Jump to content

amy G

Members
  • Posts

    344
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by amy G

  1. I recently became interested in this topic. Savagne does a highly informative piece on how the manipulation works.

     

    Another subtle yet devastating aspect of the 'global' conspiracy is their manipulation of calendars, clocks, and our perception of time. We are being enslaved by man-made mechanisms and systems for keeping time. Not only are we wage-slaves to bankers, governments, bosses, and land-owners, but we are also time-slaves to our watches, clocks, and calendars. We slave to 9-5 school and work days. We slave to 5-day school and work weeks. We are spiritual slaves to Greenwich Mean Time, the Gregorian calendar, and an unnatural 7-day week....

     

     

     

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1
  2. 3 hours ago, theo102 said:

    Given that, as confirmed by the debunkers, “the astronauts are literally sitting on the engine”, why don’t we hear any sounds from the engine during lift-off?

    This is just another one of those stand-alone proofs of the hoax. And there are many.

     

  3. 17 minutes ago, kj35 said:

    The heat sync of the earth rock and seas overrides anything you would experience at ground level from reflected light off the moon

    Ok, thanks, and I am sorry about and in contact with moderation on the flat earth trolling here. You requested that that did not happen and am sticking with my word.

  4. 38 minutes ago, peter said:

    so where is the link to the experiment by scientists ,not some joker on utube ,I can think of a hand full of variables off the top of my head that would effect the results  It is colder in direct moonlight than it is in the shade , you mean cloud cover ,(the use of the word shade is somewhat deliberately  misleading) however that statement is not surprising when you think about it .When there is cloud cover it helps trap the heat that has been able to build up in the rocks, concrete, soil and atmosphere etc etc during the day so therefore it will dissipate in the cool of the night at a lesser rate , however when there in no cloud cover to trap the heat more will dissipate over the course of the night and since we are able to see the so called moon light it would appear that it is cooler than shade ( to anyone with no logical train of thought that is)

    Sorry, are you saying that it is expected that shaded moonlight would be warmer than direct moonlight?

  5. 4 hours ago, kj35 said:

    I'm not turning this thread into another flat earth nonsense. Nice try.

    Do not panic, we are just discussing what the moon is. Is the distance not important to you? Is its material not important to you? Do you find it the least bit odd that the character or the moon's light and the sun's light is so different? Why is it hotter in direct sunlight than it is in the shade? Easy answer, yes? Well, why is it colder in direct moonlight than it is in the shade? I'm not sure if you even knew that that was fact, nor that the experiment has been replicated several times, but now you know.

     

     

  6. 31 minutes ago, kj35 said:

    The wavelength frequency is entirely measurable and provable too.

    What do you mean?

     

    And how is it possible that this is nearly 1/4 million miles away?

    https://iili.io/2V7fMG.jpg

     

    Fyi, I took that picture recently with a camera that anyone can get off amazon.

  7. On 9/30/2020 at 2:30 PM, Michi713 said:

    Book: Freemasonry and the Birth of Modern Science by Robert Lima’s

     

    Synopsis from goodreads.com:

    “Lomas claims that modern experimental science was born out of The Royal Society, which was secretly funded by The Invisible College, which is known today as Freemasonry.”

    Great find!

     

    Thanks @Coldrum for getting the video to embed.

     

    Here's a fun one one evolution:

     

  8. The responses to this too from the globurists are few, far between and quite absurd when they even try to explain this away.

     

     

    If Earth were a globe with a radius of 3,959 miles, the above video would not be possible. The video is right there, therefore, the Earth is not a globe with said radius falsifying r again.

     

  9. 3 minutes ago, Comedy Time said:

    You can't even read and understand your own links!

    Hint Your horizon line always falls at eye level regardless of where you're looking. For instance, if you are looking down, your eye level remains at the height of your eyes, not down where you are looking.

    I read that and posted the math in the side by side comparison that shows reality. The camera is mounted perfectly flat.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ig9YOyei_hc

     

    Timestamped at 5 miles and what we should all see when we fly, but don't. Which is right to next to the perfect horizontal, eye level horizon that we all do see in reality.

    (odd how sometimes my links embed and sometimes not)

     

    And there are several links now explaining that horizon and eye level are synonymous.

     

     

  10. The responses to this too from the globurists are few, far between and quite absurd when they even try to explain this away.

     

     

    If Earth were a globe with a radius of 3,959 miles, the above video would not be possible. The video is right there, therefore, the Earth is not a globe with said radius falsifying r again.

     

  11. The responses to this from the globurists are few, far between and quite absurd when they even try to explain this away.

     

     

    If Earth were a globe with a radius of 3,959 miles, the above video would not be possible. The video is right there, therefore, the Earth is not a globe with said radius falsifying r again.

  12. Worthing to Birling Gap

    Distance: 27 miles/43.4 km

    Thursday, August 6, 2020, 6:15 PM

     

    Examine the video at 8:07

    Distance: 27 miles/43.4 km

    Camera: 26 feet above tide level

    Target - Birling Gap cliff: 223 feet above sea level

    Based on a sphere with the radius you assume, an amazing 285 feet should be hidden!

    And the horizon again is beyond everything.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gA8VCCi8Qy0

     

    If Earth were a globe with a radius of 3,959 miles, the above video would not be possible. The video is right there, therefore, the Earth is not a globe with said radius.

     

     

×
×
  • Create New...