Jump to content

Comedy Time

Members
  • Posts

    794
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Comedy Time

  1. ttps://www.washingtonpost.com/health/more-evidence-emerges-on-why-covid-19-is-so-much-worse-than-the-flu/2020/05/21/e7814588-9ba5-11ea-a2b3-5c3f2d1586df_story.html
  2. They talk about it a lot too... https://space-debris-conference.sdo.esoc.esa.int/ Since 1957, nearly 6000 space launches have led to an on-orbit population today of more than 26,000 tracked objects. The very recent years have shown a significant and unprecedented growth, primarily in small and commercial satellites in Low-Earth orbits. Large constellations are being deployed. Today, a total of about 2,800 objects are functional spacecraft. The remaining are space debris, i.e. objects which no longer serve any useful purpose. Most of the routinely tracked objects are fragments from about 550 break-ups, explosions, collisions, or anomalous events resulting in fragmentation of satellites or rocket bodies. In addition, there is evidence of a much larger population of debris that cannot be tracked operationally. An estimated number of 900,000 objects larger than 1 cm and 128 million objects larger than 1mm are expected to reside in earth orbits. Due to relative orbital velocity of up to 56,000 km/h, centimetre-sized debris can seriously damage or disable an operational spacecraft. Collisions with an object larger than 10 cm will lead to catastrophic breakups, releasing hazardous debris clouds of which some fragments can cause further catastrophic collisions that may lead to an unstable debris environment in some orbit regions (“Kessler syndrome”). Space debris mitigation measures, if properly implemented by spacecraft designers and missions operators, can curtail the growth rate of the space debris population. Active removal of large intact objects has been shown to be necessary to reverse the debris increase. In addition, it becomes important for each and every mission, whether a large constellation or a single 1U CubeSat, to quantify the impact it has on the space environment and other operators in order to achieve a sustainable space environment. To improve our understanding of the space debris environment, assess related risks, mitigate its growth, and control its stability, collaboration of and information sharing between a multitude of technical disciplines is key. This conference aims to contribute to this goal by gathering recognised experts in their fields.
  3. The Moon is 1/4 of a million miles away, as recorded by daily, multiple radio ham-geeks doing EME bounces. Satellites can be seen, as can the ISS and anyone with a radio and receiving dish can log into many of these satellites and receive data. Worldwide, millions of satellite dishes point up to the sky and receive TV signals. And you think all your silly photography proves that is all untrue??? The Kessler Effect is a very real thing, unlike many of the stuff you cling to.
  4. What about engaging with people who find flaws in your claims? Labelling them as "defenders of the system" is a neat way to avoid replying to them isn't it? A great piece of advice, that way the actual idea that everything you type must be correct, because there is no way that anything you typed against the mainstream is wrong now is there....and free speech and open discussion can;t possibly highlight this can it.
  5. You ignored it totally as you do with anything that tears your bogus claim to shreds. Source video for an image? Well here's some videos for you to ignore.... You seem to think that crepuscular rays only shine downwards!! https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=crepuscular+rays+above+the+sun&newwindow=1&safe=active&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjsr6PTz73sAhVxRBUIHV12AkcQ_AUoAXoECEAQAw&biw=1600&bih=757#imgrc=T3XTup4glVmWtM Probably up there in my top 10 ludicrous claims on planet Earth. @alexatry not to believe such an insane claim huh?
  6. They are "converging" and that is impossible with a studio light anyway. The terrain is uneven and perspective is in play.
  7. Dude, the NHS is only "accurate" when the stats "work" for the conspiracy! So why didn't YOU pull him up about his reference to the jooos doing it? Zionists would be more in keeping huh? Yeah sure it is. It's true I am in a thread full of virtually total opposition and there is some nasty crap going on throughout the world, but you being in the majority here isn't the winning hand. My rhetoric is no more childish than quite a large number or responses coming my way.
  8. << snipped off topic pissy image >> Hey great idea (even a moderator liked it), only the NHS stats you didn't cherry pick and then ignored say the virus isn't fake. So just that one set of stats proves you don't research or post things that go against your claims. How many people do you figure are in on this gigantic scam? Or are you going to pull the old compart-mental card? I find it ironic that there is even a conspiracy theory about the term conspiracy theory and that is nonsense as well. I have never used it personally as a derogatory term and still can't understand the problem with doing so. https://theconversation.com/theres-a-conspiracy-theory-that-the-cia-invented-the-term-conspiracy-theory-heres-why-132117 https://www.google.com/search?q="conspiracy theory"&tbm=bks&tbs=cdr:1,cd_min:1800,cd_max:1965&lr=lang_en Flu stats have dropped off have they? Eyes wide open dude...... https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/02/25/you-might-not-want-rely-trump-information-about-risk-coronavirus/ I despise corporations. They are completely out of control. I think you are locked into a self supporting scenario and are surprisingly getting all pissy about it being highlighted and questioned. My main issue with your posts surrounds you claiming this disease is fake. I don't give any level of flying fucks as to what nurse said this or that, because I KNOW people from my local hospital who dealt with this shit. But don't tell me, this one is fake is it? https://metro.co.uk/2020/09/07/second-wave-of-coronavirus-could-overwhelm-more-than-100-nhs-hospitals-13235218/ "However, it comes as a leaked NHS document revealed coronavirus could hit hospitals five times harder than in April, when an average of 16,000 beds were required for coronavirus patients per day." Hey, it's the daily fail. Don't tell me, all the stats are fake in this article! https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8746817/Matt-Hancock-warns-Covid-19-hospital-admissions-doubling-EIGHT-days.html Regarding your deaths from FLU in 2018, did you inquire as to how many had underlying health conditions? And I didn't see your response to how Sars-2 is just a tad more virulent. Some questions: 1. What crazy reason would they admit their test was inaccurate if the virus was hoaxed? 2. What crazy reason would they release stats that DIDN'T back up the fake virus? 3. What crazy reason would they soften the blow by mentioning underlying health conditions? 4. Why haven't Brigade77 infiltrated this thread? 5. What totally insane evil-overlord CDC admits they don't have any virus?
  9. And you tell me you are the big I am on research. It's from the NHS website! And it kind of takes a gigantic dump on the stats you cherry pick. I'll address the rest of your foaming rant in the morning. Try and stay calm...less of the rude huh?
  10. Yes I read all about that 25 years ago. They'll all be dead soon. Slow tiptoe.
  11. Well no. I tend to think it's more an opportunistic thing to make money on the quiet and introduce draconian measures. The idea it was planned is ludicrous. If it was...ffs.....surely they would have made it far worse???
  12. As I said. This is hardly a place where anyone will disagree with any alternative theory! Thanks for chiming in though. How did you rate his insults?
  13. Hahaha..... If ever there was someone who has no right commenting on what looks real!
  14. @wideawake All your one liners and off topic posts and my one above ignored and dumped off the latest page! Why are so afraid to answer here?
  15. Did you smell one of your own farts? How far away was the Sun when it went down, give or take 100,000 miles....just a guess will do. It's the same size as everywhere on the planet, any time of day, any time of year......
  16. The clue is in the words "it seems".... http://physicsbuzz.physicscentral.com/2017/08/perspective-why-dont-sunbeams-look.html Read that link and tell me if you think "it seems" that the Sun is in amongst a bunch of trees.
  17. You are cherry picking and let me ask you another dead OBVIOUS question. If this is a big scam why the hell do they release charts saying "pre-existing conditions"?? Far simpler just to not mention it huh? Makes it far more scary then doesn't it. Yeah whatever. You're using one conspiracy to prop up another and by doing so enabling the auto-dismiss of anything they present. Oh, except where they admit dumb things that "give the game away" - like we haven't got any virus available. I know you can read and make a good job of responding to my points, albeit missing glaring inconsistencies.....but how the hell can you fail to see where I typed.... I don't agree with their policy. Ergo, I DO recognise all of that. That is a gas lighting term and I already told you I don't buy mainstream media as gospel. Accept what I say. Just as much I don't automatically buy conspiracy theories. And you post references to "nurses" one of which is selling books of all her exploits on AMAZON! "Yeah, I went in and they were telling the truth" doesn't sell as well. I apologise if it offended you. "You are a tinfoil septic" / "you simpleton" / "No dodge gimpy." / "Youre infected mate big time." / " its boring to fuck replying to an apologist" / "Jog on then fake news." / "Bullshit boy" / your rant about me and Gareth Icke None of that is gaslighting huh? I am somebody who doesn't drop into any category. I analyse evidence and act on it. I don't dismiss it automatically - either mainstream or alternative. The snopes article didn't debunk anything for you, because you undoubtedly didn't even read it. But you expect me to soak up all the things you read and dismiss all the things you dismiss. Your opinion is largely based on cherry picked articles and propped up with other conspiracies enabling you to dismiss things without even checking them. I wondered how long before the "joos dunnit" entered into the proceedings. Or she was telling the truth and some of the nurses you put out have quieter regions. Overall I'm inclined to believe that the virus is being exaggerated....but it isn't fake! You dismiss everything that doesn't work in your pre-loaded model. What steps have you taken to check on the possibility that some of YOUR info is propaganda designed to create this colossal distrust? I have never seen such an obvious case of confirmation bias. Your research begins and ends with everything that fits into your model. I'm not running my mouth, I am critiquing your content. Sorry of it bugs you, but these are valid points and you seem to be getting all pissy about it. I'm not actually making any headway here am I. For about the 4th time...... WHERE ARE THEY on this thread? You raised them as this brigade of shills. So why aren't they on this thread? As I said - I know I'm not one and hell's bells, I only just popped in the other day. A pandemic was as inevitable as Christmas. Obama spoke about one years ago. There are models for every eventuality for operational response planning.....not so much with this though. Gates is the major contributor to WHO, so he must get a say in running it I suppose. The problem is the Dr. Evil angle and that is a complete other conspiracy. I think that sounds a fairly reasonable course of action. So where do you quarantine them? A hospital? No it was not! The area generally open to the public - A&E - was closed, not the bloody hospital! And this nutter went into a QUARANTINED area. You just suggested it and he breached the quarantine guidelines issued for protection against catching and re-transmission of an official pandemic virus.....regardless of your conspiracy conclusions! And only a careless reader would have failed to notice me disagreeing with his prison sentence and saying he should have been fined. You though.....give him a pat on the back for his sterling work breaching a quarantined hospital! And once again you DELIBERATELY avoid the point I am making!! If they are faking these stats, why the bloody hell don't they make them better and why the hell did he come clean about things that cause all this uproar! Basically you are claiming all this subterfuge but the people doing it are too incompetent to back up their actions - that's bollocks. It isn't the oddsnsods free to post anything he wants unchallenged thread either. Last time I checked this was a debate forum and I am taking your position to task, based on your dismissal of conflicting data. Surely this gives you a chance to show that is not the case - you've failed to so far but nobody on your side cares. IT's also a massive point to inquire why nobody is taking any other post to task regardless of it source and content. My remark was accurate about this leaving the impression "there is this whole thread of data and info" and it all must be right. My position if you give a rat's arse(or not!) - At this moment I think the effect of the virus has thus far been horribly overstated, but the virus itself is certainly very real and has the potential to still kill quite a significant number of people over and above the norm.
  18. Thanks for the correction - typo. The second statement is actually just daft.
  19. Why would you do that? I mean post a useless off topic response and once more evading valid posts. A truth seeker woukd look at all evidence. Not so much here though.
  20. Whenever I see designer face masks and there are so many of them now, I wonder how many times they wear them between washes. Seems somewhat of a complete waste of time if they aren't disinfected every time they are used. You can guarantee that the vast majority of people wearing these stupid things do not do that. And some of those regulation blue ones look decidedly worse for wear! Just that alone makes a mockery of this whole process.
  21. How very off topic and personal. You see nothing but the things you want to see. You dismiss everything that contradicts what you believe. There is middle ground here, an exaggerated epidemic is a good possibility. A fake one is just bullshit.
  22. Wow, look at that total piece of ad hominem shite. You are addressing ME and not the post you are afraid to answer. I don't have arrogance with logical and honest responses, only sometimes with people equally arrogant in their defence and denial. You are the one being rude here, not me. Appealing to the crowd. You aren't the spokesperson for the crowd. I imagine there are some genuine truth seekers who want to know how the bodies and planes were disposed off, how they created plane shaped holes with bleedin' missiles or no planes. I think genuine truth seekers will look at the analysis of the Pentagon footage and think oh, there IS a plane there when you pixel extraction of two frames. I have performed this myself long ago with the help of a Python programmer friend....it is accurate. You are afraid to be wrong, simple as that. There is no arrogance in finding flaws in theories and asking those who fail to see them why they cannot!! p.s. I see you've gone to a busier thread to seek "reinforcements"
×
×
  • Create New...