Kovidiot

Can all those who believed that Trump was on their side and that that he was going to clean the swamp and get rid of the parasitic globalist now admit that they were wrong and they got played? There is no more excuse now for Trump supporters to make about him playing 5d chess or whatever. It has been proven now, as any of us who understand that president are selected and not elected and both republican and democrat are two wing of the same bird. Trump was always a globalist puppet actor. There can be no doubt now

i have read the book many times. It is one of my favourite. Clearly from your review the series have very little to do with the book

add to the fact the Drosten papers was peer-reviewed and admitted by eurosurveillance.org. in one day.Something which has not happened before.

https://cormandrostenreview.com/report/ SUMMARY CATALOGUE OF ERRORS FOUND IN THE PAPER The Corman-Drosten paper contains the following specific errors: 1. There exists no specified reason to use these extremely high concentrations of primers in this protocol. The described concentrations lead to increased nonspecific bindings and PCR product amplifications, making the test unsuitable as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus. 2. Six unspecified wobbly positions will introduce an enormous variability in the real world laboratory implementations of this test; the confusing nonspecific description in the Corman-Drosten paper is not suitable as a Standard Operational Protocol making the test unsuitable as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus. 3. The test cannot discriminate between the whole virus and viral fragments. Therefore, the test cannot be used as a diagnostic for intact (infectious) viruses, making the test unsuitable as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus and make inferences about the presence of an infection. 4. A difference of 10° C with respect to the annealing temperature Tm for primer pair1 (RdRp_SARSr_F and RdRp_SARSr_R) also makes the test unsuitable as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus. 5. A severe error is the omission of a Ct value at which a sample is considered positive and negative. This Ct value is also not found in follow-up submissions making the test unsuitable as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus. 6. The PCR products have not been validated at the molecular level. This fact makes the protocol useless as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus. 7. The PCR test contains neither a unique positive control to evaluate its specificity for SARS-CoV-2 nor a negative control to exclude the presence of other coronaviruses, making the test unsuitable as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus. 8. The test design in the Corman-Drosten paper is so vague and flawed that one can go in dozens of different directions; nothing is standardized and there is no SOP. This highly questions the scientific validity of the test and makes it unsuitable as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus. 9. Most likely, the Corman-Drosten paper was not peer-reviewed making the test unsuitable as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus. 10. We find severe conflicts of interest for at least four authors, in addition to the fact that two of the authors of the Corman-Drosten paper (Christian Drosten and Chantal Reusken) are members of the editorial board of Eurosurveillance. A conflict of interest was added on July 29 2020 (Olfert Landt is CEO of TIB-Molbiol; Marco Kaiser is senior researcher at GenExpress and serves as scientific advisor for TIB-Molbiol), that was not declared in the original version (and still is missing in the PubMed version); TIB-Molbiol is the company which was “the first” to produce PCR kits (Light Mix) based on the protocol published in the Corman-Drosten manuscript, and according to their own words, they distributed these PCR-test kits before the publication was even submitted [20]; further, Victor Corman & Christian Drosten failed to mention their second affiliation: the commercial test laboratory “Labor Berlin”. Both are responsible for the virus diagnostics there [21] and the company operates in the realm of real time PCR-testing.

i remain a firm believer that JFK assassination was a psyop. Everything about it scream Psyop. It massively traumatised Americans and the world. He was an insider. President are always selected so he was selected.

Well, he is. What exactly has he done in his four years to make you think otherwise? He is now already on his golf course playing gold while his supporters cries foul. He will concede soon just like that other puppet Al Gore

i personally think that the JFK assasination was a psyop. I do not think he was killed in Dallas. I just think they use his staged death to traumatized the American public. Afterall JFK was a nasty character himself and an elite insider.

And if that is the best he can do then i think we can all rest easy that Icke is not a shill

Fantastic. Can i steal this and post it on FB?

yep i did a bit of research on it and it could either be one of those two answers you posted. The thing is that without a screenshot preceding 2020 we cannot tell if and when the change was made

exactly, if this was a real pandemic no way would they be making these kind of songs about it. When was the last time you heard a nursery rhyme about cancer

can you give a bit more info, if you know, of what this is exactly. Was this graph up on that page since 2018?

ask them what proof they have that such event did not use to happened before covid.

am i the only one who think this is a psy op. The fact that the police wanted to be on camera to arrest her suggest they wanted to get the message out that if you protest we will arrest you. Not convinced this was a real event

i have seen no evidence that what mainstream science called a virus actually exist. Exosomes yes, cell debris yes. But no evidence of virus.

i have read how the CDC supposedly isolate/identify Sars Cov 2 and if you want a bit of light relief i recommend a read https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/6/20-0516_article. I mean the amount of tortured and poisoning that the sample goes through should cause the sample to file a case for sample abuse at the War crime tribunal. They even boil the sample, i kid you not. I mean how the hell is that even logical or makes any scientific sense. If a virus is that indistructible then we should start building planes black boxes out of them.

but that is what exactly what they have done. The virus is a deliberate invention. There is no evidence anywhere that it actually exist

those policeman photos look very strange. Photoshopped maybe?

since the virus is immaginary then it stands to reason that all the base pair are immaginary too