Comedy Time

Tedious. The guy is driven by nonsense memes and refuses to debate properly. Address the content being posted?

I actually agree with you here. Yes, amazing observation. You can't see through rock. What now, some daft youtube video where a bloke sees the Moon "in front" of clouds or "sees a star" in the shaded part of the Moon?

No they don't. You seem very easily led by youtube and hearsay? And that is your basis for claiming the Moon is faaaake????? https://www.ancient-symbols.com/symbols-directory/star-crescent.html The star and crescent symbol originated in Sumeria. The moon was associated with the god Sin and the star with the goddess Ishtar. The star was set beside the crescent moon. The star represents Venus and the crescent represents the moon. The star crescent symbolized power. The star crescent was also found in Greece where it was used to represent the moon goddesses, Luna and Diana. The crescent is pointed upward and the star is directly above the moon. It was a symbol of virginity and female chastity.

Bean and Cernan both DID swear on the Bible. This film maker stalked them for many months - Armstrong said to him - "Knowing you Mr. Sibrel, that Bible is probably fake". I could prove to you that Bart Sibrel is a really bad liar but you would probably ignore it.

You can't see through it. You can land on something solid and NASA didn't lie.

I hate it when people deliberately ignore clear and direct evidence and post silly pictures designed to inflame. Hey look at this conversation. That is 3 people in a row(one a moderator) deliberately trying to provoke me. If your theories are correct, what are you afraid of?

No, really? That's one way to analyse whether the alternative conspiracy theory stands up to scrutiny. It's where the acid test comes. Occam's razor, the more likely, the one with the most evidence. Or, Bic's razor, no evidence, endless and colossally varied speculation, ludicrously unfeasible. I call that the pursuit of truth. I always receive evasion. If the conspiracy stands up to scrutiny there should never be a problem answering the difficult questions - sadly the difficult questions never get answered. You are a moderator on this forum, your bias towards me is a disgrace! You have the audacity to claim that I have some "intentions" hidden behind my free speech? YOU are hiding behind your moderating status and using it exactly the same way as TPTB that most on this forum wish to bring down. Not all the time. This "pattern behaviour" is INVARIABLY preceded by provocation and evasion from those I engage. You nearly always ignore that, because you appear to think it justified. A perfect example straight above your comment.

Mollison can. This nonsense is so Sci-fi and crazy no one can believe it's true. FTFY. And have amassed the grand total of zero evidence to back it up. Meanwhile, his side businesses are churning over income like a cosmic cash cow. Ker-ching.

Sorry Alexa hope you did not get too offended. All this diversion and you still haven't answered the difficult post. BC you just altered my quote to a blank.

People who label others as shills do so as a means to avoid responding to their arguments. It is called an ad-hominem. The best way to close down an argument is to make a better one and refute the one being presented.

I don't necessarily agree with you but this is the perfect attitude. If I see stuff that questions my own beliefs it always adds fuel to the fire. No planes, nuclear weapons and a cast of impossible extras, not so much.

China bought 50,000 tons of steel from the wreckage.

Stop calling me names. The steel fell downwards and out. The dust obviously confuses you

It's made up guff and there is nothing to debunk. Not one single iota of proof for any of it.

Explain the truth in this......!! Can you respond to this? You are standing on the equator and the Sun is directly overhead. According to the flat earth community it is 3000 miles away. In 6 hours time it is just about to set. You are in French Guiana and six hours later the Sun is directly above Ethiopia - verifiably so. Distance roughly between those is 6,300 miles. Even on the totally unfeasible flat earth map (and proven so with aircraft routes) the distance is still about the same. Now, I don't care whether you are good or crap with maths, ANYBODY can put figures into an automatic calculator. The Sun is a couple of degrees above the horizon. http://www.cleavebooks.co.uk/scol/calrtri.htm A= 2 (degrees) a = 3000 (miles) Now go off and put in the figures and read out what it says for b, that is the distance between the observer on French Guiana and where the Sun is above Ethiopia. I make it 85,900 miles. Can you see the major problem here with your perception of reality. ALL of this is fact. NONE of it is gobbledygook.

Why are you so afraid to answer the full post?

How strange, you believe the words of a phoney website "news outlet" quoting a man who walked on the Moon and went into space. Selective much. https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/buzz-aldrin-tweeted-we-are-all-in-danger-it-is-evil-itself/

Regarding this "great debate". Piri labels the area as ‘in ruins’, ‘very hot’ and ‘full of snakes’, a description that might apply to South America but couldn’t possibly be regarded as any kind of accurate representation of Antarctica. http://www.badarchaeology.com/old-maps/the-piri-reis-map/ "In the Turkish legend detailing his sources, written over South America, Piri states “This section describes the way in which this map was executed. No such map existed in our time. Your humble servant is its author and brought it into being. It is based mainly on twenty charts and mappae mundi, one of which was drawn in the time of Alexander the Great, and is known to the Arabs as Caferiye. This map is the result of comparison with eight such Caferiye maps, one Arab map of India and China and also the map of the western land drawn by Columbus; such that this map of the seven seas is as accurate and reliable as the latter map of this region.” In his own words – which most Bad Archaeologists do not quote – Piri specifically denies that it is a copy of an ancient map and states that it is his own composition and, moreover, by claiming Columbus as the source for the map of the ‘western land’ (i.e. the Americas), he clearly implies that it was not present on the ancient Caferiye maps. Only Hapgood and his followers see value in this statement: Hapgood believed that Piri had miscombined several separate maps of South America and Antarctica. Only this way could he explain why Piri’s map is not an accurate depiction of these continents." "Hapgood assumed that the original source maps, which he believed derived from an ancient survey of Antarctica at a time when it was free from ice, were extremely accurate. Because of this, he also assumed that any difference between the Piri Re‘is map and modern maps were the result of copying errors made by Piri. Starting from this position, it mattered little to Hapgood if he adjusted the scales between stretches of coastline, redrew ‘missing’ sections of coastline and altered the orientation of landmasses to ‘correct errors’ on Piri’s map to match the hypothesised source maps, a technique derived from Mallery. Hapgood found it necessary to redraw the map using four separate grids, two of which are parallel, but offset by a few degrees and drawn on different scales; a third has to be turned clockwise nearly 79 degrees from these two, while the fourth is turned counterclockwise almost 40 degrees and drawn on about half the scale of the main grid. Using this method, Hapgood identified five separate equators. To make matters worse, it is necessary to ignore the placenames that fill the map. The placenames given by Piri match those found on other maps from the early sixteenth century, many of which continue to be used to the present day."

That gif is real enough. I've seen Jupiter through a quality telescope at many different times and it has a different face each time. It is rotating. As is Mars, Venus and all the other planets. If somebody nailed you to a telescope you would still deny all of this. It is utterly pathetic that you avoid an enormous number of posts completely because you are afraid to be wrong. Now address the post properly. Do you have an understanding of 100% verifiable reality - Can you respond to this? You are standing on the equator and the Sun is directly overhead. According to the flat earth community it is 3000 miles away. In 6 hours time it is just about to set. You are in French Guiana and six hours later the Sun is directly above Ethiopia - verifiably so. Distance roughly between those is 6,300 miles. Even on the totally unfeasible flat earth map (and proven so with aircraft routes) the distance is still about the same. Now, I don't care whether you are good or crap with maths, ANYBODY can put figures into an automatic calculator. The Sun is a couple of degrees above the horizon. http://www.cleavebooks.co.uk/scol/calrtri.htm A= 2 (degrees) a = 3000 (miles) Now go off and put in the figures and read out what it says for b, that is the distance between the observer on French Guiana and where the Sun is above Ethiopia. I make it 85,900 miles. Can you see the major problem here with your perception of reality. ALL of this is fact. NONE of it is gobbledygook.

Landing strip for Kohnen Station. Those are the landing lights. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kohnen_Station https://earth.google.com/web/search/75°00′07″S+0°04′00″E/@-75.00557035,0.0778677,2883.21424071a,2798.84920737d,35y,159.49340828h,44.84391337t,359.9999986r/data=CigiJgokCc7VpTgZ-TzAEQAm96gAuUXAGV_abIuROlNAIbPSp71Bd2TA

Really??? Your basis for denying the existence of trackable satellites, including the highly visible ISS is that you personally haven't seen one. https://www.satflare.com/track.asp Radio Hams all around the world connect with satellites routinely. Companies own their own one and use it for purpose. Weather satellites, FFS sending real time pictures down continuously! A thousand facepalms at that! Astronomers track, photograph and sequence things like this all the time. It is exactly what WE think it is and those people view objects light years away in space. Please don't include yourself in the communal "we", your claim is proven nonsense. The signals travelling at measurable light speed take 2.5 seconds to return. Now does that confuse you in anyway? So you aren't denying EME. Are you denying the speed of light? Complete gibberish. That is the problem. It isn't "gobbledygook" and "it beats" you. Your lack of understanding of mathematics and apparently quite a large portion, if not all of science is the problem. Do you have an understanding of 100% verifiable reality - Can you respond to this? You are standing on the equator and the Sun is directly overhead. According to the flat earth community it is 3000 miles away. In 6 hours time it is just about to set. You are in French Guiana and six hours later the Sun is directly above Ethiopia - verifiably so. Distance roughly between those is 6,300 miles. Even on the totally unfeasible flat earth map (and proven so with aircraft routes) the distance is still about the same. Now, I don't care whether you are good or crap with maths, ANYBODY can put figures into an automatic calculator. The Sun is a couple of degrees above the horizon. http://www.cleavebooks.co.uk/scol/calrtri.htm A= 2 (degrees) a = 3000 (miles) Now go off and put in the figures and read out what it says for b, that is the distance between the observer on French Guiana and where the Sun is above Ethiopia. I make it 85,900 miles. Can you see the major problem here with your perception of reality. ALL of this is fact. NONE of it is gobbledygook.

Now now, don't get direct and personal. I want to know how you can fail to understand very simple things. How can you deny every single piece of space travel, satellites when you can see them, planets when you can see them rotating and the colossal, I mean colossal infrastructure of astronomy and cosmology that study the universe. Nobody can genuinely call all that made up with honesty, it's about 10 levels above impossible for it all to be fake and fabricated. Answer this directly please. Amateur radio hams perform EME bounces quite routinely within their radio clubs, on their own and all across the world. I've seen it done and it made me go, "hmmm let's go down the pub", but it does work. https://rsgb.org/main/technical/space-satellites/moonbounce/ https://www.frars.co.uk/eme/ https://w6trw.com/tag/eme/ https://www.dxmaps.com/eme.html http://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/K1JT/Moonbounce_at_W2PU.pdf There are hundreds and hundreds of clubs doing this. Explain.

What kind of nasty god requires you to fear them!! Earth is a planet within a solar system in a big universe. The big star is not close by and neither is the Moon. There is space and the world is not flat. If there's a god he's a bit of a swine. Have you heard of Dunning Kruger?

Made up. None of the metal turns to dust. Nuclear bombs would send the building blasting apart many miles away. You'd hear it as well, just a tad. There would be nuclear fallout absolutely everywhere and all those caked in dust would have radiation poisoning.