Jump to content

Comedy Time

Members
  • Posts

    794
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Comedy Time

  1. 45 minutes ago, oddsnsods said:

    I gave you NHS Covid monthly report & you give me what? You dont even quote your source.

     

     

    And you tell me you are the big I am on research. It's from the NHS website!

     

    And it kind of takes a gigantic dump on the stats you cherry pick.

     

    I'll address the rest of your foaming rant in the morning. Try and stay calm...less of the rude huh?

  2. 53 minutes ago, Basket Case said:


    lf onIy 20% of what's brought here is correct, it's a WORLD WIDE - NEW ORDER - PLANEDEMIC - plain and simple.
    A World Wide CRIME.

     

    Well no. I tend to think it's more an opportunistic thing to make money on the quiet and introduce draconian measures. The idea it was planned is ludicrous. If it was...ffs.....surely they would have made it far worse???

  3. 13 minutes ago, Basket Case said:

     

    He's failed nothing.
    What with you quoting SNOPES  - FFS - l have no time at all for any of your 'robust' debate.
    l'm surprised Odds is giving you any of his time.
    You might notice - (almost) nobody cares for what you have to say on this thread.
     

     

    As I said. This is hardly a place where anyone will disagree with any alternative theory! Thanks for chiming in though. How did you rate his insults? 

     

     

  4. On 10/16/2020 at 8:53 AM, Comedy Time said:

     

    Irony. A total off topic personal post. You seem unable to debate numerous things I am putting up...why is that?

     

    1. How did they make the plane sized holes go inwards? The columns bent inwards.

    2. What crazy world has the MASSIVE team involved creating video showing it doing "impossible" speeds.  Kinda dumb don't you think? Answer please.

     

     

    Now we are into the following territory:

    • Nobody must see the Tomahawk missile. Including air-traffic control.
    • A team must be quickly assembled to invisibly and very quickly sprinkle plane parts all over The Pentagon. Emergency services on route + news teams/helicopters.
    • The actual plane and all passengers must be disposed off.
    • The bodies must be burnt and mashed and a team/person to sprinkle the DNA quickly all over the crash site(s).
    • A team to launch the missile from somewhere.
    • A team to set charges to bust the internal walls and set aircraft fuel charges.
    • Somebody to set the charges to blow the light poles and the generator.
    • Somebody/a team to create the general shape of a plane in the wall with explosives

     

     

     

     

     

    @wideawake All your one liners and off topic posts and my one above ignored and dumped off the latest page! Why are so afraid to answer here?

  5. 3 hours ago, oddsnsods said:

    Bullshit. Covid has killed around 313 healthy people under the age of 60 & under 1439 total in hospitals...

    with a fraudulent inaccurate test.

     

    excess.jpg

     

    You are cherry picking and let me ask you another dead OBVIOUS question. If this is a big scam why the hell do they release charts saying "pre-existing conditions"?? Far simpler just to not mention it huh? Makes it far more scary then doesn't it.

     

    3 hours ago, oddsnsods said:

    The WHO is a terrorist organisation, funded & controlled mainly by Gates mafia. Its goal has always been to bring about a NWO. The Great Reset.

     

    Yeah whatever. You're using one conspiracy to prop up another and by doing so enabling the auto-dismiss of anything they present.  Oh, except where they admit dumb things that "give the game away" - like we haven't got any virus available.

     

    3 hours ago, oddsnsods said:

    What kind of a response is that?

    Why dont you recognise & have an issue with this Orwellian bullshit & attack of free speech & our liberties? They even censored the NY Post on twatter a few days ago, because it went against the commie narrative. Fakebook bans anyone talking about Covid1984 outside the offical narrative. They ban peoples paypal accounts who dont follow the far left woke agenda.

     

    I know you can read and make a good job of responding to my points, albeit missing glaring inconsistencies.....but how the hell can you fail to see where I typed....

     

    I don't agree with their policy. Ergo, I DO recognise all of that.

     

    3 hours ago, oddsnsods said:

    Anyone buying media as gospel is infected.

     

    That is a gas lighting term and I already told you I don't buy mainstream media as gospel. Accept what I say. Just as much I don't automatically buy conspiracy theories.

     

    3 hours ago, oddsnsods said:

    You post a nurse that supposedly is exposing the hoax?? I would think more critical, she is "ex" army, so is she really telling the truth or hyping the situation & telling half truths?

     

    And you post references to "nurses" one of which is selling books of all her exploits on AMAZON! 

     

    "Yeah, I went in and they were telling the truth" doesn't sell as well.

     

    3 hours ago, oddsnsods said:

    Conspiracy theorist is a gaslighting term.

     

    I apologise if it offended you.

     

    "You are a tinfoil septic" /  "you simpleton" /  "No dodge gimpy." /  "Youre infected mate big time." /  " its boring to fuck replying to an apologist" / "Jog on then fake news." /  "Bullshit boy" / your rant about me and Gareth Icke

     

    None of that is gaslighting huh? 

     

    3 hours ago, oddsnsods said:

    You are a tinfoil septic, who believes everything the media corpocracy & crappy fact checkers say, you demonstrated that with your Snopes post on Mason Wells. That didnt debunk anything.

     

     

    I am somebody who doesn't drop into any category. I analyse evidence and act on it. I don't dismiss it automatically - either mainstream or alternative. The snopes article didn't debunk anything for you, because you undoubtedly didn't even read it. But you expect me to soak up all the things you read and dismiss all the things you dismiss.

     

    3 hours ago, oddsnsods said:

    Bullshit boy you are clueless & im laughing at your ignorance on this thread.

     

    Your opinion is largely based on cherry picked articles and propped up with other conspiracies enabling you to dismiss things without even checking them. 

     

    3 hours ago, oddsnsods said:

    Thats all we ever do on this forum..like your Jewy nurse you posted. What her real agenda is..is she controlled ops.

    Like many nurses putting out info about hospital conditions. They get PAID to put out propaganda.🙈

     

    I wondered how long before the "joos dunnit" entered into the proceedings.  Or she was telling the truth and some of the nurses you put out have quieter regions. Overall I'm inclined to believe that the virus is being exaggerated....but it isn't fake! You dismiss everything that doesn't work in your pre-loaded model. 

     

    What steps have you taken to check on the possibility that some of YOUR info is propaganda designed to create this colossal distrust? 

     

     

    3 hours ago, oddsnsods said:

    Yes I posted some stats above, from the NHS clearly showing hospitals wernt full. Im constantly researching this topic. Youve done zero research & just run your mouth.

     

    I have never seen such an obvious case of confirmation bias. Your research begins and ends with everything that fits into your model. I'm not running my mouth, I am critiquing your content. Sorry of it bugs you, but these are valid points and you seem to be getting all pissy about it.

     

    3 hours ago, oddsnsods said:

    Brigade 77 psychological warfare army of trolls Along with Hasbara, pushing the offical narrative.

    In a democracy, funded by the tax payers.

     

    I'm not actually making any headway here am I. For about the 4th time...... WHERE ARE THEY on this thread? You raised them as this brigade of shills. So why aren't they on this thread? As I said - I know I'm not one and hell's bells, I only just popped in the other day.

     

    3 hours ago, oddsnsods said:

    Why does Bill Gates control world health & has predicted everything that is happening?

     

    A pandemic was as inevitable as Christmas. Obama spoke about one years ago. There are models for every eventuality for operational response planning.....not so much with this though. Gates is the major contributor to WHO, so he must get a say in running it I suppose. The problem is the Dr. Evil angle and that is a complete other conspiracy.

     

    3 hours ago, oddsnsods said:

    You quarantine the sick & vulnerable, you dont restrict the movement of healthy. That is tyranny & is precisely what has destroyed the economy. Only a complete retard could not see this from day one.

     

    I think that sounds a fairly reasonable course of action. So where do you quarantine them? A hospital?

     

    3 hours ago, oddsnsods said:

    SO fucking what? It was empty. That was his point. He was exposing FASCIST TYRANTS hes a fucking hero.

     

    No it was not! The area generally open to the public - A&E  - was closed, not the bloody hospital! And this nutter went into a QUARANTINED area.

     

    You just suggested it and he breached the quarantine guidelines issued for protection against catching and re-transmission of an official pandemic virus.....regardless of your conspiracy conclusions!

     

    3 hours ago, oddsnsods said:

    Only a filthy tyrant apologist would support sending him to prison.🤢

     

    And only a careless reader would have failed to notice me disagreeing with his prison sentence and saying he should have been fined. You though.....give him a pat on the back for his sterling work breaching a quarantined hospital!

     

    3 hours ago, oddsnsods said:

    As ive explained already to you, they did fake them & are still faking them with fraudulent death certificates & tests.

    I posted a video with Vallance in a press conference admitting this. You are the one dodging the points here.

     

    And once again you DELIBERATELY avoid the point I am making!!

     

    If they are faking these stats, why the bloody hell don't they make them better and why the hell did he come clean about things that cause all this uproar!

     

    Basically you are claiming all this subterfuge but the people doing it are too incompetent to back up their actions - that's bollocks.

     

    3 hours ago, oddsnsods said:

    This isnt the Comedytime septic show...start a thread on anything you have an issue with ive stated.

     It isn't the oddsnsods free to post anything he wants unchallenged thread either. Last time I checked this was a debate forum and I am taking your position to task, based on your dismissal of conflicting data. 

     

    Surely this gives you a chance to show that is not the case - you've failed to so far but nobody on your side cares. IT's also a massive point to inquire why nobody is taking any other post to task regardless of it source and content. My remark was accurate about this leaving the impression "there is this whole thread of data and info" and it all must be right. 

     

    My position if  you give a rat's arse(or not!) - At this moment I think the effect of the virus has thus far been horribly overstated, but the virus itself is certainly very real and has the potential to still kill quite a significant number of people over and above the norm.

  6. 20 minutes ago, wideawake said:

    Childish you are  😄

     

    Why would you do that? I mean post a useless off topic response and once more evading valid posts.

     

    A truth seeker woukd look at all evidence. Not so much here though.

  7. Whenever I see designer face masks and there are so many of them now, I wonder how many times they wear them between washes. Seems somewhat of a complete waste of time if they aren't disinfected every time they are used. You can guarantee that the vast majority of people wearing these stupid things do not do that. 

     

    And some of those regulation blue ones look decidedly worse for wear!

     

    Just that alone makes a mockery of this whole process. 

  8. 8 minutes ago, SimonTV said:

    Comedy Time still arguing with himself I see...

     

    How very off topic and personal. You see nothing but the things you want to see. You dismiss everything that contradicts what you believe.

     

    There is middle ground here, an exaggerated epidemic is a good possibility. A fake one is just bullshit.

  9. 26 minutes ago, wideawake said:

    You are kicking nothing here, all you are doing is create animosity in EVERY POST in all threads you "contribute" to.

    You make a fool of yourself and we all see it.

    Some people should be banned on here but yet they can't be as they are always on border line and yet not enough to justify a ban.

    I've seen other arrogant clowns like you and you don't impress me. Go back to your sandbox and come back when you mature.

     

     

    Wow, look at that total piece of ad hominem shite. You are addressing ME and not the post you are afraid to answer. I don't have arrogance with logical and honest responses, only sometimes with people equally arrogant in their defence and denial. You are the one being rude here, not me.

     

    26 minutes ago, wideawake said:

    You make a fool of yourself and we all see it.

     

    Appealing to the crowd. You aren't the spokesperson for the crowd. I imagine there are some genuine truth seekers who want to know how the bodies and planes were disposed off, how they created plane shaped holes with bleedin' missiles or no planes. I think genuine truth seekers will look at the analysis of the Pentagon footage and think oh, there IS a plane there when you pixel extraction of two frames. I have performed this myself long ago with the help of a Python programmer friend....it is accurate.

     

    You are afraid to be wrong, simple as that. There is no arrogance in finding flaws in theories and asking those who fail to see them why they cannot!!

     

    p.s. I see you've gone to a busier thread to seek "reinforcements"

  10. 3 minutes ago, Diesel said:

    Mythbusters replicated the photo under artificial light in a studio. They did not replicate it under the sun. I fail to see what they have proved. A single light source can produce divergent shadows but the sun produces parallel shadows. Your other example is better although the angle of the rock is acute.

     

    Mythbusters used a light some distance away from the miniature setup. It was basically one light source as it must be, but far enough away so that the angle was close to parallel. There is not a light source in existence apart from the Sun that can evenly light massive areas of terrain whilst still maintaining single crisp shadows that follow parallel paths.

     

    Find me another Apollo example with divergent shadows please. You may struggle....but if you do, remember this...

     

    images?q=tbn:ANd9GcR2ifHRV5GpopPpXlKwrTf

     

    here's more on that example you gave...

    http://www.moonhoaxdebunked.com/2017/05/55-why-arent-shadows-parallel.html

  11. 5 minutes ago, Newbiebrbr said:

    🥱🥱🥱 Keep defending the government. 

    I'm sure defending the government is going to give a leg up on the tower of social credits once that's here in the UK. 

     

    Wrong!! I am not defending the shitty government and your argument is like someone going nah nah na nah naaaah.

     

    I am pointing out discrepancies and poor methodology in these alternate claims. They aren't all wrong, far from it....try reading the flow of that exchange instead of knee jerk comments.

  12. 8 hours ago, wingwang said:

     

    Not really. You have pseudo isolation and then there's real isolation. Take your pick.

     

    False dichotomy. Koch's postulates are not gospel.

     

    Despite the importance of Koch’s postulates in the development of microbiology, they have severe limitations, which even Koch realized. For example, he believed that cholera and leprosy were caused by microbes, but could not fulfill all four postulates. Furthermore, Koch knew that the putative agent of cholera, Vibrio cholerae, could be isolated from both sick and healthy people, invalidating postulate #2.

     

    Many viruses do not cause illness in all infected individuals, a requirement of postulate #1. An example is poliovirus, which causes paralytic disease in about 1% of those infected. Further compromising postulate #1 is the fact that infection with the same virus may lead to markedly different diseases, while different viruses may cause the same disease. Postulates #2 and #3 cannot be fulfilled for viruses that do not replicate in cell culture, or for which a suitable animal model has not been identified.

  13. 16 hours ago, oddsnsods said:

    There are several different estimates on mortality rates.

     

     

    And you chose the inaccurate Facebook one. From your link, which is from the "evil" WHO...

    "The WHO believe Covid-19 kills 0.6 per cent of all patients or one in every 167. Although it sounds minimal, it means Covid-19 is six times deadlier than the flu and almost as twice as fatal as polio."

     

    If the methodology by which you dismiss counter evidence is "because it's from the mainstream" - then your method is just a little bit flawed.

     

    16 hours ago, oddsnsods said:

    Why does Google show fact checker sites when doing any search that may contradict the offical narrative?

    Why does Google have the authority to decide what is & what isnt truth? When most of these fact checker sites are financed by the very people who the claims are aimed against.

     

     

    Take it up with Google. I imagine they don't hold the same sites as you do in high esteem. I don't agree with their policy.

     

    16 hours ago, oddsnsods said:

    Its a wizard of Oz senario.. how else can you expose the psyop or break the spell, that everyone is under?

     

     

    Then don't label me as "infected" when I do the same. If you think I watch it and lap it up then you are mistaken.

     

    16 hours ago, oddsnsods said:

    Its trauma based mindcontrol to keep you in a state of fight or flight.

     

     

    I suppose there is an element of truth to that in general terms, but since the matter is deemed as "nothing to worry about" that is not valid here.

     

    16 hours ago, oddsnsods said:

    Thats all the news is 24/7 so you will easily summit to any demands.

     

    Yes, I can agree in theory with that. The news generally will dictate the reaction from the public at large.

     

    16 hours ago, oddsnsods said:

    Read between the lines, coz everything is censored yes thats a fact.

     

    I don't have a problem with reading between the lines or that some things are censored or shutdown. You weren't reading at all simply because it comes from the MSM. So effectively you only cherry pick things FROM the MSM that support your case and ignore things that don't.

     

    Please don't insult "anyone's" intelligence by saying that is not the case.

     

    16 hours ago, oddsnsods said:

    Im not going to take anything CNN puts out as legit as they put out countless amounts of proven bullshit. I gave you examples. Ive seen cases of nurses that have been debunked on this thread or the previous pre hack thread as actors or links to government. So excuse me if I cant be bothered to drag it all up again

     

     

    I've just spent a couple of hours searching this thread and there are examples of empty wards etc. But again you are cherry picking things that agree with you and labelling fake those that do not.

     

    16 hours ago, oddsnsods said:

    Snopes wanky fact check doesnt debunk nothing neither does your BBC fake news paedo apologist news corp.

    She could be real but doesnt mean shes not acting or shedding crocodile tears you simpleton.

     

     

    Righto, so Snopes is all wrong and so is the BBC because of "reasons".  She could be real huh and I am a "simpleton" for not realising she could be acting. But you aren't one for not realising that all your examples could be from people selling books and lying to get attention?

     

    https://www.simonandschuster.co.uk/books/Undercover-Epicenter-Nurse/Erin-Marie-Olszewski/9781510763678

     

    Cherry picking again.

     

    16 hours ago, oddsnsods said:

    You automatically take their words as truth because the fear mongering lying horror show media tells you its true.

     

    And YOU automatically take all the opposite as truth because you are a conspiracy theorist. I don't automatically take anything as truth, I assimilate data and form a logical opinion that fits what the data tells me. I modify that opinion as the data may or may not change.

     

    You should try that.

     

    16 hours ago, oddsnsods said:

    Your bullshit is tiring & cluttering up the thread.

     

     

    My "bullshit" is observational contradictions to what is being presented. None of you people are questioning a single thing being shown. What you are doing is lapping it all up into a "coronavirus" memory store then when quizzed about it, it becomes a huge thing because of "all" that evidence presented.

     

    I actually don't want to limit this thread at all, or disrupt it, but really!! WHY aren't any of you truth seekers questioning things being presented by your own side?

     

    Example... Empty hospital beds/ full beds and sobbing nurses. Former stored, latter is fake

     

    16 hours ago, oddsnsods said:

    Go read about Brigade77

     

     

    Which bit, the official one or the conspiracy "read between the lines" one? I asked where they are on this thread!

     

    16 hours ago, oddsnsods said:

    No dodge, Barack Obama doesnt control world Health.

    Again you haven't listened to any interview with BG or know anything  about the topic.

     

     

    It is a complete dodge. You quote an advisory script from the government employed buffoons but failed to answer this....

     

     I dare you to imagine just for a second that there IS a nasty disease out there and the public aren't taking it seriously. What would YOU do?

     

    16 hours ago, oddsnsods said:

    No dodge gimpy.

    This isnt meant to be North Korea.

     

    Yes it was, insult noted yet again. Regardless of the agreed draconian result. He didn't photograph what you said he did!!

     

    He actually photographed the sealed off section of A&E that was closed.

     

    16 hours ago, oddsnsods said:

    They did & they are still doing it.

    Theres tons of evidence also, thats been provided non stop for months now. You are insulting everyones intelligence.

     

    I cannot actually believe how you can so badly miss the point I am making!

     

    You claim the figures show x,y,z (cherry picking again of course). I said why don't they fake them, you know the ones that YOU think are incriminating. It would be a piece of cake for them to do so. You aren't the spokesperson for "everyones intelligence" sic.

     

     

    16 hours ago, oddsnsods said:

    Start a thread for any questions you have with me on this topic coz you clutter the thread with discussion, most are well past.

     

    No, I am highlighting inconsistencies with your approach, relevant to the topic. Don't flatter yourself concerning me "asking you questions", many are asked to show how your method is biased.

     

     

  14. 7 hours ago, Diesel said:

    Sure... 

    figure_a.jpg

     

     

    Agreed. Only a light source quite some distance produce parallel shadows ie. the sun. A studio light would produce divergence as shown in the above photo

     

    Ok, so all the "examples" on the internet where the rays appear to converge are caused by 1 or both of two things. Variation in the terrain, such as craters or small undulations or by the object itself not being vertical.

     

    Anyway, back to your example. It's perspective and variable terrain. The LM shadow is being cast in roughly the same direction as the undulating ground where the rocks are casting theirs.

     

    Harsh-Light-iPhone-Street-Photos-39.jpg

     

    Terrain and angle make the shadows change - very brief video:

     

     

    Seal the deal? Mythbusters analysed that very photo..

     

     

     

     

  15. 55 minutes ago, Diesel said:

    Please explain how the shadows in Apollo Landing Photos converge at different angles when compared to shadows under direct sunlight that run in parallel. 

     

    Certainly. Just one small request first...(after you provide a specific example)...

     

    Draw the light diagram from ANY light source that does this. Because nearfield light sources produce shadows that DIVERGE. Only when it gets quite some distance does the divergence angle come close to the parallel of the sun. There is NO studio single source light that illuminates such a vast area evenly.

  16. 14 minutes ago, FrankVitali said:

    Kindly stop linking to Snopes and other fact checkers. Its obvious they are bs and who funds them.

     

    Who me ? Use @userid command or quote. Kindly stop saying something is "obvious" when that only applies to people unable to address their content. Which fact checking website do you use? Or should we take alternative websites as written?

  17. 21 minutes ago, alexa said:

    I don't care if they say there were a thousand landings, it still wouldn't change the truth that we have never landed on the moon. 🌜

     

    You didn't know. And please, must I repeat myself? You and the truth are not best friends. You have been misled by the oldest deceit in human history.....religion. And now you are being mislead by some of the newest....tin-foil-hattery.

     

    Now present a piece of evidence or find another thread to dump your nonsense into?

     

    I've seen some cast iron world-ain't-flat posts totally ignored by you with no excuses, so if I offered you anything on this thread it would get the same result. I can prove beyond doubt that we landed on the Moon to a rational intelligent person, or somebody prepared to look at things objectively. Not you though, you have proven yourself unreachable by any debate.

  18. 16 minutes ago, Jode said:

    It doesnt matter about "beliefs" does it.

     

    Sure it does. If there are conflicting beliefs that don't work with each other, there is no common ground.

     

    16 minutes ago, Jode said:

    What matters is the evidence suggests lockdowns is a huge over reaction. I believe there is a virus doing the rounds - I'm not convinced it's a novel virus,

     

    Evidence suggests a second one is an over reaction. But evidence suggested the first one was way too late.

     

    16 minutes ago, Jode said:

    but I managed to be on this forum for months without attacking anyone else's beliefs and without having mine attacked....

     

     

    Yeah about that. Your extremely blinkered views are not seeing MY beliefs being attacked? Really? I'm not attacking beliefs, I am discussing what I believe to be problems supporting them.

     

    16 minutes ago, Jode said:

    Prehaps your level of discourse is the problem? Because you sound like a......

     

    Or perhaps people who have really strong beliefs resent them being challenged and will defend them at all costs. I don't have arrogance in general but sometimes the odd thing sneaks out in defiance. I am quite ok being arrogant on occasion, pretty much exclusively on subjects I fully understand though. Certainly not in this thread - I am totally open to the ideas being presented, just not nearly convinced. There are gaping holes in the theories, but also in the main narrative.

     

    p.s. that isn't the cue to drag this thread through another off topic series of posts aimed at poor old me.

     

  19. 2 hours ago, oddsnsods said:

    Mr Google full fact there are lots of different studies.

    Nothing like Fergusons estimates that got us in lockdown.

    Ferguson whos never got it right, yet government & media take his word as gospel.

     

    https://www.cebm.net/covid-19/global-covid-19-case-fatality-rates/

     

     

    Uhuh, so when you quote the bare minimum bullshit facebook story that's ok then? You are deliberately misrepresenting and doing the same as the people you criticise.

     

    2 hours ago, oddsnsods said:

    If you watch the news you are infected. Youre infected mate big time.

     

     

    Yet pretty much every picture you are posing comes from a conspiracy theorist watching the news. So you are watching the news but it doesn't count because they are cherry picking stuff and not watching all of it? Is that right?

     

    2 hours ago, oddsnsods said:

    Kids who have been tested positive (fraudulent test) for Covid without symptoms (illness) develop Kawsaki disease.

    Yet Kawaski UK at the time reported there were no more cases than usual..now changed their story to say Covid might trigger Kawasaki.

    The media virus shows children in hospital & parents crying.

    Now admit no child without serious illness has died.

    How can this be possible in a pandemic?? 

     

    Shit news reporting? As I said, from what is presented, nothing to worry about was the message. Why are you still blabbing on about this?

     

    2 hours ago, oddsnsods said:

    Alternative stuff is censored heavily, you cant find an alternative, you have to read between the lines..

    Loss of smell is a symptom for those infected with the media mind virus, so they cant smell the bullshit.

    Flu can linger for months. "long covid" is another buzzword for the media to feast on.

     

    Uhuh. Read between the lines. You ignored the content in that link. That's not reading between any lines.

     

    2 hours ago, oddsnsods said:

    Genuine CNN crisis actor..might even be a nurse.🙈

     

    Total conspiracy shit. 

     

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-43140105

    https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/american-three-terrorist-attacks/

     

    The nurse is real, you couldn't find any bullshit about her could you, so you rake up some other daft stuff.

    2 hours ago, oddsnsods said:

    Keep the public in a constant state of fear & send out Brigade77 army of shills for a psywar?🙈

    Thats the virus we are talking about, you get it now.👍

     

     

    Self supporting conspiracy. Yes I get it. Brigade of shills huh? Where are they all on this thread? I know I'm not one and there ain't an awful lot of people taking any of you lot to task!

     

    2 hours ago, oddsnsods said:

    Ask BillGates he knew the exact script from the start.

     

     

    So did Barack Obama. Inevitable is inevitable. This was always likely to happen. But nice dodge....

     

    That is a genuine question. 

     

    A man breaks into a hospital in the middle of a genuine pandemic, putting people's lives at risk...what would YOU do?

     

     

    2 hours ago, oddsnsods said:

    You think he should be locked up for 12 weeks for filming an empty hospital then, its boring to fuck replying to an apologist who isnt interested in reality on a conspiracy forum.

     

    You seem to mainly read what I type...so what went wrong here?

     

    What would YOU do? Then....

     

    "Tell him off and say stop being so naughty. Prison was a bit extreme, but a fine would have been about right."

     

    Nice dodge again. He photographed sealed off closed A&E areas.

     

    2 hours ago, oddsnsods said:

    You havent read my reply.

     

     

    And you just ignored MY stats. Serious question - try not to dodge:

     

    These people are according to you going to extraordinary lengths to fake a pandemic. Why didn't they fake the death stats? I mean you posted stuff about death certificates and attributing deaths to covid19, so how did all this come out and why didn't they just quietly fudge the death stats...not my ones....YOUR ones. There seems to be an awful lot of foul ups going on here. I say incompetence, you say fakery. There does exist some middle ground.

     

    2 hours ago, oddsnsods said:

    Jog on then fake news.

     

    No, don't be like that. I'm not jogging on - you've 3 times complained I didn't answer your post. Which one?

  20. 13 minutes ago, wideawake said:

    I already did answer so... pay attention

     

     

    No, really you didn't.

     

    Let's recap. You said your version of events explained everything that happened. I asked how the columns bent in and you said this....

     

    "I don't care how they bent. A missile can bend them inwards just as easy as a plane."

     

    Now excuse me for pointing it out but a) You don't know and B) missiles don't make plane shaped holes and it involves all the no plane shite to occur with the video footage.

     

    So try again...and we're only on item number one.

     

     

     

     

×
×
  • Create New...