Kovidiot
-
Posts
44 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Kovidiot
-
-
i have read the book many times. It is one of my favourite. Clearly from your review the series have very little to do with the book
-
add to the fact the Drosten papers was peer-reviewed and admitted by eurosurveillance.org. in one day.Something which has not happened before.
-
https://cormandrostenreview.com/report/
SUMMARY CATALOGUE OF ERRORS FOUND IN THE PAPER
The Corman-Drosten paper contains the following specific errors:
1. There exists no specified reason to use these extremely high concentrations of primers in this protocol. The described concentrations lead to increased nonspecific bindings and PCR product amplifications, making the test unsuitable as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
2. Six unspecified wobbly positions will introduce an enormous variability in the real world laboratory implementations of this test; the confusing nonspecific description in the Corman-Drosten paper is not suitable as a Standard Operational Protocol making the test unsuitable as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
3. The test cannot discriminate between the whole virus and viral fragments. Therefore, the test cannot be used as a diagnostic for intact (infectious) viruses, making the test unsuitable as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus and make inferences about the presence of an infection.
4. A difference of 10° C with respect to the annealing temperature Tm for primer pair1 (RdRp_SARSr_F and RdRp_SARSr_R) also makes the test unsuitable as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
5. A severe error is the omission of a Ct value at which a sample is considered positive and negative. This Ct value is also not found in follow-up submissions making the test unsuitable as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
6. The PCR products have not been validated at the molecular level. This fact makes the protocol useless as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
7. The PCR test contains neither a unique positive control to evaluate its specificity for SARS-CoV-2 nor a negative control to exclude the presence of other coronaviruses, making the test unsuitable as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
8. The test design in the Corman-Drosten paper is so vague and flawed that one can go in dozens of different directions; nothing is standardized and there is no SOP. This highly questions the scientific validity of the test and makes it unsuitable as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
9. Most likely, the Corman-Drosten paper was not peer-reviewed making the test unsuitable as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
10. We find severe conflicts of interest for at least four authors, in addition to the fact that two of the authors of the Corman-Drosten paper (Christian Drosten and Chantal Reusken) are members of the editorial board of Eurosurveillance. A conflict of interest was added on July 29 2020 (Olfert Landt is CEO of TIB-Molbiol; Marco Kaiser is senior researcher at GenExpress and serves as scientific advisor for TIB-Molbiol), that was not declared in the original version (and still is missing in the PubMed version); TIB-Molbiol is the company which was “the first” to produce PCR kits (Light Mix) based on the protocol published in the Corman-Drosten manuscript, and according to their own words, they distributed these PCR-test kits before the publication was even submitted [20]; further, Victor Corman & Christian Drosten failed to mention their second affiliation: the commercial test laboratory “Labor Berlin”. Both are responsible for the virus diagnostics there [21] and the company operates in the realm of real time PCR-testing.
-
2
-
1
-
-
On 11/8/2020 at 6:27 PM, MatchaLove said:
He made too many men angry. Too many mobsters, he was a classic good guy. Not perfect, not even Macys has that to buy, lol. He represents what happens to the good guy in reality when they get that high. They dont like it.
Now, my gut feeling, is that back then no one had the balls, clearance levels, or intelligence to pull it off OTHER THEN the Area 51 community.
Since JFKs death, they have used fake news non stop with no punishment, and its been swept under the rug. So, that makes fake news the more suspicious groups. Then there are the mobsters and cartels, which back then make trails and make noise, then there are the black ops programs that JFK was not going fund with 25% of the military budget. He was going to shut them down, and how did they respond??? Yeah......not so well.
It came down to his decision to defund and shut down projects similar or worse then Mantaulk that were going through innocents in the thousands. By then, they had more programs all over the USA, and they needed fresh flesh. How can you say yes to that?? Well, my thoughts are that he was going to defund them after having to hear about the effects these new black operation programs were having on the local communities around the USA.
Now, one thing that we learned from that 1997 call, is that the programs had expanded beyond the original Roswell incident, and this is the period of time (JFKs death) that it was beginning to pick up expand way beyond what they had, and they needed money. Desperation.
i remain a firm believer that JFK assassination was a psyop. Everything about it scream Psyop. It massively traumatised Americans and the world. He was an insider. President are always selected so he was selected.
-
On 11/7/2020 at 12:11 PM, Desmond said:
I am afraid David Icke has let Donald Trump down, by dogmatically place him in the category
"just another president run by the elite".
Unfortunately this has influenced the collective conscientiousnessin a wrong way.
Well, he is. What exactly has he done in his four years to make you think otherwise? He is now already on his golf course playing gold while his supporters cries foul. He will concede soon just like that other puppet Al Gore
-
On 11/1/2020 at 6:41 PM, MatchaLove said:
Most importantly, JFK was going to make, as one would suggest from his last speech, it a crime you could be locked up for, for reporting FAKE NEWS.
It didn't happen, he was shot DEAD!!!
Now, what has always been used by these people???
FAKE NEWS!!!
I believe it could land you a year or two in jail PER OFFENCE, and without his legislation over the span of decades to today, the average journalist has life sentences of FAKE NEWS under their belt.
He also probably clashed with MIB operatives over the reporting of UFOs and such in news papers, b/c they stopped doing it for the most part.
i personally think that the JFK assasination was a psyop. I do not think he was killed in Dallas. I just think they use his staged death to traumatized the American public. Afterall JFK was a nasty character himself and an elite insider.
-
On 10/21/2020 at 9:14 PM, Joebman said:
This guy made multiple videos “exposing” icke as a mason / shill . And there is one video on his page where he confronted DI in London .
Not saying I agree with this guy but I would say he is the only guy who goes into depth about Icke been a Shill.
And if that is the best he can do then i think we can all rest easy that Icke is not a shill
-
1
-
-
On 9/17/2020 at 7:58 AM, Seeker said:
I’ve realised something tonight, the official story about how the authorities became suspicious about a new virus going around is a total fantasy. There’s 11 million people in Wuhan, a place notorious for its polluted air, so respiratory issues are not out of the ordinary. And dozens of people getting pneumonia like symptoms during flu season, a time when people get pneumonia, raised someone’s suspicion... who would notice that dozens of people have pneumonia in a city of millions, even if they are close by they would be at home or hospital recovering. As a residence you’d never notice. If you worked into a hospital you’d diagnose them as having pneumonia. You know it’s dozens of people, not millions, considering 450 million people a year get pneumonia then how is dozens anything to make people think something new no worse is going about. Let’s say the pneumonia numbers were higher or symptoms were more aggressive than usual, as a worker in hospital you’d say, huh, we have had a bad flu & pneumonia season this year haven’t we. This fantasy story is up there with Hani Hanjour crashing a Boeing plane into the pentagon
Fantastic. Can i steal this and post it on FB?
-
1 hour ago, Mitochondrial Eve said:
As far as I can tell, the consensus is that the website is genuine - it has been capturing a lot of attention and curiosity on social media including Simon Dolan and the Ickes. It appears to show trading in Covid-19 test kits, instruments and apparatus in 2017/2018, long before Covid-19 was "discovered" at the end of 2019. There is excitement that this is evidence of planning for the virus and thus helps to refute the mainstream narrative.
An alternative explanation is that there has been a change in the product title after the event which has now been re-described to Covid-19 more specifically to aid with searchability. The latter explanation doesn't negate that the products were being traded in 2017/2018 but perhaps under a more generic name at that point - if the inventory could also be combined with other evidence such as a patent for testing, this would be clearer proof of planning for the virus in advance.
yep i did a bit of research on it and it could either be one of those two answers you posted. The thing is that without a screenshot preceding 2020 we cannot tell if and when the change was made
-
exactly, if this was a real pandemic no way would they be making these kind of songs about it. When was the last time you heard a nursery rhyme about cancer
-
1
-
3
-
-
On 9/4/2020 at 9:37 PM, Mitochondrial Eve said:
Unless my eyes are deceiving me, the following webpage shows that Canada were trading in Covid-19 test kits in 2018.
https://wits.worldbank.org/tariff/trains/en/country/ALL/partner/CAN/nomen/h5/product/300215#
can you give a bit more info, if you know, of what this is exactly. Was this graph up on that page since 2018?
-
ask them what proof they have that such event did not use to happened before covid.
-
1
-
-
am i the only one who think this is a psy op. The fact that the police wanted to be on camera to arrest her suggest they wanted to get the message out that if you protest we will arrest you. Not convinced this was a real event
-
1
-
-
i have seen no evidence that what mainstream science called a virus actually exist. Exosomes yes, cell debris yes. But no evidence of virus.
-
1
-
-
i have read how the CDC supposedly isolate/identify Sars Cov 2 and if you want a bit of light relief i recommend a read https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/6/20-0516_article. I mean the amount of tortured and poisoning that the sample goes through should cause the sample to file a case for sample abuse at the War crime tribunal. They even boil the sample, i kid you not. I mean how the hell is that even logical or makes any scientific sense. If a virus is that indistructible then we should start building planes black boxes out of them.
-
but that is what exactly what they have done. The virus is a deliberate invention. There is no evidence anywhere that it actually exist
-
2
-
-
those policeman photos look very strange. Photoshopped maybe?
-
since the virus is immaginary then it stands to reason that all the base pair are immaginary too


US ELECTION 2020: Trump vs Biden
in Politics & Social Engineering
Posted
Can all those who believed that Trump was on their side and that that he was going to clean the swamp and get rid of the parasitic globalist now admit that they were wrong and they got played? There is no more excuse now for Trump supporters to make about him playing 5d chess or whatever. It has been proven now, as any of us who understand that president are selected and not elected and both republican and democrat are two wing of the same bird. Trump was always a globalist puppet actor. There can be no doubt now