Jump to content

Comedy Time

  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Comedy Time

  1. Gravity: Gravity completely debunks the flat earth all on its own.
  2. These are crepuscular rays that form similar to a train track in terms of their direction. They appear to cast a pyramid to the observer, just like the tracks. They recede into the distance, just like the track. HOWEVER - these ones below don't work with a flat earth at all. No daft assertion available with this one.... https://www.atoptics.co.uk/atoptics/anti1.htm#:~:text=Crepuscular rays appear to converge,sphere directly opposite the sun. Flat earthers cannot explain anti-crepuscular rays (not with anything from reality that is!).
  3. The flat earther casually shoots himself in the foot. Notice how the Sun is now about a quarter the size and in terms of its proximity to the artificial horizon it's about halfway from when it started. Notice also all the garbage he left up because he knows full well it never goes lower than the worktop. It is impossible. To really hammer this home, the sizes of the Sun projected onto his false horizon show the vanishing point on a flat Earth - looks to be on the small side. QED. The angular velocity of the Sun anywhere on Earth is measurably the same - 15 degrees of arc per hour. This is impossible on a flat Earth with the variable distances claimed from observer to the Sun.
  4. Two statements... The Sun, no matter what distance it is away from Earth, changes elevation all over the world during the day. It is simultaneously observed by half the Earth. The scenarios that follow are used to demonstrate speed variances. The height of the Sun for this purpose is not relevant..... Point one on the globe is where the Sun is directly above: Just as an example using 3000 miles and the Sun changing from 15 degrees/30 degrees/45 degrees from zenith(directly overhead) - that is 3 one hour movements everywhere on Earth - proven and irrefutable. http://www.cleavebooks.co.uk/scol/calrtri.htm Little a is 3000 Big A is 75 degrees - It has travelled 804 miles from zenith. So average 804 mph. Little a is 3000 Big A is 60 degrees - It has travelled 1730 miles from zenith. 1730-804 = 926. So average 926 mph now! Little a is 3000 Big A is 45 degrees - It has travelled 3000 miles from zenith. 3000-1730 = 1270. So average 1270 mph now! Point two simultaneoulsy on the globe is where the Sun is at 75 degrees to observer at its highest elevation: Little a is 3000 Big A is 60 degrees - It has travelled 1730 miles from zenith. It began 804 miles away from zenith. So average 926 mph. Little a is 3000 Big A is 45 degrees - It has travelled 3000 miles from zenith. 3000-1730 = 1270. So average 1270 mph now! Little a is 3000 Big A is 15 degrees - It has travelled 11,200 miles from zenith. 11200-3000 = 8200. So average 8200 mph average now! In hour 1 at two different points the Sun is travelling 804 mph and 926 mph at the same time!! In hour 2 at two different points the Sun is travelling 926 mph and 1270 mph at the same time!! In hour 3 at two different points the Sun is travelling 1270 mph and 8200 mph at the same time!! Now BASIC mathematics tells us the Sun MUST be covering that distance, so it is not apparent distance. These are actual figures.
  5. The closest possible distance the Sun can be to the Earth is a ridiculous Everest height. Computing the distance to the Sun on a flat earth when it is 0.001 degrees above the visual horizon and at a ludicrous and provably impossible distance of 5 miles away..... http://www.cleavebooks.co.uk/scol/calrtri.htm a= 5 miles A= 0.001 degrees Distance to object is 286,000 miles. https://www.omnicalculator.com/math/right-triangle-side-angle Distance to object 286,479 miles. https://www.calculator.net/right-triangle-calculator.html?av=5&alphav=0.001&alphaunit=d&bv=&betav=&betaunit=d&cv=&hv=&areav=+&perimeterv=&x=103&y=13 Distance to object 286,478.89754 miles. A bit high don't you think?
  6. Yeah yeah I hear many of you say, this forum needs another flat Earth thread like a hole in the head. I agree. This isn't one. This is a collection of responses that have been systematically buried and consistently ignored by people claiming the Earth is flat. To me, given the truly astonishing amount of evidence saying it is a sphere that is like believing in fairies in your living room.This thread targets those members who may be in a little doubt from some of the videos that get put up on youtube. But, in this case none of it gets buried because it's all on page 1. Here is a short and by no means concise list: The Sun sets without any size change and that is impossible in itself. The vanishing point is named thus! The Sun's motion through the sky is the same at every angle, location and time. It NEVER varies - 15 degrees of angular distance per hour. On any map of the flat earth, the two tropic circles HAVE to be different circumferences - the Sun HAS to increase speed for the larger one!! It provably does not differ in speed anywhere, any time. There has been not one iota of scientific measurement that corresponds to a flat earth, including sudden speed changes from the Sun. The Moon is inverted in the Southern Hemisphere. At a range of distances starting with the unfeasible Everest height for the Sun - the horizon is a ridiculous distance away. ANYONE can take an image through a quality telescope of Mars/Jupiter etc. and see them rotating. ANYONE can take an image through a filter and see the Sun rotating. Lunar eclipses occur where the Earth moves across the Sun's path to the Moon. There are so many problems with long haul flight distances on the common flat earth map - it is quite absurd. Australia on the regulation flat earth map is 5,000 miles across!! Star fields rotate in opposite directions by hemisphere. Gravity - there is no offer of a workable counter explanation. Sea tides. There is no mechanism where the Sun is able to illuminate half a disc. It is an absurd magic spotlight needed to do this. It is impossible for anything including the Sun and Moon to drop below eye level when they are always above it. There are thousands of orbiting satellites. Including the ISS. There are hundreds of thousands of images taken in space over the decades. There is live footage from the ISS. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zY4UJceEaVg / https://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/nasatv/iss_ustream.html Amongst the orbiting satellites are 24/7 weather satellites downloading realtime data. Satellite TV dishes receiving data from a point out in space. This list could go on for pages and pages. Some of the answers given by flat earthers to these are amongst the most absurd things written on the internet.
  7. @alexa Your post is spam - duplicate post requires a duplicate response... Face palming stuff. The astrolabe was designed for a spherical Earth. Similar to a sextant. An astrolabe consists of a disk, called the mater (mother), which is deep enough to hold one or more flat plates called tympans, or climates. A tympan is made for a specific latitude and is engraved with a stereographic projection of circles denoting azimuth and altitude and representing the portion of the celestial sphere above the local horizon. The rim of the mater is typically graduated into hours of time, degrees of arc, or both.
  8. This is trolling. You have been shown quite clearly that on a diving plane the absolute limit is 30 seconds for reasons that they don't want to crash the damn plane! You have been presented CONTINUOUS weightless footage from 1969 and 1973 that FAR exceeds this, is CLEARLY unedited and impossible to fake in the manner presented. Not least the size of the area on Skylab! I find this continued evasion and diversion over and over again something way beyond pathetic. Filmed in small chunks and edited together, you can actually see clear variances in motion between verse and chorus. On skylab, there is a continuous sequence of all astronauts spinning together. There are no cuts and no periods of gravity!
  9. That is what gives it rigidity, plus all those top sections too. And widen it to put all that stuff on the edges as well. Then find somebody daft enough to dive it like that over and over with all the vital cross members missing and the momentum it would generate.
  10. Not really going to change anything except the affordability of small sized satellite launches. There is constant demand for them, so a small lightweight rocket that can do it on the cheap is going to satisfy that market.
  11. @alexa Six full minutes of continuous weightlessness on board the ISS: If you can't tell the difference between that and the edited Hollywood stuff then you really cannot be reached. Fence sitters - ISS, in space.
  12. These are not REAL pictures of Venus, they are taken through a device not fit for purpose!! https://www.bing.com/images/search?view=detailV2&ccid=%2fuDiF5wk&id=352B705DC1B24453AA86C76CCD873C89B37471F9&thid=OIP._uDiF5wkhub0H9w8nVxILgHaFO&mediaurl=https%3a%2f%2fc2.staticflickr.com%2f2%2f1142%2f618108540_c4ea04b0e8_z.jpg%3fzz%3d1&exph=452&expw=640&q=telescope+pictures+of+venus&simid=608052697975555613&ck=50CBC777EC7A44D946309D26EFA5D5A1&selectedIndex=123&FORM=IRPRST&ajaxhist=0
  13. Tesla says SPACE is xxxxxxxxxx, and you say it doesn't exist. You have to be colossally confused not to see how that is a problem with you referencing him.
  14. OK, so he is talking about someething you deny. Space. Your continued inability to see this is quite baffling. Space exists. Planets rotate. Astronomers see this clearly. I've had the privilege of looking though a big telescope and seeing Jupiter and some of its moons. Here are a few pictures at various times: It is rotating - it is a real planet and you are just totally and provably wrong.
  15. The man you quoted says that space most definitely existed and here you are quoting him to support irrelevant and incorrect side issues!
  16. He was clever enough to know space wasn't faked! Is this some kind of trolling exercise for you? Do you not see the big problem here?
  17. His equation is a road map to determine the factors needed to work out if there is life out there. It is irrelevant what unknowns he plugged in to the formula, it was what NEEDED to be known to determine accuracy! LMAO at you and your limited understanding of Tesla! https://www.teslasociety.com/cosmos.htm Nikola Tesla built a laboratory in Colorado Springs, Colorado, in 1899, to experiment with high frequency electricity and other phenomena. In that laboratory he received and recorded on his sensitive instruments, cosmic radio waves. He announced that he received extraterrestrial radio signals. The scientific community in 1899 did not believe him, because knowledge of cosmic radio signals did not exist at that time. Nikola Tesla had a vision of radio communications with planets of the solar system. His Wardenclyffe magnifying transmitter had sufficient energy, voltage and frequency of oscillations to reach that goal. Tesla’s vision was the exploration of cosmos.
  18. Ahhh bless you don't quote understand the burden of proof do you? When somebody makes a brainless and ill thought out claim - as you have - THEY have the burden to prove it. You quote a piece of mathematics that has been fully explained. Now YOU must prove your useless claim.
  19. The kind of statement that makes a mockery of debate. A person says something that is so clueless that it becomes comedy time and tantamount to deliberate trolling. Overview: https://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/tools/Welcome.html A list of many geologists who have examined them - around 2000: https://www.lpi.usra.edu/publications/books/lunar_sourcebook/pdf/References.pdf Each one has produced numerous reports and analyses all available to be read, on numerous platforms. All photographed. It is a waste of time supplying any reports or images or personal accounts to somebody like you. Utter pish. There is not a shred of evidence that the Earth is flat, space is faaaaaake, Apollo was faaaaaake or that you know how to tie your own shoelaces. C. Give NASA money for space travel and generate thousands of subsidiary jobs and industries giving long term economical growth. D. Pay for all the flat earthers to go into space and conveniently forget to show them how to turn round!
  20. HEY NOBBY!!! IF YOU PAY ATTENTION YOU WILL SEE THIS DISCUSSED AND ANSWERED ABOUT 2 POSTS BACK! Don't worry though - it got ignored completely so you will be in "good" company.
  21. Oh ffs. They gave teeny weeny fragments and this was after Apollo 17 when They had banked 842lbs of samples. You cannot answer honestly can you? Of course they wouldn't it makes no bloody sense at all!
  22. No, read the data and watch the informative videos. You are just waving your arms in the air like a classic hoax believer. I've never come across one who is able to use logic and critical thinking. I dare you to answer some questions - hey at least be brave enough to answer them honestly in your head! 1. Would NASA give a fairly sizeable and unbelievably valuable moon rock to a complete nobody ex prime minister of the bleedin' Netherlands? 2. Would they then give a tiny fragment to the QUEEN of the same country? 3. All Goodwill Tour gifts had a display, were encased in resin, tiny fragments of one single rock and a gold embossed carved plaque - the piece of wood had none of that - seem right? 4. The US ambassador says HE gave the gift why is it so hard to believe him? 5. He says Drees had previously seen the rock in the State Department collection - why would he lie? 6. When the Museum took possession of it they assumed it was a Moon rock - why is that so out of the question. 7. NASA had nothing to do with any of it, what possible reason could they have for handing that out anyway!? "Tests" were where a geologist took one look at it and told them right away what it was! So geologists who took MANY looks (thousands of them) have no trouble with ANY Apollo sample.
  • Create New...