Hegel Schmegel

Pro-Islamic leanings from non-Muslims, and anti-Zionist sentiments by non-Muslims, are virtually omnipresent these days; they are found on student campuses across North America, within the so-called progressive movement and LGBTQ community, and it is only natural that at least some of these apologists/critics would find their way and filter down into this movement as well. This demonstrates the extent to which this sacred cow has disseminated its droppings. When the alternative/independent media likewise remains largely silent as to this sacred cow, that's when you know we're no longer in Kansas. I have also found this rather odd, if not a little alarming. Programs and shows which presumably have the freedom to discuss something that within the MSM is considered un-PC and practically taboo, curiously and seldom venture into this territory, despite claims of being edgy or in pursuit of truth. This may at times have something to do with shows that are aired on the radio, in which political correctness is monitored and policed by various commissions. The hosts of these shows may themselves wish to focus upon a particular cow patty every now and then but more often than not decide against it, perhaps feeling it's not worth it to make waves which could potentially jeopardize their show's very existence, which serves a useful purpose in so many other ways, via the discussing of other important yet less sensitive subject matter. But there also seems to be a lot of self-censorship among podcasters, which I find quite telling, also. There are some exceptions to this, of course. Although not among the conspiracy theory subculture, Ezra Levant, as an independent news commentator, is one who doesn't seem to be intimidated when it comes to being critical of sacred cows, which the country's state broadcaster and legacy media either won't touch or cleverly 'spin' from a sanitized leftist slant. He is to be admired for this, but you're right, even outside of the corporate-owned media, there is for the most part eerie silence if not covert, in-the-background submission at work. For this, freedom-lovers might all be doomed.

The term antichrist means against Christ. There are many people who would fit that description. Over the years, specific individuals have been thought to embody the one and only. Aleister Crowley was nicknamed 'the Beast', and others have pointed to Hitler as having been the Antichrist. And on it has gone, akin to randomly drawing names out of a hat. The Bible speaks in general terms of the existence of an antichrist spirit, but it also is very clear that there will come a being who will one day perfectly personify this spirit and who will have to fulfill some basic biblical criteria/prophecies in order for this being to accurately be identified as the Antichrist. Within traditional Christian eschatology, the common belief is held by many that this abominable one will emerge from out of the Roman Catholic Church, or the EU, or the U.N. According to Bible prophecy, the Antichrist will be a great and influential leader, both militarily and politically, who will establish a New World Order and who will set up a one-world religion. That rules out quite a number of candidates for the role. Scripture gets even more specific as to what this Antichrist will do. In the end, he/it will lead many people astray and will desecrate a holy place set aside for worship of the one true God (as foretold in Matthew 24:16-22). He/it will be against God's bride, the 'Woman' spoken of in Revelation 12:1, a figure that represents the nation of Israel. The Antichrist will set up a throne in a sacred temple (2 Thessalonians 2:4; 9-12). With this one can see that the Third Temple will need to be rebuilt or otherwise somehow exist in order for the Antichrist to appear. Prior to my discovering Joel Richardson's body of work, I had thought that this one-world religion prophesied about in Scripture was in all likelihood in reference to the New Age Movement/Freemasonry, with the false messiah who is said to one day appear on the scene as possibly referring to Lord Maitreya (a.k.a. the Master Jesus). Yet this theory doesn't match with the prophecies as recorded in the Bible. What Richardson teaches makes much more sense. He makes a strong case for Islam as generally possessing the antichrist spirit more than any other group, and points to the embodied Antichrist as coming from within Islam, yet nevertheless perceived by the majority of Muslims as being their final caliph. Islam is, after all, the world's fastest-growing movement. Islamists (not speaking of ordinary Muslims here) often tend to be Christophobic/Judeophobic. The Antichrist is said will oversee a global empire and invade (even if by stealth) Jerusalem. At first he/it will make a peace treaty with Israel, which he/it will break midway through, after which the Antichrist will turn on 'the Woman.' Muslims here try and confuse the issue by pointing to the Dajjal as being the Antichrist, when in fact it is Islam that views Christ as being just another prophet, and as such rejects Christ, denies His sonship, divinity, as well as the Crucifixion. Indeed, it could be said that 'the spirit of the age' is anti-Zionist (i.e. anti-Christ). Israel-bashing as it is today is beyond mainstream, more than fashionable with most people, and utterly ubiquitous in today's society. One may think himself an outspoken nonconformist or brave maverick for speaking out against Zionism and its perceived extremes, when such rhetoric is all too common the world over. The radical left, especially, is most condemnatory of Israel, as is much of social media, the MSM, Big Tech, and of course many Islamists throughout the earth. One cannot help but feel that this is the enmity spoken of in Genesis 3:16. This isn't to say that what is happening in and involving Israel is all godly and of divine doing. The Bible speaks of the whole world being under the influence of the Devil, and this would include the so-called center of it. Yet, it appears that somehow Jerusalem will play a significant role in helping to bring about the Second Coming of Christ. It's of interest that in recent years there has been a movement in Israel based on an ecumenical vision or interfaith alliance between certain rabbis and Muslim intellectuals. One wonders, however, if this would be the equivalent of signing a peace treaty of sorts, this coming together and worshipping the same God, what with each side being Abrahamic in origin and monotheists. As noble as this sounds, this could very well be a sly ploy in an attempt to conquer Israel, via stealth.

As one who is of the opinion that the overlords of the underworld are most likely the Jinn and that if Reptilians exist they are interdimensional as opposed to intergalactic, I find it difficult to accept the history of the Snake People as recorded in Len Kasten's Alien World Order. This is a far-out read, to say the least. A lot of it could pass for outright sci-fi; as if something that L. Ron Hubbard could have written. A number of alien names are mentioned within, most of them spelled with capital letters and with few vowels. Has anyone else read this work? For those Reptilian enthusiasts on board, this is all but considered an historical account of the Reptilian Empire, but oddly I have yet to find any mention of Kasten anywhere in these threads. The book is a bit all over the map. One minute we're on Earth reading about chemtrails and Nazis, the next, far off in distant galaxies, with talk of star beings from Alpha Centauri, Andromeda, and the Pleaides. We learn that what largely keeps humanity imprisoned has been the invention of money; that we are mind-controlled and, as Charles Fort also believed, viewed as cattle. Whether these entities consume our souls upon our passing, is something I went about contemplating as I perused the publication. It is told of how these Reptilians inhabit the inner earth, and how they are largely responsible for child trafficking. Within these subterranean bases of theirs, it is written of their practicing occult rituals and engaging in cannibalistic buffets. Apparently, these Reptilians are not just earthly occupiers but cosmic conquerors as well, and that they don't take too kindly to agrarian peoples. Originally from the Draco star system, it is estimated that they arrived here 900 000 years ago -- long before Christ ever appeared on the scene. What I find somewhat dubious is that much of this information contained in the book in regard to supposed Reptilian chronology was obtained by people allegedly to have been in communication with space aliens, via telepathic means/channeling. One wonders just how much of this is accurate or misinformation. The book also includes some prehistoric-conjecturing from a North American native -- a half/Apache-half/Hopi elder. It is taught that we as humans have it in us the ability to ascend to higher states of consciousness, to the point of reaching 5D -- the Fifth Dimension, which is why the Reptilians detest humanity so much, being it is said they are confined to the lower part of the fourth dimension, otherwise known as the realm of the deceased. The chapter on Christianity and the origins of Judaism is when it starts to get a little suspicious, almost as if the messages obtained via the channeling were received directly from those crafty Jinn. According to these 'star people,' the Jewish exodus at the time of their being freed from ancient Egypt was a deliberate tactic, a plot to spread Judaism -- here told as being a creation of the Brotherhood -- throughout the world, in an attempt to consolidate power and bring together nomadic peoples. Who helped pave the way for this and was responsible for parting the Red Sea? YHWH? Uh-uh. ET. Namely, the Sirians, who oversaw the Exodus and guided it along. The Ten Commandments? YHWH? Don't be daft. Why space aliens, but of course, who revealed to Moses the laws while they were hovering in a spacecraft above the mountain. Along we move to Sodom and Gomorrah, where we are told these two cities were destroyed, by space aliens, not because of any immorality on the part of the inhabitants, but so as to prevent the spread of AIDS. I have no problem believing in the existence of Reptilians, but I am highly skeptical of their existing an accurate account of the history of their race.

The Trigger is my least favorite book among the author's canon, but still recommendable. The forepart is classic Icke, with its discussion of elite bloodlines, hidden history, secret societies, etc. This is the most readable portion of all. Part 2 of The Trigger is another matter. The tone of the tome at this point becomes a bit hardened. Some of the discrepancies that are pointed out that contradict the official version of events are obvious pointers to an 'inside job,' but the book goes way beyond the Saudi connection to its becoming bogged down in anti-Zionist rhetoric. In many of the chapters that open Part 2, there is just way too much ultra-Zionist this and Israel that for my liking. Reading between the lines, it's a diatribe that becomes tiresome after a while, if not questionable and off-putting. So bin Laden was not the culprit. I would agree with this. Still, it's worthy of note that following the 9/11 event, the catastrophe that claimed close to 3000 lives was cheered on by many Muslims the world over. Al Qaeda was praised by numerous celebratory Muslims across European cities, and you also had imams believing this to be divine vengeance with their mindless chants of 'Allahu Akbar.' Would these chanters have understood and embraced instead an ultra-Zionist connection, assuming one existed? Around the period when The Biggest Secret was published, Icke was teaching how even though the U.S. was a superpower, it was ultimately controlled by the 'Brotherhood' operating out of the City of London. Less emphasis was placed at this time on Israel and Muslim-Jewish relations, and rightly so. Fact is, extreme Islamist anti-Semitism extends back some 1400 years and all that time had, obviously, nothing whatsoever to do with Zionism (extreme or otherwise), as the state of Israel hadn't existed. Suddenly, along comes 9/11 and the question is asked of the West (i.e. the U.S. & Israel), Why do they hate us? Try reading the Koran, for starters. Extremist Muslims (Islamists) see Westerners as infidels, philosemites, a hundred times more than they do imperialists. Enter the Eurasia agenda theory, as put forth in The Trigger. That there were no hijackers is something that Thierry Meysson also had suggested in his book, 9/11: The Big Lie. Author Bruce Bawer has written about how most of the Western European establishment were quick to latch onto this delicious belief also; that this all had to do with the U.S./Israel and their expansionist goals. After all, there is much anti-Americanism/anti-West sentiment in these parts, what with the huge influx of immigrants from Arab lands and with Israel being run by elites who are for the most part far-left secularists. Even though Mr. Icke is not a Muslim (not yet anyhow), in reading The Trigger one gets the sense of where he stands on the whole Arab-Israeli dispute, which seems to be the entire thrust of the book beneath the '9/11' pretext. The author mentions a Alan Hart, a man who's an historical revisionist, and who actually thinks there would be more Arabs/Muslims flocking to the U.S. (as if there aren't already) if it were not for so many Americans being 'Islamophobic.' What utter nonsense this is, on so many levels. This self-perceived 'objective' Mid-East pundit is so clearly biased, that to authors like Bawer and Leo Hohmann this remark would no doubt be considered downright preposterous, backward & twisted. Elsewhere in The Trigger, in the context of social media censorship, Mr. Icke places Alex Jones alongside Louis Farrakhan in the same sentence, as those whom he feels have been wrongly silenced by Big Tech. As one who is totally free-speech myself, I am not saying guys like Farrakhan ought to be censored. But placing this pompous speechifier/demagogue on par with Jones, there's absolutely no comparison(!), and it makes me wonder why Icke would even be in favor of such a minister as this. 'Ultra-Zionist' is a term used ad nauseum throughout The Trigger. For me, there's no such thing. There are either Zionists or pseudo-Zionists (i.e. globalists operating within Israel). The term Zion is biblical in origin, and yet somehow by adding the suffix of 'ism' we are told in the book that such an idea was conceived by some Nathan Bimbuam, circa 1890. To be a Zionist, we are also told, one doesn't have to be Jewish. So true. There are those wonderful Christian Zionists, many of whom are non-Jewish. If what occurred on 9/11 is what is at the crux of The Trigger, then I would have to say that what comes closest to explaining what happened and who was behind it, can be found in The Big Bamboozle, a book authored by the late Philip Marshall. I believe there were Arab hijackers ('the Magnificent 19' as some Islamists have dubbed them), and real commercial airliners involved, not holograms, remote controllers, or directed energy weapons. Marshall was onto something and he ended up dying under mysterious circumstances. Some think he was 'suicided' for getting too close to the truth. Yet there are those who will prefer clinging to 'Jews' or 'Israel' as having been the masterminds, that this was all about land grabbing. Well, if you want to talk about expansionism, look no further than what has been happening all around the world (albeit, in the West especially), both openly and insidiously, in the spread of what is at its core a political and anti-democratic ideology. Noahide! Noahide! Whatever. Try instead that fascist S-word; that is, if you even care to speak this unmentionable word.

Quite interesting that in The Answer, David Icke speaks of the Freemasons as believing Lucifer to be the grand illusionist behind this simulated fallen realm of ours; a role commonly attributed to the demiurge, Yahweh, according to Gnostic tradition; a possible Luciferian inversion, this.

In chapter 3 of The Answer, Mr. Icke writes of good ETs who are spiritually elevated (here ruling out the Reptilians and the Grays), but which the fallen entities overseeing this prison planet of ours do not want us to be in contact with, as the advanced knowledge these benevolent aliens have to offer humanity would serve as a potentially liberating force, freeing us from the grip of the controllers. Such talk is eerily equivalent to the message being propagated by certain close encounter experiencers who espouse a New Age philosophy. Yet, at the same time, Icke does not seem to be talking about advanced technology, not in the form of spacecraft, anyhow, for elsewhere in the book the author mentions how many of the UFOs that are spotted are likely of human origin (in a sense), as the result of a transfer of knowledge alleged to have taken place years ago between the elites and the archons, in seeming reference to the Greada Treaty. If such is the case, these elites now have in their possession the supposed secret of UFO propulsion systems, something which many in the close encounter community fail to believe, their still looking to the extraterrestrial UFO as savior, utterly denying that a secret space program even exists and has now for decades. There will be no 'invasion' as perceived by those who anxiously await the otherworldly spacefleet. My guess is they will be among the first line of dupes to fall for the appearance of the so-called visitors.

No one knows exactly as of yet but he/it will likely be from that elephant in the room that also just so happens to be a sacred cow.

One of the things I've observed and admired about Mr. Icke's overall message is how refreshingly Earth-centric it is, in a sense. The need for consciousness expansion as individuals, and concerns for the freedom of future generations on Earth is often given heed to. Within certain alternative and UFO communities, however, the fundamental issue pertaining to mankind's welfare and salvation revolves around, not the sovereignty and liberty of the individual, but rather some benevolent ET presence in our midst and hence the need for government Disclosure of this -- revelations, they say, that would help to ensure mankind's evolution as a space-faring species. Firstly, evolution. I notice how frequently this term is used within the aforementioned community, within the context of their collectivist dream of terraforming other worlds, by way of supposed back-engineered, state-of-the-art propulsion systems/anti-gravitic technology. Meanwhile, the need for improving the inner man is all but absent from this intergalactic, scientifically ambitious, worldview. It's been over 70 years since Roswell and to this day certain ones are still enthusiastically riding the extended treadmill of this much-debated event. Some close encounter experiencers have in recent years resorted to alarmism. The ecosystem is out of balance! The environment is out of control! There are too many of us on the planet! We need to get off it in order to survive! Naturally, these ones point to the presumed positive ET presence as our potential, if not only, means of averting all this doom-and-gloom. Hence, why they are working so hard at seeing to official Disclosure. This alien technology, they believe, will help bring an end to our dependence on fossil fuels and help to usher in a glorious age of singing Kumbaya alongside benevolent Space Brothers. One such self-perceived pundit within the close encounter community has even gone so far as to say that anyone who denies the environmental warnings of the Aliens are those belonging to the dark side. So very twisted, this. If this is not a perfect example of the politicization of the UFO phenomenon, I don't know what is. Yet, rather craftily, these very ones skewedly try and turn it around and claim that talk of the Deep State among those concerned primarily with "NWO conspiracies" here on Earth is what is being politicized! That the Deep State or Secret Government was, in their view, originally designed specifically to keep the presence of (enlightened, technologically advanced) space visitors from being made known to the public, that the DS has nothing whatsoever to do with controlling the U.S. political system other than to keep whatever president is in office from knowing the truth about the alien presence and by extension every other American/Earthling as well. In other words, as they see it, the Deep State is keeping this cosmic knowledge concealed from us in order to keep humanity confined to the planet, which is in deep trouble due to an archaic space-shuttle program as well as man-made climate change brought on by our dependence on "dirty" oil and emitting of CO2. To reiterate for emphasis what I stated in an herein-above post, all this strikes me as not only having a deep political undertone and an agenda seemingly in alignment with the globalists/technocrats (who long for humanity becoming a hive mind, as some collective bride to be presented to the heavens), but one which also conspicuously fails to take into consideration the spiritual component of those whose natural habitat in this dimension/realm is the one we find ourselves born into. My own personal belief in an afterlife in which -- for better or for worse -- consciousness survives is unwavering. If you are a Christian, then you know what the Bible says about the purpose and destiny of Earth, of it having been created for humans and of it one day being restored to its original state. Or if all you have is but an inkling of there existing more to us than just our five senses and physical containers, what has reaching the Pleiades got to do with the cost of a carbon tax?

Interesting that back in 2013, Britain banned Ms. Geller from entering the country, where she was hoping to attend a freedom event. On the reason of her being pro-Israel. It's hard not to read between the lines of this. Why, even the Board of Deputies of British Jews were for this ban, and Ms. Geller is Jewish! Says quite a lot about the sad state of affairs in this part of the West.

There is some hope out there. Not much, but some. Case in point. Whenever I hear stories of ex-Muslims who upon abandoning their religion have taken to speaking out against their former faith, I absolutely rejoice, as no doubt all the angels in heaven do as well. Here are people who have come to their senses and are now that much closer to raising their consciousness and expanding their hearts. Apostates of Islam are some of the most admirable human beings on the planet, having escaped spiritual darkness and twisted ideological enslavement, these ones are to be proud of themselves, as they represent a beacon of light and hope for the worldwide family of beloved kafirs, who surely must feel heart-warmed at the brave stance these awakened souls have taken; fine examples they are for those who have yet to renounce their allegiance to an overbearing and arguably demonic theocracy. There are thousands of examples across the world of those who have left Islam and come to Christ, and should this joyous trend continue, the future would certainly not appear so bleak as it presently does. Truly, to be called an infidel is the highest of compliments an Islamist could offer, and many do so without any reluctance on their part, perhaps unaware of their strengthening the self-esteem of many a nonbeliever throughout the world. Although there are many Christians who continue to hope and pray for Muslim minds to be opened to the light of a more loving God in Jesus, there are others who would simply be in praise of the divine were an Islamic Reformation to take place, one that would see to the hateful and supremacist aspects of the religion being removed from its ideology and sacred texts once and for all. Followers would then be able to read their holy books to their hearts' content without ever the risk of their becoming deranged lunatics. That is to say, there would be no passages for the demented jihadist to try and pass the buck onto. This would no doubt lead to an end of numerous divisions and strife, and there might finally be peace in the Islamic lands. More genuine conversions to Islam might even occur, sans the need for coercive tactics and ultimatums. Ayaan Hirsi Ali is one such admirable soul who has championed the need for an Islamic Reformation to occur, although I'm not exactly certain what in her mind this would entail. Imagine if all Muslims were moderates who embraced freedom and democracy and sharia law was no more. There would be more of heaven on earth for sure.

In The Answer, Mr. Icke writes of climate change being connected to weather manipulation, via the use of satellite systems, and how what's been really fueling all this is technocracy. Once again, Icke is spot-on, as he often is. Now we are hearing of a Bill Gates-funded project called "Stratospheric Controlled Disturbance Experiment," which is said to have the goal of supposedly wanting to cool the earth by releasing artificial particles into the atmosphere. All this ties in to the book I am currently reading: Under An Ionized Sky by Elana Freeland, which aside from the The Answer, of course, is in my opinion the most important book anyone could be reading right now. According to the authoress, our weather is not only being modified but even weaponized by means of electromagnetic technology. Involved in this vast Mephistophelian plot are military psychos, Deep State lowlifes, and other contemptible riff-raff. Aside from geoengineering, somehow tied into all this is what is termed full spectrum dominance, the Space Surveillance System, transhumanism, and a whole bunch of other nasty stuff. Most people know nothing about any of this and probably continue to believe that CO2 is the greatest threat to our well-being. What nonsense. The process of photosynthesis is absolutely divine. What isn't divine, in fact the very opposite of such, is all these self-appointed, soulless megalomaniacs out there wanting to play god and fuck with Mother Nature.

The study of end-times prophecies can initially at first seem convoluted and to those in want of analytical endowment perhaps an altogether meaningless intellectual exercise without any relevance to world events. Yet with time and patience (and some might include prayer) what at first appears labyrinthine gradually gives way to understanding. In a way, it too is a form of dot-connecting, with biblical verses/passages the hints and clues by which to work from. Personally, I am not altogether engrossed in this material but do find it interesting and important to some degree, as well as highly respect Richardson's oeuvre. I've enjoyed a number of his seminars/lectures and believe his scripturally based worldview to be relatively accurate (although he makes no claims of being infallible). It is true that there have been numerous fake Mahdis who have come and gone in the Islamic world, with all of them said to be Sunni. Many Christians believe, however, that even the final and "real" Mahdi will be false as well -- specifically, the very Antichrist! Christians who are accepting of Richardsonian interpretation of end-times analysis also feel that the character of Isa (the Jesus spoken of in the Koran) is an utterly blasphemous concept and the very False Prophet -- the Mahdi's sidekick, if you will -- spoken of in the Book of Revelation. Indeed, it is many a biblical Christian's contention that certain teachings within Islam are adamantly, diametrically opposed to orthodox tenets with regard to the Lord and Savior; hence, blatantly antichrist in spirit. Not surprisingly, Islamists will fail to see it this way, with an eschatology of their own in which black is white and white is black. Said Bible commentator offers one such glaring example of the latter, in his pointing out an interesting fact about Islamic teaching which just so happens to be a complete inversion of biblical eschatology. Apparently, there is a beast that is said will emerge out of Mecca. This beast also marks the foreheads of people. The difference being, that in the Islamic tradition, this beast is viewed as benevolent, making the receiving of the mark a positive sign identifying all true Muslim believers. As such, the recipients of this mark would be totally accepting of the mark of the beast -- this beast anyway -- as they would consider it a good thing. This, a total reverse of what the Bible teaches, as if inspired by the Devil itself. As for the messiah figure and deliverer prophesied about in Islamic scripture, he is said to be one who will invade and conquer Israel and rule the world (for a time being, anyway) from Jerusalem. Coincidentally, this is a perfect description of the biblical Antichrist! There are Christian Zionists who feel this would be the ultimate sacrilege, far surpassing the "monument of defiance" that already exists on the Temple Mount. What concerns evangelists like Richardson are those like the Shia Iranian leaders who believe that they can assist their god along in bringing about these prophecies via their intervening as active messianists. (These ones note, however, that it is unlikely that Iran would ever outright nuke Israel as this would go against the prophecies contained in their religious texts.) According to some Bible teachers with an in-depth knowledge of the Middle East situation, peace treaties that some Islamic countries have signed with Israel are considered to be insincere at their core or to be honored no more than ten years, what with the very root of Islamic theology said to be one involving the conquering of Israel (and, by extension, the rest of the world) in the name of their god. These teachers have warned that this would be more easily accomplished were a caliphate to once again emerge in the region. Historian Bat Ye'or has also written of the possibility or likelihood of a coming global caliphate. As for information pertaining to the founder of the Islamic faith with regard to his intimacies with women if not as well with an underage girl beginning in his middle age, such is well-known throughout most of the world and has been for centuries long before the internet. There have been moderate Muslims who have acknowledged this, as well as critics such as Christopher Hitchens (author of God Is Not Great) and scholars like Nigel Davies (author of The Rampant God), among other credible sources.

About the only quibble I have with this film is with its treatment of 9/11, of which I personally do not feel was an act of militant jihadism, even though what sadly happened to the approximate 3000 victims of the WTC towers was loudly praised and cheered throughout most of the Islamic world, as if their believing that bin Laden and his henchmen were the orchestrators of the event. Nevertheless, to think that just days following 9/11 there was a proposal to construct a mega-mosque at Ground Zero! Just what message was this heartless and disrespectful idea intended to convey to the world? As I watched this film, I was reminded of the fact that radical Islamists perceive moderate Muslims as being weak in their faith if not nominal members, albeit people capable of being radicalized, or so they believe. The film also focuses on militant jihad only, which although troubling is not as insidious a threat to western liberty as that of cultural jihad. America ought to be thankful that they have those among the citizenry trying to raise public awareness as to the wolves in their midst; righteous souls like Robert Spencer and the stylish Pamela Geller. Ms. Geller, in fact, was the main organizer behind the protesting of the 9/11 mega-mosque, which had it been built would have most certainly been a contemptuously monstrous desecration of the site. God bless these freedom-loving individuals like Spencer and Geller and others on the side of peace and democracy.

There are those among the Blue Pillers who are so lost without hope that even God in all his omnipotence would nevertheless be powerless to arouse from slumber. As with members of a cult, their minds are hopelessly closed to any information that threatens their highly guarded and self-perceived infallible belief systems. No amount of reasoning has any effect on the irredeemably mentally imprisoned. Fantastically, among those of said mental state are those who claim to possess absolute truth(!), such is the extent of their hubris and the power of self-delusion. Then there are the somnambulists who do not wish to be disturbed. It's not so much that their minds are impenetrable (as the former lot) as their hearts simply not interested in hearing anything unpleasant. Theirs is the attitude of, You are probably right but I much prefer blissful ignorance. What you speak is no doubt gospel but such has no place in my protective bubble, where happiness supersedes often inconvenient truth. Fantastically, such ones are all for the illusion so long as there's television game shows to watch, card games to play, and chicken dances to flap their arms to (admittedly, a fun pastime in its proper time and place). These people do not care to be informed of anything that may upset their carefree, pleasure-seeking la-la-lands. They are like ostriches with their arses to the wind. To them, the Red Piller is nothing but a bearer of negative news. Heck, often mainstream tidings do not even puncture their orbit, let alone alternative/independent news sources. Sadly, I feel such zombies make up the majority of earth-dwellers, who are not so much mass conditioned by the social engineers and occult enchanters as it being a case of their choosing to inhabit fairylands of their own devising. It is why so many can be controlled by so few. The powers-that-be merely need to draft a blueprint for the prison; the inmates are the ones who by and large willingly construct, maintain, and update it. Is it pessimistic of one to glean from this that the so-called Great Awakening being anticipated by some, mostly in New Age circles, is nothing but wishful thinking on the part of those who are not being realistic? Those awake to the grim reality of things and to the manipulators operating behind the curtain can do little it seems to open the minds of those who -- either out of a sense of infallibility or vulnerability -- dismissively write their potential perceptual liberators off as being crackpot conspiracy theorists or wallowers in doom-and-gloom. Indeed, the chains of this prison planet are so deeply entrenched that there are those who would not exchange their beloved shackles for all the freedom in the world, even if it only meant just once listening to someone with a critical yet open mind without smirking or snickering and tuning out.

I've been told by an avid enthusiast of ET lore that the Zeta Grays, although thought to be behind the "H+" movement by many a seer, are actually opposed to the transitioning of Homo Sapiens into hybrid-human machines as this would only work to interfere with their Breeding Program, in which unaltered human DNA is a most precious commodity to them. This leads me to believe that, aside from the involvement of the earthly Dark Cabal, another alien race is likely behind the push for Homo Evolutis, quite possibly those speculated descendants from the Draco region, who are thought to be generally misanthropic and in want of reclaiming the planet as their own, which would first require subjugating, nay, transmogrifying the divine's special creation. Once across the dystopian threshold, it is thought the super A.I. will serve as minions on behalf of the unearthed Dracos. Something very dark is behind this antihuman phenomenon to be sure. It's no stretch of the imagination to think certain crypto-terrestrials may somehow be involved, in quite possibly influencing the (unwitting) proponents of this movement. It seems to me that no human in his or her right mind would willingly choose to relinquish their precious humanity unless their minds were not totally their own to begin with. I could be wrong in this but what else can explain the absolute disdain some among the species have for being endowed with divine spirit? This divine spark, it has been said, can be lost to the archontic illusion or on the altar of the demiurge, and if it is so that certain cosmic entities are absent of silver cords connecting them to what Nigel Kerner terms the 'Godverse,' it only makes sense that from their perspective the forever earthbound would want to devour as many souls as possible, by keeping them tethered to the earthplane, as mechanized, quasi-immortal freaks of science. So not worth it.

I grappled with a question recently but I think I may have stumbled upon the answer. The question involved the seeming contradiction between the NWO agenda & its characteristic police state and the recent 'defund the police' movements that are in large part funded by globalists. Is the latter not counter-intuitive on the part of the one-percenters? It was not until I stumbled upon a little news notice of a soon-to-be published book that it was all clarified for me. Brandon Tatum is the name of the author. The book is titled: Beaten Black and Blue: Being a Black Cop in an America Under Seige. The book apparently delves into various stats, such as how in the U.S. unarmed whites are shot and killed by police twice as much as unarmed blacks, and how the majority of homicides and other crimes are committed by black offenders. As I read the snippet the author Vince Everett Ellison came to mind, whose book I reviewed elsewhere on this forum. Tatum, as with Ellison, is also strong in his opinion that black Americans ought to exit the Democratic Party. (The movement Tatum co-founded dedicated to working towards this is playfully dubbed 'BLEXIT'.) But what caught my attention was what the author had to say about the 'defund the police' movement. According to this former police officer, the agenda has to do with the transference of police power over to the government. Once federalized, he says, unconstitutional mandates will be more easily enforceable.

Film Title: Obsession: Radical Islam's War Against The West Director: Wayne Kopping Released: 2006 This highly important yet disturbing documentary is an exceptional examination of radical Islam, a fanatical movement within Islam driven by an innate contempt for western values and especially Jews the world over. Specifically, the film focuses on the power of anti-Israel, anti-American propaganda on the impressionable minds of those content with getting their news solely from Arab media/satellite TV. The doc also parallels the spirit of Islamic extremism with the spirit of Nazism, highlighting their uncanny similarities, in which Jews are regarded as subhuman and referred to as 'pigs' and 'swine.' One commentator remarks how back in the mid-to-late 1930s, very few people took Hitlerian rhetoric seriously, until it was too late. The Nazis had sought world domination, and held a dehumanizing view of the Jews, as do radical Islamofascists. About halfway through the film there's shown a set of split-screen images, comparing sketches of (past) Nazi and (present) Palestinian depictions of Jews. The first of these split-screen images depicts the Jewish race as a spider in a web; the second, as an octopus. Although produced generations apart, these images are practically identical and are products of the same reptilian-brain mentality. The lovely Nonie Darwish appears in this production as do other commentators, moderate in their Muslim faith (including political scientist Salim Mansur), who have taken to speaking out against increasing rabid Islamism and warning western societies of the enemies in their midst. A former PLO terrorist is also heard from, as well as a Palestinian journalist, both warning of the danger. Various clips are shown, mostly from Arab tv, in which is shown ... small Arab children being indoctrinated in anti-Semitism, with adults instilling in them hatred at an early age ... a jihad rally in London ... a sheik expressing to his audience of how U.S. decision-making is manipulated by Zionists ... an Islamic cleric who recounts some remarks that another cleric once said to him about the dream some radical Muslims have of one day completely occupying the White House and renaming it the Muslim House. One of the interviewees in the film, an intelligence researcher, speaks of his having acquired audio recordings that were secretly made of meetings held in London mosques which reveal a not so peaceful message. (What a contrast to Christ's gospel which teaches to love even one's enemies. It has been said that 'by their fruits' true followers of God can be identified, with God being Love.) Within the doc are many a scene of these ungodly extremists clad in black attire, often with their faces concealed, and brandishing weapons, appearing every bit as woefully spiritually impoverished. This is not a documentary on what is known as cultural jihad -- which is a more insidious threat to the west, in which the intended takeover of infidels is attempted or accomplished via deep-laid, subtle and gradual 'democratic' means, lobby groups, and such -- but of militant jihad, in which in some cases passages taken from the Koran have been left at the crime scenes; sadistic atrocities all done in the name of their tribal deity. The one person missing from this film who has discussed extensively about the threat of Islamism is the intellectual heroine Ayaan Hirsi Ali, a dignified and refined gentlewoman, who has spoken of radical clerics in Great Britain, for example, who preach 'holy war' and how such talk is not the product of U.S. imperialism (as such talk has existed from as far back as the political ideologue's very first conqueror) but rather intrinsically rooted in the sacred texts of the faith. 'Tis why the Islamic caliphate known to history was a conquering force, subduing other peoples in the name of their belief system and bringing their captives under oppressive submission. As one expert on the threat of global jihadism has noted, the Islamists' hatred of non-Muslims and especially Jews is ultimately based not on any provocation on the part of so-called victimizers, but is largely predisposed.

The gist of evangelist Richardson's polemic is that the final world empire and the Antichrist will not be of European origin. His take was initially unpopular within Christian circles, but has since been gaining momentum in recent years, this message convincing many believers as to this particular scriptural interpretation. As is common knowledge to most people, the founder of Islam was himself a conqueror -- in more ways than one. He was said to have been visited by the angel Gabriel (a la Joseph Smith, the founder of the Mormon faith), and went onto become a polygamist at almost 50 years of age, reportedly sleeping each night with a different spouse. This revered figure to a lot of religionists, it is recorded, even had a wife as young as 8 years, a girl who still played with dolls. This was in and around the time of his supposedly having taken an airborne safari from Mecca to Jerusalem, long before magic carpets were even invented. In the spirit of the founder, following his demise, Islamic imperialists and intolerant Muslim armies went about for centuries attempting to conquer or conquering Christian territories and other lands -- in the name of peace or something or other. From as far back as the eleventh and twelve centuries A.D., there were fanatical sects of Muslims who terrorized and sought to dominate not just Christians and Jews but pagans; one of the earliest forms of these sects being the "hashish eaters," otherwise known as the Assassins. The final kingdom of end-times teaching is said to be one akin to being under the influence of the 'Prince of Persia,' who will once again take to conquering, perhaps not militarily in this case as culturally -- a fertile supertribe (i.e. one against abortion) into the crushing of other cultures and religions, perhaps this time by less overt and more stealthy means (as with the modern-day phenomenon of 'Chrislam'). Interestingly, according to biblical eschatology, the Jewish Temple is destined to be rebuilt, in or around Mount Moriah in Jerusalem; once re-established, it's said it will then be sacrilegiously usurped by Gog, a scriptural figure interpreted by some scholars as being in reference to the final caliph of Islam, the Mahdi who some speculate if not a biological thrall will be of artificial intelligence, operating under the control of the Great Dragon, who gives him/it authority -- up until, that is, the return of Christ, who will reign from Mount Zion, as has been prophesied in holy text. No wonder, remark some Christians, that Satan's seed is set against the very idea of religious Zionism and why maybe crypto-globalist, pseudo-Zionists posing as Jews have infiltrated and control Israel, in order to ruin the reputation of and detract from biblical Zionism. As Mr. Richardson has noted, the Bible, from beginning to end is, after all, Israel-centric.

To this day, The Biggest Secret continues to hold a special place in my heart and remains my favorite among Mr. Icke's printed works. Periodically, I will return to it and each time am amazed at how much of what is contained in that book continues to remain true and relevant after all this time. In it, Mr. Icke writes of his being a truth-seeker and as such how he is always willing to change his views if need be. Over time he has on occasion done just that it seems; incidentally, much to the dismay of a few people I know who no longer regard themselves as among his fanbase, due to their not having liked where their once admired and indirect guide has taken his research in recent years. To be sure, whatever fans Mr. Icke has lost on account of this estimated exodus has been made up for and then some via his undoubtedly having acquired since about the publication of The Trigger a whole new interested readership and following, apparently quite fond of the direction in which he has been led. Aside from many interesting if not shocking parenthetical asides relating to Pierre Trudeau, Brian Mulroney, Charles Taze Russell, and a whole host of others, much is made in The Biggest Secret of the threat of global fascism, of Reptilians (the ultimate and main string-pullers) operating from within the lower fourth dimension (this, the big dark secret that was), of secret societies, interbreeding bloodlines, the royal families of Europe, the Tavistock Institute, intelligence agencies (one of which, based in Amerika, Icke writes of having been created by Nazis), and of the epicenter of the Spider being the City of London financial district. All these intersecting strands and cusp groups ultimately forming the Web that controls the world. At the time, Mr. Icke wrote of Zionism strictly in passing and only constituting a mere part of this Web, despite many believing it to be the central aspect to it all. Unlike today where it's Sabbatian this and Sabbatian that, there was instead more emphasis on Hitler, Aryans, their warped ideology of there existing a "master race," and of how the U.S. is a superpower-puppet, controlled not by Zionists but by the Babylonian Brotherhood (a much less controversial and divisive term). All of which I myself continue to believe to be quite accurate. Recently, I had a chance to view Confessions Of A Mother Goddess for the first time. Prior to the candid interview Icke conducts with Arizona Wilder, Icke gives the viewer a tour of this very aforementioned epicenter, providing insightful commentary in addition, for about fifteen minutes. He describes this video at the time as being a complementary companion to the book, and I would have to agree with this. (Incidentally, I'm not quite sure what to make of every last detail of Ms. Wilder's testimony. The gist of what she says is not entirely beyond plausibility but one wonders just how much of her anecdotal revelations are entirely factual. Her testimony reminds me of Cathy O'Brien's equally rather far-out memories as recorded in Trance Formation Of America, one of the most disturbing accounts I have ever read. Many of the claims that are made allegedly involving one-time prominent figures in American politics and Hollywood often come off sounding too fantastic to be believed.) It's as if all the villains mentioned and discussed in The Biggest Secret have, since its publication, in line with Mr. Icke's latest findings, gradually coalesced into a neatly packaged, oft-used, coined catchphrase, one which has seen to the Spider in the last decade having shape-shifted so to speak and relocating from the City of London to Israel of all places. Take for instance the image of the All-Seeing Eye. What is clearly a Freemasonic symbol (as also observed to be in The Biggest Secret) is described in a caption in chapter 20 of The Trigger as now being of Sabbatian-Frankist origin. And on and on this seeming overwriting-vocabulary goes, enough to make some question this apparent contrast or contradiction between Icke's message of old and the rebooted version if you will. As perceived in the index to The Trigger, even the great big "Illuminati" has since taken a back seat to Sabbatian-Frank-speak, this SF phrase used so often now with almost mantra-esque fascination. Without doubt, The Biggest Secret would be my pick to recommend to anyone interested in learning more about the esoteric goings-on behind the scenes and the Orwellian agenda of the elite one-worlders (an agenda, by the way, that within today's alternative media has been kept largely suppressed by system-controllers operating under the guise of paranormalists who wish to conceal the NWO plot by means of seductive consciousness-diverting "programming"). As an aside, I think The Trigger, with all its talk of (ultra)Zionists, would only end up turning off too many seekers unfamiliar with the one-percenters and their shadowy masters. (Somehow I just can't picture Mr. Icke in the years to come sporting a fez and quoting from suras to help lend weight to his arguments, if that is the intellectual destination he is subtly inching towards.) Whatever the case, as it presently stands, I continue to recommend to others Mr. Icke's entire body of work and really couldn't care less where they start from, as I feel each one of Mr. Icke's books to be good starting points to one degree or another. Interestingly, author Mark Dice, whose research I also happen to think contains much vital info, devotes a small section to David Icke in his book The Illuminati: Facts & Fiction, and his overall impression is unfortunately not a very flattering one. Dice goes as far back to the early '90s to make a case for his general dismissal of Mr. Icke's credibility, which I think is rather unfair. As Icke himself notes in The Biggest Secret, it was not until August 1996 that he began discussing conspiracy subjects (in the U.S.), which would make anything he said beforehand, prior to entering into his dot-connector mode, for the most part obsolete and beyond comparing.

Yesterday was Canada Day. It was disappointing to hear in the news of Canada Day events being cancelled in various communities across the country, with some citizens ashamed of living in one of the greatest countries on earth. One can really see the influence of the infiltrators and their quasi-Marxist adherents at work here. All the good about Canada, which far, far outweighs the (magnified) negative, ought to have been the focus of the national holiday. Instead, there were numerous skeletons at the feast, party poopers, and others who seemingly took great delight raining on the annual parade. What a disgrace. No doubt there were many others, however, who celebrated the day from coast to coast with a sense of patriotic pride, waving their handheld flags, perhaps even clad in their "Make Canada Great Again" ballcaps, glad they are not to be living in places like China, or Iran, or North Korea, fully aware of the precious freedoms they have living in a democracy.

The expression 'God works in mysterious ways' just may in fact be applicable in this case. If it is according to a divine plan that the Third Jewish Temple be rebuilt, who's to say that God isn't using -- however indirectly, imperceptibly, as He sometimes has in the past, according to Scripture -- people not His own, at times even impostors or outright enemies, in order to carry out His will, by means of 'placing it into the hearts' of, in this case, the ultra-Zionists who, although having their own agenda for rebuilding the Temple, may unbeknownst to them be unwittingly setting into place the necessary building blocks in harmony with biblical eschatology. Then again, some have wondered whether the whole 'ultra-Zionist plot' theory is maybe nothing more than a clever invention of propagandists operating from within a Fourth Reich, ultimately deceiving those who promote it, who have fallen for this particular campaign in thought reform. Following Germany's defeat in WW2, it is well-known that numerous Nazis fled to various parts of the world -- some have speculated Brazil, Argentina, Spain, with Israel possibly having been an even more plausible destination point for these ones in which to covertly settle, as members of an occult-based fifth column. The Nazis' knowledge of rocket science and possession of advanced technology was said to be superior to anyone else's, with high-ranking Nazi officials and scientists, via Project Paperclip, having found their way into top establishment positions in the U.S. To this day, anti-American sentiments frequently depict the U.S. in generalized terms (e.g. 'the U.S. funded so-and-so', etc) when it is more likely an anti-American faction within that's responsible for marring or attempting to mar the democratic nation's reputation in the non-free world, as well as attempting to dismantle the Constitution.

Re: PPE as its relates to "Covid"... I know someone who works in a warehouse in Ontario who told me today of a company policy that'll be taking effect next Monday. These are workers, some might say exploited workers, who are already required to wear two facemasks as per company policy, and who of late have been suffering from almost unbearable working conditions due to plus-thirty degrees temperatures in the building (this multibillion dollar company doesn't provide these floor workers with air conditioning, that's how much they truly care about their employees' health). Starting Monday these warehouse staff will now also be required to wear either a face shield or another form of protective eyewear. This, or the highway. (Can anyone spell exploitation?) This is June 30, 2021 and not June 30, 2020, correct? Is it just me, or does this policy seem a bit extreme? And why now, a year-and-a-half into this "plandemic" and not, say, a year earlier, when in the thick of it? There are some places in North America finally starting to open up and are easing off on restrictions; then you hear of stories like this that boggles the mind, and it makes you wonder whether those in positions of power within business care about freedom and the emotional and mental health of their employees or whether these ones derive a diabolical thrill acting like petty tyrants, into the imposing of dictatorial policies that in all likelihood will not affect them, those who sit comfortably at home or in their air-conditioned executive offices. This person I spoke with is none too pleased and has informed me of co-workers of hers who also have had about enough of these (arguably illogical and unscientific) company policies in regard to PPE. This lady contacted a government agency that specializes in workplace matters to enquire as to whether a company has the right to mandate ridiculous policies such as this and was told that in regards to covid-related policies, that a company has the right to go above and beyond governmental policies, if they so desire. My question is, if all your employees are double-masked, then what possible reason is there for protective eyewear, other than to implement it for public relations purposes (i.e. herald it in the news of this latest virtue-signaling act of yours), or just for the hell of it, like how mad emperors in ancient Roman times used to order their underlings to do senseless things, for no reason at all other than so that the emperor can get off on a power trip. This lady is thinking about quitting her job. For fun, I put on two facemasks and some goggles and in a matter of a minute, the lenses kept fogging up. Good lord. How does this company expect their employees to work under these draconian working conditions? Are the ones who dream up these policies sadists? It could be worse, I told her. At least it's not a HASMAT suit she has to wear or a suit of armor. (I wouldn't put it past them.)

There are those who are of the opinion that the centuries-old Illuminati are an offshoot of Sabbatian-Frankism. I would respond by saying that it's probably the other way around. Too much emphasis, I feel, has been placed on the identity of this existent "Death Cult" as somehow being interconnected with this SF element out to control Israel and the world, which in my view, even if true to some extent, only ends up muddying the waters and creating a convenient deflection for overt or crypto anti-Semitic readers, followers, and Arab Nazis to latch onto, magnify, and become mired in their infallibly perceived vocal and printed echo chambers. The sincerely expressed sentiments contained in the Protocols are undoubtedly Illuminati-inspired and much of its contents, as others have noted, has been put into global action by the actual devotees of its ghostwriters who are satanic at their core, never-minding their irrelevant heritage. The Jewish connection was, according to some astute and objective researchers, a clever and later addition to the documents as part of a disinformation exercise designed to divert attention to the scapegoats, and in effect causing a century of hatred for an Illuminati-despised people, culminating in the horrific Holocaust and its loathsome deniers, who continue to this day, primarily among the "Mideast Beast" countries, that have tremendous influence on the minds of many a suggestible and bigoted ignoramus, via their one-sided propaganda-laced broadcasting.

There was a news report recently that told of resumed religious services in a Pennsylvania, U.S. county, in which some Amish communities re-assembled, sharing communion cups and exchanging facial pecks upon greeting each other, as the Christians in apostolic times. What a contrast compared to the police state-like reactions of certain law-enforcement officers in Alberta, and even of ordinarily law-abiding citizens who have committed actual non-covid-related crimes against these poor pastors, crimes utterly hateful and malicious in spirit, as if compelled by a demonic force. Even if you're one like many among the mask-fetishists who almost derive an erotic pleasure from the experience and feel that what these pastors have done in peacefully assembling in physical environments is wrong and maybe even deserving of capital punishment, it's hard to disagree with the fact that the way they were manhandled and charged far exceeded befitting punishment. I don't think this was so much about penalizing those who have committed infractions as it was about singling out representatives of a faith you despise. Who knows, maybe they'll come up with a reason to target self-professing Christians who meet in virtual settings next. Perhaps something along the lines of not being permitted to recite the Lord's prayer unless gagged and six feet away from the monitor.

When it comes to the decades-long Palestinian-Israeli conflict, in which letting bygones be bygones seems to be easier said than done, there is much room for dialogical debate, complex as this is as opposed to being cut-and-dry. (I feel it smacks of wokeism/political correctness to want conformity of opinion on certain debatable issues and to demonize intellectual dissent as out to intentionally "cause division.") For those who have not succumbed to wokeism or have fallen for the Protocols, it is generally felt that in a professed democracy such as the United States, support for Israel, a democratic ally, ought to be a bipartisan affair. Yet, in cases where the provocation of Israeli retaliation occurs, the common reaction has been the leftist/PC media's subsequent zeroing in and magnification only on the actions of the retaliatory party. I don't believe this can be solely attributed to possibly Arab-inspired anti-American sentiments, which sees the U.S. and its allies as being overall "oppressive" colonial powers, much of which is cover for (veiled) anti-Jewishness and insidious expansionism of their own. For centuries, the Jewish people, regardless of statehood, have been arbitrarily attacked and made the scapegoats for no other reason than their ethnic heritage. History informs us, for example, of Muslim zealots who for centuries, prior to the 19th, persecuted Jews (regarded as dhimmi as opposed to imperialists), for no other reason than that the persecutors were incorrigibly dogmatic bigots, if not djinn-possessed. Indeed, an argument could be made that the religious aspect of Zionism -- the purest and most legitimate aspect -- has been superseded or hijacked by a pseudo-Jewish faction said to be driven by a sinister, conspiratorial agenda; in effect devilishly marring what at its root is a non-pejorative term. Perhaps the overzealous exposers of this (theoretical) diabolical agenda are doing a disservice to all Israeli Jews and religious Zionists, in their inadvertently(?) painting these ones with the same brush. Interestingly, hate-mongering muftis in and around Palestine during the mid-to-late 1930s had allied themselves with the Nazi Party, some even co-opting the swastika and the brownshirts' salute, and took to championing on their fascist anti-Jewish friends and sometimes financial supporters, such as the SS, who funded these Palestinians and their anti-Semitic deeds. To this day, psychologically disturbed pro-Hamas protestors in Western lands such as Canada have been known to use the Nazi salute in seeming admiration of their hate-filled, thuggish predecessors. A disturbing fact which many an anti-Zionist conveniently glazes over and minifies, despite their professing to despise fascism in all its forms.