Doctor What

Yes, I am able to see. I see example of the desert and a forest with shadows spreading and I see you not replying about them. This is more a reason for longer shadows and not a reason for direction in any image. Yes this does. They are not nearly opposite this is perspective. Please tell me if you see the shaman poles being almost opposite - and this is on a quite flat ground! It is evident you cannot change your mind with explanations and pictures. Strange reply. https://www.eyeem.com/p/85549766 Flat beach, imagine now in a crater.

Is this your joke? The desert picture is authentic. Problem for you is the odd paths for shadows. I gave you full explanations for variation on shadows. The Earth picture shows similar differences with shadow casting. Camera lens / angle of rock / shapes of terrain - in crater or hill. Distance from a camera. One thing to explain desert top right - It is probable dip in ground and not shadow from the rock plus far away makes the angle appear flatter. Do you now see how shadows can vary dramatically? I showed tree shadows also quite wide spread - did you also see this?

@Pre-RaphaeliteI found a good video for making case about terrain and angle making differences to way the shadow falls: Anomalous Shadow Directions? - YouTube Hopefully explains many things about odd rock angles. Then see this picture - look top right - odd eh?:

The photograph is wrong arrows in top of the left corner! These are drawn in wrong direction. The shadow falls away direction from camera. True directions are converging from slopes. Did you look at tree picture and very wide shadow range? And may I point to you failure you make. You already said multiple light source make more than one shadow. There is only 1 shadow. Two choices: Picture is correct in crater, wide angle lens. Uneven terrain and vary angle of rocks. Or it has been doctored on a film from 1969. Always this crazy claim for shadows and stars - it's BS.

Am I understanding you? Your thinking is shadows cannot do this, therefore a hoax, but you fail in explaining how this is done for your hoax? It is perfectly normal to shadows to do this and combine camera angles and the perspective together with shapes of terrain and angle of object to ground. AS-11-40-5930 is shot having terrain fall away from camera towards small crater. This picture AS11-40-5930 | Apollo 11 Hasselblad image from film magazine… | Flickr is full raw scanned image. On your picture is deceptive top right saying shadows go across, they go away from camera but are far away - it is cause by perspective. See this picture, also has wide shadows converge and only to the right not shown would be even more wide: tree-shadows_00442730.jpg (1920×1080) (wallpoper.com)

No. But in the past I believe reincarnation. For you, this Hitler consciousness sits there forever with capacity to talk to persons who have paypal buttons. What a load of honk. You use the phrase "we all know". But for this is only a small select bunch of people who do not know much. The Moon landings were not a lie. More important though is you still say this person who draws pictures from live TV feed from Apollo 11 is still credible? Explain for me how this works? And also he is talking about Nazis and ETs - What a load of honk. I laugh at your ideas on who is credible. Man channels Hitler and another man scribbles ET pictures - to you these are credible? Sure. A very dumb claim. The numbers of persons who needed to do this is crazy high. According to you it must still be people doing LROC pictures 50 years after! He does not claim he worked in NASA. He claims he works for one of the contractors for NASA. A real pea-soup of honk. You now claim NASA not just faked the first TV, but now deliberately added ET spaceships because they wanted to confuse William Tompkins? There isn't any mazes of confusion or misinformation, the honk is coming from Tompkins and now you. For more better direction, you should watch this video: https://tinyurl.com/y7xbspmn

I don't think many need this swaying. When you make claims of channelling dead Hitler you show credibility down the u-bend. He is reliable? Apollo Mission Ended Because Of Extraterrestrials? | by Antoni Tarner | Medium "According to William Tompkins, a top aerospace designer who worked for major NASA corporate contractors during the Apollo era, the covert Navy plan came to a crushing end during the Apollo 11 mission when Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin were met by a fleet of menacing extraterrestrial spacecraft." Apollo Mission Ended Because Of Extraterrestrials - Alien News (newsinstact.com) Tompkins says he saw live feed from surface camera and Armstrong says he saw lots of extra-terrestrials. Great expression, must use this for future!

This is a very poor statement. There are many tens of thousand reports from all over the world and you make poor assumption all are university job people! apollo rocks - Google Scholar More truth would be very large money from proving rocks are not real!

I have bolded two sentences from newspaper quote - please read. This is nonsense story btw. NASA have given no big rocks as gifts and after Apollo 11 it is crazy for assuming they would do to an old prime minister of a tiny country. These rocks are very valuable. These are very good researched videos: The Moonstone of The Netherlands - Part 1 - YouTube The Moonstone of The Netherlands - Part 2 - YouTube Short explaining - this is Museum making assumption Drees has Moon rock, because of complimentary slip. This is what actual gifts look like, with tiny pieces inside in some resin and gold plaque with flag. These are gifts Apollo astronauts handed to head of states.

Your concern is of no matter. Burden lies with people who claim this hoax. NASA has provided nearly 400kg of rocks been examined by world's many geology experts. Golf was not played and this is very silly claim of argument by incredulity. Shepard took club head attached to geology handle plus golf balls. Not big deal. Third-party evidence for Apollo Moon landings - Wikipedia This is very ludicrous and false statement. No this again is simply not true. Apollo 11 landing from PDI to Touchdown - YouTube Apollo 11 Landing Profile - YouTube You are copying other people claims like sheep. There is no dust under lander and rocket exhaust entrainment sends dust local, at hundreds of feet a second. More suspicious would be dust on landing pads. I have not any interest in what you think it looks like. what should this look like, then explain how you have experience to say so. It would be much more than your very poor copied ramblings to prove space travel is a lie. Possibly you think hundreds of thousand scientists are all stupid because you on the David Icke forum know all about it.

You failed to reply in my point made. The shadows are not 'virtually opposite'. There is only one light source so you must explain what is casting shadows. I give you explanation. Terrain, camera perspective. Draw light diagram for one light and converging shadows please.

Ad hominem response. I suppose it is an element of truth. Informed people probably always do give the correct answer. People who believe in hoax always make the same copied unoriginal claims. Here is very cool website: http://www.clavius.org I am amazed at this hoax still being alive - it is debunked thousands of times.

It is in a small crater. Perhaps you can draw me the light diagram from the light for making shadows converge? Yes, please show me how one light source is doing this. More than one light source makes more than one shadow.

The opposite of this is the real truth. It is always best to have some idea about physics and science when looking into things.

I wonder about such clueless persons. The floppy piece is thermal covering on outer air lock. The inner air lock door is just inside and opens inwards! Would you wish me to explain why always inwards?

This is not true. If more light sources, there are more than one shadows. This is curious effect called "heiligenschein". https://www.atoptics.co.uk/droplets/heilig.htm On Earth, cause is dew drops, on the Moon cause is volcanic spheres.

These are polar orbits satellites. Here is some black and white from last days: https://www.ospo.noaa.gov/Products/imagery/mosaics.html Click blue circles.

This is the speed for time it has reached close to the planet. Slow down phase. It is not under any propulsion during journey. It fires initial burn to escape Earth and perform transfer orbit and then from this point correction burns: https://mars.nasa.gov/mars2020/timeline/cruise/ For explanation about distance travelled 300 million miles - this is relative distance caused by planet orbits. Actual distance is as said 130 million miles.

I have responded only to direct claim on space subject.

Did you notice he used water in balloon to reinforce, this also limits ability to rise very high. It does not frighten me. You are bflat. Balloon must have very strong, but also light material to stop this popping. How High Can Weather Balloons Go? - StratoStar Edit: I see once more that you fail in response to the rest of my post.

Are you a denier of gravity? Explain please why all things fall in down direction. Explain too what you mean with your word 'heavy'. Helium balloon explodes in vacuum.

Sounding like regurgitation of all the failed claims from many years ago. The command module shield were very adequate for the belt radiation on outskirt of the belts. With magnetic tilt adjustment for route, it was very much higher than the weak areas of van allen belts. Blue lines are route direction: For computer, onboard makes minor adjustments. All major computing was on the ground mainframe and transmitted to uplink. The landings were not easy, and very costly. Saturn 5 is a billion dollars to put tiny object on the Moon, for Moon base it is very much higher.

This is of no sense. Republicans hold majority in US supreme court. It is always the same with conspiracies, always there is another one to help when evidence says it is wrong. I recognise futility, so no more in this thread. As regarding Pelosi, her brother is scumbag, how is this relevant? No need for response - I assume you think she is involved in hiding this with involvement in capitol riot.

I wonder what source you think is in place for these. This is not real. Plus, why do you have high opinion of such a website? If the site is called wearenotlying.com would that be as good? The courts are obliged in USA law to listen to testimony.

Are you of any mind to have your opinion turned, as I am? This is called hearsay and amounts to a possibility of a local interference. Trump's star election fraud witness was so bad Giuliani had to 'shush' her | Metro Video If there was video of such, it was not presented as evidence. Are you sure it is not fake news? Where is this? It's easier to just paste BBC link and NY Times reporting : US election 2020: Five viral vote claims fact-checked - BBC News Fact-Checking Trump's Debunked Election Claims in Georgia Call - The New York Times (nytimes.com) President Trump, in an hourlong telephone call with Georgia’s Republican secretary of state, repeated a number of false and misleading claims about election results in the state that have been circulating on social media. Here’s a fact check. WHAT MR. TRUMP SAID “Then it was stuffed with votes. They weren’t in an official voter box, they were in what looked to be suitcases or trunks, suitcases but they weren’t in voter boxes. The minimum number it could be because we watched it and they watched it certified in slow motion instant replay if you can believe it, but it had slow motion and it was magnified many times over, and the minimum it was 18,000 ballots, all for Biden.” False. Mr. Trump was most likely referring to debunked claims that a water leak at a vote counting location in Fulton County forced an evacuation and made it possible for trunks full of ballots to be rolled in. Election officials have said and surveillance videos show that this did not happen. A water leak caused a delay for about two hours in vote counting at the State Farm Arena, but no ballots or equipment were damaged. Georgia’s chief election investigator, Frances Watson, testified that a “review of the entire security footage revealed that there were no mystery ballots that were brought in from an unknown location and hidden under tables.” Throughout the phone call, Mr. Trump also repeatedly suggested that an election worker seen in the surveillance videos “stuffed the boxes” and “they thought she’d be in jail” — referring to a baseless conspiracy theory promoted on social media. [Read more about the voting in Georgia so far.] WHAT MR. TRUMP SAID “There were no poll watchers there. There were no Democrats or Republicans. There was no security there.” This is misleading. Election observers and journalists were present at State Farm Arena when the water leak occurred. They were not asked to leave, Ms. Watson said, but simply “left on their own” when they saw one group of workers, who had completed their task, leave. WHAT MR. TRUMP SAID “So dead people voted. And I think the number is close to 5,000 people.” False. The actual number was two, Brad Raffensperger, Georgia’s secretary of state, told the president in the call. WHAT MR. TRUMP SAID “You had out-of-state voters — they voted in Georgia but they were from out of state — of 4,925.” This is misleading. Ryan Germany, the chief counsel for Mr. Raffensperger’s office, refuted this description in the call. “Everyone we’ve been through are people that lived in Georgia, moved to a different state, but then moved back to Georgia legitimately,” he said. “They moved back in years ago. This was not like something just before the election. So there’s something about that data that, it’s just not accurate.” WHAT MR. TRUMP SAID “In Fulton County and other areas — and this may or may not be true, because this just came up this morning — that they are burning their ballots, that they are shredding ballots, shredding ballots and removing equipment. They are changing the equipment on the Dominion machines, and you know that’s not legal.” False. Mr. Trump was likely referring to images of Fulton County ballots that circulated on social media and posted by a supporter, Patrick Byrne, the former chief executive of Overstock. The photos showed piles of ballots that were visibly not filled out and wrapped in plastic. Mr. Byrne characterized the ballots as “counterfeit” and said they were later shredded. But those images were simply of emergency backup ballots, said Gabriel Sterling, a Republican official who is the voting system implementation manager in Georgia. State law requires counties to prepare additional paper ballots in case voting machines cannot be used. Dominion Voting Systems, which has been the subject of countless conspiracy theories and false rumors, did not remove any machinery from Fulton County, Mr. Germany told the president. WHAT MR. TRUMP SAID “In Detroit, we had 139 percent of the people voted. That’s not too good. In Pennsylvania, they had well over 200,000 more votes than they had people voting.” False. About 51 percent of registered voters and 38 percent of the entire population cast a ballot in Detroit. The figure for Pennsylvania was a reference to faulty analysis conducted by state Republican lawmakers. The analysis relied on a voter registration database that Pennsylvania's Department of State said was incomplete as a few counties — including Philadelphia and Allegheny Counties, the two largest in the state — had yet to fully upload their data. The department called the analysis “obvious misinformation.” WHAT MR. TRUMP SAID “She got you to sign a totally unconstitutional agreement, which is a disastrous agreement. You can’t check signatures. I can’t imagine you’re allowed to do harvesting, I guess, in that agreement.” False. This was an inaccurate reference to a settlement between Georgia and the Democratic Party. Under the March settlement, officials must notify voters whose signatures were rejected within three business days and give them the chance to correct issues. It does not bar officials from verifying signatures and does not allow “harvesting,” or collecting and dropping off ballots in bulk. “Harvesting is still illegal in the state of Georgia. And that settlement agreement did not change that one iota,” Mr. Raffensperger said in the call. This is just absurd claim, it is not impossible in the slightest ways. The useless Trump presidency ensured record Democratic vote. Regarding my two links : One thing I learn very quickly with all conspiracy is that every mainstream evidence must be dismissed, but no alternate evidence has the same action. Legal teams who work for Trump will find every single detail to prove things. They did not present any thing.