Hegel Schmegel

Went to make an edit in order to correct this sentence but found no option to. Zero-point energy/anti-gravity is how this sentence should read.

Headnote: I wasn't quite sure where to post this message, in the Transhumanism section or here, as the gist of this post is that these two subject areas overlap to some degree and not, in my opinion, by mere coincidence... What becomes almost immediately evident in one's research of the transhumanist and spaceflight movements is how deeply and suspiciously interconnected they are at their core, if not perceived as such upon first superficial glance. The galactic community awaits our 'evolution' but first we must meet these beings halfway. So goes the spiel. Enter talk of zero-point 'gravity' and the need for man to overcome his physical limitations in order to safely & successfully traverse the stars and become as one with the highly advanced techno-beings of this great universal religion. Many within the more New Agey circles of ufology are obsessed not only with "visitors" but with spaceflight, with wanting to colonize the interstellar regions (the 'To The Stars Academy' comes to mind), whose roster contains many high-profile figures within the field, and before this there were other institutions and groups like the 'globalist' World Future Society (that combined sci-fi memes & transhumanist ideology) and the Overview Institute, of which Apollo astronaut Edgar Mitchell (who allegedly planted a Masonic flag on the lunar surface) was part of. Indeed, one cannot help but wonder whether some of these influential sci-fi writers and published contactees of the past & present were/are not paid operatives, but I nominally digress. Whatever the case, many of these ones write of man's supposed need to escape Earth, either out of necessity (survival of the species) or because they feel it is man's destiny to do so (to ascend as a collective planetary body). Where that leaves Gaia worship in all this I'm not entirely certain. Have you heard of this thing called 'the Overview Effect'? This is the view of Earth from outer space said to have been experienced by Edgar Mitchell and other NASA astronauts; an event which apparently left them with a warm and fuzzy feeling of awe and wonder. And, whaddya know, there are those within certain institutions who want the rest of humanity to experience the same numinous experience for themselves, if not by actual space travel (in trans-humanist/post-humanist) form then by 3D simulation. (If donning VR goggles in order to be taken in by a short propaganda picture is not a blatant example of social engineering/brainwashing, I don't know what is.) The mystery for me, then, seems to be solved, when in my past attempts to raise awareness of the (dystopian) transhumanist movement with those in the alt-media into say, Disclosure, I have been met with telling, voluminous silence, akin to SETI's satellite receptions.

I would be greatly remiss if I did not mention one other podcaster who delves fairly deep into subject matter similar to that which is discussed on parts of this forum, and in a straightforward and sincere manner, as one who generally takes a back-seat to his guests and the material that's presented; who's neither into acquiring a cult personality for himself nor into promoting 'conspiritainment,' a la some other hosts who shall go unmentioned among the alternative subculture, who seem more about wanting to make a name for themselves, and packaging their programs in such a say so as to appeal to a wide and lowest-common-denominator audience, more entertained by stories of UFOs & ETs than they are interested in down-to-earth and more pressing concerns. "William Ramsey Investigates" is my kind of podcast, a show that's more about substance than it is style; here where you will seldom if ever hear the host speak of acquiring new affiliates or of desiring more subscribers. Neither sell-out nor shill, Ramsey seldom focuses his attention on the UFO phenomenon, but when he does his show shines a light on the topic and the field of ufology quite unlike any other, often exposing areas and aspects of it that other podcasts within the alternative media curiously choose not to. One particular episode I highly recommend to anyone suspicious of the whole UFO-Disclosure movement (as I have been for quite some time), with its seeming ulterior motives, is Ramsey's interview with author Charles Upton, whose latest book Alien Disclosure Deception reads like an absolute godsend. Whereas other supposedly independent podcasters within the conspiracy-theory culture are clearly obsessed with the topic of UFOs, strangely devoting almost every second or third episode to it, with their heads so far up ET's ass that a detached observer might easily suspect some type of fetish, it's refreshing to come across shows like Ramsey's, with hosts who have both feet on the ground, who are properly focused, and whose minds and hearts are in the right place. Then there's Ramsey's interview with Jack Pine, on the Jehovah's Witnesses, that's not to be missed either!

This film is a quasi-satire on life inside the JW movement. Here's an intriguing little footnote I would like to add on the early founder of this 19th-century unorthodox-Christian offshoot. There is rather convincing evidence to support the belief that Charles Taze Russell, founder of the Bible Students, a group that emerged from out of the Seventh Day Adventists, and that would later go onto rename themselves Jehovah's Witnesses(*) was either a covert Freemason or at the very least was sympathetic to some degree to this secret order. (* Incidentally, the witnesses of Yahweh referred to in the Bible were obviously not modern-day JWs but rather ethnic Jews. Replacement theology, this is called, and quite unbiblical according to many Christian theologians/scholars.) Russell is said to have once lectured at a Masonic lodge, his burial site is for some researchers quite telling, and he held strong & strange beliefs on his interpretation of Isaiah 19: 19-20 that the Great Pyramid contained esoteric knowledge regarding the end times, on par with the Bible. (Perhaps where the significant year of 1914 was derived?) There are even those who would describe Russell as having been an esotericist. (It is interesting that one of the sect's periodicals at the time was called The Golden Age, a name quite similar to the term The Golden Dawn.) Although JWs themselves are outright opposed to anything having to do with the occult, that the term watchtower also appears in Freemasonic circles is quite interesting to learn. In a book by Thomas Horn, titled Shadowland, there's a rather curious passage discussing a Freemasonic magic ceremony, in which unseen forces which are called 'lords of the Watchtowers' are invoked, as well as the name of Jehovah.

Interesting that in chapter 4 of John Hamer's latest book (The Falsification Of Science), the author refers to/cites an alleged letter (written in stone?) penned by Freemason Albert Pike, outlining the method by which a NWO could be brought into being: via the orchestrating of three world wars. WW3, as Pike is said to have envisioned, would pit Islam against the Zionists. According to Pike, these two forces would enter into conflict, out of which would arise a Luciferian world order. (As an aside, in Ed Decker's The Dark Side Of Freemasonry, one reads of Shriners who during a high-level initiation ceremony conclude an oath by using the name of Allah.) As I read this passage in Hamer's book, it brought to mind Joel Richardson's biblical interpretation of a 'Mideast Beast' (a coalition of Islamic nations) and the scenario based on a study of prophetic text of a theorized invasion of Israel occurring during the end times. Assuming for a moment the authenticity & realization of said letter, this brings us to the issue of what role Zionism plays in the divine plan, if any. True, political Zionism is in all likelihood totally counterfeit but may just in fact be used in the end by Providence to help usher in the messianic kingdom. What with religious (Judeo-Christian) Zionism having its foundation in the Bible, the usurping political Zionists (a.k.a. pseudo-Zionists), who in general are quite possibly covert Freemasons, thought to be manipulating key international events, might very well be pawns themselves in a supernatural chess game of sorts, with the Divine the ultimate strategist and caller of checkmate. (After all, as Scripture informs, sometimes God uses ungodly agents to accomplish his will.) If and when the carpet is pulled out from under the Antichrist, revealing a reigning Yeshua to be the greatest of all true Zionists, I wonder whether there will still be those who regard Christian Zionists as being misled dupes of the satanic cabal? Postscript: I would like to add that although I do not identify myself as a follower of Jesus, I am a seeker of truth regardless of whether I happen to like what I find or not. Whether Richardson's take on the Antichrist will be proven true, no one can say at this point, but I do know that his theological position, after years of personally studying and dismissing various other eschatological beliefs within Christendom, is one of the more convincing ones I've come across; one that incorporates geopolitical factors, with the state of Israel understandably smack in the middle of things. To think there are those, as with Yaldabaoth's Worshippers (as I call them) who teach that Christ's return is invisible and unrelated to the Holy Land, strikes me as most heterodoxical, whereas the idea of the Messianic Kingdom being rooted in the earth definitely resonates with me (on one level), even if at this moment in my spiritual journey all religious paradigms seem the product of archontic influences.

Title: The Hidden Dangers Of The Rainbow Author: Constance Cumbey Published: 1983 What relevance could a book published in 1983 have for readers in 2021? Surprisingly, a significant amount is to be found in this rare, one-of-a-kind expose/critique of the NAM (New Age Movement), which although published nearly forty years ago, remarkably reads not all that out-of-date. Take the passage that appears in the book's very first chapter, in which laser-beam-induced holographic images are discussed -- technology with the capability of simulating, say, a Second Coming in the skies, perhaps? Although not referred to here as 'Project Bluebeam,' the passage reads as if it could be describing this very thing. Did you know that the NAM is sometimes referred to as the 'Human Potential Movement' and that the terms 'matrix' and 'Global Village' have been part of its active vocabulary since at least the 1980s? This and so much more is revealed by Ms. Cumbey, with much of the material not the least bit outdated. Read about the early visions/grand plans of prominent movers and shakers in the movement of an earth without borders, of adherents in the U.N., of various 'conspirators' with international designs. What we have here is more than just a bunch of spaced-out navel-gazers & sitar-players into meditation and astral traveling but rather something far more insidious, something quite 'with it' and actively working to bring about radical changes in all sectors of society, most notably, politically (however covertly). Will the "Antichrist' arise from the NAM in the form of a modern-day variant of Maitreya? Will high-tech computers and Orwellian surveillance play a key role as Ms. Cumbey wrote about here, decades ago? Will the one-world religion demand of its subjects they all be of one planetary hive mind of sorts, connected by euphemistic 'Christ consciousness'? I'll end this review on that cliffhanger.

Although the Rite of Exorcism is nowadays all but a relic of Church history (some speculate, in large part on account of the infiltration of satanic elements & the de-spiriting Second Vatican Council), in various parts of the world, beyond the secular and pseudo-religious, the recognition of oppressive excarnates and unclean spirits is very much a part of everyday reality. That we who live under scientific orthodoxy inhabit a false paradigm, in my opinion, there is no doubt; here where antipsychotics have taken the place of exorcisms and pill-pushing labcoats are the new high priests. Refreshingly, wisdom continues to exist to this day, however, within so-called primitive societies (the few that remain), where insanity (or 'psychosis' as it is termed in the Occident) is recognized as a spiritual disorder and thus tended to by shamans and 'medicine men' and often with extraordinary success. This I find most interesting, as according to traditional ecclesiastical thought, only by the authority of the Church and in the name of Christ are exorcisms believed to work -- save for those cases involving the 'perfectly possessed' who are considered irredeemable and instances where the would-be ouster is not of strong faith. How to explain the common characteristics often associated with genuine cases of spirit possession, amidst these rituals of intended deliverance? -- the fear of sacred objects (staurophobia); remarkable displays of superhuman strength; knowledge of languages unknown to the afflicted, often Latin (xenoglossy); knowledge of unspoken secrets (usually regrettable sins) of those in attendance; foreknowledge of immediate events (which come to pass); the use of the 'royal we' on the part of the victim; the materialization of objects (apports) and nasty substances sometimes said to occur; fits of uncontrollable, diabolical laughter; the use of profanities/blasphemies in the otherwise verbally respectful sufferer, etc. Must be schizophrenia, or those repressed anxieties said to reside in the unconscious! Personally, I have read too much on spirit possession over the years not to be persuaded by the evidence pointing to such an unpopular concept as being an actuality. The secularist scoffs at this, but what do ignoramuses (who have not examined the extensive material) know? Then you have the smug sophisticates who self-identify as Satanists, all the while meaning atheistically speaking (if that makes any sense at all). Interestingly, it is said of the Devil that the greatest of all his advocates -- those most under his grip -- are those who openly deny his very existence, as what could be more satanic than believing or wanting God to be nonexistent? The late Malachi Martin, ex-Jesuit and exorcist warned of the increasing disbelief, among many, in the spirit realm; that there would be an increase in lapsers among the laity and especially among the clergy. He witnessed this happen back in his day among professing religionists, all the while as many power elites are thought to worship Luciferic forces, the military-industrial complex studies the paranormal & dabbles in occult realms, trying to make contact with threshold dwellers, and the youth and twenty-somethings of otherwise scientifically minded lands are fascinated with ghost-hunting shows and other paranormal-themed entertainment. As an aside, interesting it was for me to learn that it was not too long ago, in the west, that the phenomenon of hearing unseen voices was considered relatively natural and not the least bit pathological. Only a few hundred years ago, several well-known bards were said to have been clairaudients or spoke of the relationship with their Muse in more than just metaphorical terms; poets including William Blake, John Milton, Alfred Tennyson, Emily Dickinson, among several others (as is cogently documented in Judith Weissman's dense book, Of Two Minds). As far as exorcisms go (those that include cassock, surplice, and stole), they are said to be rare, but I think this has more to do with the shortage of believing priests more than a shortage of spirit possessors. Postscript: Curiously, you would think Hollywood would be the last place to find the treatment of (demonic) possession taken seriously, but every now and then a movie is released that could have been made by a Christian film company, but surprisingly is strictly Tinsletown fare. I think of The Exorcism Of Emily Rose (2005), based on the real-life Anneliese Michel case; The Rite (2011) starring Anthony Hopkins; and The Possession (2012), about a young girl who becomes afflicted after buying a dybbuk box at a yard sale. These movies remarkably get it right, overall, minus a few exaggerations here and there included for dramatic effect. For pure laughs, there is, of course, Repossessed (1990), featuring Linda Blair. The late Leslie Nielsen (one of my favorite comedic actors) plays the heroic man of the cloth. Nielsen plays Father Mayii, who in preparation for the upcoming ritual, attends a gym so as to get himself physically in shape. The spoofer includes a bouncing bed with an off switch, and plenty of reality-defying sight gags, that many a skeptic watching this would be only too eager to point out.

Despite the far majority within the alt-media believing the QAnon movement to be a psychological operation (designed to discredit the entire alternative subculture), this has not stopped conspiracy deniers, especially those within academia, who to this day continue to paint all conspiracy researchers/theorists with the same 'Q-tip' ... thus proving QAnon's effectiveness as a psy-op. Here, I make the distinction between 'truthers' and 'truth-seekers'; the former who have sometimes also been called 'Trumpers' (or Anons) and the latter, who are critically thinking individuals, often apolitical, who do not belong to any (cultish) movement, and who have existed in one form or another since the dawn of mankind. (Seriously, are there really people who believe that conspiracy theories did not exist until QAnon came along to muddy the waters?) Even those who profess to be on the intellectual fringes of society (just because they believe in UFOs/ETs when the mainstream media generally ignores or belittles these fields of study) will often fall back on their beloved QAnon-scapegoat when presented with rumors, theories, or reports that are not in line with the official narrative or which seem on the surface as being too unsettling or outlandish to entertain as a possible reality. As an example, try and discuss things like the Franklin scandal with such people, or occult goings-on within Hollywood/Washington, and immediately these ones become dismissive and think you are a part of the QAnon crowd (i.e. brainwashed, etc). This only validates for me the power that this devilishly clever psy-op has had on human ostriches within society who love this scapegoat of theirs, possibly a lot more than they imagine. Still, there are others, I suspect, who are in positions of censorial control (say, on online bulletin boards) who in all likelihood know of certain questionable theories as having some validity but who take to conveniently playing the QAnon card, as if disinfo agents or secret participants in the very shadowy/corrupt/perverted conspiracy themselves. I bring this up because the fascination with QAnon within the mainstream culture does not seem to be going away. Whether it's recent articles on the movement in magazines written by so-called debunkers or a latest publication in which (supposed) ex-Anons profess to now being able to see the error of their past thinking are interviewed, this particular scapegoat is very much around and well. Cue The Storm Is Upon Us: How QAnon Became A Movement by an author by the name of Mike Rothschild. There is also a new docuseries/film entitled Q: Into The Storm (a review of which can be found on the Roger Ebert site), which I'm interested in watching only from a sociological perspective. I once belonged to a message board similar to this one several years ago, long before the Trump/Q phenomenon appeared on the scene as a likely distraction to get the American public focused off disturbing revelations that were at the time just beginning to come to light in the media. At one time forum members were able to discuss conspiracy theories freely -- ranging from alleged pedophile rings & Satanic Ritual Abuse (SRA) existing within high levels of politics (as the late Dave McGowan also wrote about and persuasively presented in the first few chapters of the disturbing read, Programmed To Kill [2004], a must-read for anyone interested in learning about this) to things like Bohemian Grove and seances/witchcraft ceremonies involving western heads of state -- without being thought of as belonging to or influenced by some mind-control cult into far-out theories with absolutely no basis in truth. If QAnon has done anything, it has deliberately/inadvertently demonized all talk of such things within non-alt-media circles and in some cases has politicized them (i.e. labeling such talk as the supposed ravings of extreme right-wingers). One can hardly engage in a serious discussion with some people, say, regarding "Pizza Gate," without being thought of as being a 'truther' or a 'Trumper.' This, evidence to many of us that this particular psy-op has managed to achieve what it set out to do quite masterfully.

I listen to several alt-media podcasts but two I especially enjoy are Mark Devlin's "Good Vibrations" (already mentioned above) and Jan Irvin's "UnSpun" podcasts & archived "Gnostic Media" podcasts, found at www.logosmedia.com. Common topics discussed are social engineering, the counterculture of the 1960s, Aldous Huxley, and "Lifetime Actors" (a term said to be coined by co-host Joe Atwill). Highlight episodes for me include (191) featuring guest Constance Cumbey, titled "The Counterculture and the New Age Movement" (in which the Trudeaus are briefly mentioned) and the several which feature Lloyd De Jongh discussing various topics relating to Islamism. There's even an episode (035) titled "Satan's Sabbatean Jews" featuring David Livingstone, whose book on transhumanism I highly recommend reading.

Film Title: The Hour Of Our Time Director: James Jankiewicz Released: 2011 William (Bill) Cooper was best known for being the host of "The Hour of The Time" (1992-2001), a show that was broadcast on short wave radio and appreciated by listeners interested in supernatural/conspiratorial topics. As time went on, Cooper began to focus his attention less on the UFO question and more on the goings-on within the establishment. This somewhat obscure yet instant-classic documentary is an intriguing look at one of the original dot-connectors of our time. Before there was David Icke, Jim Marrs, et al, there was Cooper, doing his best to put the pieces of the puzzle together, with talk in the 1980s/early '90s of secret societies, Mystery Schools, infiltration of the Catholic Church by the Illuminati, Bilderberg, FEMA camps, the Club of Rome, etc. The doc contains biographical bits as well as examines material mostly from Cooper's first book, Behold! A Pale Horse, which I've read and can say that the information within holds up remarkably well even to this day. It is evident to me that Cooper was for the most part definitely onto some things, yet off-base here and there at other times (e.g. he was a believer in the official Apollo 11 account). That he experienced a transformation or re-awakening in his thinking, there is no doubt, with his eventually going on to abandon his interest in the wild goose chase of UFO study for solid-based talk of police states and government overreach. Cooper's final broadcast occurred on November 5, 2001, the very night many of his followers believe he was 'taken out' by the powers-that-be. The last half-hour of the documentary examines the incident in some detail, which took place in Eager, Arizona, where he made his home. Cooper died at the age of 58, only weeks after 9/11, of which he was quite outspoken about, having questioned various aspects of the official story. What remains a mystery to me is why this man seems to have faded from memory within alternative media circles. Alt-media radio shows and podcasts barely make mention of him, if at all. This I find rather curious, considering Cooper was practically the granddaddy of the very subculture these modern-day hosts inhabit. Cooper deserves to be remembered and recognized for his contribution in exposing the elites and their agenda, but is all but ignored by the likes of many who today speak and write about a lot of the very things he did. (Can't we get even one tribute episode? C'mon!) Watching this documentary made me want to go back and read what Cooper had to say in Pale Horse. In it he writes of Christ being his savior (maybe), of the Zionist conspiracy being a decoy (more than likely), and of the Brotherhood of the Snake (on par/synonymous with the Illuminati). Here, over thirty years ago, Cooper writes of global warming being a hoax, and contemplates whether the entire UFO mystery (which Reagan alluded to) is not some colossal hoax perpetuated by the one-worlders. (I'm going with conclusion 5, as put forth in chapter 12, as the most likely scenario.) The Fatima prophecy (or ultimatum) is briefly mentioned; the supposed secret of which is here said to regard a possible end-of-days outcome -- ultimately leading to a nuclear world war, should man fail to repent and turn from his godless ways. Was AIDS the result of hepatitis B vaccine experiments that were said to have taken place in the late '70s, which led to outbreaks in a number of major U.S. cities? Cooper seemed to think so. One paragraph deals with Pope John II and his background links to I.G. Farben, in the years prior to his entering the Vatican. As brought out in the documentary, Cooper, during his years while serving in the Navy, was said to have witnessed a USO emerge from the ocean. This was a momentous moment in his life, that changed his outlook on the world, completely. This is not to say he thought these were otherworldly craft. He does, however, go into President Eisenhower's alleged meeting with 'space aliens' in 1954 that led to a treaty being signed. (I personally believe this or something similar to this happened, but that interdimensional entities along the likes of those Crowley was said to have summoned -- as opposed to ufonauts -- were involved.) Interestingly, one of the alleged witnesses to this earthshaking encounter describes these beings in metaphysical terms, as originating not from another planet, but from another plane; beings who called themselves, archons, er, Etherians. When Cooper gets around to discussing the field of ufology that's when things really get interesting. Expressed in Pale Horse is the howler/shocker that (the late) Stanton Friedman was an intelligence agent and that, for that matter, most of the prominent UFO organizations have been infiltrated by those whose aim it is is to lead people off track. Regarding Don Ecker, Cooper has some suspicions and clearly didn't think much of him. And what are we to make of Cooper's claim of both Budd Hopkins and Whitley Strieber having been assets of the CIA? That Cooper pondered the question as to whether the Alien Abduction phenomenon is to some extent if not entirely a psy-op, is I think worth noting and something I too have wondered every now and then. That he kept his feet planted firmly on the ground is what I liked about Cooper. In Pale Horse there's excerpts from a supposedly leaked top-secret document, serendipitously obtained. The document discusses social engineering methods being used against the American people; 'silent weapons' as part of a 'Quiet war,' in which economic slavery is one of its aims, with the "lower class" specifically targeted, kept overburdened and preoccupied and their children exposed to dumbed-down education. Think what you will of Bill Cooper. In Pale Horse, he writes of being the victim of character assassins and encourages readers to examine what he has to say and to evaluate the material he presents on its own terms. I, for one, have in recent months gained a newfound respect for his work and the efforts he made in trying to bring the truth to light in his day. Watching this documentary is as good a place to start as any for those unfamiliar with Cooper and looking to be introduced to this overall forgotten and undervalued subcultural pathfinder. (Personally, I could care less about his days in the Air Force and whether he liked Alex Jones or not.)

Periodically, a perhaps bad habit of mine has me perusing op-eds, columns, and articles authored by so-called 'debunkers of the paranormal' and those ever so fascinating 'conspiracy deniers,' curious as to what goes on inside the small minds of these particular Blue Pillers, who remarkably regard their fantastically filtered views as being reality-based (if not, privately, propagandistic). Take the recent article on 5G that can be found in the latest issue of Skeptic magazine. The term 'Operation Mockingbird' came to mind as I sat reading it, all the while as my BS detector was going berserk. It's not for me to say whether the author of this article is a covert disinfo agent, as who am I to know, but his shit piece sure reads as if it was scribbled by some hack either working for a particular alphabet agency or for the telecom industry itself. This guy is either majorly ignorant of the subject in question or a spin-doctor extraordinaire. Whatever the case, the article will surely go down in history as a disservice to humanity, as it no doubt will lead many a credulous reader to believe that 5G is nothing to be alarmed over; in fact, if anything, it will be a positive impact on the world, leading to driverless cars and smart cities. Wahoo! Not surprisingly, there's no mention in the article of how EMFs associated with technological devices are unnatural and thus alien to our bioenergetic makeup; of how wireless safety standards are suspiciously lax; of how wired infrastructure is more energy efficient and also more sustainable than wireless systems; of how EMFs have increased exponentially over the last hundred years or so on account of Big Tech. Driverless cars, smart cities? I question the sanity and humanity of anyone who is for these. One of the more preposterous comments made in said article is the claim that the 5G frequency is about the same as its predecessor's. What a crock. Conveniently, an in-depth, scientific discussion of MMWs (millimeter waves) and how the entire wireless infrastructure will be altered, with cell towers needing to be replaced by ubiquitous small cell stations mounted every 300 feet or so, and what this will mean to the physical/mental states of citizens (if not for those under house arrest), is omitted from this tangential article, which blatantly sugarcoats and circumvents the real issues and concerns that 5G activists have. We live in a topsy-turvy world of misplaced concerns, where average people, or at least the intelligentsia anyway, are more concerned with curbing/eliminating CO2 emissions than wireless emissions, even though, it is said, 5G will be bad for the environment, with some critics even going so far as to call the effects of its rollout, 'eco-genocide.' It is also common knowledge to anyone who has ever taken the time to read their mobile phone manuals that the manufacturers strongly advise users to hold the phones a precise distance away from their head, and yet this article makes light of the fears some have with radiation emitted from cell phones, as well. (I'm assuming the author is an adult and not a kid who wrote this.) Which leads me to something called 'conspiratology.' This is basically the study of the sub-culture of those who subscribe to conspiracy theories, which has been a hot 'ology' within the debunking community for some years now, with many a glib, self-perceived pundit and self-deluded embodiment of rationalism getting off on putting the minds of those who believe in conspiracy theories under an analytical, textual microscope. Quite often these ones are way off the mark in their fanciful perceptions and laughable presumptions yet, utterly unaware as to this themselves, so long as it makes them feel sophisticated, that is probably all that matters to these self-congratulatory ideological clones -- the illusion of being expert at profiling and psychoanalyzing those much more informed than they are. Within this article (primarily) on 5G, the astute reader will observe something else going on, between the lines, if you will. Note the number of times the terms 'conspiracy,' 'conspiracies,' and 'conspiracy theory' are used. I counted, in total, a staggering 32 times (!) in the course of this relatively short article. From my studies on brainwashing techniques, I recall learning of a particular thought-reform tactic that involves the use of repetition of a key word/phrase as a means of subconsciously associating something (say, in this case, 5G) on a subliminal level. Anyone remotely suggestible and uninformed on 5G will likely come away from reading this article with (uttered in robotic tone of voice) '5G equals conspiracy theory' on their brain, without ever caring to do their own research, as is probably this article's intent, which reads to me as a detached observer of its clever craftsmanship as an exercise in mind programming. Never mind that conspiracies exist and have ever since man first began to conspire. (One of the better books out there that examines, in part, this academic phenomenon of 'conspiratology,' why it exists, who is behind it, and so forth, is Andy Thomas' Conspiracies.) An important and relevant digression this, as the author of the article seems to suggest that all those with fears and concerns with regard to 5G are kooks and crackpots. Whereas, in truth, there are hundreds of non-industry doctors and scientists from around the world who have signed petitions, urging agencies like the WHO, and the EU, to carefully consider the health implications of this unprecedented technology (which, IMO, has its roots in the Greada treaty). MMWs after all, exactly what 5G uses, have been used as military weapons in crowd control. I remember learning even way back in public school about the Curies -- Pierre and Marie -- the married discoverers of radium, and how they were both severely effected on account of radiation exposure. In recent years science has begun to recognize some of the harmful effects of fluorescent bulbs (CFLs) and the digital blue light these emit, which can wreak havoc on one's equilibrium and upset the body's melatonin functioning. As well, who isn't familiar with the history of X rays, and how when they were first introduced they were immediately hailed as a scientific marvel, were used extensively and ended up taking a number of years before the adverse health effects from exposure to these came to light. Now along comes 5G and hardly anyone in the mainstream media is taking heed. Here's to all those who have somehow managed to survive off the grid. God bless 'em. Such ones probably do not care about faster downloads and the convenience of devices that are wireless. It is my feeling these ones are living closer to how life was meant to be lived. Whether they like to bask in the sunlight and feel rejuvenated, as I do, is anyone's guess, yet in this topsy-turvy world we are told that this natural source of radiation is bad for us so remember to first apply sunscreen! Yet, with a certain dickhead wanting to block out the sunlight via geoengineering, maybe these megalomaniac efforts of his will end up putting the sun-lotion makers out of business? This spraying of the skies will be done to supposedly protect Earth's environment, is the official story. There goes my BS detector again. Postscript Aside from Dr. Joseph Mercola's excellent book on 5G, here are a few other recommendable reads pertaining to electromagnetic radiation: Cancer and EMF Radiation: How to Protect Yourself from the Silent Carcinogen of Electropollution by Brandon LaGreca Disconnect: The Truth About Cell Phone Radiation by Devra Davis Radiation Nation by Daniel T. DeBaun For those who prefer educating themselves by way of audio, two of the better podcast episodes I've heard on 5G, among several I've listened to, can be found on "The Higher Side Chats" show, hosted by Greg Carlwood. There's his interview with guest Matt Landman that's highly listenable, and I especially enjoyed the one with Susan Clark.

It amazes me the number of people I talk to who, despite their being technophiles/netizens, and who therefore ought to be in the know, are in denial or profess ignorance when in conversation with them the topic of wireless radiation/5G is raised and discussed. Case in point. In a recent dialogue with an extended relative, I somewhat rhetorically asked the fellow whether hard-wired internet connection was safer than, say, a Wi-Fi router, when it comes to the emitting of wireless radiation. This man pointed out to me that there is no escape from electromagnetic radiation, that these waves/fields are all around us, bombarding us from satellites and what-not. In other words, he was using the It's safe because it's omnipresent argument. Move over, Socrates. (Had we been standing knee-deep in a sewer, no doubt this guy would have been trying to allay any fears I have over consuming human waste. Luckily for me, I know better.) A few weeks ago I was chatting with an I.T. technician. Wanting to know what this self-perceived expert's thoughts were on EMFs and the pervasive wireless infrastructure, he chuckled and tried to reassure me that all was well in the land of Oz. EMFs are natural, he said, as natural as sunlight. When I brought up 5G, he became quite enthusiastic and told me not to pay too much attention to everything I come across on the internet, because 'There's a lot of misinformation out there.' I was tempted to ask this techie when it was the last time he passed a CAPTCHA test, but decided against it. Still, another person, an elderly lady I spoke with not too long ago, thought nothing of the potential harmful effects I listed to her, said to be correlated to EMF/RF exposure. The granny explained to me how she already suffers from daily headaches, fatigue, and insomnia as it is. As for possibly getting cancer, she replied something to the effect of, At my age, I'd be long gone before a tumor ever gets me. Why the ado? Resignation and/or minifying the issue. This is but a sampling of the responses one receives from those who are so tethered to their wireless devices that they seek out each and every latest technological convenience passionately, unquestioningly, and due to the past year-and-a-half of intermittent lockdowns are now online more than ever before, which I think is what one of the intended effects of the plandemic was to begin with -- to get people more hooked on Wi-Fi and virtual environments, whether these ones are familiar with nonionizing radiation or not. Only one person out of several people I spoke with during the past couple of months related to me his concerns about what all this electrosmog is doing to our health and DNA. A bit of a paranormalist, this older gent half-jokingly said he's considering trading in his doodlebug for an EMF meter. (No doubt he'll have more success finding what he's after.)

One of the most important points that is made in Islam Rising is just how influential the Saudi lobby has been and is within the United States (on college campuses and in government, in particular). Much is made by some/many on this board as to tiny Israel's influence on American politics/foreign policies ('the Zionists control the U.S.!', yawn) but that's an absolute joke when compared to the Saudi & Palestinian lobbies; the former whose financial resources and means to buy off prominent figures and key institutions within the American establishment makes any talk of an Israeli presence in the U.S. sound utterly ridiculous by comparison. Two excellent books on this are Gerald Possner's Secrets Of The Kingdom: The Inside Story Of The Saudi-US Connection and Robert Baer's Sleeping With The Devil. Yet there are those who, either out of ignorance or sympathy with Islamists, like to go on and on and on promoting the overall red herring that is the Israel-U.S. alliance which, as two countries that are democratic allies, is true to some quite understandable extent, but is nothing compared to the (Middle Eastern) Islamists' insidious tactics and infiltration of the West as continental conquerors and big-time monetary contributors. As has been researched and reported over the years, for decades now, extending at least as far back as the 1970s, Saudi financiers have donated massive amounts of money to various U.S. presidents and other American politicians on both sides of the political spectrum (which has often turned such ones into Islamic apologists), as well as to Ivy League universities. A common saying is that 'the world runs on oil' and the Saudi Kingdom, which is filthy rich (we're talking princes who, for example, own numerous diamond-studded cars and who live in gaudy palaces, who are a hundred times wealthier than any high-profile Hollywood actor or sports stat), it is said not only funds radical Islam throughout the world but is responsible for infiltrating the brainwashed woke culture on major college and university campuses in the U.S. where not surprisingly anti-Israel (read anti-Jewish) sentiments are prevalent due in large part to the Saudi/Palestinian vast propaganda machine.

Film Title: Islam Rising: A Call To One World Ummah Director: Caryl Matrisciana Released: 2009 There are anti-sharia activists and other Western sentinels who foretell/warn of a new Dark Age vastly approaching. According to their predictions, three to four decades from now (possibly sooner) the Western world will no longer resemble anything like it has looked for the past century or more. With a significant decrease in birth rates among kafirs all across the world, coupled with demographic shifts and Muslims doubling/tripling their populations via pullulation & high conversion rates, the creation of a modern-day dhimmis underclass and the implementation of a Jizya tax, so these ones predict, may be sooner than most people care to think. In a sense, the genie has been let out of the bottle and there is no way of putting a lid on it. It's of interest to note that the most popular baby boy's name in a number of European countries is said to be Mohammed and that numerous churches all over the world are being converted into mosques. An invisible war -- insidious and largely ideological -- is being waged against infidels and the average citizen remains utterly oblivious to it. How many non-Muslims are aware, for example, that the founder of Islam was the very first oppressive and barbaric jihadi, who expanded the religion mostly by sword? Today, the (generally peaceable) Islamists' desire for world domination continues (a totalitarian quest that has been going on for 1400 years), despite the positive image these ones and their PR apologists often like to project to kafirs in their midst, in an attempt at hiding their true motivations. (The doctrine of Kithman refers to the concealing of Islam's deepest beliefs or truest intentions from unbelievers. Or as one sheik put it, an Islamist might smile at a non-Muslim but inside regard him/her with utter contempt. As well, it's said that Muslims strong in their faith are not to befriend unbelievers [other than for show], what with non-Muslims considered enemies of Allah [Surah 3:28].) For those looking for the truth about what Islamism is all about, a good place to start, in my opinion, is with those who were brought up in the very ideology itself, and who later as adults went onto abandon their beliefs, upon waking up to the crooked path they were on. Kamal Saleem grew up as a mercenary and was at one time a Sunni Muslim and is a former PLO terrorist. Zach Anani is an ex-terrorist of Lebanese origin who has also come forward to speak out against Islamism and the threat that it poses to the free world. These are just two of the interviewees presented in this tremendously important docuseries, which serves as a wake-up call to those not already alert as to this particular serpent in the grass. Aside from Saleem and Anani, we also hear from Nonie Darwish, Walid Shoebat (another former PLO terrorist), Brigitte Gabriel, et al. ISLAM RISING is an inside look at Islamism from the perspective of several people whose intimate knowledge of the ideology and its way of life is based on their own one-time involvement in the belief system. They provide us with enlightening information with regard to CAIR (Council of American Islamic Relations) and the Muslim Brotherhood. They also inform us as to what mosques are often really used for behind their religious facades (we are told that 80% of mosques in the U.S. are Wahhabi.) We learn of the origin of Allah the tribal deity (once a moon god, hence their lunar calendar and crescent emblem), how the so-called Prophet believed the sword to be more powerful than the inkhorn and olive branch, how money for terrorism is often raised under the guise of peaceful front organizations, as well as the eight different forms of jihad (sometimes referred to as the sixth pillar of Islam). This exceptional and dateless docuseries is broken up into four parts, each one of about 45 minutes in length. ISLAM RISING is for those, I think, with more than just a passing interest in this topic. "Dawah: The Duty to Conquer" is the title of the first part, with 'the Great Satan' (the U.S.) being the Islamists' primary ideological target in their quest to take over the world and eventually impose a global caliphate. Whereas most immigrants to the West merge themselves into the native population, Islamists, obeying their duty of al-Hijra fail to assimilate, and thus stand apart, with divided loyalties or even outright allegiance to sharia law over Western constitutions and values. ISLAM RISING exposes things that imams, mullahs, sheiks, and Islamic clerics would never dare reveal to their host communities, which is what makes this such an important docuseries that ought to be viewed by all not of the Muslim faith.

Finally received my copy of Mr. Icke's latest release, Perceptions Of A Renegade Mind, which was pre-ordered months ago. (Some pony express.) As it stands... My schedule has been cleared. All appointments have been cancelled. Chores and errands -- postponed. All other interests and hobbies have been put on hold. The answering service has been turned on. 'Do Not Disturb' signs have been posted. Air baths will have to do. Cat naps, too. Pre-made meals are all set to go. The adult diaper fits comfortably. Suffice it to say, Mr. Icke's books deserve a reader's undivided attention!

The youth-geared music industry certainly appears to be a demoralizing force by design. In the documentary Drugs As Weapons Against Us, the film makes a strong case for the theory that drugs such as psychedelics (in the 60s) and later Ecstasy (in the '90s), as just two examples, were/are purposely introduced into society as a means of both promoting a lack of social values in their users as well as a means of controlling a large segment of the masses, by keeping them, (young adults especially), enervated & disoriented and thus incapable of producing any positive changes in the world. When I hear some of the 'music' that young ones listen to nowadays, to each his own, but it makes me wonder if music as well has been and is being used in large part as a means of keeping a large portion of the population confined to a spiritually destructive frequency. Aside from this, I have heard snippets of interviews on alternative podcasts, guests who have spoken of how even certain tonalities and specific notes -- aside from downbeat lyrics and the infernal screaming & shouting that passes for singing in at least two genres I can think of -- are intentionally employed as a means of negatively affecting their intended audience on both a psychical and subconscious level. Most of the music I listen to rises above the earthplane, both melodically and lyrically, as opposed to becoming locked into its base wavelength as with, say, some bellowing wallower, which is where I think the powers-that-be prefer musicians and their fans to be: submerged in discordance. Certainly, since about the 1970s there has been an increase in antimusic (as I like to call it): chart-topper after hit obsessed with morbid or low-minded themes such as death and hate -- angst-ridden, gloomy offerings. It seems to me that, generally, many of these Alternative Rock stars and almost all Heavy Metal bands, undoubtedly unbeknownst to them, perform a valuable function to the very system, the very machine, they oppose in their vocalized moaning and screams, by keeping a large number of the younger generation down -- feeling angry at the world and down on life. I cannot help but feel that that's just what the controllers of the system want: for people, young ones in particular, to be depressed, moody, cynical, feeling as disempowered & disillusioned victims of society, totally embracing of the gutter & the sewer, instead of as mature, upbeat, responsible, radiant, intelligent, physically pure, spiritually empowered & sober adults, appreciative of life's beauty, with love in their hearts, and in a position to make a positive impact on the world. It truly baffles me how anyone can like, say, Gangsta Rap if they are one who envisions a world better than this one where only peace and harmony exists, or do these ones get off on songs obsessed with revenge and ego, the lust for power and riches? I also don't understand how anyone can read books that stress the importance of ascending to higher states of being and yet at the same time be attracted to music that seems designed to keep, or at least has the effect of keeping, the listener from experiencing positive feelings and emotions. Maybe I'm just reading too much into all this and there really are light beings inside those who look and sound like Marilyn Manson, but the greater part of me suspects that this is not the case. Just as there is junk food for the body, so too in my opinion do I think there exists junk food for the mind/soul. By comparison, how can one listen to the positive-consciousness lyrics of (to name just a few examples) Jon Anderson's "Time Has Come," or Christopher Franke's "Scene At The Crossroads," or the song "Serra Pelada" off the Powaqqatsi soundtrack and not feel positively euphoric, elevated, and recharged?

My song for today: "Babylon" by Brendan Perry (of Dead Can Dance), otherwise, of late, during this Canadian federal election period it has been Perry's "The Bogus Man" which I've been listening to on a daily basis, with "Wintersun" my favorite track off the Ark album.

What I can't stand is when you're surfing online and you come across a news item/headline about another woke celebrity or popular media personality repeating the covid mantra. One wonders: Are these influential mouthpieces sadly-misled useful idiots or paid/bought-off agents of the corrupt system? Take the latest self-appointed authority which the MSM has spotlighted as being a source of wisdom. Howard Stern of all punchlines. You're talking about a dude with the I.Q. level of a Beavis or a Butthead. What is it with these guys in society who look or sound as if they exist at the margins or the fringes, who appear as, say, hard-featured & goateed diehard individualists, or as in Stern's case as one who presents himself as a host of shock radio, but who are some of the most mainstream-thinking & overly compliant conformists around? Stern has spoken! Everybody needs to get jabbed and fuck anti-vaxxers and their freedom! If there's ever an agitator who looks like he wouldn't care what type of substance was injected into his body, it's this ill-favored moron. This low-minded, crass & obnoxious ignoramus is so plugged into the matrix it's not funny. How this freak of nature ever managed to acquire even a semiconscious fanbase as he has is beyond me.

Movie Title: Confessions Of A Teenage Jesus Jerk Director: Eric Stoltz Released: 2017 Confessions Of A Teenage Jesus Jerk is a bit of a satire on the Jehovah's Witnesses, although it really could be about any claustral and holier-than-thou faith which takes itself too seriously. The movie centers around Gabe, played by Sasha Feldman, here in his cinematic debut. The several scenes of life inside the organization are quite entertaining. Take the sequence set at an annual convention, in which two teenage members of the church are shown on stage illustrating for the audience a dialogic strategy when confronted with a disinterested householder, in response to various 'conversation-stoppers' they may encounter during their door-to-door ministerial assignments. There are scenes of Gabe engaged in the recruitment work, calling on people's homes, and attending his local meeting hall dressed in his Sunday best. Gabe's father, an elder within the congregation, is none too pleased when he finds out that his son has been caught holding hands with a 'worldly' girl at school. Gabe is placed on the hot seat and undergoes a grilling by a committee of elders. He swears to them that all he did was embrace. Confessions Of A Teenage Jesus Jerk portrays its sympathetic hero caught between two extremes, and if the screenplay is at fault for anything, it's that it limits the choices the protagonist has to one of two options: the family faith or living a life of immorality and hanging out with punks. It's that old Us verses Them, black-and-white mentality, commonly associated with cults or cloistered religious communities.

I have relatives who even prior to this plandemic were already borderline unstable valetudinarians, germaphobes, and walking basket cases, people practically afraid of their own shadows and who have for years suffered from dysphoria and other mentally debilitating complexes (like melancholia). All the irrational fearmongering that has gone on since early 2020 has only exacerbated these issues of theirs. These are the same hyperventilating victims of nervous breakdowns who have bought the scam hook-line-and-sinker and who have been encouraging me to take the jab so that once or twice a year we may get together for social events. (Okay. Enough with your powers of persuasion, you've made a believer out of me!) I love of all them but these are people who do not go onto the websites of the vaccine makers to read the long list of potential side effects, nor do they visit government websites to compare fatalities with the size of the population and thus put things in their proper perspective, to know that the death rate in Canada in the past few weeks has been virtually zero or very close to it. (This is so not a pandemic. It doesn't even come close to one.) Here are people who have little knowledge of or seeming interest in the Charter. Ignorant they are of things like Event 201 and a war game simulation that took place back in 2001 called Operation Lockdown, or NASA's 'Future Wars 2025' which also took place in 2001. Would they look dumbstruck if they were to learn that the leading cause of polio in America in recent decades has been the result of the polio vaccine itself?, and that in recent months most hospitalizations in Israel have been due to the covid vaccines? What would they think of the Tuskegee Experiment if informed of this? Have they even heard of VAERS (the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System) or ever visited its database? The Center for Autism and Related Disorder; the 'Vaccine Court': Sound even remotely familiar? And yet these fanatical, snickering, socially conditioned pin-cushions regard me as misled and speak to me as if they had just mussed my hair. (Hey, the world laughed at Noah and his family.) Even those among my family (including those who have gotten jabbed) are in agreement that it normally takes at least 2 to 3 years for a vaccine to be properly tested and studied. How is it then that this covid vaccine was able to appear so quickly on the scene? They find themselves caught in a verbal predicament. They don't care to entertain the idea that these vaccines may have existed prior to the 'outbreak' of covid, so they start to respond by saying how they now can make vaccines more quickly, but have stopped themselves in mid-sentence, as if dawning on them that this also contradicts what they so adamantly believe, which is that these are standard vaccines and not gene therapies speedily concocted in large part by technocrats, as those crazy 'conspiracy theorists' say.

This past year I re-read a classic book on social panic and the hysteria prone to crowds. In it, was the story of an imaginary outbreak that occurred in some small European town in which students were initially told there had been a poisonous leak in the building. Some of the students began fainting, others even convulsing. Later it was discovered there had been no leak at all and that all the effects upon the students were caused by the power of (auto)suggestion. As I read this, I could not help but think of what we have been witnessing with regard to all the covid hype. Say, if for the past eighteen months the media had reported and endlessly repeated every single automobile accident that ever occurred the world over, with 24/7 coverage, can you imagine the number of psychological cripples and paranoiacs there would be worldwide; people afraid of getting too close to their vehicles and ever fearful of other motorists on the road, possibly even regarding all those driving the speed limit (as opposed to under it) as 'not caring for other drivers' and being 'selfish'? One simply cannot underestimate the almost supernatural power of media propaganda & social conditioning and its glaring effects upon the impressionable public at large.

Here in Canada we are being told that these vaccine passports are only temporary measures, to last for a few months, or possibly into next year. Oh, is that why the Canadian PM has ordered something like 37 million vaccines to last all the way into 2024? And are these pre-ordered vaccines for the original covid or for the invisible variants to come? (Never-mind that this latest Delta 'variant' is in all likelihood caused by the very covid vaccines themselves.) In a world where you have governments legalizing marijuana and contemplating doing the same for harder drugs, via injection dispensaries and so forth, and where these very same politicians do nothing to help pass laws that prevent babies and infants from receiving dozens of jabs before these poor innocents have even developed an immune system for god's sake, it's quite comical to hear some of these transparent rhetoricians in recent weeks saying they're all for vaccine passports in order to 'protect children' (the using of children to promote your cause, a tactic which began with the Nazis and which also can be seen in the eco-anxiety movement). How about protecting children from a possibly damaging rushed-to-market quasi-vaccine? Meanwhile, it wouldn't surprise me if these same politicians were privately wary of the shots, enough to maybe inject themselves and their own kids with nothing more than saltwater placebos. Incidentally, as more and more people are being (coerced into getting) jabbed, it'll be interesting to see what the reaction will be among various religionists, and especially those within Christendom. One may remember it was only a few churches that had tried to freely assemble during the lockdowns. Now all the ones that have remained under virtual arrest all this time are likely preparing to reopen their places of worship, what with vaccine passports now likely being their ticket to do so. In fact, it's been quite interesting to learn that one particular religious movement has been totally pro-vaccine from the very beginning, and of late has instructed its members how they ought only to associate in person with those who have been vaccinated, in true totalitarian fashion. This, coming from a religion that appeals to their charter-protected right to individual conscience when in the face of state-mandated blood transfusions (as portrayed in the excellent film, The Children Act). There seems to be a double-standard here: treating those who have not been vaxxed as a separate (under)class to be segregated, all for their abiding by the same constitution they themselves fall back on in defense of their right to reject blood transfusions. Yes, but refusing blood transfusions does not risk putting the health of others in jeopardy, they'd most likely respond. Yet, say for the sake of argument that it did. Do you think that would stop them? I think that, in such a hypothetical scenario, these ones would continue to obey their god-given consciences, which is what the entire point is here.

It goes without saying that since the beginning of this plandemic, critical and free thinkers have found themselves in the midst of a social cult, with the majority of its members more than willing to take the socially revered, if not idolized, pharmaceutical concoction. Sadly, such lobotomized groupthink has extended down into the family unit, with numerous stories now coming out about domestic clans being divided, and even divorce cases and custody battles taking place, and all over strong differences of opinion regarding the virus and now the vaccines. No doubt the diabolic masterminds of this worldwide psy-op are loving every minute of it, as the family unit has always been a target for them in so many other ways prior to this. In my own situation, in recent weeks I received a letter from a close family member who went and got herself vaxxed. Prior to this, she was wary of the vaccines; undecided as to whether she would take one, all the while watching as her lady friends and relatives were quick to jump on the bandwagon. Since the jab, she has reversed her formerly cautious and level-headed stance entirely and, bafflingly, has become a rabid advocate of the vaccines. Go figure. This complete reversal of belief, as if overnight, has been unsettling and surreal for me to observe. Yet, not all that surprising. I love her dearly but when it comes to the inner workings of this fallen realm she possesses a Norman Rockwell view of the world. This is a person who listens daily to a mainstream call-in talk-show on the radio (the propaganda box as I call it), in which listeners receive only one-sided information (bordering on disinformation), hosted by a guy who promotes the official covid narrative and who immediately hangs up on anyone who calls in not in psychological lockstep with the controlled media. This missive of hers was written, albeit with good intentions, for the most part in a condescending tone (from her perspective, I'm lost and in need of being rescued from incorrect thinking). In all my years I've never witnessed this person use the term conspiracy theory until my skimming over this letter of hers. (Hmm. I wonder where she picked that up from?) What I find most frustrating in all this is that all the members in my immediate and extended family who now consider themselves 'saved' are saying they're afraid of being around me out of supposed fear they may catch covid. It doesn't don on or matter to them that for the past year or so during 'the worst of it,' back when everyone was unvaccinated, that on occasion we used to visit one another in person without there being a problem. Neither does it matter to them that they're now 'protected' from the unwashed, er, unsaved. It's this new variant which has these highly suggestible groupists all concerned for the welfare of my soul. At the outset of the social hysteria, back in 2020, I made the comment how I thought this plandemic to be, on a spiritual level, occult in nature. What I see occurring with hysterical pro-vax family members -- with their resorting to guilt, coercion; even accusing unvaxxed relatives of having no love for parents and siblings; along with other manipulative tactics -- only confirms what I have suspected from the beginning, of there being something most definitely supernatural and skewed involved. From out of this 'chaos magic' there is a strong chance the NWO will emerge. It disturbs me to personally observe unthinking parrots repeating the official narrative as if victims of post-hypnotic suggestion, all the while -- as people who have no time for or interest in reading & research, nor an open & questioning mind to listen to the other side of the story -- having the arrogance to regard individuals like me as confused, simple-minded, and astray, just as religious cults do those who begin to doubt what they've been spoon-fed by the group's or organization's authority figures. So, you're in the right and the 80-90% of us who are getting vaccinated and all the bureaucrats and newscasters and doctors and leaders are wrong? was a question one of my relatives rhetorically put to me recently. This is the type of 'logic' one encounters when dealing with some religious zealots. As if majority opinion always equals truth or rightness. What if you were a Jew living in Nazi Germany? What if you belong to a quasi-Christian sect of about 6 million in a world of 7 billion and are totally convinced you possess absolute 'Truth'? If Satan is the ruler of this world, as you believe to be the case, is this not a conspiracy? The examples are endless in cogent refutation of this fatuous 'majoritarian' argument. This person told me how, after struggling with the thought of whether to get vaccinated or not, prayed to God, and suddenly felt a calmness wash over her. Good lord, how to reason with and intellectually get through to such ones? Next, I was told how she contacted her GP to ask him for his advice on the matter. Hold on to your seats. You'll never guess what was said. The advice she received was that the vaccine was okay to take. What a shocker. This person was not interested in hearing about the 11, 000 or so doctors and citizens who have signed a petition titled 'Declaration of Canadian Physicians for Science and Truth,' challenging the covid narrative and doctatorship of the CPSO (the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario) or about how GPs are (no, not in one some grand conspiracy as they think I think this to be, but) generally 'experts' who are indoctrinated themselves, from medical school onward, and who basically serve as well-meaning middlemen between Big Pharma and patient. No, I do not think her doctor is a quacksalver, simply a Pharma-owned drug-pusher, mostly. There were those who as soon as the covid vaccines were rolled out were more than eager to get the jab, and very pleased with themselves for doing so, to the extent of proclaiming to others just what good citizens they were. I recall during the Bush Jr administration years, a popular motto among the political left being: 'Dissent is patriotic.' Apparently, if you're conservative in your views, dissent is something altogether different.

It's been something to observe what has been occurring in Canada. There's a federal election coming up near the end of the month and the contemptible PM is on the campaign trail fascistically promoting vaccine passports like a loathsome dictator, and speaking very critically of the righteously unvaccinated, when back in January of this year the feminist dick had spoken out against the very idea of these Gestapo-esque tactics. These unsurprising about-faces by so-called elected representatives, statists with zero personal integrity and moral backbone, have been occurring all across the country of late. Premiers and other officials who only a month ago were saying they were opposed to vaccine passports have since changed their tune, fickle and controlled and unprincipled as they are. What a pathetic bunch of liars, if not arguably unCanadian as well, what with their glaring contempt for the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Two Michaels are being held hostage in China and I think many Canadians would love to see them released & safely returned and the PM traded for them. During the election campaign, the scumbag has been heckled in many places all across Canada. The once blackface-wearing buffoon is understandably despised by free-thinking citizens who cherish their constitutional freedoms. Despised also are those handlers-controlled premiers who have taken to giving members of their party the 'vax or ax' ultimatum. One provincial politician, Rick Nicholls, has refused the jab and has willingly suffered the consequences. No doubt the guy's a national hero and a role model to many Canucks. These are crazy and dark times, to be sure. Like trained seals, the mindless masses have taken to flapping their flippers in full acceptance and appreciation of the genetic therapy they've been receiving via the shots. Facemasks made from nanotechnology and containing graphene particles now seem the least of one's worries. Now there's the thought of graphene oxide nanotubes in the COVID vaccines that are on the minds of many conscious individuals (the prochoicers). Sure, vaccines may very well be 'effective' if the whole purpose of them is to create health problems by which Big Pharma can be relied upon to try and correct, or if they're designed to rewrite your body's DNA. Never-mind that the plandemic is statistically over, and that for people under 60 'COVID' is no less bothersome than the rhinovirus, vaccine passports, in keeping with the globalist agenda, are being rolled out and promised as being only a temporary measure (like the income tax of old). I cannot help but feel this may be a slippery slope. Mandatory vaccines today; compulsory cross-sex hormones, tomorrow. Now the ptb can keep on going with the variants excuse indefinitely, to further justify more lockdowns and booster shots. How convenient. So what if the FDA has now approved what still amounts to being in many people's estimation an experimental vaccine, as it's still way too early to tell what the long-term effects of the vaccines will be. On another level, vaccines hold a special symbolic value in the hearts of those who champion them. More than just a medical treatment, vaccine mandates speak to those who are unconsciously or overtly anti-individualistic & advocates of communitarianism. It is not simply about keeping society 'healthy' as it is about the super-spreading of collectivist thinking via an enforced/coerced injection. As the chemicals and toxins enter the bloodstream of the unwilling or reluctant recipient, an act of violative conversion to an undemocratic ideology occurs, perhaps more than anything else.

Film Title: The Pathological Optimist Director: Miranda Bailey Released: 2017 For those in search of a documentary which highlights one particular hero in the whole vaccine debate, I recommend viewing The Pathological Optimist. That is, for anyone who sits in the court of public opinion and whose sense of justice allows for the other side to speak. This thoroughly compelling film recounts the Andrew Wakefield case and all the trouble this poor guy was put through. Here was a labcoat who was accused of falsifying data, scientific fraud, and who his critics said only spoke out against the combination MMR vaccine due to supposed vested interests he had. Wakefield, in my opinion, was unjustly treated by his peers and by the media at large. I like the fact that Wakefield stood his ground and refused to cave in to the suppressive -- and, in his case, oppressive -- medical establishment, even if that meant his having to move to another country to do so. Once in the United States he tried to get his life back in order. Here was a physician who truly cared about the health of people, enough to risk his reputation and put his career on the line, in order for the truth to be told. What a prick this Brian Deer was, who wrote for the Sunday Times. This smug little tightass went after Wakefield the way that all reprehensible mudslingers do their targets. It seemed to be that Deer thoroughly relished in demonizing Wakefield and had went on quite the crusade in an attempt at discrediting this then clinical and courageous scientist. Watch close and you will catch a brief clip of Bill Gates, also making Wakefield out to be an unethical physician. As an aside, in my research of the MMR controversy, I came across the story of a holistic doctor by the name of Dr. James Bradstreet, who also had expressed concerns with the vaccine, circa 2015. The doctor's clinic was soon raided by the FDA, and the man mysteriously died not long afterwards.