Jump to content

Comedy Time

Members
  • Posts

    794
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Comedy Time

  1. 2 hours ago, Reet Hard said:

    GCHQ careers section on their website.

     

    I was being flippant, but since you are playing the smart arse, post a link please.

     

      

    2 hours ago, Reet Hard said:

    Please define thing, thank you. 

     

    No. 

     

      

    2 hours ago, Reet Hard said:

    Does it depend how and where the explosive are packed in?

     

    You tell me! How exactly do you "pack" explosives in to SUCK a bloody support column inwards!

     

    No planers make all sorts of hoooohaaaa about how strong the columns are but are shit scared to explain how they went inwards!

     

      

     

  2. 1 hour ago, Reet Hard said:

    Irrelevant.

     

    I appear to have acquired a stalker.  He is going around the forum responding to all my quotes on various threads and posting pissy one liners.

     

    The use of newbie was most certainly relevant in the original context in which it was used. You interject into an exchange without bothering to check any of the posts around it. It is none of your business unless you are actually shit stirring. 

     

    1. He says this: "What do you mean plane parts? Man this guy needs to be banned from for forums for spreading misinfo "

    2. I said this: "I need to be banned for debating with a newbie raking up shit that has been covered already about a thousand times?"

    3. He then said this: "Don't call me a newbie, you don't know me - in fact I can guarantee I have been researching 9/11 for longer than you  I am 99% sure you are an agent."

    4. I said this: "You've made 13 posts dude. You're a newbie."

     

    HE had a comprehension problem as well.

  3. 2 hours ago, oz93666 said:

     

    Quiet ridiculous anyone can see the building is behind ... if you have evidence lets see the street maps   and the rest of it .

     

    Does "anyone" agree with oz???

     

    I can't find the debunk video....but when you actually use the proper damn video it all looks just a little bit different!

     

     

     

    LMAO.. .soooooo obvious it is in front. Holographic planes my arse.

  4. 3 minutes ago, alexa said:

    So according to you there is no dome or the heavens and space is absolute

     

     

    Yes that is correct....and it isn't just according to me. It's according to the entire population of this planet, minus a few very strange and sad people who have no idea about science, reality or how to work out how far fetched their beliefs are.

     

    3 minutes ago, alexa said:

    you'll be telling me next that star trek is absolutely true.🤣 

     

     

    No, that is a huffandpuff non sequitur. 

  5. Just now, oz93666 said:

     

    Quiet ridiculous anyone can see the building is behind ... if you have evidence lets see the street maps   and the rest of it .

     

    You aren't the spokesperson for "anybody" and the building is in front. I'll see if I can find it, but I can't remember how I stumbled on it the last time. If I can't I don't care. I don't tell lies, especially if YOU went off to verify this yourself you could prove it so.

     

    The salient question is, if I prove the building is in front, will you be brave enough to concede? Or will you do what you have always done in Apollo threads and run off.

    • Thanks 1
  6. 8 hours ago, FrankVitali said:

    ComedyTime's a shill 🙂

     

    Nope, but if such a job exists, can you tell me where to apply? Why do people with no answers always complain at the people asking the questions?

     

    See post above - I await your non-shill answer....because of course the idea there were no planes is not completely insane at all and doesn't make a mockery of the entire thing.

  7. 5 hours ago, Haunted Universe said:

    Just been banned from posting for 2/3 days for "abusive behavior"  - I smell controlled opposition, double standards, hypocrisy and mala fide.

     

    I suggest you do what I do, behave myself and just get on with debating.

     

    Now, explain to the forum how the "No-plane-perps" designed an explosion to coincide with their fake planes that managed to blow very strong support columns inwards. The kinetic energy from the plane explains it. Your turn.

     

  8. 5 hours ago, oz93666 said:

    Sh*t !!! Unbelievable !! Have a look at that video @Comedy Time and explain  ...the video is only 2 mins long ....

     

     

    Yeah, saw that one debunked a long time back. Those buildings are in FRONT of the target path. There was a video explaining it with street maps etc. 

     

    5 hours ago, oz93666 said:

    The error in the CGI (computer generated Imagery) is so gross it had to be intentionally put there 

     

    There is no error only with the ignorant "research" that goes into these daft videos.

     

    5 hours ago, oz93666 said:

    Just like some of the Apollo material

     

    Nope. Come on over to the only thread and debate like an honest person. I find it hilarious that you believe in Nazis and flying saucers on the Moon.

     

    5 hours ago, oz93666 said:

    They have such contempt for the public ,  believe we' re so stupid that they put that out , confident there will be no comeback .It's a joke to them , proves how well the mind control works .

     

    How odd.

     

  9. 6 hours ago, oz93666 said:

     

    Man ... You are funny Comedy Time ... A real laugh a minute ....

     

    In our last exchange you asked about time travel and I gave you plenty of links to back up the reality of time travel , overwhelming evidence the US government were doing primitive work on this many decades ago ... have you followed those links??? ... I didn't think so .

     

    That's not the way forward , you do have to make some sort of effort yourself  ... 

     

    So I'm not going to try to convince you there were no planes , it's all been gone over before . 

     

    Your time travel links were total shite, I read them. I'm glad you won't try to convince me of no planes, your pitiful attempts at Apollo showed what you are incapable of. My effort involves logic, reason, physics and I guffaw with derision at you suggesting it is me who has to make "some effort".

     

    Explain why you totally ignored this. And all the other no planers posting their daft "evidence"? This is the consequence of your collective claim and it is ludicrous.....

     

     

    No need to dispose of the real planes or passengers, sod about making dozens of films and faaaake plane sounds. No need to have teams of people sprinkling parts all around New York and Washington or burning the bodies, mangling them up and dropping body parts and DNA everywhere. No need for bullshit "crisis" actors or management teams to oversee all this. No cash to change hands for silence, no paper trails, recordings or farting around planning and coordinating. No chance of it messing up with eagle-eyed "truthers" noticing "things". No need to set any magic and IMPOSSIBLE inwards column pulling blasts on all buildings, or to deploy people to place all the impossible charges. No need to dump all that plane fuel at the explosion site or pieces of random non-plane wreckage.

     

  10. 10 hours ago, FrankVitali said:

    Watch this documentary September Clues https://www.bitchute.com/video/1s5HlZLRyXYD/

     

    Watch all of it, but specifically from 9.00minutes in, its amazing.

     

    Wow, September "clues" again? One could make the argument that the whole 911 movement has been deliberately derailed by no planers/ nuclear bombs and space weapons as opposed to those who think it may have been an inside job of some sort.

     

    Even 911 truthers hate this total crap:

    https://ignoranceisfutile.wordpress.com/2008/09/08/september-clues-busted-no-planes-debunking/

    http://www.truthaction.org/debunkingseptemberclues.pdf

     

  11. 1 hour ago, amy G said:

    Sorry, are you saying that it is expected that shaded moonlight would be warmer than direct moonlight?

     

    It's probably best if you just stop now. Before ......you could sneak your constant evasion and crazy claims under the radar. Now it is getting absurdly obvious.

     

    Come on scaredy  cat ....why is the moon upside down in Australia and why do you keep avoiding radio club EME activity. 

  12. 17 hours ago, amy G said:

    Well, why is it colder in direct moonlight than it is in the shade? I'm not sure if you even knew that that was fact, nor that the experiment has been replicated several times, but now you know.

     

    tenor.gif?itemid=9140688

     

    Every single thing this bloke posts is connected some daft conspiracy video or bonkers website.

     

    https://www.physicscentral.com/buzz/blog/index.cfm?postid=1590436706491009951

     

    Why is the Moon upside down in Australia?

     

    Why do you keep ignoring Earth-Moon-Earth radio bounces that take 2.5 light seconds to return?

    • Like 1
  13. 9 hours ago, oz93666 said:

    Perhaps the holographic tech presents a better image to those viewing from the ground. 

     

    Why do you keep making up completely insane claims? Show me an example of your magic technology in action, or some schematics of its design.

     

    It was planes - big heavy, fast. Four of them.

     

    No need to dispose of the real planes or passengers, sod about making dozens of films and faaaake plane sounds. No need to have teams of people sprinkling parts all around New York and Washington or burning the bodies, mangling them up and dropping body parts and DNA everywhere. No need for bullshit "crisis" actors or management teams to oversee all this. No cash to change hands for silence, no paper trails, recordings or farting around planning and coordinating. No chance of it messing up with eagle-eyed "truthers" noticing "things". No need to set any magic and IMPOSSIBLE inwards column pulling blasts on all buildings, or to deploy people to place all the impossible charges. No need to dump all that plane fuel at the explosion site or pieces of random non-plane wreckage.

     

    Occam had a razor, not a blunt fork made out of plastic!

  14. On 8/27/2020 at 6:51 PM, Grumpy Owl said:

     

    It's interesting watching this, because the theory demonstrated in these videos is something I've pondered about before in the past.

     

    I've been involved in the automotive aftermarket for many years, so I have an understanding of how vehicle electronics work.

     

    Engine rotation drives the alternator (generator), which powers the electrics in a vehicle as well as charging the vehicle battery. The vehicle battery is primarily used to 'start the engine' via the starter motor.

     

    If there was a way of replacing the car engine, with some kind of electric motor, you could then theoretically create a 'self-perpetuating' system, whereby the alternator output is used to power a motor which drives the alternator which then provides the output to drive the motor... you get the idea.

     

    Obviously the sticking point has always been the fact that you still need some power source to start the motor in the first place. As well as having some 'excess output' to be able to do anything useful with this setup.

     

    But otherwise thanks, you've shown my own ideas may not have been that crazy (at the time) after all.

     

     

    I hate to burst your bubble, but that video is a clever scam. The way it works is amazingly simple. It has a very heavy flywheel that is spun up to very high speed from the input by the man. It carries loads of stored energy and drives the system and takes feedback from its own output. However it slows down slowly but surely.....that's why the video has edits.

  15. 10 hours ago, zArk said:

    are there sensible experienced people who still believe in the crock of ++++ plane story?

     

    Yes, it's an exclusive club for the sensible. It involves logic, reasoning and proper analysis of all evidence. It involves understanding physics properly.

     

    10 hours ago, zArk said:

    even after the well publicised Norman Mineta story about Cheyney

     

    http://www.911myths.com/index.php?title=Norman_Mineta

     

    10 hours ago, zArk said:

    even after the infamous Bush in the school watching the plane crash before the video was on TV

     

    How does that prove the dumb no planes claim!?

     

    10 hours ago, zArk said:

    even after September Clues fairly well highlighted all the videos

     

    September Clues has had the living crap kicked out of it. That's where the sensible people come in with logic, critical thinking and physics.

     

    10 hours ago, zArk said:

    even after  only 2 of the 4 named flights existing

     

    You said that before and ignored my response. All 4 flights existed. In one traffic log, two of them were not noted because it was a log of LANDED planes!

     

    10 hours ago, zArk said:

    even after Flight 93 was seen landing Cleveland Hopkins Airport

     

    ....Sigh.....seek the truth and ye shall find it. Stick with no-plane crap and you never will.....

     

    http://www.911myths.com/html/93_landed_in_cleveland.html

     

    10 hours ago, zArk said:

    The videos are fake, 

     

    No they aren't. I see we are in to the bare assertion bullshit section.

     

    10 hours ago, zArk said:

    the people interviewed are agents for the narrative

     

    No they aren't.

     

    10 hours ago, zArk said:

    the people interviewed on the streets (like harley davidson man) are intel agents

     

    No they aren't.

     

    10 hours ago, zArk said:

     which would place all photographic and video evidence as suspect.

     

    Circular logic - that evidence is fine.

     

    10 hours ago, zArk said:

    Sitting analysing fake doctored footage and pictures has those repsonsible laughing their heads off.

     

    It's not fake or doctored and I can't imagine anyone laughing if a gang of such "astute" internet detectives are on their case:classic_rolleyes:

     

    10 hours ago, zArk said:

    Its a great wheeze for them and they love to argue the toss over the images because ... they made them deliberately

     

    If you say so.

     

    It was planes, four of them.

     

  16. 6 hours ago, wideawake said:

     

    Can you explain to me how a commercial plane can enter the WTC through steel columns and not lose ANY parts of the plane on the impact side?  i.e wings and/or wing tips for example.

    It goes right through the skyscraper like there was no obstacle encountered.

    Nah...

     

    It has colossal kinetic energy. What you should be asking yourself is does the edge of the building have enough resistant force to combat that kinetic energy? It does not by a long way.
     

  17. 54 minutes ago, mishy said:

     

    The picture of a plane halfway in the building with no bits falling off and the building still intact has been posted too many times to count. You should know, you've been trolling for years. But for some reason, as someone who screams that planes did it, you never use these images to prove your point. And we all know why. They're not real planes.

     

     

    The building is still intact with an inwards facing plane sized hole.

     

    You really are making lots of noise aren't you, but you haven't got a clue how this major major thing was even possible 

     

    Trolling you say? Yet you are the one making personal shit an art form. That's what people like you do when they are boxed in by the evidence 

     

    Inward columns made by a plane or impossible magic explosives.

  18. 1 hour ago, mishy said:

     

    No collison physics!

     

    It's just noise now when i read your posts

     

    Show me YOUR collision fizzix.  I showed kinetic energy physics. You are completely clueless about one of THE major points in this whole setup.

     

    It is so fundamental it should be top of your list. What world of batshit do vertical columns blast inwards from an explosion that MUST have come from inside the building.

     

    White noise from you would be a step up from buttrinse.

  19. 2 hours ago, oddsnsods said:

    Yes Boris Johnsons Grandfather was a Donmeh Sabbatean & is part of a Satanic cult, David Icke continually points out this cult..

     

    I suggest checking out my Twisted Sabbatean weirdos thread. You are obviously eyes wide shut.🙈

     

    Nope. My eyes read all about this some 25 years back. I bought it 100%.

     

    I just don't find it compelling anymore. This symbolism stuff. It is supposed to have some effect on the masses....yet how does it. Ive never met anyone who gives a crap about any of it. It's fine for you to point out all the shitty corruption because I don't doubt any of it. But the symbols? 666 to do something to people? Nahhh.

     

     

×
×
  • Create New...