.jpg.8081a54a3b74a5d1823dfac966666137.jpg)
.jpg.594f0ef23288ec5ab04539b2f8a8dbd4.jpg)
amy G
-
Posts
344 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by amy G
-
-
I just got this today. Wow! Our beautiful translucent Moon!
-
On 10/8/2020 at 1:56 PM, Sunny_Leslie said:
Or watch Mars.
I got Mars the other day, her closest approach til 2035.
Edit to embed video
-
Thanks for the feedback. I just wanted to add that they seemed to be traveling much faster than planes and at a much steeper downward angle from my perspective. They made no noise that we could hear and I could not identify anything but the contrails. Does anyone even see a vehicle? And how they vanished from sight after the video ends?
-
3 hours ago, theo102 said:
Given that, as confirmed by the debunkers, “the astronauts are literally sitting on the engine”, why don’t we hear any sounds from the engine during lift-off?
This is just another one of those stand-alone proofs of the hoax. And there are many.
-
-
17 minutes ago, kj35 said:
The heat sync of the earth rock and seas overrides anything you would experience at ground level from reflected light off the moon
Ok, thanks, and I am sorry about and in contact with moderation on the flat earth trolling here. You requested that that did not happen and am sticking with my word.
-
38 minutes ago, peter said:
so where is the link to the experiment by scientists ,not some joker on utube ,I can think of a hand full of variables off the top of my head that would effect the results It is colder in direct moonlight than it is in the shade , you mean cloud cover ,(the use of the word shade is somewhat deliberately misleading) however that statement is not surprising when you think about it .When there is cloud cover it helps trap the heat that has been able to build up in the rocks, concrete, soil and atmosphere etc etc during the day so therefore it will dissipate in the cool of the night at a lesser rate , however when there in no cloud cover to trap the heat more will dissipate over the course of the night and since we are able to see the so called moon light it would appear that it is cooler than shade ( to anyone with no logical train of thought that is)
Sorry, are you saying that it is expected that shaded moonlight would be warmer than direct moonlight?
-
I have no idea what these things are, but they were fascinating to watch. My battery died where this clip ends, but just a second or two later, both objects just vanished.
Thanks for looking and any feedback.
-
Bless
-
4 hours ago, kj35 said:
I'm not turning this thread into another flat earth nonsense. Nice try.
Do not panic, we are just discussing what the moon is. Is the distance not important to you? Is its material not important to you? Do you find it the least bit odd that the character or the moon's light and the sun's light is so different? Why is it hotter in direct sunlight than it is in the shade? Easy answer, yes? Well, why is it colder in direct moonlight than it is in the shade? I'm not sure if you even knew that that was fact, nor that the experiment has been replicated several times, but now you know.
-
31 minutes ago, kj35 said:
The wavelength frequency is entirely measurable and provable too.
What do you mean?
And how is it possible that this is nearly 1/4 million miles away?
Fyi, I took that picture recently with a camera that anyone can get off amazon.
-
On 9/30/2020 at 2:30 PM, Michi713 said:
Book: Freemasonry and the Birth of Modern Science by Robert Lima’s
Synopsis from goodreads.com:
“Lomas claims that modern experimental science was born out of The Royal Society, which was secretly funded by The Invisible College, which is known today as Freemasonry.”Great find!
Thanks @Coldrum for getting the video to embed.
Here's a fun one one evolution:
-
The true dark age is upon us.
-
1
-
1
-
-
On 8/31/2020 at 2:18 PM, kj35 said:
What is the Moon??
I am still not sure, but it cannot be very far away and definitely appears many times as translucent. I just uploaded this for you. Enjoy.
-
This clip is not as far, but I was stunned and amazed as I was filming:
-
Almost 1/4 million miles away.
-
These are just wonderful! Where's the LOVE button?
-
1
-
1
-
-
Thanks for looking
More to come...
-
1
-
-
If Earth were a globe with a radius of 3,959 miles, the above video would not be possible. The video is right there, therefore, the Earth is not a globe with said radius falsifying r again.
-
The responses to this too from the globurists are few, far between and quite absurd when they even try to explain this away.
If Earth were a globe with a radius of 3,959 miles, the above video would not be possible. The video is right there, therefore, the Earth is not a globe with said radius falsifying r again.
-
3 minutes ago, Comedy Time said:
You can't even read and understand your own links!
Hint Your horizon line always falls at eye level regardless of where you're looking. For instance, if you are looking down, your eye level remains at the height of your eyes, not down where you are looking.
I read that and posted the math in the side by side comparison that shows reality. The camera is mounted perfectly flat.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ig9YOyei_hc
Timestamped at 5 miles and what we should all see when we fly, but don't. Which is right to next to the perfect horizontal, eye level horizon that we all do see in reality.
(odd how sometimes my links embed and sometimes not)
And there are several links now explaining that horizon and eye level are synonymous.
-
The responses to this too from the globurists are few, far between and quite absurd when they even try to explain this away.
If Earth were a globe with a radius of 3,959 miles, the above video would not be possible. The video is right there, therefore, the Earth is not a globe with said radius falsifying r again.
-
The responses to this from the globurists are few, far between and quite absurd when they even try to explain this away.
If Earth were a globe with a radius of 3,959 miles, the above video would not be possible. The video is right there, therefore, the Earth is not a globe with said radius falsifying r again.
-
Worthing to Birling Gap
Distance: 27 miles/43.4 km
Thursday, August 6, 2020, 6:15 PM
Examine the video at 8:07
Distance: 27 miles/43.4 km
Camera: 26 feet above tide level
Target - Birling Gap cliff: 223 feet above sea level
Based on a sphere with the radius you assume, an amazing 285 feet should be hidden!
And the horizon again is beyond everything.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gA8VCCi8Qy0
If Earth were a globe with a radius of 3,959 miles, the above video would not be possible. The video is right there, therefore, the Earth is not a globe with said radius.
⏰ TIME - 🕸 Chronic Frustration Trap 🍥 - Timeloop 🦋
in Nature Of Reality
Posted · Edited by amy G
I recently became interested in this topic. Savagne does a highly informative piece on how the manipulation works.
Another subtle yet devastating aspect of the 'global' conspiracy is their manipulation of calendars, clocks, and our perception of time. We are being enslaved by man-made mechanisms and systems for keeping time. Not only are we wage-slaves to bankers, governments, bosses, and land-owners, but we are also time-slaves to our watches, clocks, and calendars. We slave to 9-5 school and work days. We slave to 5-day school and work weeks. We are spiritual slaves to Greenwich Mean Time, the Gregorian calendar, and an unnatural 7-day week....