.jpg.9e99ff3727a52b51047711c51028c847.jpg)
.jpg.e0850aef2895b3e8c638a24da2b8f92e.jpg)
Comedy Time
-
Posts
794 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Comedy Time
-
-
6 hours ago, - TZC - said:
By CT logic, the explosion will become longer away from impact on the videos the more they are downloaded and uploaded. Because of compression and loss of clarity.. Eventually if shared enough the video will end before you get to see the explosion.
Let's have some more comedy time now, trying to wiggle out of what I posted about the video compression lol
Firstly I don't ever need to wriggle out of anything. Honest and convincing debate always works with me. Secondly what specifically are you talking about? Thirdly, are you a no planer because there are about a dozen things your team are evading.
-
22 minutes ago, lake said:
How about Dr. Margareta Griesz Brisson or Dr. Dolores Cahill?
Can you discredit them? (before they refuted the current main stream agenda they were very well thought of)
How many should I give to you??
They aren't completely unqualified like a frickin' chiropractor!!
First one anti-mask? Second one says immunity after 10 days from a real covid19 virus?
What's to discredit? How many shall I give YOU?
22 minutes ago, lake said:What would show it to you which is not main stream??? I guess nothing will!
I have so very many doctors stating that this is bullshit but I see that you will not allow the thoughts into your mind.
That is a shame to me.
I guess no number of doctors taking the opposite stance will convince you! Many things you have stated on other topics are "a shame" to me.
22 minutes ago, lake said:Without the massive promotion via the media, there is no pandemic.
Ok. So the bloke standing on the railway track with headphones on and a blindfold....to him there is no passenger train bearing down on him at 100mph.
22 minutes ago, lake said:It is a marketed promotion of a twisted normal flu. Nothing more but as Kill Gates stated:
"The next one WILL get their attention"
and they will love him for it as they die.
Yes, but consider this. A real pandemic would do just that and it was as inevitable as Christmas.
-
17 minutes ago, Morpheus said:
@Comedy Time please change your user name. Clearly humour is not one of your strong points. Clearly I'm exaggerating to make a humorous remark and clearly what I have said has gone over your head.
Just answer the reply. I get quite a few remarks that are sarcastic and worse, so forgive me for not guffawing at your attempt at humour.
-
16 minutes ago, bamboozooka said:
are you already standing in the queue for the bill gates vaccine?
Do a search on this forum for "pisswater".
-
2 minutes ago, bamboozooka said:
i can see where this is going.
bill gates c++ programmer
elon musk c++ programmer
Can you really? If I posted a report by a psychiatrist who was commenting on viruses would that work for you?
-
Just now, Morpheus said:
it amuses me that half of the DI forum are attempting to convince 1 person that something isn't right here. You couldn't make it up.
Oh come on. The guests. Think of the guests. It's hardly half of you and what is it you are trying to convince me of?
Some of you think it's caused by 5G, some of you think it is completely faked and some think it is real but an opportunistic moment to usher in draconian measures.
-
2 minutes ago, Seeker said:
Kary Mullis dying in August 2019 is another ‘coincidence’ too
Hardly, he developed the test you are all claiming is crap, so he had no chance to defend himself. He was 75, so hardly a bad innings.
-
2 minutes ago, Grumpy Owl said:
Well that is indeed possible, but I just think it is highly suspect that this 'simulation' was carried out in October 2019, which then became a 'reality' just a couple of months later.
Just a coincidence, nothing to see here...
Yeah, so why publish details about it?
-
Just now, Seeker said:
@Comedy Time I’m only giving you the satisfaction of this one reply. Here is a video from Dr Tim O’Shae who explains why the tests do not work
Thank you for your repeated unsatisfying reply. May I ask you for one more reply? Please?
He is a doctor. In what field is he in?
-
9 minutes ago, Grumpy Owl said:
@Comedy Time are you aware of 'Event 201' from last year?
You quote from the Johns Hopkins Center, which was one of the organisers of this 'tabletop simulation' that played out practically the same scenario that has played out over the last few months.
Other organisers included the World Economic Forum and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/event201/about
Is it not beyond the realms of possibility that the Johns Hopkins Center is manipulating current Covid-19 stats and data?
The World Economic Forum is pushing their "Great Reset" agenda as a 'response' to the Covid-19 'pandemic'.
And of course the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation as well as pushing for vaccines, also have their financial fingers within the World Health Organisation, as well as media outlets and major universities/research centres across the globe.
This is why MSM is not to be trusted, and why they never/rarely question anything, because they are just parroting the same 'official narrative' as they are being instructed to.
None of that is out of the question. However, a pandemic has been inevitable for some considerable time and the readiness of the World to contain anything like it was somewhat shite.
Is it out of the realms of possibility that such a simulation was long overdue, or that there IS a nasty virus and the incompetence levels are close to what was expected from unpreparedness?
-
12 minutes ago, Steph said:
Lets consider the possibility that the round earth hypothesis is correct, what would you expect to see in Australia that will not show up if the earth is flat?
Not this.
http://www.illustratingshadows.com/split-world.pdf
-
34 minutes ago, Morpheus said:
Yeah, the thing is the media is controlled by a few people, who no doubt have interests in other matters like pharmaceuticals, AI, weapons development, fossil fuels etc.
With that in mind, it's surely not beyond the realms of possiblity that they will therefore control the narrative on major stories.
And whilst they have investments in the above areas, they'll also be keen as to not expose any wrong doings in such areas.
I know you won't agree, but this is how the world works. You say they aren't lying about everything, but then where was the investigative media when Blair was taking us into Iraq due to a sexed up dossier?
That's right, they were telling the story the government was telling them, they investigated fuck all. So that's the state of the media today.
There's no such thing as journalism, they just parrot what the government wants them to say. Thankfully, a lot of people on this board get that and understand that.
I do not disagree totally with any of that. I have a more temperate view on it that's all. And I do get that news outlets and corporations have their own agendas - but I'm sorry, I do have faith in people and they aren't all corrupt bastards.
-
3 hours ago, oddsnsods said:
Im just going to deal with a few of your points, coz you really are here as the link proves, just to be an argumentative & ruin discussion. You post a paywall for a start. Washington Post a left wing politricks rag, showing stats from America dated Feb. 25, 2020
And you do what you always do, label the source as MSM something or other and avoid what it says. When it suits you, you go to any number of MSM sites and take small sections of data.
Would it be possible for you to actually shut up about "ME" and why you think I'm here?
3 hours ago, oddsnsods said:You know people who work in ICU with flu cases.
That really proves nothing & is hearsay.
No, I know people who know the difference and yes, it is inadmissible and hearsay. But it is why I KNOW it isn't a fake virus. I have no need to offer any of that to you to try and convince you otherwise.
3 hours ago, oddsnsods said:Again what does this prove, its more speculation.
The first wave Ferguson claimed would kill 500,000 people.
He has a serious history of massive blunders, yet the media & gov never stop taking his bullshit seriously.
And muppets like you who post speculative metro links as some kind of evidence.
Would it help if I referred to you as Kermit or Gonzo? Or tell you that you are infected by blinkered research? Almost certainly not. So do try to desist from the insults.
What does it prove? It proves that YOU don't ever post anything like it because it doesn't fit your preconceived view. Blunders all over the place. Hanlon's razor.
3 hours ago, oddsnsods said:Matt Handcock? Infected.
Arm waving away all the stats because they conflict with yours.
3 hours ago, oddsnsods said:No you missed my point on how this is nothing new or more dangerous than any other bad flu season. As you are posting Fail links. Did you read my post on WHO & the Swine flu? No course you didnt.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-5440785/Killer-flu-outbreak-blame-42-spike-deaths.html
Yes I read all that and once again your non medical appraisal is noted. Medical professionals say it is worse than common flu.
COVID-19: There have been approximately 1,099,380 deaths reported worldwide. In the U.S, 217,717, people have died of COVID-19 between January 2020 and October 16, 2020.*
Flu: The World Health Organization estimates that 290,000 to 650,000 people die of flu-related causes every year worldwide.
The COVID-19 situation is changing rapidly. Since this disease is caused by a new virus, the vast majority of people do not yet have immunity to it, and a vaccine may be many months away. Doctors and scientists are working to estimate the mortality rate of COVID-19, but at present, it is thought to be substantially higher (possibly 10 times or more) than that of most strains of the flu.
https://www.healthline.com/health-news/why-covid-19-isnt-the-flu
He notes that during mid-April the “counted deaths” for COVID-19 in the United States were around 15,000 per week. During a typical “peak week” for the flu, the “counted deaths” are about 750.
Faust concludes that COVID-19 deaths are actually anywhere from 10 times to 44 times the number of influenza fatalities.
Other experts say there are also reasons beyond the raw statistics that indicate COVID-19 is more dangerous than influenza.
Please do not re-post your cherry picked statistics.
3 hours ago, oddsnsods said:Maybe they are pissed off with their corporate overlords & worried they might be exposed & lynched for their crimes or maybe they are Satanist rubbing it in your face, with a dumbed down zombie public, that accept any draconian shit. Narcissists tend to do this & Boris does it all the time.
Nice dodge. The source for this came from the daily briefings - the one avenue guaranteed to reach the most people. Yeah like THAT makes sense.
"Our test is shite, we don't know what we are doing" Really?
3 hours ago, oddsnsods said:Yes the tests are fraudulent thats a fact...so yes its a hoax.
This is so typical of the way conspiracy believers/followers or whatever term you want to use....take a term and remove it from any definitive context!
Of course you will arm wave away any response to this because it MUST come from a definitive MSM outlet!!
The PCR test is the preferred COVID-19 testing method in England (tinyurl.com/u9xxxup). It detects the presence of the virus by amplifying the virus’genetic material to a point where it can be detected by scientists (tinyurl.com/y7rno7pf).
A spokesperson for Public Health England told Reuters why PCR tests are being used widely in England: “Molecular diagnostic tests, such as real-time PCR, are the gold standard methods for identifying individuals with an active viral infection, such as SARS-CoV-2 (the cause of COVID-19 disease), in their respiratory tract. These tests are rapid and produce results in real-time.
“It is important to note that detecting viral material by PCR does not indicate that the virus is fully intact and infectious, i.e. able to cause infection in other people. The isolation of infectious virus from positive individuals requires virus culture methods. These methods can only be conducted in laboratories with specialist containment facilities and are time consuming and complex.”
3 hours ago, oddsnsods said:Because not everyone is in on the scam?
You have the audacity to make such a rubbish claim with a facepalm??
Much of the data that comes into the vast majority's field of view comes from daily briefings and newspaper reports. Are you seriously suggesting that THEY aren't in on this nonsensical hoax? They could have left it out quite easily and been more simplistic on the daily tirade of information pushed out.
3 hours ago, oddsnsods said:They infest mainstream social media, where people are more easily influenced plus they have full control & can launch multiple bot accounts & censor posters.
Proof for any of that? Seriously, that is not a flippant question. What have you got, anything solid and tangible?
3 hours ago, oddsnsods said:What does that even mean?
You labelled the CDC as being in on this whole thing. so what possible daft reason would they "admit" they didn't have any of the 2019 source material? That is just plain dumb. And stop insulting "everybody's" intelligence by suggesting they were rubbing our noses in it.
-
4 minutes ago, Morpheus said:
To be fair, Bamboo has presented the ultimate argument in controlled narrative by the MSM. That story has been surpressed by Facebook and Twatter. Whilst you have your position, you have to acknowledge that story has been doubled down on by the msm. I mean FFS, they're calling Guiliani a drunk and that guy took down the Mafia for crying out loud. Also trying to say he is in cahoots with the Russians!
So I think we can safely say that she media lies and it's obvious.
The media does lie and it is usually very obvious when they do. It doesn't however mean they do it all the time or conduct ludicrously concocted and sustained campaigns. It's one thing the government and money making advisory bodies messing with the numbers and projections, which I'm inclined to lean towards than to suggest the whole damn thing is a fake. That's just absurd and DOES require large numbers to suppress multiple avenues of inquiry.
And yes, there is of course censorship which I most certainly do not agree with ANYWHERE
-
1 hour ago, Lord Humungus said:
Well some "truthers" tend to do that yeah. Skeptics only use fake news
8 minutes ago, Lord Humungus said:Skeptics only use the fake news media to proof their point, even when they know it's fake.
Dude, I saw that was your claim from 3 posts ago. Stop cluttering up the thread.
Sceptics of what? The general term is used to denote somebody who doubts accepted opinion. So that would be you lot. But I won't be so rash in my claims. Truthers/sceptics only sometimes fall prey to fake news and you should all point it out when they do, not leave it to people like me to do it!
However, they DO use mainstream sites but very rarely quote the whole thing. As I said and has been demonstrated on this thread....small cherry picked "ahaaah" snippets are used, sometimes out of context, often without pointing out other variables and certainly never using anything from mainstream sites that contradict the general line of the claim.
That isn't truth seeking, that is confirmation bias.
-
1 hour ago, bamboozooka said:
when truthers use fake news media articles to satisfy their warm fuzzy narrative
washington post ffs
"Truthers" use them to cherry pick stats and quotes. Then when presented with the bits they don't use, play the MSM card to avoid responding. Ffs.
Prove it's fake. I won't hold my breath.
-
50 minutes ago, amy G said:
If the Earth were a globe with a radius of 3,959 miles, then one must look down to observe the horizon.
One never has to look down to observe the horizon. Therefore, the Earth is not a globe with a radius of 3,959 miles.
Awaiting your thoughts... hope that wasn't too long.
Spam. All of that was already posted...answered...and ignored.
You were supplied videos, mathematics and links...yet you post the same crap under the guise of some bullshit private exchange you are having.
-
2 hours ago, amy G said:
I know it says that on your script, but isn't there some number of times after you are proven wrong that you stop saying it?
Dude....that is one of the most ridiculous attempts at contradicting reality you can get. You get the last blurred lens flaring of a sunset and present that as the Sun disappearing?
Cos you got a camera?
-
2 hours ago, amy G said:
That is how a PSYOP works. The more important for them to keep their lies, the more they will talk about it, but that does not make any of it real.
I am guessing ....
Well duhhh....it was a figure of speech. 99.99999999999% of the human race will never heard about this or care.
It's also how the real planet works.
Please don't guess. Your attempts at evidence are worse than a small child's guesses.
-
@alexaCan you find any nonsensical reply to explain where the city has gone to?
https://flatearthinsanity.blogspot.com/2016/07/toronto-cn-tower-from-olcott-ny.html
-
QED - laser bends over the horizon.
/thread
-
12 minutes ago, amy G said:
And here is my first sunrise video. Counting pixels can be fun.
So can photographing it without light bleeding all over the place. Use a filter!!
https://expertphotography.com/solar-photography/
-
34 minutes ago, amy G said:
And here is a new one from my 'understanding perspective' series...
Lol - you have no understanding of perspective. Things get smaller until they disappear, as the move away from the observer.
34 minutes ago, amy G said:The important part to notice is that the actual horizon is far above the ships that have vanished from the viewers on the shore.
Utter nonsense. The boats aren't anywhere near the horizon and breaking news: I can still see them.
Here is another link in my "Don't bother trying to teach a flat earther about refraction and the planet" series...
-
3 minutes ago, SimonTV said:
That article says nothing about it being more contagious.
Whoops, misread...
https://www.livescience.com/new-coronavirus-compare-with-flu.html
Researchers are still working to determine the R0 for COVID-19. Preliminary studies estimated an R0 value for the new coronavirus to be between 2 and 3, according to a review study published Feb. 28 in the journal JAMA. This means each infected person has spread the virus to an average of 2 to 3 people.
Some studies suggest COVID-19 has an even higher R0 value. For example, a study published April 7 in the journal Emerging Infectious Disease used mathematical modeling to calculate an R0 of nearly 6 in China.
It's important to note that R0 is not a constant number. Estimates can vary by location, depending on such factors as how often people come into contact with each other and the efforts taken to reduce viral spread, Live Science previously reported.
Fake Moon Landings
in Space & Universe
Posted
Are we done with shadows?