Jump to content

Comedy Time

Members
  • Posts

    794
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Comedy Time

  1. The forces involved are identical....BUT....you cannot sum the kinetic engine of the building in the same way and use it to determine damage. It is a much more complicated sum. I wasn't actually expecting you to post an answer to my request for quantifiable mathematical analysis, so there you go.
  2. I was being flippant, but since you are playing the smart arse, post a link please. No. You tell me! How exactly do you "pack" explosives in to SUCK a bloody support column inwards! No planers make all sorts of hoooohaaaa about how strong the columns are but are shit scared to explain how they went inwards!
  3. https://rense.com/general64/wth.htm
  4. I appear to have acquired a stalker. He is going around the forum responding to all my quotes on various threads and posting pissy one liners. The use of newbie was most certainly relevant in the original context in which it was used. You interject into an exchange without bothering to check any of the posts around it. It is none of your business unless you are actually shit stirring. 1. He says this: "What do you mean plane parts? Man this guy needs to be banned from for forums for spreading misinfo " 2. I said this: "I need to be banned for debating with a newbie raking up shit that has been covered already about a thousand times?" 3. He then said this: "Don't call me a newbie, you don't know me - in fact I can guarantee I have been researching 9/11 for longer than you I am 99% sure you are an agent." 4. I said this: "You've made 13 posts dude. You're a newbie." HE had a comprehension problem as well.
  5. Does "anyone" agree with oz??? I can't find the debunk video....but when you actually use the proper damn video it all looks just a little bit different! LMAO.. .soooooo obvious it is in front. Holographic planes my arse.
  6. I actually don't give any semblance of s shite who else believes in your crazy crap.
  7. Yes that is correct....and it isn't just according to me. It's according to the entire population of this planet, minus a few very strange and sad people who have no idea about science, reality or how to work out how far fetched their beliefs are. No, that is a huffandpuff non sequitur.
  8. You aren't the spokesperson for "anybody" and the building is in front. I'll see if I can find it, but I can't remember how I stumbled on it the last time. If I can't I don't care. I don't tell lies, especially if YOU went off to verify this yourself you could prove it so. The salient question is, if I prove the building is in front, will you be brave enough to concede? Or will you do what you have always done in Apollo threads and run off.
  9. Nope, but if such a job exists, can you tell me where to apply? Why do people with no answers always complain at the people asking the questions? See post above - I await your non-shill answer....because of course the idea there were no planes is not completely insane at all and doesn't make a mockery of the entire thing.
  10. I suggest you do what I do, behave myself and just get on with debating. Now, explain to the forum how the "No-plane-perps" designed an explosion to coincide with their fake planes that managed to blow very strong support columns inwards. The kinetic energy from the plane explains it. Your turn.
  11. Went to bed actually. This was asked before the forum hack and the answer is the same result. Listen, do you have any actual mathematical analysis to support any of this? Because at the moment it's just you doing Ralph from the Simpsons.
  12. Yeah, saw that one debunked a long time back. Those buildings are in FRONT of the target path. There was a video explaining it with street maps etc. There is no error only with the ignorant "research" that goes into these daft videos. Nope. Come on over to the only thread and debate like an honest person. I find it hilarious that you believe in Nazis and flying saucers on the Moon. How odd.
  13. Your time travel links were total shite, I read them. I'm glad you won't try to convince me of no planes, your pitiful attempts at Apollo showed what you are incapable of. My effort involves logic, reason, physics and I guffaw with derision at you suggesting it is me who has to make "some effort". Explain why you totally ignored this. And all the other no planers posting their daft "evidence"? This is the consequence of your collective claim and it is ludicrous..... No need to dispose of the real planes or passengers, sod about making dozens of films and faaaake plane sounds. No need to have teams of people sprinkling parts all around New York and Washington or burning the bodies, mangling them up and dropping body parts and DNA everywhere. No need for bullshit "crisis" actors or management teams to oversee all this. No cash to change hands for silence, no paper trails, recordings or farting around planning and coordinating. No chance of it messing up with eagle-eyed "truthers" noticing "things". No need to set any magic and IMPOSSIBLE inwards column pulling blasts on all buildings, or to deploy people to place all the impossible charges. No need to dump all that plane fuel at the explosion site or pieces of random non-plane wreckage.
  14. Wow, September "clues" again? One could make the argument that the whole 911 movement has been deliberately derailed by no planers/ nuclear bombs and space weapons as opposed to those who think it may have been an inside job of some sort. Even 911 truthers hate this total crap: https://ignoranceisfutile.wordpress.com/2008/09/08/september-clues-busted-no-planes-debunking/ http://www.truthaction.org/debunkingseptemberclues.pdf
  15. Not relevant. They carried sufficient kinetic energy to break them. The quantity of fuel in them aided in making them more solid.
  16. It's probably best if you just stop now. Before ......you could sneak your constant evasion and crazy claims under the radar. Now it is getting absurdly obvious. Come on scaredy cat ....why is the moon upside down in Australia and why do you keep avoiding radio club EME activity.
  17. Every single thing this bloke posts is connected some daft conspiracy video or bonkers website. https://www.physicscentral.com/buzz/blog/index.cfm?postid=1590436706491009951 Why is the Moon upside down in Australia? Why do you keep ignoring Earth-Moon-Earth radio bounces that take 2.5 light seconds to return?
  18. Why do you keep making up completely insane claims? Show me an example of your magic technology in action, or some schematics of its design. It was planes - big heavy, fast. Four of them. No need to dispose of the real planes or passengers, sod about making dozens of films and faaaake plane sounds. No need to have teams of people sprinkling parts all around New York and Washington or burning the bodies, mangling them up and dropping body parts and DNA everywhere. No need for bullshit "crisis" actors or management teams to oversee all this. No cash to change hands for silence, no paper trails, recordings or farting around planning and coordinating. No chance of it messing up with eagle-eyed "truthers" noticing "things". No need to set any magic and IMPOSSIBLE inwards column pulling blasts on all buildings, or to deploy people to place all the impossible charges. No need to dump all that plane fuel at the explosion site or pieces of random non-plane wreckage. Occam had a razor, not a blunt fork made out of plastic!
  19. I hate to burst your bubble, but that video is a clever scam. The way it works is amazingly simple. It has a very heavy flywheel that is spun up to very high speed from the input by the man. It carries loads of stored energy and drives the system and takes feedback from its own output. However it slows down slowly but surely.....that's why the video has edits.
  20. Yes, it's an exclusive club for the sensible. It involves logic, reasoning and proper analysis of all evidence. It involves understanding physics properly. http://www.911myths.com/index.php?title=Norman_Mineta How does that prove the dumb no planes claim!? September Clues has had the living crap kicked out of it. That's where the sensible people come in with logic, critical thinking and physics. You said that before and ignored my response. All 4 flights existed. In one traffic log, two of them were not noted because it was a log of LANDED planes! ....Sigh.....seek the truth and ye shall find it. Stick with no-plane crap and you never will..... http://www.911myths.com/html/93_landed_in_cleveland.html No they aren't. I see we are in to the bare assertion bullshit section. No they aren't. No they aren't. Circular logic - that evidence is fine. It's not fake or doctored and I can't imagine anyone laughing if a gang of such "astute" internet detectives are on their case If you say so. It was planes, four of them.
  21. It has colossal kinetic energy. What you should be asking yourself is does the edge of the building have enough resistant force to combat that kinetic energy? It does not by a long way.
  22. The building is still intact with an inwards facing plane sized hole. You really are making lots of noise aren't you, but you haven't got a clue how this major major thing was even possible Trolling you say? Yet you are the one making personal shit an art form. That's what people like you do when they are boxed in by the evidence Inward columns made by a plane or impossible magic explosives.
  23. Show me YOUR collision fizzix. I showed kinetic energy physics. You are completely clueless about one of THE major points in this whole setup. It is so fundamental it should be top of your list. What world of batshit do vertical columns blast inwards from an explosion that MUST have come from inside the building. White noise from you would be a step up from buttrinse.
  24. Nope. My eyes read all about this some 25 years back. I bought it 100%. I just don't find it compelling anymore. This symbolism stuff. It is supposed to have some effect on the masses....yet how does it. Ive never met anyone who gives a crap about any of it. It's fine for you to point out all the shitty corruption because I don't doubt any of it. But the symbols? 666 to do something to people? Nahhh.
  25. Next I'll be telling you that spying through a keyhole needs one eye. And Dr. Hilary is part of the "onslaught of 666'ery" on a poor unsuspecting population to do something-or-other because of whatchamacallit?
×
×
  • Create New...