollo example with divergent shadows please. You may struggle....but if you do, remember this...
here's more on that example you gave...
http://www.moonhoaxdebunked.com/2017/05/55-why-arent-shadows-parallel.html