Comedy Time

Bare assertion? Shit, you never say anything but dismissal and evasion. You are a liar, you make claims about members then fail to back them up when called out. I suggest you go back a dozen posts and either back up your lies or withdraw them The distances are verified by the long haul flights and the visible land they traverse....all exactly matching the progress map, all exactly matching expected times. NOTHING matches the flat earth map - the one flat earthers rely on....especially the ludicrous distances. YOU - you have fuck all, no map, nothing so you have the option of denying everything without explaining a damn thing. Nobody here is working on a script and that is about the 10th time you have made that personal allegation. That is not my fucking screen name and I don't work from a script. It is not amusing for you at all, you simply cannot answer a damn thing - even hypothetical best case scenarios you are still shit scared to respond. People on this forum are debating in good faith and you are just deliberately winding people up for shits and giggles. Do something amazing - answer the actual post and explain my mistakes.....you won't, you can't, you are owned.

@amy G One reason you cannot be a mathematician is your flagrant disregard for the obvious. Flag any statement you don't agree with and explain why... The Sun, no matter what distance it is away from Earth, changes elevation all over the world during the day. It is simultaneously observed by half the Earth. You will not address the content below in this post because it makes a complete joke of flat earth comedic belief. The scenarios that follow are used to demonstrate speed variances. The height of the Sun for this purpose is not relevant - so try not to dismiss it because of that! Point one on the globe is where the Sun is directly above: Just as an example using 3000 miles and the Sun changing from 15 degrees/30 degrees/45 degrees from zenith(directly overhead) - that is 3 one hour movements everywhere on Earth - proven and irrefutable and agreed by you! http://www.cleavebooks.co.uk/scol/calrtri.htm Little a is 3000 Big A is 75 degrees - It has travelled 804 miles from zenith. So average 804 mph. Little a is 3000 Big A is 60 degrees - It has travelled 1730 miles from zenith. 1730-804 = 926. So average 926 mph now! Little a is 3000 Big A is 45 degrees - It has travelled 3000 miles from zenith. 3000-1730 = 1270. So average 1270 mph now! Point two simultaneoulsy on the globe is where the Sun is at 75 degrees to observer at its highest elevation: Little a is 3000 Big A is 60 degrees - It has travelled 1730 miles from zenith. It began 804 miles away from zenith. So average 926 mph. Little a is 3000 Big A is 45 degrees - It has travelled 3000 miles from zenith. 3000-1730 = 1270. So average 1270 mph now! Little a is 3000 Big A is 15 degrees - It has travelled 11,200 miles from zenith. 11200-3000 = 8200. So average 8200 mph average now! In hour 1 at two different points the Sun is travelling 804 mph and 926 mph at the same time!! In hour 2 at two different points the Sun is travelling 926 mph and 1270 mph at the same time!! In hour 3 at two different points the Sun is travelling 1270 mph and 8200 mph at the same time!! Now BASIC mathematics tells us the Sun MUST be covering that distance, so it is not apparent distance. These are actual figures. Now what? A flurry of shite to push it off the current page. I can feel a new thread coming on to stop this deliberate tactic.

You irritating f&%* - I just gave you 3 pieces of trigonometry showing the MINIMUM distance to the Sun possible (and that is utterly insane) and it puts the distance to the Sun at "sunset" on a flat earth at 286 THOUSAND MILES. Is that FUCKING clear enough? Show me a) how that is a logical fallacy b) the trigonometry is wrong. Or show some integrity and admit you are wrong.

He was clever enough to know space wasn't faked! Is this some kind of trolling exercise for you? Do you not see the big problem here?

Not only clear it is total bullshit! There is nothing logically fallacious about determining the distance across seas, countries and continents, working out their orientation and plotting these against each other. There is nothing logically fallacious about a plane that has a set cruising speed and covers x amount of distance in that time doing so thousands of times a day year in year out and always in the timeframe stated. Or ships traversing oceans at set speeds in the time frame they should take. You are cluttering up this thread with obfuscation, evasion and bullshit. Trigonometry - you "majored in mathematics" did you? The closest possible distance the Sun can be to the Earth is a ridiculous Everest height. Now YOU will NOT do this because you will shoot yourself in your foot yet again...... Compute the distance to the Sun on a flat earth when it is 0.001 degrees above the visual horizon and at a ludicrous and provably impossible distance of 5 miles away. Hold on, let me do it for you, please offer corrections.... http://www.cleavebooks.co.uk/scol/calrtri.htm a= 5 miles A= 0.001 degrees Distance to object is 286,000 miles. https://www.omnicalculator.com/math/right-triangle-side-angle Distance to object 286,479 miles. https://www.calculator.net/right-triangle-calculator.html?av=5&alphav=0.001&alphaunit=d&bv=&betav=&betaunit=d&cv=&hv=&areav=+&perimeterv=&x=103&y=13 Distance to object 286,478.89754 miles. Now do something amazing, start demonstrating your "mathematics" and show me where any of that is wrong. The ludicrous minimum doesn't work and as the ludicrous minimum increases, so does the distance to the object.

There is a very good reason for this. There is not a map in existence that works. You know this!! I'm too afraid to provide an idiotic flat earth map? You cannot put a spherical map on to a 2d drawing. You can only use inaccurate projections. YOU don't have that excuse. Yes. You have just told some lies - show by answering the allegation that you haven't.

Provide a damn map and give the distance of anything on it!!

You are lying!! You referenced a bloody optical illusion! Now answer the damn point properly. No matter where or when it is always the same size. It is lunacy of the highest order to dismiss all of that because at the Horizon it looks bigger!! Ok, so let me get this quite straight, the Sun does move the same angular distance you admit? It takes a colossally confused brain not to see the major problem with that - now the Sun Must be going much faster on the outer circuit and its angular velocity is different!! How about you use your "mathematical" brain because we are done right there. You just shot yourself in the foot with an Uzi!! A lie. EXPLAIN HOW!! Show me where and show me the correction. You are lying. Dude, your answers are proven hogwash, so yes go on, but answer the damn things properly. Prove it. Show me where I made a mistake and correct it. You are a liar. You have been proven wrong. You do this......

His equation is a road map to determine the factors needed to work out if there is life out there. It is irrelevant what unknowns he plugged in to the formula, it was what NEEDED to be known to determine accuracy! LMAO at you and your limited understanding of Tesla! https://www.teslasociety.com/cosmos.htm Nikola Tesla built a laboratory in Colorado Springs, Colorado, in 1899, to experiment with high frequency electricity and other phenomena. In that laboratory he received and recorded on his sensitive instruments, cosmic radio waves. He announced that he received extraterrestrial radio signals. The scientific community in 1899 did not believe him, because knowledge of cosmic radio signals did not exist at that time. Nikola Tesla had a vision of radio communications with planets of the solar system. His Wardenclyffe magnifying transmitter had sufficient energy, voltage and frequency of oscillations to reach that goal. Tesla’s vision was the exploration of cosmos.

Then provide a map of Flatovia. The exact map. Provide an estimate or ballpark figure of where you think the Sun is. You are a gigantic phoney and from where I'm sitting your evasion HAS to be some sort of hidden agenda. You have failed at every juncture to respond to any single point and you had the audacity to claim you are a mathematician! Let me list some stunning unanswered points and a couple of new ones! The Sun sets without any size change and that is impossible in itself. The vanishing point is named thus! The Sun's motion through the sky is the same at every angle, location and time. It NEVER varies - 15 degrees of angular distance per hour. On any map of the flat earth, the two tropic circles HAVE to be different circumferences - the Sun HAS to increase speed for the larger one!! There has been not one iota of scientific measurement that corresponds to a flat earth, including sudden speed changes from the Sun. The Moon is inverted in the Southern Hemisphere. At a range of distances starting with the unfeasible Everest height for the Sun - the horizon is a ridiculous distance away - I use trigonometry - go learn some. ANYONE can take an image through a quality telescope of Mars/Jupiter etc. and see them rotating. ANYONE can take an image through a filter and see the Sun rotating. Lunar eclipses where the Earth moves across the Sun's path to the Moon. There are so many problems with long haul flight distances it is ridiculous. Australia on Flatovia is 5,000 miles across!! Star fields rotate in opposite directions by hemisphere. Gravity - offer a counter explanation. Explain the tides. Explain how the Sun is able to illuminate half a bloody disc. Explain how the Sun and Moon actually drop below eye level when they are always above it. That's enough for now. It's a shame that evasion isn't a rule breach because you do nothing but. I believe you are doing it deliberately because you KNOW your nonsense cannot be true, ergo ulterior motive. You will not answer any of that. Not one thing and you will probably ignore the whole post. Flat Earth belief is THE dumbest one of all. Fence sitters look at the above list and just know this, I can make it pages long and every single point by flat earthers is debunked and also ignored.

Pathetic evasion again. The laser is subject to refraction. I answered this pages and pages ago....you ignored it as you always do. Puck puck puckargggghhhh. The laser in theory can be skipping over the sea but this is 100% light refraction. I want you to go to your video at 4.12 and look at how this dead straight laser can easily be bent through simple temperature gradients and density variations in the sky. If you like I can give you some great mathematics pages that show the looming effects that this is. https://youtu.be/PI8kdz79yyw I would add that we have no independent corroboration the heights are as they say - and I really don't trust these people at all. They cannot possibly believe the Earth is flat, it's a big cash cow for them.

Don't be absurd dude. It's over the horizon! Oh no it isn't! https://aty.sdsu.edu/mirages/mirsims/loom/loom.html Water doesn't "curve" on the ocean. It is so close to flat because the planet is absolutely massive. Gravity curves it so gently it is barely noticeable, unless of course the sun is setting and a ship is disappearing over the horizon! An airplane has an absolute maximum limit of 25 seconds. Run along and do so...you might actually learn something. Don't read the flat earth crap though, you'll get sucked down into the pit of no hope!

Ahhh bless you don't quote understand the burden of proof do you? When somebody makes a brainless and ill thought out claim - as you have - THEY have the burden to prove it. You quote a piece of mathematics that has been fully explained. Now YOU must prove your useless claim.

Honestly dude, your evasion is something to behold. It's almost as though you're afraid to look ignorant. Why are you afraid to answer basic easy stuff? The Moon is upside down in Australia - explain Star fields rotate in opposite directions by hemisphere - explain. How can an object ABOVE eyeline drop below the horizon? How can an object disappear full size anyway!!? I did some maths showing the Sun as close as bloody Mount Everest...you ran away like a coward and said to use proper numbers. The lower to the surface the Sun is, the less distance must the Sun be to the horizon. As you go higher it gets progressively more and more ridiculous!! Since I started at a fucking ridiculous height to begin with, that is STILL a crazy distance to the horizon! , you have nowhere to go.... SO. Let's get really silly shall we? Mount Everest is 5.5 miles high - we shall substitute x for 5.5 miles. Nobody is THAT dumb to claim the Sun is below the damn mountain - but shall we work it out anyway? http://www.cleavebooks.co.uk/scol/calrtri.htm A= 0.01 degrees a=5.5 miles The Frickin' Sun is 31 500 miles away! @Nobby NoboddyDude, save yourself, come back from the dark side that's tempting you. Look what all the flat earthers do, they actually totally ignore slam dunk posts like this, make loads of noise and then back to normal @amy G You are toast. Totally afraid to answer anything! Here's your starter for 10: GLOBE: Sydney to Santiago - flying time 12 hours 35 minutes - distance 7,046 miles. Boeing 787 cruising speed 561 mph. Works just fine. FLAT: Sydney to Santiago - flying time 12 hours 35 minutes - distance 10,184 miles. Boeing 787 cruising speed 561 mph. Not so much. Can you explain that? It's ok, we both know you aren't going to answer it.

There isn't a problem with curvature. There is a thing called refraction and it explains things perfectly. @amy G HELLO????? Oh look the boat is over the horizon and it is zoomed in and tiny. The Sun? Same size. How come!