Jump to content


  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Carlos

  1. That it? Not going to address any evidence, afraid to be wrong?
  2. Type in English and answer the full post! He claims the MOTION of the Moon is the same as the shadow direction. Horseshit. Not to mention that people actually saw the damn thing arriving at the times expected. This line of argument is absolutely absurd - no surprise there. Why do you insist on jerking everyone's chain with this? You can't possibly believe it, surely!
  3. Gravity explains everything that it is claimed to do. Quite how you can reference the aether when Michelson/Morley proved it didn't exist is baffling. Aren't you one of the space deniers? How in hell does that work? Because both adhere to the gravitational model. Helium rises because it has less density than the medium in which it is released. It rises to a point where its mass is equal to the volume of air around it. Because they are heavier. Because air has less density than water. Nonsense. Only air in water and helium in air fall into that category. The others, any falling object are due to gravity. Explain why air is less dense the higher up you go. You can't say density is the cause, because it is the bleeding result - of gravity! Explain why a man jumping up in Mexico City doesn't jump significantly higher than at sea level. Science doesn't have all the answers - especially to a full universe explanation, but some of the mathematics involved in cosmology is incredibly accurate.
  4. Beigy pink with a hint of orange to be factual. My view on this is that as long as they keep labelling dark brown skinned people as black and lighter shaded people as white then the compartmentalisation will never end.
  5. Had to watch this a couple of times to get what this bloke is saying and finally understand what his error is. He is equating the motion and appearance of the Moon which appears to Earth observers to always travel East to West and saying that is the direction the shadow should be travelling - that is bollocks. The shadow cast by a moving object will move WITH the object regardless of where it lands. Since the Moon has positive West to East velocity subtracting the rotational speed - it has to move West to East. If you rely on idiots for your information you will get misinformation.
  6. No, I don't know this made up nonsense. They have verifiable experiments that visually demonstrate it. Wait what??? The Earth is in the way? Dude, that is one of the dumbest things I've ever seen. The Earth occupies around 2 degrees of the Lunar sky and thanks to the way the Moon librates and changes distance elliptically, there is never any exclusive area of sky where the Earth always blocks. Even if it stood completely still, the damn thing is a quarter of a million miles away! It isn't an uncomfortable fact, no incredible mental gymnastics and the variable incident angle approach is a ludicrously inevitable consequence. What mad universe sees object only impacting at 90 degrees!? Yet all the craters are round. Go and educate yourself, your posts demonstrate such dire understanding of even the basics.
  7. Please note, I am not the least bit interested in your evasive opinions. You are simply too scared to address the evidence. Do not address me unless you have something tangible to say.
  8. I know this technique deliberately shoehorns stuff in to alter meaning, but since when has 9 x 11 equalled 18? Let me guess, you add the two together to get 18, then forget to add the 1 and 8 together to get 9? https://numerologysecrets.net/what-is-numerology/#:~:text=What Is Numerology%3F (Numerology Explained) Often associated with,that study numerology study the symbolism of numbers. "In essence, all numbers are first reduced to the single digits of 1 through 9 except for the special numbers 11 and 22. Each of these numbers (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 22) represent one of the major vibration rates that everything in the universe vibrates at. Each of these is, in turn, associated with a certain personal characteristic. Each of the numbers in numerology is reduced by addition. For instance, the number 23 is reduced by adding 2+3. This equals out to 5. Larger numbers with more digits, such as 193, are reduced by adding 1+9+3 to get 13. This number is then reduced by adding 1+3 to get 4." Can you show me where this Masonic number 18 is "common Masonic shorthand"? http://www.masonicdictionary.com/numbers.html No reference found.
  9. Large meteors and on collision courses are extremely rare. To be honest your beliefs are of no interest to me, you clearly have no grasp on reality and prefer to think you are one of the "in crowd" who are smart enough to see things. Sadly the complete opposite is true. Tell me about the craters on the Moon. Tell me about all animated gifs of the planets spinning - absolutely anyone can do this and verify it.
  10. Can you advise me where you determined it was a vacuum?
  11. Point me to the mathematics used to determine it was not possible. All I saw was a lot of bare assertion.
  12. So was burning witches, thank you for your observation - kind of missing the point - it may well have been the consensus when there was no way to verify it, but now there is. It isn't "resurging" though is it. Number 1 is irrelevant, number 2 is what shows it to be the dumbest claim on the planet, number 3 is very debatable since a tiny select few are unable to assimilate knowledge properly, just those items that confirm their beliefs. I am unconcerned about your concern. I use the word reality in terms of what is clearly observable to the vast majority. For flat earthers to be correct, it requires hundreds of thousands of people to be liars. Every single person who has been involved in a satellite launch or any other space endeavour. It requires virtually every scientist to be gullible and/or stupid. It requires all the people who observe satellites and the ISS to be lying and/or mistaken. It requires all the satellite engineers to be morons. And that's just the tip of the iceberg, it doesn't even explain observable reality and uses pitifully narrow examples to generalise vast swathes of daily occurrences. There is no control system regarding the shape of the world. There are people who know it is a planet as it is and there are noisy lunatics who think it is flat. There are quite a few gullible fence sitters who only see the mad videos and fail to follow up.
  13. Irony. The person who appears to deny space, seeks to explain a crater in a space denial thread, uses a claim that doesn't deny space. They then put up an infantile facepalm for some weird reason.
  14. No dude, really it doesn't. Some eejit making daft claims in a youtube video doesn't quite cut the mustard. Then show them one at a time and I'll see if I can draw you back from the abyss. Perhaps you could start by explaining how flat earthery explains anything? There is no resurgence - only a few persistent buffoons unable to explain reality or respond to the evidence. No need to @ me - I'm responding to most stuff until I get bored. It's not a belief system it is the actual system. It is not a matter of belief to explain how things work, verify it in every way possible and disprove alternatives.
  15. Dude, you are in a thread that denies space and joining in with the crazies who believe it - now how the hell do you resolve this with the electric universe. These are impact craters from objects arriving from outer space. They are pretty much always round regardless of the incident angle of approach. How can truthers be so dishonest?
  16. Doesn't look like it. The Moon moves between the Earth and Sun and blocks out all the light - flat earth gibberish would mess up your magic marble refraction. How is it? The globe explains it, flat earth doesn't even explain a sunset/sunrise. You should have stopped typing at the bolded section. There is no "challenge" to the global earth, just a few nutjobs unable to explain their crazy claimed reality whilst ignoring copious amounts of evidence. https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLmWeueTF8l82GItQhl7vTP_WM43B4ebNq
  17. Do you believe the Earth is flat? Do you require assistance feeding yourself? See what I did there? I also added a question mark and some gaps between punctuation.
  18. Well no, "everyone" can look at the science behind high velocity impacts and see that quite clearly and provable, from visible lunar craters that are all mainly round, that the angle of approach doesn't make much difference! But shit, you ignore that why don't you! It is not debateable because people with brains have already studied it. Your "it's obvious" crap doesn't wash - the appeal to ignorance. Dude, you really need to get your head out of your backside. A plethora of facepalms at you. Nukes weren't around 2 billion years ago!
  19. Maybe they used a fleet of fairies to transport them.
  20. Dude, you are a complete failure. You just got owned on both points and your response is some stupid emoji. How about you respond like an honest poster and admit you were wrong, that would make you feel all good knowing your integrity is intact. Try it.
  21. No on both accounts. Let me point something out to you - listen very carefully. YOU CANNOT USE A THEORY ABOUT AN ALTERNATIVE TO SPACE, THE UNIVERSE ETC. AS A MEANS TO DISPROVE THAT SPACE EXISTS. That is astonishingly stupid. https://www.scienceabc.com/nature/universe/why-are-impact-craters-on-the-moon-round-and-not-some-other-shape.html "When a meteor hits the lunar surface, a shockwave spreads out in all directions and the impact creates a dent in the surface that is much bigger than the size of the impacting object itself. Since the impact sprays ejecta in all directions in equal proportions (just like the shockwave of an explosion), the direction and incident angle of the impact become irrelevant in determining the shape of the crater."
  22. No, it demonstrates how a glass marble can refract light. I ask you the question again.
  23. You made a mistake dude and failed to admit it. The maths adds up. Maybe you can show us your computations?
  • Create New...