.jpg.8081a54a3b74a5d1823dfac966666137.jpg)
.jpg.594f0ef23288ec5ab04539b2f8a8dbd4.jpg)
Comedy Time
-
Posts
794 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Comedy Time
-
-
10 hours ago, FVCK BILLY G4TES said:
I'm just trying to add to the conversation with actual evidence mate. Don't get upset when you make a thread about a subject with multiple viewpoints and someone questions your narrative. It's childish.
I don't go looking for affirmation off other people, shows mental immaturity when you only speak to people with the same perspective as you and no one else. I like learning things and being proven wrong, it challenges the mind instead of just being in an echochamber of the same opinion. No one learns anything, people remain stupid.
I don't necessarily agree with you but this is the perfect attitude. If I see stuff that questions my own beliefs it always adds fuel to the fire. No planes, nuclear weapons and a cast of impossible extras, not so much.
-
1
-
-
45 minutes ago, Haunted Universe said:
Clear video evidence of metal columns evaporating into thin air-"made up".
China bought 50,000 tons of steel from the wreckage.
-
1
-
-
55 minutes ago, Haunted Universe said:
Made up? Its in videos clear as day.
Once again, stop shilling you hypocrite. You state the planes in every video are real but the steel columns blowing away in the wind are made up.
Very selective aren't you.
Stop calling me names. The steel fell downwards and out. The dust obviously confuses you
-
1
-
-
9 minutes ago, Q&A said:
Has anyone debunked Judy Woods book?
It's made up guff and there is nothing to debunk. Not one single iota of proof for any of it.
-
19 minutes ago, alexa said:
I'm not, it just that you afraid to face the truth.
Explain the truth in this......!!
Can you respond to this?
- You are standing on the equator and the Sun is directly overhead.
- According to the flat earth community it is 3000 miles away.
- In 6 hours time it is just about to set.
- You are in French Guiana and six hours later the Sun is directly above Ethiopia - verifiably so.
- Distance roughly between those is 6,300 miles.
Even on the totally unfeasible flat earth map (and proven so with aircraft routes) the distance is still about the same.
Now, I don't care whether you are good or crap with maths, ANYBODY can put figures into an automatic calculator. The Sun is a couple of degrees above the horizon.
http://www.cleavebooks.co.uk/scol/calrtri.htm
A= 2 (degrees)
a = 3000 (miles)
Now go off and put in the figures and read out what it says for b, that is the distance between the observer on French Guiana and where the Sun is above Ethiopia. I make it 85,900 miles.
Can you see the major problem here with your perception of reality. ALL of this is fact. NONE of it is gobbledygook.
-
56 minutes ago, alexa said:
I'm sorry but it's not, you've been had.
Why are you so afraid to answer the full post?
-
On 8/14/2020 at 7:08 AM, alexa said:
Buzz Aldrin (who had just been evacuated from Antarctica due to health concerns) had mysteriously and alarmingly tweeted a photograph of a mountain along with a chilling comment:
His words: “We are all in danger. It is evil itself.” and showed a photograph of a pyramid located at the South Pole as show here.
Next we have John Kerry in Antarctica firing some secret energy beam from there.
Then we have Russian Patriarch Kirill head of the Russion Orthodox Church who held a strange ritual in Antarctica under the direction of Pope Francis,
Something to do with the Ark of Gabriel. It’s referred to as “Gabriel’s Instructions To Muhammad” and is mentioned in conjunction with mass deaths in Saudi Arabia, Russian military operations, secret bases in Antarctica. What is the Ark of Gabriel? What ever it is It's dangerous!
I believe what is buried & chained up (as stated in the Bible) under this Pyramid in Antarctica are the Fallen Angels, and they are looking to somehow release them (as stated in Revelation) to cause havoc on earth.
How strange, you believe the words of a phoney website "news outlet" quoting a man who walked on the Moon and went into space. Selective much.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/buzz-aldrin-tweeted-we-are-all-in-danger-it-is-evil-itself/
-
2 hours ago, screamingeagle said:
The great debate was sparked by Professor Charles Hapgood when he published his theory on the Piri Reis map in his book Maps of the Ancient Sea Kings in 1965. He and a team of students at the University of New Hampshire studied the map and found many anomalies, such as the use of mercatorial projection and the inclusion of a pre-ice Antarctica.
Regarding this "great debate". Piri labels the area as ‘in ruins’, ‘very hot’ and ‘full of snakes’, a description that might apply to South America but couldn’t possibly be regarded as any kind of accurate representation of Antarctica.
http://www.badarchaeology.com/old-maps/the-piri-reis-map/
"In the Turkish legend detailing his sources, written over South America, Piri states “This section describes the way in which this map was executed. No such map existed in our time. Your humble servant is its author and brought it into being. It is based mainly on twenty charts and mappae mundi, one of which was drawn in the time of Alexander the Great, and is known to the Arabs as Caferiye. This map is the result of comparison with eight such Caferiye maps, one Arab map of India and China and also the map of the western land drawn by Columbus; such that this map of the seven seas is as accurate and reliable as the latter map of this region.” In his own words – which most Bad Archaeologists do not quote – Piri specifically denies that it is a copy of an ancient map and states that it is his own composition and, moreover, by claiming Columbus as the source for the map of the ‘western land’ (i.e. the Americas), he clearly implies that it was not present on the ancient Caferiye maps. Only Hapgood and his followers see value in this statement: Hapgood believed that Piri had miscombined several separate maps of South America and Antarctica. Only this way could he explain why Piri’s map is not an accurate depiction of these continents."
"Hapgood assumed that the original source maps, which he believed derived from an ancient survey of Antarctica at a time when it was free from ice, were extremely accurate. Because of this, he also assumed that any difference between the Piri Re‘is map and modern maps were the result of copying errors made by Piri. Starting from this position, it mattered little to Hapgood if he adjusted the scales between stretches of coastline, redrew ‘missing’ sections of coastline and altered the orientation of landmasses to ‘correct errors’ on Piri’s map to match the hypothesised source maps, a technique derived from Mallery. Hapgood found it necessary to redraw the map using four separate grids, two of which are parallel, but offset by a few degrees and drawn on different scales; a third has to be turned clockwise nearly 79 degrees from these two, while the fourth is turned counterclockwise almost 40 degrees and drawn on about half the scale of the main grid. Using this method, Hapgood identified five separate equators. To make matters worse, it is necessary to ignore the placenames that fill the map. The placenames given by Piri match those found on other maps from the early sixteenth century, many of which continue to be used to the present day."
-
5 minutes ago, alexa said:
Not real lol'z, two thousand face palms back to you.
That gif is real enough. I've seen Jupiter through a quality telescope at many different times and it has a different face each time. It is rotating. As is Mars, Venus and all the other planets.
If somebody nailed you to a telescope you would still deny all of this.
It is utterly pathetic that you avoid an enormous number of posts completely because you are afraid to be wrong. Now address the post properly.
Do you have an understanding of 100% verifiable reality - Can you respond to this?
- You are standing on the equator and the Sun is directly overhead.
- According to the flat earth community it is 3000 miles away.
- In 6 hours time it is just about to set.
- You are in French Guiana and six hours later the Sun is directly above Ethiopia - verifiably so.
- Distance roughly between those is 6,300 miles.
Even on the totally unfeasible flat earth map (and proven so with aircraft routes) the distance is still about the same.
Now, I don't care whether you are good or crap with maths, ANYBODY can put figures into an automatic calculator. The Sun is a couple of degrees above the horizon.
http://www.cleavebooks.co.uk/scol/calrtri.htm
A= 2 (degrees)
a = 3000 (miles)
Now go off and put in the figures and read out what it says for b, that is the distance between the observer on French Guiana and where the Sun is above Ethiopia. I make it 85,900 miles.
Can you see the major problem here with your perception of reality. ALL of this is fact. NONE of it is gobbledygook.
-
On 6/12/2020 at 3:18 PM, Beachcomber said:
Apparently some of those shapes glow red, very interesting subject to look into further..
Landing strip for Kohnen Station. Those are the landing lights.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kohnen_Station
-
1
-
-
43 minutes ago, alexa said:
Never seen one (Literally)
Really??? Your basis for denying the existence of trackable satellites, including the highly visible ISS is that you personally haven't seen one.
https://www.satflare.com/track.asp
Radio Hams all around the world connect with satellites routinely. Companies own their own one and use it for purpose.
Weather satellites, FFS sending real time pictures down continuously!
43 minutes ago, alexa said:These are not planets they are stars.
A thousand facepalms at that! Astronomers track, photograph and sequence things like this all the time.
43 minutes ago, alexa said:I agree it's not fake, I never said it was, it's just that space isn't what we think it is., there is a firmament then there is water above that, then the Heavens
It is exactly what WE think it is and those people view objects light years away in space. Please don't include yourself in the communal "we", your claim is proven nonsense.
43 minutes ago, alexa said:Neither am I saying that signals don't bounce of the moon, what I am saying is that space is not what we think it is
The signals travelling at measurable light speed take 2.5 seconds to return. Now does that confuse you in anyway? So you aren't denying EME.
Are you denying the speed of light?
43 minutes ago, alexa said:here is a picture depicting how I believe this space to be.
Ist We have the underworld 2nd We have the earth 3rd We have skies (our atmosphere) 4h We have the firmament Containing the stars, moon and the sun, which by the way rotates every 24 hours 5th We have the waters above 6th We have the gates of heaven, 7th We have the Heaven of Heavens (Gods throne, which by the way is an anagram of NORTH, the north star Polaris).
Complete gibberish.
43 minutes ago, alexa said:So what all this gobbledygook of equations is all about beats me, b/c it's so simple, God is not a God of confusion.
That is the problem. It isn't "gobbledygook" and "it beats" you. Your lack of understanding of mathematics and apparently quite a large portion, if not all of science is the problem.
Do you have an understanding of 100% verifiable reality - Can you respond to this?
- You are standing on the equator and the Sun is directly overhead.
- According to the flat earth community it is 3000 miles away.
- In 6 hours time it is just about to set.
- You are in French Guiana and six hours later the Sun is directly above Ethiopia - verifiably so.
- Distance roughly between those is 6,300 miles.
Even on the totally unfeasible flat earth map (and proven so with aircraft routes) the distance is still about the same.
Now, I don't care whether you are good or crap with maths, ANYBODY can put figures into an automatic calculator. The Sun is a couple of degrees above the horizon.
http://www.cleavebooks.co.uk/scol/calrtri.htm
A= 2 (degrees)
a = 3000 (miles)
Now go off and put in the figures and read out what it says for b, that is the distance between the observer on French Guiana and where the Sun is above Ethiopia. I make it 85,900 miles.
Can you see the major problem here with your perception of reality. ALL of this is fact. NONE of it is gobbledygook.
-
7 hours ago, alexa said:
Maybe you suffer from some sort of deficiency of Chromosome 8.
Now now, don't get direct and personal. I want to know how you can fail to understand very simple things.
How can you deny every single piece of space travel, satellites when you can see them, planets when you can see them rotating and the colossal, I mean colossal infrastructure of astronomy and cosmology that study the universe.
Nobody can genuinely call all that made up with honesty, it's about 10 levels above impossible for it all to be fake and fabricated.
Answer this directly please. Amateur radio hams perform EME bounces quite routinely within their radio clubs, on their own and all across the world. I've seen it done and it made me go, "hmmm let's go down the pub", but it does work.
https://rsgb.org/main/technical/space-satellites/moonbounce/
https://www.dxmaps.com/eme.html
http://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/K1JT/Moonbounce_at_W2PU.pdf
There are hundreds and hundreds of clubs doing this. Explain.
-
27 minutes ago, alexa said:
A God fearing believer
What kind of nasty god requires you to fear them!!
Earth is a planet within a solar system in a big universe. The big star is not close by and neither is the Moon. There is space and the world is not flat. If there's a god he's a bit of a swine.
Have you heard of Dunning Kruger?
-
5 minutes ago, Haunted Universe said:
In videos you see them turn to dust as they fall, including the last standing column tip over and simply blow away in the wind. What else apart from a nuke would make metal turn to dust.
Made up. None of the metal turns to dust. Nuclear bombs would send the building blasting apart many miles away. You'd hear it as well, just a tad. There would be nuclear fallout absolutely everywhere and all those caked in dust would have radiation poisoning.
-
1 hour ago, zArk said:
there were no planes.
There were 4 planes.
1 hour ago, zArk said:entirely cgi video (ala 2001 effects).
Nonsense.
1 hour ago, zArk said:there were no planes. entirely cgi video (ala 2001 effects). September Clues completely dissects all the videos and the agents 'on the ground'
Loose Change 1 and 2 poked into the plane landing at cleveland (loose change lads were no planers before aLEX jones offered them £1 mil for loose change edited) and two of the fights didnt even exist as per official records
1 hour ago, zArk said:September Clues completely dissects all the videos and the agents 'on the ground'
September Clues is the biggest pile of shite imaginable.
http://truthaction.org/debunkingseptemberclues.pdf
1 hour ago, zArk said:Loose Change 1 and 2 poked into the plane landing at cleveland
http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/
1 hour ago, zArk said:(loose change lads were no planers before aLEX jones offered them £1 mil for loose change edited)
No idea what you are even saying.
1 hour ago, zArk said:and two of the fights didnt even exist as per official records
Go on then, let's do this - SOURCE please. Please tell me it isn't the flight and landing logs - because of course the two planes they refer to didn't, you know, actually land!
-
3 hours ago, alexa said:
It could involve the whole world, this doesn't make space anymore real!
Has anyone ever told you how rather unimportant your opinion is? You remind me of King Canute up to his neck denying the tides. Oh run me by that one. Flat earth tides. As if
What manner of person systematically denies dozens and dozens of posts as a means to uphold their ludicrous claims?
-
On 9/16/2020 at 1:23 AM, amy G said:
It's really hard to explain this to people who seem to show little regard to reality but those rays aren't being viewed sideways on, they go back towards the Sun.
Besides.....EXPLAIN THIS! ie. where the crap is the Sun??
Would you like me to draw some rays for this?
-
-
On 9/16/2020 at 1:05 AM, amy G said:
What is this? Some sort of joke????
Artificial object Image Country Year Mass (lb) Mass (kg) Status Location Notes Luna 2 
Soviet Union
1959 860 390 Intentionally crashed 
29.1°N 0°E
[2] Luna 2
Third stage of Vostok rocket
Soviet Union
1959 20,100 9,100 Intentionally crashed 29.1°N 0°E
[3] Ranger 4 
United States
1962 730 331 Intentionally crashed 15.5°S 130.7°W
[4] Ranger 6 
United States
1964 840 381 Intentionally crashed 9.358°N 21.480°E
[5] Ranger 7
United States
1964 805 365 Intentionally crashed 10.63°S 20.60°W
[6] Luna 5 Soviet Union
1965 3,250 1,474 Crashed 8°N 23°W
[7] Luna 7 Soviet Union
1965 3,316 1,504 Crashed 9.8°N 47.8°W
[8] Luna 8 Soviet Union
1965 220 100 Crashed 9.1°N 63.3°W
[9] Ranger 8
United States
1965 809 367 Intentionally crashed 2.638°N 24.787°E
[10] Ranger 9
United States
1965 809 367 Intentionally crashed 12.828°S 2.387°W
[11] Luna 9 
Soviet Union
1966 220 100 Landed 7.08°N 64.37°W
[12] Luna 10 Soviet Union
1966 3,500 1,600 Crashed
(post-mission)Unknown[a] [13] Luna 11 Soviet Union
1966 3,620 1,640 Crashed Unknown[a] [14] Luna 12 Soviet Union
1966 3,680 1,670 Crashed Unknown[a] [15] Surveyor 1 
United States
1966 600 270 Landed 2.474°S 43.339°W
[16] Luna 13 Soviet Union
1966 3,700 1,700 Landed 18.87°N 62.05°W
[17] Lunar Orbiter 1 
United States
1966 851 386 Crashed
(post-mission)6.70°N 162°E
[18] Surveyor 2
United States
1966 644 292 Crashed 5.5°S 12°W
[19] Lunar Orbiter 2
United States
1966 849 385 Crashed
(post-mission)3.0°N 119°E
[20] Lunar Orbiter 3
United States
1966 851 386 Crashed
(post-mission)14.3°N 97.7°W
[21] Surveyor 3 
United States
1967 619 281 Landed 3.015°S 23.418°W
[22]
Lunar Orbiter 4
United States
1967
851
386
Crashed
(post-mission) Unknown[a] [23] Surveyor 4
United States
1967
624
283
Crashed
0.4°N 1.33°W
[24]
Explorer 35
United States
1967
229
104
Crashed
(post mission) Unknown[a] [25] Lunar Orbiter 5
United States
1967
851
386
Crashed
(post-mission)3°S 83°W
[26]
Surveyor 5
United States
1967
619
281
Landed
1.461°N 23.195°E
[27]
Surveyor 6
United States
1967
622
282
Landed
0.49°N 1.40°W
[28]
Surveyor 7
United States
1968
640
290
Landed
40.86°S 11.47°W
[29]
Luna 14
Soviet Union
1968
3,680
1,670
Crashed
Unknown[a]
[30]
Apollo 10
LM-4 Snoopy descent stage
United States
1969
4,874
2,211
Crashed
(post-mission) Unknown[a] [31] Apollo 11
LM-5 Eagle descent stage
United States
1969
4,484
2,034
Landed
0.6741°N 23.4730°E
[32]
Luna 15
Soviet Union
1969
5,992
2,718
Crashed
Unknown
[33]
Apollo 11
LM-5 Eagle ascent stage[c]
United States
1969
4,815
2,184
Crashed
(post-mission) Unknown [34] Apollo 12
LM-6 Intrepid descent stage
United States
1969
4,874
2,211
Landed
3.0124°S 23.4216°W
[35]
Apollo 12
LM-6 Intrepid ascent stage[c]
United States
1969
4,771
2,164
Crashed
(post-mission)3.94°S 21.20°W
[36]
Luna 16 descent stage[d]
Soviet Union
1970
3,040
1,380
Landed
0.68°S 56.3°E
[37]
Luna 17 and Lunokhod 1
Soviet Union
1970
12,300
5,600
Landed
38.28°N 35.0°W
[38]
Apollo 13
S-IVB (S-IVB-508)[39]
United States
1970
29,661
13,454
Intentionally crashed
2.75°S 27.86°W
[40]
Luna 18
Soviet Union
1971
4,140
1,880
Crashed
3.57°N 56.5°E
[41]
Luna 19
Soviet Union
1971
4,140
1,880
Crashed
Unknown[a]
[42]
Apollo 14
S-IVB (S-IVB-509)
United States
1971
30,900
14,016
Intentionally crashed
8.09°S 26.02°W
[43]
Apollo 14
LM-8 Antares descent stage
United States
1971
4,727
2,144
Landed
3.6453°S 17.4714°W
[44]
Apollo 14
LM-8 Antares ascent stage[c]
United States
1971
4,705
2,132
Crashed
(post-mission)3.42°S 19.67°W
[45]
Apollo 15
S-IVB (S-IVB-510)
United States
1971
30,944
14,036
Intentionally crashed
1.51°S 11.81°W
[46]
Apollo 15
LM-10 Falcon descent stage
United States
1971
6,193
2,809
Landed
26.1322°N 3.6339°E
[47]
Apollo 15
Lunar Roving Vehicle (LRV-1)
United States
1971
460
210
Landed
26.08°N 3.66°E
Apollo 15
LM-10 Falcon ascent stage[c]
United States
1971
4,700
2,132
Crashed
(post-mission)26.36°N 0.25°E
[48]
Apollo 15 subsatellite
United States
1971
79
36
Crashed
(post-mission) Unknown[a] [49] Luna 20 descent stage[d] Soviet Union
1972
<12,626
<5,727
Landed
3.57°N 56.5°E
[50]
Apollo 16
S-IVB (S-IVB-511)
United States
1972
30,869
14,002
Intentionally crashed
1.921°N 24.623°W
[51]
Apollo 16
LM-11 Orion descent stage
United States
1972
6,096
2,765
Landed
8.9730°S 15.5002°E
[52]
Apollo 16
Lunar Roving Vehicle (LRV-2)
United States
1972
460
210
Landed
8.97°S 15.51°E
Apollo 16
LM-11 Orion ascent stage[c]
United States
1972
4,713
2,138
Crashed
(post-mission) Unknown [53] Apollo 16 subsatellite
United States
1972
79
36
Crashed
(post-mission) Unknown[a] [54] Apollo 17
S-IVB (S-IVB-512)
United States
1972
30,780
13,960
Intentionally crashed
4.21°S 12.31°W
[55]
Apollo 17
LM-12 Challenger descent stage
United States
1972
6,169
2,798
Landed
20.1908°N 30.7717°E
[56]
Apollo 17
Lunar Roving Vehicle (LRV-3)
United States
1972
460
210
Landed
20.17°N 30.77°E
Apollo 17
LM-12 Challenger ascent stage[c]
United States
1972
4,740
2,150
Crashed
(post-mission)19.96°N 30.50°E
[57]
Luna 21 and Lunokhod 2[e]
Soviet Union
1973
10,690
4,850
Landed
25.85°N 30.45°E
[58]
Explorer 49 (RAE-B)
United States
1973
723
328
Crashed
Unknown[a]
[59]
Luna 22
Soviet Union
1974
8,800
4,000
Crashed
Unknown[a]
[60]
Luna 23
Soviet Union
1974
12,300
5,600
Landed
12.75°N 62.20°E
[61]
Luna 24 descent stage[d]
Soviet Union
1976
<12,787
<5,800
Landed
12.75°N 62.20°E
[62]
Hagoromo
Hiten[f]
Japan
1990
26
12
Crashed
(not confirmed) Unknown [63] Hiten
Japan
1993
315
143
Intentionally crashed
34.3°S 55.6°E
[64]
Lunar Prospector
United States
1998
278
126
Intentionally crashed
87.7°S 42.35°E
[65][66]
SMART-1
Various[g] 2006 677 307 Intentionally crashed
34.262°S 46.193°W
[67]
Moon Impact Probe (MIP)
Chandrayaan-1
India
2008
77
35
Intentionally crashed
89.76°S 39.40°W
[68][69][70]
SELENE Rstar (Okina)
Japan
2009
117
53
Crashed
28.213°N 159.033°W
[71][72][73]
Chang'e 1
China
2009
4,400
2,000
Intentionally crashed
1.50°S 52.36°E
[74][75][76]
SELENE (Kaguya) main orbiter
Japan
2009
4,374
1,984[74]
Intentionally crashed
65.5°S 80.5°E
[77][78][79]
LCROSS Shepherding Spacecraft
United States
2009
1,500
700
Intentionally crashed
84.729°S 49.36°W
[h][80][81]
LCROSS Centaur
United States
2009
5,000
2,270
Intentionally crashed
84.675°S 48.725°W
[82][83]
GRAIL
United States
2012
293
133
Crashed
(post-mission)75.62°N 26.63°W
[84]
Chang'e 3
Yutu rover China
2013
2,600
1,200
Operational[j]
44.12°N 19.51°W
[85][86][87]
LADEE
United States
2014
547
248
Intentionally crashed
10.8°N 91.6°W
Chang'e 4
Yutu-2 rover China
2019
2,600
1,200
Operational
45.5°S 177.6°E
Beresheet
Israel
2019
330
150
Crashed[88][89]
32.5956°N 19.3496°E
Longjiang-2
China
2019
104
47
Intentionally crashed[90]
16.6956°N 159.5170°E
[91]
Chandrayaan-2
Vikram lander
Pragyan rover
India
2019
3,243
1,471
Crashed[92]
70.8810°S 22.7840°E
[93]
Total estimated dry mass
421,109
191,012
But all faaaaaaake. God knows how many people just that would involve!
-
1
-
-
10 hours ago, Messenger said:
Sorry for not clarifying, Comedy Time, it wasn't paper files, but electronic data.
Offsite backups are standard. Besides burn it still works or better still if it hasn't been backed up. Delete file.
-
39 minutes ago, zArk said:
it should have the suns light shining around it creating a black/dark disc pre and post eclipse NOPE
this black/disc suddenly appears at the start of eclipse and disappears immediately at the end of eclipse YEP the suns rays are blocked.
this is illogical. the object must be viewable prior to the the crossing and after the crossing. Nope not illogical - your understanding is fairly inept.
the earth moves .2 degrees on its orbit around the sun during eclipse So does the Moon.
so the moon moves relative to the Sun slightly more than 0.2 degrees on a orbital path. In parallel with the Earth as one.
the observed effect is complete disappearance to appearance and the back to complete disappearance NOPE. The observed effect is a non reflective body blocking the Sun.
absolute nonsense. this is not demonstrable at all. Your opinion is the absolute nonsense bit.
lets not forget this manufactured fake picture It's a layered multiple image stacked shot. It's not fake.
just admit @Comedy Time this picture is fake to support your stance that the new moon is unseen until eclipse. It isn't fake and your position is real comedy time.
you cant have both YES you can.
oh you do want both. you want a moon that can be seen in eclipse but completely unseen before or after Which is exactly the case. You're seeing the Moon blocking the Sun's rays.
fs an angular change of 0.2 degrees to the sun ! So what!
I'm actually getting really bored with this absurd line of "debate". You are denying that which billions on this planet understand in simple detail.
-
46 minutes ago, Haunted Universe said:
Nah, I've said all I wanted to say, head-brick wall.... but will leave with this:
Ok, no problem. My questions are too difficult for you and the points about the numbers involved make it ludicrous.
46 minutes ago, Haunted Universe said:The Powers That Be are petrified of too many people waking up to their atrocities. That's why they pay the shills. It's an information war and its important to them because they are fully aware of the latent powers of humanity, especially as a collective consciousness. They know that if the awakening process is left unchecked there will be a revolution at some point and they will be overthrown.
Uhuh and of course you have copious amounts of proof for all that. Tell me something, is it feasible that being so terrified they might do the same thing to employ people to come up with obviously crazy ideas like nuclear bombs and no planes in an effort to tar them all with the same brush?
46 minutes ago, Haunted Universe said:All of the debating and otherwise nasty diatribe aside
Debating coming from me, "nasty diatribe" seems to be coming from you.
46 minutes ago, Haunted Universe said:you have much to learn about human consciousness and the evolutionary process. And there is nothing wrong with that.
Okie-dokie. Well thank you for your powerful insight. I did all that stuff in the 90s before you were born I suspect.
46 minutes ago, Haunted Universe said:In order to progress in knowledge and wisdom, someone has to sling the lunacy and nonsense to provide inspiration and motivation to those on the positive side to move forward. And that's your purpose.
Wow, "lunacy and nonsense" you say. Yet you are the one who is talking about no planes and nuclear bombs.
It isn't "my purpose" - allegations of being a paid shill are the domain of the person boxed in by powerful rebuttal.
46 minutes ago, Haunted Universe said:The good news is, human beings will absolutely awaken and take control of this world from the Dark Cabal of the Power Elite. Its not a question of if, but when.
Great, can't wait. Because the common person is so wise and not prone at all to a total "look after number one" mentality. We're generations away from that kind of enlightenment. You only have to look at the panic buying from the selfish horde when lock down was looming. People with 500 bog rolls in their garages. Yep. Can't wait.
-
2 minutes ago, Haunted Universe said:
Here you go again shilling for a corrupt piece of shit. Why should, or would I believe anything that comes out of his mouth? So he goes on tv and states trillions of dollars are missing and the next day, voila, its taken care of, and a series of events all too convenient take place. What a coincidence! The VERY next day.
Try and stay calm. I didn't say he wasn't a corrupt piece of shit and 911 didn't "take care of it". It was still there in the following months. It wasn't anything other than an accounting issue with multiple incompatible software programs.
I asked you why he would be daft enough to go on TV the day before.
2 minutes ago, Haunted Universe said:It's clear even to a lobotomized baboon you are willfully blind/ignorant of the secret occult economy, exponentially larger than the false front portrayed to the world, a mere pittance of the $Quintillions that are actually out there being used by the Power Elite "Private Club" behind the scenes. And yet you bang on and on about paper trails and it must be soooo impossible for so many people to be involved without whistle-blowers.
Try to stay calm. Just because I gave you quite damning summaries of how this whole thing would be ludicrously unfeasible, no need to get your nose out of joint. Do any of those people know how to rig buildings for explosives? Or were any of them involved in plane and body disposal.
You bang on about how so many people could keep a secret. Right.
“Three may keep a secret, if two of them are dead.”
― Benjamin Franklin, Poor Richard's Almanack2 minutes ago, Haunted Universe said:You must know many people are involved and it goes on all the time, so why ask such stupid questions?
YOU are the one making the claim. YOU must have some inkling of how many are involved. It is quite substantial. Only conspiracy theorists say things like this go on all the time. My questions are not stupid, you just cannot answer them.
2 minutes ago, Haunted Universe said:Much like I am pointing out how ludicrous the 'official' story is, and its many events. You can't even show concrete evidence of at least one plane on 9/11. 'Nada' as you say.
Yes I can. The plane parts, the visual evidence in countless videos, live tv and untold witness accounts. Occam's razor and not one single piece of counter evidence for the colossal number of things underlying this claim.
2 minutes ago, Haunted Universe said:And why are you convinced of this?
I'm not. It seems the more likely of all the explanations. Find me one that fits better and I'll consider it. Offer me a cast of thousands and a secret plot that is ridiculous and I won't.
-
Get a telescope and watch the planets spinning
Watch the ISS travel overhead.
Get a radio and lock into to some overhead satellites.
WHY ARE YOU IGNORING THINGS?
https://rsgb.org/main/technical/space-satellites/moonbounce/
"One of the unique characteristics of EME is that it is possible to hear and observe your own transmissions echoed back approximately 2.5 seconds later as the transmitted signal propagates from the earth to the moon, is reflected, and propagates back to the earth."
Anmateur radio hams all over the world do this. Are they all lying?
.jpg){kind=small}
.jpg)
Shill tactics
in Censorship & Freedom Of Speech
Posted
People who label others as shills do so as a means to avoid responding to their arguments. It is called an ad-hominem. The best way to close down an argument is to make a better one and refute the one being presented.