Hegel Schmegel

Title: Woke Racism Author: John McWhorter Published: 2021 Hey, y'all, brothas and sistas, McWhorter's the man for penning this outasight little gospel message in defense of Whitey who ain't in no position to speak 'gainst the wokey posse say those PC coppers. Gotta hand it to Johnny for comin' to Whitey's rescue -- a real man of color, no less. That's no lie. Yo, like he ain't no Caucasian in blackface as some critics might diss the Mick as bein'. The dude's legit, and frankly has had enough of this cracker-barrel jive from those anti-vanilla phobes, screamin' oppression as they tar-and-feather the white man's "burdensome" booty in the kangaroo court of woke opinion. Think Ibram X. Kendi and Robin DiAngelo need to be censored, their highly influential, cotton-pickin' books banned, or at least re-published minus their propaganda? Do ya play a mean violin every time you hear one of those same ol' sob stories goin' on 'bout "white privilege"? Then you bound to luv Woke Racism, yes sirree -- a bona fide pushbacker that dishes out the real dope and is the gavel to this skin game, bar none. Word to the unwoke wise: Read it before it goes the way of Dr. Seuss and Uncle Tom's Cabin. As a square and straight-laced white person, I for one digged it. Peace.

Does anyone know in what book, video presentation, or videocast David Icke speaks of this experience? I'm unfamiliar with it. Incidentally, I'm curious to know whether he thinks these 'aliens' are extraterrestrial in origin, a theory I rule out myself, believing whatever these beings are to be either interdimensional and/or subterranean.

It is only to be expected that talk of this nature would set of alarm bells in those prone to seeing conspiracies under every bedstead. One such theory being floated around has it part of the ruling cabal's depopulation agenda, believing that if there's nothing transhumanist about this (there isn't, as far as I can tell), then there is at least the concern that this could very well lead to a posthuman society, via low or nonexistent birth rates. Personally, I do not see this ever happening. The biological urge to procreate is very strong in the majority of people and so there will always be those who will opt for real-life partnerships over their simulative counterpart. As someone who has hitherto been highly critical of the field of robotics (and with good reason), I can nevertheless see how humanoid automatons, in some cases and specific scenarios, would be an absolute service to humanity. Interestingly, it is with companionship in mind that humanoid robots are for the most part being designed, or so we are told -- a strictly platonic series, for example, being built to serve as companions to the elderly, for seniors who find themselves alone with no one to talk to and look after them. Far from this being unnatural, enter the man or woman in want of an android to share household chores with and to cuddle up with at night. Basically, these automated partners of the future will be smart assistants with arms and legs (not to mention a few exciting bells & whistles), or embodied chatbots, if you will. Presently, the interactive capabilities of these machines is said to be rather limited, with the current line of robo-humans consisting of perhaps only thirty to fifty preprogrammed responses; still pretty communicative, and arguably more sociable than your average Silicon Valley nerd with Asperger's. Still, if our faith is to be in Moore's Law, then it is only a matter of time before these artificial residential and portable assistants will need to become equipped with a Mute feature! We are being told all this is still a few decades away from becoming a commonplace reality, but we can already see the tell-tale signs of this eventual if not inevitable world in the here-and-now as if a gradual conditioning process occurring within everyday society. Consider the number of human residents who today talk to their smart assistants at home and think nothing unusual about it, and the number of AI-generated erotic prints and videos being produced of supermodels; images practically indistinguishable from those of real-life attractive women. It seems more and more people are opting for nonhuman alternatives in almost every aspect of their lives, so it should not be of surprise when guys like 'Davecat' are looked up to as role models and hailed as trailblazers even as we speak, only the automated partners we are talking about will be far more sophisticated in design, on par with Sophia, the pretty android who was given citizenship in Saudi Arabia back in 2017. If all this sounds too much like sci-fi, that's because it is, or rather was. Here I think of Sofia Shinas' character in The Outer Limits (the color reboot series), a program which decades ago told (if not foretold) the story of an ultra-realistic & gorgeous gal made of synthetic epidermis and circuitry, created and designed to fulfill the -- practical, emotional, and physical -- needs of a man confined to a wheelchair. The narrative I refer to is "Valerie 23" and for anyone interested in this topic, it's one episode not to be missed.

With fully functional and quasi-anatomically equipped automated partners becoming ever more common with each passing year, prognosticators within the tech industry envision a neo-sexual revolution awaiting humanity that will forever alter the way we humans view and engage in love, sex, and relationships. Among futurists and techies, there are those who are predicting the sex robot industry to be the next big thing since the invention of the wheel, and equal if not surpassing in the impact it will have upon the world. There will be critics, of course, who will view this revolution not quite as enthusiastically, believing it to be an unnatural alliance between man and machine. As this has nothing to with transhumanism, however, such misgivings may be misplaced. Some of the upsides to artificial relationships that are being promoted include, for starters, the obvious one that these will be touted as a godsend by incels the world over. For such wannabe Casanovas, this means no more having to deal with clunky & primitive rubber or (gasp!) plastic dolls that require inflating with water or air prior to their being put to use. Enter the high-tech sexbot, of which it is said will be immediately at one's service with just a push of a button or a flick of a switch. How very convenient. Involuntary celibates, doubtless champing at the bit upon reading this, aren't the only ones that futurists are predicting will benefit from this new and state-of-the-art technology. The claim is being made that sexbots will be most welcome within some marital unions as well, with their foreseen global presence possibly leading to a worldwide decrease in divorce rates on grounds of infidelity, what with there potentially being an additional and far more socially acceptable sexual outlet not only based in the home but, overall, favorably understood by and at the disposal of both mates. With practically everything becoming automated in the world today, from vehicles to supermarket checkout lines, with even robotic lawnmowers and autonomous floor vacuums on the market, the rise of the humanoid electronic companion was pretty much bound to happen sooner or later. They are here and my guess is they aren't going away. The only question is: Are you for or against it? And if yes, you can picture yourself making out with a bot and decide to enter into a relationship with one, would you keep this a secret from friends and family or be more than willing to show them your home movies? Already, there are men who confess to being deeply involved in romantic relationships with sex robots (as these not so platonic machines have been crassly defined), from reported cases of men cohabiting with these creatures to even -- unashamedly and unapologetically -- appearing in public with their beloved robotic companions, accompanying them to restaurants and shopping centers. Although automated partners can in some cases be custom-designed in order to fit specific requirements and measurements, what these men are saying, however, who are involved in such man-machine bonds, is that their attachment goes beyond a mere superficial attraction. Sophisticatedly interactive as these robo-humans are, these machines, more importantly, are said to help in curbing feelings of loneliness among adults uncomfortable with using an online dating service, or unable to connect with flesh-and-blood humans & frankly tired of trying to find fulfillment in messy and complicated, real-life intimate relationships. All this sounds to me a bit like something out of The Stepford Wives movie, only there's no replacing of spouses going on but rather everything quite out in the open and transparent. The only thing preventing many a man and woman, it is said, from hopping aboard this revolutionary bandwagon, currently in its infant stage, is the present cost: Not many can afford or are willing to go into debt ten grand, which as it stands is about the price of a beginner's model, but if we are to believe the futurists, a virtual and affordable paradise looms on the horizons!

I've lived in Canada my entire life and have witnessed the native Caucasian population slowly yet vastly decline in the short span of a few decades, thanks/no thanks to Pierre Trudeau, the man allegedly known to Cathy O'Brien and, more relevant to this discussion, the politician ultimately responsible for introducing multiculturalism in Canada. Critics who blame him for this error tend to think he was merely a myopic idealist but I believe the no-good prick knew exactly what he was doing in opening the borders to seemingly every immigrant and refugee known to the middle-eastern Arab world. Not that I have anything against moderate and responsible immigration policies or any ethnic group but this is so clearly part of a globalist agenda to in part export Islam(ism) to the West and ultimately to normalize homogenization in the name of virtue-signaling 'wokeness' and diversity. Mind you, this has not entirely been the outcome, however, as visit practically any fill-up station, fast-food franchise, corner mart, or donut shop, etc, and you are likely to find a man or woman of claustral middle-eastern heritage manning the till, where once stood a one- or two-child Caucasian parent ten, twenty years ago. By 2050, it is estimated that Caucasian Canucks will make up the greater minority in a country soon to be frighteningly Muslim-majority; to the point that the country will look totally unrecognizable and Canadiana will become outright extinct. Why am I not surprised to hear in the news of Canada leading the way in population growth among 'the Group of seven' countries, with close to 500,000 immigrants to be imported in this year alone? If white people are so bad, then why have so many nonwhites been leaving their countries and fleeing oppressive governments to come to a part of the world where (in contrast to their homelands) the natives have been living in peace and under democracy? Consider, that if massive numbers of Caucasians from all corners of the earth were suddenly relocating and settling in their homelands, and taking over their jobs, etc, to the point of it appearing to be a peaceful take-over of sorts, what do you think would be their reaction? Would they not wonder what's going on and take to entertaining a conspiracy theory? Another contributing factor in all this that can't be ignored, is the fact that white (Western) women generally see no problem with and indeed practice abortion, whereas the far majority of nonwhite ethnic groups are (rightly) anti-abortion, and reject the non-spiritual/atheist philosophy it's based on, much to their credit. And unless through some divine miracle akin to an immaculate conception, the far majority of LGBT people are white also and do not procreate either, much to the delight of the ruling cabal.

Title: Light Therapies: A Complete Guide To The Healing Power Of Light Author: Anadi Martel Published: 2018 I wonder how many people are aware of the incandescent lightbulb being as close to natural light of all the artificial options available on the market? Furthermore, with this being the case, what then could possibly account for the rise and popularity of CFLs and LEDs in recent years, when scientific studies have shown incandescents to be salubrious and the blue light emitted from LEDs in particular, rather problematic, if not outright deleterious to human psychological and physical health? Although this isn't a book that delves into conspiracy theories, it's difficult for the reader who travels with Alice not to speculate as to the reasons why the movers and shakers of the system have in recent decades taken to demonizing sun-like incandescent lighting while at the same time promoting a light within the electromagnetic spectrum not all that beneficial to the well-being of humans. We live in a dark period in history in which 'They' want to block out the Sun, spraying the skies as they are, whether out of misplaced paranoia or, more likely, as part of a sinister agenda; where children are socially engineered to play indoors in front of their electronic screens; where even moderate doses of vitamin-D containing sunlight is feared by many; and where the knowledge of the therapeutic effects of Joseph Swan's greatest if sole invention, later patented by Thomas Edison, has been largely suppressed, with books like John Harvey Kellogg's Light Therapeutics (1910) all but totally ignored and forgotten. After listening to physicist Anadi Martel interviewed by show host Gordon of "Rune Soup," I knew that here was a man on the side of humanity and who was onto something; namely, how significant certain light is to life and health and how some forms are not as healthful as others, even if they are promoted by the cabal as being more 'environmentally friendly' (where else have we heard that line?). That special forms of light can be used medicinally, is also something that no one in support of, say, Big Pharma would want a person to know. This here is a dense, scientifically based, and highly important publication that ought to be read by anyone who dares to think outside of the LED-lit conceptual box. Was it not God who said, And let there be Anadi Martel to light the way?

Here in Canada you have some devotees of Islam who are beginning to withdraw their support from both the NDP and Liberal parties on account of these political groups being (aggressively) pro-LGBT. Specifically, these are Muslim fathers who are against the teaching of gender ideology in classrooms, who don't want their children exposed to this nonsense and things like Drag Queen reading hour. In other words, the tables are being turned in a sense in that you are now beginning to see Muslims being reprimanded by the state for their not being 'politically correct' and 'tolerant.' Aside from the fact that I find it encouraging to see these Mohammedans finally coming to their senses with regard to the parties they've hitherto been in support of, I also find this to be the height of irony. For here you have Muslim fathers saying -- and rightly so -- how it's not the government's place to tell parents how they're to raise their kids and yet what is their own religion's sharia law but a government-interfering and dictatorial ideology, that would behave the very same way towards a disbelieving citizenry? These Western-based Muslims who are against transgenderism and the state telling parents what to do do not sound like moderates in their faith to me, so I find it ironic to see these first- and second-generation immigrants getting a taste of their own medicine, so to speak. It's certainly interesting and I wonder how it will all play out in the end, against these two opposing and equally alarming forces.

Film Title: Unacceptable Views Director: Mitch Fillion Released: 2022 Recently in the news, there was reported a protest outside Parliament Hill in Ottawa, Canada, in which 1000-plus demonstrators turned out to express their democratic dissent in opposition to the Canadian public school system preaching gender ideology to minor students. Although national in scope and as admirable as this "1 Million March for Children" was, it nonetheless paled in comparison to the nation-wide movement that converged outside the nation's capital in late January to mid February of 2022. Dubbed the Freedom Convoy, this particular protest primarily involved non-compliant long-haul truckers from coast-to-coast -- freedom-loving owner-operators of independent rigs mostly -- opposed to a violating 'vaccine' mandate, imposed by a tyrannical and contemptible federal government with ties to corrupt, globalist handlers. Unacceptable Views is a highly recommended documentary film which manages to capture, for the record, a three-week period in Canadian history that was quite unprecedented and especially unforgettable. Here were Canadian citizens not out to spread misogyny and racism but who were simply out to defend their civil liberties, as defined by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and specifically to speak out against social segregation/employee discrimination, in the context of a new and experimental 'gene therapy' being taught as a salvific godsend, in off-putting religious-like terms and smug, intimidating tones. Not surprisingly, the Canadian PM would have none of this talk of democratic rights and individual sovereignty and immediately took to demonizing this constitutionally protected and peaceful movement with all sorts of outrageous slurs and ridiculous misnomers. With help from a venal mainstream media in his back pocket, the Freedom Convoy -- made up of multicultural flag-wavers from the western to the eastern provinces -- quickly became the target of a massive smear campaign, whose participants were painted as everything from "mischief-makers" and "agitators" to even "revolutionaries" out to overthrow Canada! What an absolute farce this reaction was on the part of the Trudeau party, a laughable insult to those who were there in Ottawa, on the ground, to witness the three-week-long peaceful event for themselves and to tell of it. Indeed, if there's one thing to be gleaned from watching Unacceptable Views it's the power that government propaganda and state-owned media mis-/dis-information can have even in the supposedly free Western world. Aside from much roadside fanfare which the trucker convoy inspired, here in this excellent documentary we learn how this largely blue-collar movement garnered the moral support of numerous and various ethically conscious middle-class citizens from across the country as well, ranging from police officers and nurses, including many who identified as being double-vaxxed. With the film containing special appearances by Dr. Paul Alexander, Dr. Chris Shoemaker, and Dr. Roger Hodkinson. We hear from one trucker who fled East Germany to come to Canada in search of a better life only to observe during the thick of the Covid lockdowns the wretched state of the 'Liberal' government, a politically sick condition which brought to his mind nightmarish memories of former days having lived under an oppressive regime. We're shown footage of police entering a house of God and disrupting a church service in Orwellian fashion, removing the pastor and parishioners from the building and locking its doors, which doesn't get any more reprehensible of a state than that. We're reminded of the incident in Ottawa in which an indigenous woman was violently trampled on by a police horse outside Parliament Hill. Then there was the shameful freezing of bank accounts, a draconian and spiritually criminal measure condemned by European MPs and other democratic statesmen & civil liberties activists the world over. May we never forget what happened in Canada during this politically disgraceful period in its history, with Unacceptable Views being a most helpful and important reminder of what actually occurred. As for the Canadian heroine, Tamara Lich, who helped organize the impressive trucker movement, oddly, her contribution is hardly noted, with very little mentioning of the co-leader at all, which is perhaps the only quibble to be had with the film. Sadly, Ms. Lich has unjustly stood on trial for this, yet for those of us who stand on the side of freedom and true democracy, one can only wonder whether the face of Ms. Lich will ever appear on a Canadian banknote as a tribute to her, or on a commemorative coin in her honor. A national monument of this iconic figure erected on Parliament Hill, perhaps? Any one of these would make for an apt gesture on the part of an apologetic Liberal government and Finance Minister, but somehow I suspect this ain't gonna happen.

Firstly, the title of Icke's latest publication threw me for a loop, as here I was expecting it to be called Coffee. And so it was that I found this bit of news of there being a new book out, to be a bittersweet one. Based on what I've read from blurbs, this sounds to be the first of its kind in Icke's bibliography, in the sense of its pushing the author's metaphysical musings to the forefront, whereas hitherto among his printed works this has been kept either in the background or at the very most adjacent to his temporal focus and conspiracy-speak. As someone who was initially drawn to Icke's message way back when in my reading of The Biggest Secret (his masterpiece), for its opening up my mind to the hidden goings-on of this world of ours, I shall always be thankful for this, but I have never been all that interested in the (New Agey?) spirituality talk which was in those years akin to being an intellectually amusing aside or footnote. Now here we have a book in The Dream where such -- as some of his critics would call it -- mumbo jumbo is front-and-center, and for this here is one moderate Ickette who will pass on this one. Speaking of Icke's spiritual or quasi-spiritual views, I've often wondered how much of an influence his 2003 ayahuasca experience has had on these beliefs of his; this taking of an 'hallucinogen' as recounted in chapter 2 of The Answer. Here it is told of a Voice that first introduced him to this whole concept of reality being an illusion -- incidentally, a common characteristic among psychedelic-users the world over: namely, one of the side-effects being a feeling that 'nothing is real' and what is termed in psychological jargon, derealization. What made Icke seemingly trust what this Voice told him, almost or totally unquestioningly? I realize this experience of his merely planted a seed in Icke's thinking and does not represent the entire foundation of what these spiritual teachings of his rests on but still I find it curious why someone, anyone, would regard as gospel what a Voice said when under the influence of a known mind-altering substance. Personally, at this point, I would much rather prefer reading or hearing what Icke has to say, with regard to this 'illusory' world, as to whether it consists of a flat or ball Earth, or if a cave resembling Plato's visionary episode if he believes in a creator god beyond and outside of a Demiurge or did this entire 'simulation' all come about via an evolutionary process. As far as I am aware, he has spoken very little if at all on this.

Movie Title: The Ruling Class Director: Peter Medak Released: 1972 Whether or not certain members of the ruling elite are shape-shifting reptilians or tutu-donning patricians into sexual auto-asphyxiation, one thing is for certain: the upper crust and others of their elitist ilk are in dire need of more bluebloods like Jack (Peter O'Toole, in a bravo performance) -- an egalitarian earl who can see right through all the uppity pretense/pretension of the 'nobility' and into their empty if not non-existent souls. The Ruling Class is not to be missed and is one of my favorite films. O'Toole plays a man who was born with a silver spoon in his mouth, who after being away for an extended period of time, returns to his family, preaching a gospel of love and poverty; two concepts so ridiculous to his relatives that they think he's gone bonkers. The greater part of the movie takes place inside a sprawling and secluded countryside estate, home to Jack's silk-stocking kinfolk, with a few scenes set inside the House of Lords. Much to his credit, Jack is not the least bit lordly, as in imperious, nor does he think himself about the commoner. In fact, he believes himself to be the reincarnation of Jesus Christ and erects a large body-size crucifix in the drawing-room of the grand castle to prove it, to which he retires to after a long day of uneventful, attempted disciple-making. Naturally, all this talk of love and brotherhood will not do for those a part of the establishment, who set out to cure Jack of his messiah complex, first and to no avail via talk therapy and, in the film's finest vignette, when all else has failed, by summoning the services of a man possessing supposed supernatural powers, with the aim of exorcising JG of his 'pathological demons,' in effect crucifying the one person who might possibly be able to save the poor Gurneys from their wretched state. Very rarely does a cinematic film come along and pull back the curtain if you will, allowing us a glimpse into a world otherwise restricted to plebeians. This, however, is one of them. A sobering look, this, and so full of truth. Note: About midway through the picture the narrative takes a dramatic turn and enters an entirely other and far more disturbing genre, as if to suggest the schizophrenic condition of the ruling classes in general, who beneath their genteel and respectable facades just may in fact be raving mad.

One final comment on the Obamas I'd like to make. Here's what I don't get: You'd think that if Michelle was transgender that during their presidency they would have flaunted this or at least been open about it, what with transgenders being prideful of their condition. Then again, if true that Michelle is really a Michael, perhaps this was kept a secret as a way of putting one over on all the moral conservatives who during the Obama administration had taken a liking to the First Lady, watching her guest appearances on daytime tv talk shows, viewing her as a nice, upbeat person, someone with a pleasant personality and easily likable. I knew of several middle-aged and elderly women at the time who, despite their being apolitical and some even fundamentalist Christian, adored Michelle for the qualities mentioned above, yet who otherwise would never knowingly admire a transexual, no matter how personable they were. Not condoning transgenderism here, but perhaps some leftists wanted to prove, if only to themselves, that moral conservatives have the ability to be like them in relation to transgenders were it not for their religious prejudices.

Correction: The exact word Joan Rivers uses in this clip is transgender. (Would have simply edited the initial post to correct this were there an edit feature with a reasonable time limit.)

Is Michelle Obama actually a (former) male? Never-mind what this might reveal about hubby's positional preferences if true, such a revelation would only be in keeping with our inverted, ass-backwards world of ours. Even if cisgender, Mrs. Obama still looks the part and the more manly framed -- tall, big-boned, and broad-shouldered, built like a basketball player and looking every bit the dominant type, next to mister scrawny. Personally, I'm not totally convinced of this former First Lady allegedly being a born biological male but I'm in the middle of watching a rather lengthy docuseries by Nick Alvear titled Pervywood and in it is played a clip of Joan Rivers referring to Michelle Obama as a transexual, as well as a clip of Mrs. Obama dancing on The Ellen Show in sweatpants, close-ups of which appear to show a "flopping bulge" as is described by the voiceover narrator. This has got me thinking if any other presidential couples/heads of state -- recently past or present -- have privately transitioned, without the public's knowledge. As a Canadian, the possibility of this happening isn't as far-fetched as it sounds, especially when you have supposedly male statesmen publicly identifying as feminists. According to the theory put forth in said film, the Obamas' children are adopted and Michelle's real name is Michael. As stated, I'm not totally sold on this theory but it wouldn't surprise me if proven to be true. Any thoughts?

Film Title: The Emerging Church And The Bono-Screwtape Connection Director: Joe Schimmel Released: 2012 I have never been a fan of U2, with I think the only song I like of theirs being "The Wanderer," with Johnny Cash on lead vocals. Still, I did not not let my absolute dislike of this hugely overrated Rock band prevent me from watching this highly important documentary film, one that holds frontman Paul Hewson and his bandmates up to microscopic scrutiny, as perceived through the lens of a Christian pastor/documentarian. Filmmaker Joe Schimmel is probably best known for his extensive docuseries examining the dark side of the music industry: the exceptional They Sold Their Souls For Rock N Roll (2004). Anyone who has seen it cannot help but come away from the viewing feeling totally convinced of there being a satanic influence/undertone operating within said industry. Ever since the 'legend' of Robert Johnson, the early Blues artist whom some believe sold his soul to the Devil in exchange for musical talent and ephemeral fame, the question remains as to whether the same 'Faustian pacts' are in operation today, what with all the explicit Christophobic 'music' there is in existence, beginning with the Rolling Stones' "Sympathy For The Devil," of which U2 can be seen in this covering on stage. In this one, Schimmel takes to deconstructing many a song of U2, highlighting what appears to be an evident antichrist spirit in much of the band's lyrics. 'Tis a critical break down of the Rock group -- one beyond compare, due mainly to the fact that there simply isn't another one quite like it around, at least to my knowledge. Schimmel's own testimony, one that can be found online and which he has frequently shared in interviews, is worth checking out, as well. He tells of his younger days, of his once being a stoner, a young man who was heavily involved in New Age literature and who was drawn into dabbling in occult practices, including writing songs via 'automatic writing,' in which extremely dark and morbid lyrics would pour through him in trance-like states of intense inspiration, as if he were a mere conduit for low-level spirit entities. He began hearing unseen voices and experiencing paranormal activity, until circa 1981, when in a moment of despair he cried out to 'the Lord' for help and, upon allegedly witnessing first-hand divine intervention, became a Christian, one now largely dedicated to exposing Luciferianism/satanism in a lot of today's publicly consumed music, be it Rap, Pop, or Heavy Metal -- with this film being one of Schimmel's better ones, right up there with his aforementioned 10-hour magnum opus.

As one who generally isn't dogmatic in his holding of conspiracy theories -- that is, at least as far as the identification of temporal capstone conspirators is concerned -- and as one always open to considering persuasive theoretical evidence, should it partially conflict with or even be in total contradiction to a previously or presently entertained outlook, I must confess that the hypothesis put forth by those who claim Christianity to be a psyop from its very inception, instigated by self-perceived elitists within the occult or pseudo strains of Judaism, has in recent days been sounding to me increasingly convincing the more I examine and contemplate the possibility with an open yet critical mind. Which leads me wonder, whether anyone else here is familiar with the apparently significant output of Charles Giuliani? I have only just chanced upon it after serendipitously stumbling upon a rather lengthy online interview of his -- in hindsight, this auditory experience, a potential eureka if not an epiphanic moment for me -- one so exceptionally coherent in its polemic, that is has sent me in search of wanting to find out more and to see how much of it stands up to critical examination. One thing I can state at the outset and with absolute certainty is that this supposedly controversial theory sounds a lot more reasonable and logical a one than some court jester's claim that it was a 1st-century Roman (Flavian dynasty) conspiracy to invent Christianity so as to keep the surrounding non-Roman subjects and the potential insurrectionists in their midst subdued and compliant. What a howler if ever there was one. Perhaps the most vocal spokesman for this fantastically insubstantial and supremely fatuous belief has been Joseph Atwill, author of the academically marginalized Caesar's Messiah, whose (anti)argument I've always considered to be transparently spurious to its core, and which has now made me question the primary motive in his promoting of it, however of relevance the man's lineage. On the contrary, so it seems; the other way around, Joey -- via none other than what has been termed 'theological warfare.' Militarily, so this counter-Caesar theory goes, the takeover of Rome wasn't possible, but it was through the infiltration of religious doctrine, and so two more Abrahamic -- and (mind-)controlling -- faiths were born; that each of these originated with the Pentateuch, with certain men creating Yahweh (a deity that has always read to me like the Demiurge) in their power-mad image. What Mr. Guiliani, a former practicing Christian, has to say with regard to the Old Testament deity is spot-on, and I like what he says with regard to all this constant online bashing of modern-day political Zionism being in large part a red herring, one that in a sense fails to go deeper and ultimately ends up missing the forest for the trees, so to speak. Indeed, how many hundreds of millions, what percentage of humankind, adhere to one of the monotheistic faiths? I would have to agree that if there is a conspiracy of this magnitude going on, one with the covert aim of world domination, that for the past two millennia it has largely been and is being accomplished by way of organized religious means primarily, with Muslims, devout Jews, and especially Christians none the wiser. As to how all this fits in to my worldview -- as one convinced of the existence of spiritually dark entities, akin to the biblical demons -- I'm not entirely certain, nor am I completely willing to reject what sincere Christian preachers have to say with regard to such interdimensional beings and how they factor into canonical eschatology. If this is somewhat paradoxical of me, so be it.

Although espresso is my favorite caffeinated beverage, there isn't a morning that goes by that I do not partake of the drip grind. It doesn't have to be a gourmet blend, so long as it is black and contains a mild kick. I limit myself to one cup of joe per day and regard the aromatic, mouthwatering brew as nectar from the gods. At nights when I go to bed, if I have a hard time getting to sleep, I count pretty female baristas. Here in Canada, next to beer, coffee is practically considered the national drink, with its own coffee chain (named after a Canadian hockey player) almost being a state religion. The morning routine for hundreds of thousands of otherwise groggy, incompetent Canucks involves driving to one of these local coffeehouses for their daily fix, without which the country might very well collapse. Back in middle school, one of the classroom speeches I gave was on the history of coffee. Some thirty years later and I still remember a few points from it. Specifically, how in the mid-1500s, Muslims in Ethiopia were the first to popularize the drink (as a substitute for alcohol), that the term is derived from the root word kaffa, and how cafes were at one time banned in England, due to the reputation of coffee, for being an intellectual stimulant and thus a potential influencer of dissent. It is said that caffeinated coffee, consumed in moderation, leads to mental alertness, increased concentration, and creative thinking. This has certainly been true in my own experience. Whereas, I've known folks who've gone cold turkey, giving away their coffee makers, and they've become some of the most miserable people I know, with some their marriages ending in divorce and others now in therapy. I refuse to drink decaf, however, what with this insidious charlatan containing no mental value, whatsoever, and which I think is being used to try and wean as many people off its caffeinated counterpart as a means of dumbing down as many coffee drinkers as possible. In modern times, multinationals -- surprise, surprise -- have taken control of the blessed bean, with many independent coffee farmers being phased out and going the way of agribusiness victims. This has caused some people to speculate whether all this is slowly leading up to caffeinated coffee one day being Prohibited. The theory goes that this would cause countless westerners to suffer various withdrawal symptoms as means of herding them into the corral of Big Pharma. Incidentally, I think David Icke's next book ought to be called, simply, Coffee. The book would have nothing to do with coffee, of course, but with a provocative title like this coming from a conspiracy researcher no doubt it would sell like hotcakes, with many an Ickette eager to read hidden meaning into it, and others spending countless hours on forums discussing what is meant by it, with physical copies sure to attract normies who would buy the book if for no other reason than for table decor. Who knows, while dusting they might very well be inspired to pick up Coffee and give it a browse; a sort of foot-in-the-door approach to opening minds. So as for the title not to be entirely misleading, the last line of the book might read, In sum, then, based on thirty-plus years of research, I have come to the conclusion that life is NOT like a box of chocolates but more so like a cup of illusory coffee. Now I'm off to listen to that golden oldie, "Java Jive" by The Ink Spots!

I wanted to clarify where I feel conspiratorial Jesuitism fits within the 'global' pyramidal scheme, as well as make some additional comments pertinent to this discussion. Considering the Society of Jesus was formed soon following the Protestant Reformation of 1517, Loyola's sons obviously pre-date political (pseudo) Zionism by a couple centuries, and yet they themselves are fairly new on the world stage compared to the pre-Bavarian Illuminati, whose belief in 'the divine right of kings' extends far back in time to ancient Egypt/Babylon and the Mystery Schools. The ruling bloodlines see their modern manifestation within the inner circle of the 'Committee of 300,' as preeminent researcher John Coleman has so expertly shown to be the case. Thus we have situated at the pinnacle of the capstone, these 'Olympians' -- and not the Jesuits (and certainly not the Zionists/Jews), although I would certainly place the Order near/at the top, directly beneath these usurping riffraff of porcelain-pony 'useless shitters'. The organizational structure of the 'global' cabal has been illustrated by various researchers of the pre-Bavarian Illuminati as an empire, today consisting of three power centers: Washington, D.C. as its military headquarters; the City of London as its financial appendage; with the Vatican (Jesuits) as its religious power center; a three-pronged capstone if you will, with each strand under the control of these Luciferian royal bloodlines, dynasties whose meddling in human affairs have been traced back to ancient days, as the research of Fritz Springmeier, among several others, has so cogently documented. Among the numerous 'globalist' cusp groups (e.g. World Economic Forum), foundations (a la Gates'), and think tanks under the umbrella rulership of these '300' lowlifes, is the Club of Rome. Getting back to something Mr. Phelps mentions in passing within this video interview, with some elaboration upon it...The Roman Catholic Church, meanwhile, is thought to be in want of regaining control of Jerusalem, ever since the Temple Mount was to a large extent taken over by Islamists centuries ago. Contrary to those who believe an insignificant Sanhedrin are ultimately behind this agenda, logic tells us that a vastly far more powerful Roman Empire would no doubt be scheming to bring this about, first and foremost. After all, it is known that the Jesuit-controlled Freemasons revere Solomon, and therefore would be all for the rebuilding of a Third Temple in Jerusalem. As master operative craftsmen, it would not be surprising were they to be directly involved in its construction. Such is how the Black Pope/Antichrist would come into play. As far as infiltrative Jesuitism is concerned, as one or two researchers like Phelps have uncovered, several celebrity 'Protestant' ministers within the U.S. turn out to be high-level 33rd degree Freemasons. Many of these 'preachers' have always struck me as actors and phonies and it would make sense for the Jesuits, in their attack on Protestantism/Christianity, to infiltrate if not create the televangelism racket, just as they are said to have done with the governing bodies of organized 'Christian' denominations and sects in general. Moreover, Phelps has noted how the Jesuits were behind the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which allows for 'religious liberty' to exist within the country. Enter Catholicism, occultism, and nowadays Islam as well, in keeping with the devilish designs of the Counter-Reformation. Obviously, Eric Jon Phelps has not been the only one to connect dots linking the clandestine goings-on of the Jesuits throughout recent history. There have been others, dating back to the 17- and 1800s, including what Abraham Lincoln had to say of them in June of 1864, followed by Samuel Morse, Mary Francis Cusack, Charles Chiniquy, et al, each one of these revelations and warnings voiced several decades prior to political (Olympian/Vatican-controlled) Zionism appearing on the scene. As for the origins of the Jesuits, as legend has it, it all started with Inigo de Recalde (a.k.a. St. Ignatius) and the alleged Marian vision he had while convalescing at a monastery, in which he was instructed to take up the cross, er, sword...as if somewhat echoing what was alleged to have occurred in the case of Roman Emperor Constantine, centuries earlier at Milvian Bridge. More than just a military Order, the Society of Jesus, interestingly and as a closing aside, are also reported to be the driving force behind the Vatican's deep interest in UFOs, with the RCC thought to one day be a key player in the official disclosure of an 'alien' presence. Indeed, aside from the influential Georgetown University located in Washington, D.C., why are there Jesuit astronomers operating out of an observatory in the U.S.? And why adjacent to this Vatican Observatory in Arizona is there an infrared device named, in acronym form, 'L.U.C.I.F.E.R.'?

Title: Weed, Inc. Author: Ben Cort Published: 2017 Is Western society going to pot? Author Ben Cort makes a strong case that it is, and quite literally speaking. If you've ever questioned, as I have, why governments in North America would want to legalize the use of marijuana/cannabis, this book is for you. (Psst: It's not about emptying the prisons of petty criminals or eliminating the black market.) Weed, Inc. is not really a conspiracy book, however, and, as such, fails in tracing the drug trade back to the ruling elites who ultimately control it. Which is to say, you won't find any mention of the British East India Company and opium trafficking of the 1800s, for example. Still, it's of tremendous value to anyone interested in learning more about how drugs continue to be used as a means of altering the minds of the governed and to dumb down the populace. Specifically, the book concerns itself with the chemical tetrahydrocannabinal, a known psychedelic and psychosis-inducer, and how in the past few decades THC levels in marijuana have skyrocketed, all the while as the pot lobby promotes and glamorizes it, marijuana dispensaries dramatically increase nationwide, and the weed industry is basically left to do its thing, largely unregulated. All this gives a whole new meaning to 'going green,' with much of this having to do with the government wanting in on this cash crop, despite marijuana farming operations, both indoor and outdoor, being gross polluters and large producers of greenhouse gas emissions. (Yet more hypocrisy from the virtue-signaling, policy-making 'climate changers'.) Weed, Inc is a book that will no doubt get under the skin of the pro-legalization camp and one sure to be ignored by one or two alt-media podcast hosts, those into 'smokin' a little grass' and otherwise into shining a light on conspiracy 'theories.' To be noted, the book -- despite what any buttheads out there attempting to read this review might be nominally thinking -- isn't penned by a religious prude, as a few liberal-leaning comments expressed within its pages make abundantly clear to the sober-minded. In fact, it's not even against hemp per se, but rather THC, specifically; a book authored by an outdoorsy fellow into hiking, biking, camping, and a self-described former substance abuser turned drug-prevention advocate. Worth noting here, though unmentioned in the book, is that cannabis was studied as part of the MK-ULTRA program. (Enough said.)

Sounds like something the Black Pope or an agent/asset of his might say. Both controlled by the capstone conspirators and Luciferians, the very ones who had a hand in re-establishing the state of Israel as per the divine plan and who have persecuted and slandered Jews (eg, Protocols) all throughout history, as with the Inquisition. U.S. foreign policy directly benefits the military-industrial complex, CIA, the pseudo-Zionists, the Saudis, et al, but guess who has been in control of the U.S. from the shadows since circa 1868? Those responsible for the Counter-Reformation have hated the (original) United States from its beginning and have sought to undermine it ever since. The 'melting plot' is just one method they've used in their 'globalist' agenda, one which includes their attack on Protestantism and Orthodox Christianity, specifically. Incidentally, I did not mean to imply a connection between Antifa and the Jesuits per se, if one reads what I said carefully. Re: Eric Jon Phelps. In said video interview the author of Vatican Assassins assures the audience that everything contained in the book is backed up by references, primary sources; that it's meticulously and well-researched, with something like 3000 quotes, including the re-printing of entire texts in the public domain dating back a century or more, that nothing in it is the product of his imagination. He has simply documented and framed the extensive amount of material of which he'd studied for twenty years into a composite and cohesive whole. Attacking the messenger is a tired and predictable tactic, that in modern times has its origins with the CIA and Operation Mockingbird. Ever since, legitimate truth-seeking conspiracy researchers have been ridiculed and smeared, with one of the purposes of COINTELPRO being to discredit NWO whistleblowers and especially upholders of the Constitution; coincidentally, both of which apply to Mr. Phelps.

In response to the question posed in the thread title: Yes, sort of, but it's a little deeper than that... 'Mystery Babylon' of Revelation 17, 18. Without doubt, one of the more intriguing passages in all of Holy Writ. This was one of William 'Bill' Cooper's pet topics. 'Tis a portion of Scripture that has seduced numerous thinkers -- religionists and spiritually minded secularists alike -- into playing Sherlock with its devilishly ambiguous text. Who can't help but keep coming back to it; those who stray from it are often pulled back into its magnetic labyrinth, as I was and am now, thanks largely to a book I'm presently reading. Queen of All is the title. A book by Jim Tetlow, Roger Oakland, and Brad Myers. I assume these are three different persons and not just one. To this day, I still struggle with the doctrine of the Trinity, and there are those who believe the teaching is not Christian at all but has its roots in ancient Babylon/occult Mystery Religions. Let the games begin. With regard to the One World Religion, specifically... As to the identity of 'Mystery Babylon' it is not a stretch nor is it unsurprising that Rome would be a favorite suspect for many literary sleuths. Of the five commonly named suspects entertained, it's one of the more plausible ones. New York City? Ha. Jerusalem? Whatever. Iraq? The least likely of the five. Saudi Arabia/Mecca? Now we're getting somewhere. Author/researcher Joel Richardson definitely makes a strong and convincing case for this, and no, he is not a crypto-Jesuit just because he favors Mecca over Rome, as one or two published antipapal paranoiac character assassins make him out to be. As much as I lean toward Richardson's eschatological worldview centering around Islam/Chrislam being the One World Religion/Mystery Babylon, perhaps in the end all roads do lead back to Rome. In any case, this 'Babylon' is a Mystery, and not a Dogma. Queen of All, however, does provide some titillating information that has got me thinking once again of who this 'Woman' mentioned in the Book of Revelation might be. Note: Queen of All is not a book on Mystery Babylon, but rather concerns itself with how a One World Religion might come into play. Indeed, what could possibly unite the nations of the world under the umbrella of a New World Religion? Maitreya? Heard of this one but to me doesn't seem realistic. ET? Maybe. Not real space aliens, mind you, we know that. More like an 'invasion' like the kind Nazi/NASA rocket scientist Wernher von Braun during an alleged deathbed confession predicted would one day happen. Christ in holographic form? The technology certainly exists should the powers that be opt for this scenario. Holographic entertainers already 'perform' at concerts, with one nation's head of state reported to have appeared before a mass gathering in holographic form. Still, would 'ET' have the power to convert the more than two billion devout monotheists of the world, to the extent that such ones would be willing to relinquish their long- and deeply held Abrahamic creeds for godless techno-saviors espousing an ahistoric message devoid of holiness and religious tradition? That Marian apparitions have the power to transform the minds and lives of their eye-witnesses can be seen in the most famous case of them all: Fatima, in which hundreds of thousands in attendance became instant believers; among them, numerous atheists and communists. That an image of Christ could be produced via holographic projection is not out of the realm of possibility, but would it have any effect on the over 1 billion Muslims in the world? Highly unlikely. Yet, there would be no need for holograms so long as the Madonna continues to be observed in the skies. And she is. As this book documents, Marian apparitions are becoming ever more frequent and are being seen worldwide -- not just in Catholic-predominant lands but in such places as the Orient, as well. How to account for this? Most intriguingly, these heavenly visions of Mary all seem to impart the same message: Universalism (What a beautiful concept, this, however unbiblical.) Or, more precisely, ecumenicism -- the operative word, here. Interestingly, the authors tell of Muslims making pilgrimages to Marian apparition sites and shrines. The authors also quote from a Catholic Catechism in which the comment is made of how Muslims basically worship the same God that Christians do. Here we can see how 'Chrislam' would have the power to catch on with many within these faiths who tote olive branches. One thing I didn't know prior to reading this book was the extent to which Muslims venerate the Blessed Mother. Apparently, the Virgin Mary is revered within Islamic holy texts. Most surprisingly, the authors tell of increasing Mary worship and observed Marian apparitions within Protestant denominations as well. What of non-monotheistic religions and spiritualities? As one learns from reading this most fascinating book, Marian-like apparitions are also being reported among, for instance, the New Agers and neo-pagans, accompanied by the similar message that all religious beliefs are at their core equal and of the Creator, only these visions aren't perceived as Mary but of Diana -- a goddess with a 'Queen of Heaven' title, herself. Here we can see how the nature worshippers might be drawn into the NWO as well. Will Marian visions play a key factor in helping to unite the religions of the world, leading them to worldwide peace under the headship/dictatorship of the Roman Catholic Church? Of the other theories out there vying for the One World Religion position, this one to me has all the makings of a potential conspiracy-fact.

Of the many points to be gleaned from this video interview, I think the most important to be taken from it is that we must learn to recognize exactly who it is that's in ultimate temporal power. For one to zero in excessively on one specific group under the control of the controllers (those as identified in this interview) only ends up missing the capstone for the lower pyramidal structure. This is exactly what they want, to keep us focused on this cusp group or that political movement and arguing amongst ourselves who of these are most influential, all the while these master manipulators are pissing in their black cassocks, watching as those who seek truth create and cling to their various and competing conspiratorial sub-culprits. With regard to this point, a brief digression but one very pertinent to this discussion...As much as I respect David Icke's work in general, I think he has done a disservice in his overemphasizing the role Zionism has played in world events, especially since 9/11. If Zionism was a creation of a largely non-Jewish One Percent (which Icke admits to) and this One Percent are themselves under the control of the Illuminati (aka, Luciferian Jesuits), then with that in mind it seems an obliquity that Icke would go on and on, as he does in The Trigger, about Zionism, opting for the term 'ultra-Zionists' and using this hypenate ad nauseum, since what this does is exactly what Phelps warns against doing -- as it ends up missing the larger picture, in its focusing on a control group instead of the controllers. Meanwhile, others point to the Saudis or the Nazis behind, say, 9/11 and the NWO. No doubt true to some degree, yet if under the control of the Luciferian Jesuits then actually red herrings in the grand scheme of things. (As an aside, I have yet to read Secret Terrorists by Bill Hughes but I have perused Edmond Paris's Secret History Of The Jesuits, which does a great job going deeper and beyond the usual list of suspects popularly given within the largely controlled alt-media.) Note: For those who will enjoy watching Vatican Assassins, I also recommend checking out two archived episodes of a now defunct radio program which deals more on this very subject and can be found online. I refer to a show hosted by Vyzygoth. In the one interview, Eric Jon Phelps appears as guest, picking up where he left off here, and has him speaking mainly about (illegal) immigration and race wars and how these are being used by the Jesuits to undermine the national sovereignty of the United States (just as, I might add, Pierre Trudeau was responsible for introducing multiculturalism in Canada). This interview first aired long before "Black Lives Matter" and Antifa came along, and the listener will note Phelps mention Louis Farakhan in a similar vein as we do today of these elite-engineered control groups. The other episode worth a listen has Vyzygoth interviewing a guy by the name of Thomas Richards, a man who was raised Catholic but who has since spoken out against the Vatican and the Jesuits. Some interesting and important information in this one as well, sure to appeal to those who enjoyed Vatican Assassins.

Jordan Maxwell was a bit before my time and only recently have I become familiar with his work, upon discovering not too long ago a video interview titled Brothers In Arms. This has Maxwell and David Icke seated down together, engaged in an extended metaphysical discussion. Whereas Icke goes on about expanded awareness, infinite consciousness, vibrations and all that jazz, Maxwell, on the other hand, appears more into the blues, unable to reconcile this upbeat worldview of his fellow interlocutor with his own, one that has dark and powerful otherworldly entities ultimately controlling things on Earth. How is it possible, Maxwell wonders, for mankind to ever experience a mass spiritual awakening when the rulers of this system possess the superhuman ability of keeping mankind as a whole in perpetual, perceptual servitude? The two men go back and forth wrestling with this issue at some length. Whatever the case, wherever Maxwell is today, I'm sure he's by now solved this riddle, God rest his soul. A good interview, showing how people do not have to be of one mind philosophically to be united where it counts, in heart as spiritual brothers on the side of freedom and humanity.

Title: Gods Of The New Age Author: Caryl Matrisciana Published: 1985 In Gods Of The New Age, Ms. Matrisciana tells of her growing up in India and, as a child born and raised into a British household, being horrified by some of the traditions and practices of Hinduism, of witnessing 'untouchables' in the streets and other negative social effects as the result of a religion steeped in karmic superstition. Years later, as an adult living in the U.S., Caryl would find herself reflecting back on her childhood, upon getting involved in New Age mysticism and noting many similarities between it and the exotic religion that both fascinated and disgusted her as a young girl. The forepart of the book also details the hedonistic years Matrisciana experienced in-between these two periods; namely, her time spent as a professionally successful single woman living the high-life in London, England, employed with the BBC as an artist, surrounded by elitist bohemians, soulless socialites, pitiful glitterati and soporific jet-setters. Yet, despite all the travels to Europe and the late-night parties, the fun and laughter, Caryl felt something missing from her life, an inner void which first saw to her experimenting with sex and drugs in the hope that these would fill the vacuum, only to turn to escapism of the spirit when the pleasures of the flesh failed in providing any lasting fulfillment. For Caryl, it must have felt a bit like deja vu when, after moving to the United States, she found herself full circle in a sense, only this time embracing the very Eastern mysticism that as a child repulsed her so, only this a (politically motivated) spirituality imported to the States by the social engineers and culture creators. Like the (Tavistock-engineered?) Beatles who returned to the West all agog upon visiting an Indian guru, Matrisciana for a time believed she'd struck spiritual gold, and soon her whole life was one of chakras and yoga, of attaining the power of attraction in the most uncanny of ways, of astral projecting and embracing 'oneness' within an illusory reality...as if a mind not quite healed from the whole psychedelic scene she'd left back in England. Did not the gurus of her youth also teach 'maya'? Hmm. Gods Of The New Age was first published in 1985, only two years after Constance Cumbey's The Hidden Dangers Of The Rainbow, and makes for an excellent companion to the latter title. Although Gods is not an impersonal examination of its subject in the way the slightly scholarly Hidden Dangers is, it is an equally important read nevertheless and a winner in its own right, with its more intimate tone and semi-biographical style likely to appeal to an entirely different readership than Cumbey's, yet a book no less essential a read.

This is a two-hour video-presentation of a two-part studio interview that took place circa 2001; a program originally broadcast on a public access show that ran for seven years, hosted by the late Dennis Grover. In this riveting video, author Eric Jon Phelps discusses some of the material presented in his largely suppressed work, Vatican Assassins. According to Phelps, comments of which are supported by his vast, in-depth research into this religious order/militia group, the office of Jesuit Father General, along with his black-robed minions, not only controls the Vatican but pretty much everything, including all the world's intelligence agencies, key cusp groups and major secret societies and, most intriguing of all, organized religion. Ultimately, we are dealing with Luciferians who wield their worldly influence over the earth from the capstone of the temporal pyramid. Although Phelps hints at and acknowledges a metaphysical component to this grand conspiracy, that is, a spiritually dark nonhuman force operating from behind the curtain, for the most part the information he presents in this is grounded, with woo-speak kept to a bare minimum. Whether discussing vaccinations, chemtrails, gun control, education, the money system, priesthoods, geopolitics, Phelps' work points to the Jesuits as the predominant conspirators running the show. In this, Phelps refers to the United States as a Jesuit Empire and says of organized religion that its various governing bodies are ultimately under the control of high-level Freemasons, who in turn are subject to the Jesuits. I would agree with this, as I do also that Islamism is primarily being played, and that the Luciferians are covertly manipulating affairs using this religious-ideological pawn of theirs in their quest for world domination. Apparently, the rebuilding of Solomon's Temple in Jerusalem will play a significant part in this master plan of theirs, in which it is then thought 'the Black Pope' will openly emerge and take his seat. Is the mainstream media controlled by the Knights of Malta? Will the U.S. one day be invaded militarily by the Chinese and/or Islamists? Are the Mossad, MI5, MI6, CIA, all under the control of the Vatican? Are heads of state who appear adversarial actually in cahoots, despite their public persona? Are the courts, at least those within the U.S. generally controlled by Shriner Freemasons? These questions, among others, are considered in this rather obscure yet must-see video featuring the highly intelligent and articulate Eric Jon Phelps; this interview, refreshingly downhome and deliciously cracker-barrel. Here is a guy who's clearly not out after fame; it's all about the information. Vatican Assassins is definitely worth checking out and is not to be missed. As for the book, good luck finding a physical copy, or least one that's affordable. This, not surprising, what with truth often so very hard to come by in this fallen world.

In studying the Jesuits it's interesting to learn that, as with the Freemasons, not all members of this Order were/are nefarious plotters. Some early ones were said to be canonized as saints, while others have contributed to various schools of science, as human race-contributing inventors and discoverers. There are those researchers who point to the 1960s and the Second Vatican Council as being a defining moment, when an anti-papal faction within the Order began to rear its serpentine head, prior to which the Jesuits as a whole were known for being loyal to and defenders of the papacy. So, then, are we to chalk up this purported coup to the work of, say, one Jacob Frank? I think not, as this infiltration into the ranks of the Vatican appears to be, for the most part, limited to a 20th-century manifestation. Since the 1960s, we have seen the U.S. counterculture and the impact its drug-laden philosophy has had on the minds and values of countless American youth. This would be in keeping with a Jesuit influence, an Order said to be anti-American and pro-socialist at its core. Of course, you have some who regard the Roman Catholic Church/Vatican itself as being satanic and since its very inception; their constituting the very 'whore of Babylon' with the papacy viewed as the Antichrist. Although certainly not a fan of the RCC nor the Vatican, I personally wouldn't go to such perceptual extremes as to believe this, myself. Indeed, a few anti-Catholic researchers have even gone so far as to claim that the late, great Malachi Martin, author of a large critical expose of the Jesuits, was nothing but an agent of the Order, simply because he saw the Society of Jesus as having been infiltrated by anti-papal fifth columnists, as opposed to perceiving the entire Order and the RCC as false and evil from their very start. Malachi Martin, a Jesuit shill? What bull. More Martin-bashing is found in a little known book titled, Clerical Error, authored by 'former' Jesuit Robert Blair Kaiser. Within the pages of this highly entertaining and often amusing memoir, Kaiser portrays Martin as a Vatican agent not to be trusted, as one who got excited while watching a Marilyn Monroe movie, and as a man whom he suspected of having an affair with his wife. These portions of the book read like a hit piece to me. (Martin was a man of God, imo, who knew that dark supernatural entities were at work in the world and who spoke at length exposing and warning of this, so it's no surprise that he would be the victim of various character assassination attempts,) In answer to the Protestant Reformation of 1517, the Society of Jesus was founded in 1540 as a counter force against it. It is on this point that some researchers have put forth the claim that teachings since this period of a future, individual Antichrist is nothing but Jesuit propaganda, designed to deflect attention away from the RCC, the 'true' Antichrist, so these ones imagine. What is worth noting, however, is that eschatological futurism did not originate in the 16th century but in fact has it roots in many of the early first- and second-century Church Fathers, who had been premillennial restorationists, themselves -- and obviously not Jesuits. That the Jesuits were always more than just a religious order, one primarily driven by sociopolitical aims and goals, there is no doubt. Illuminati-founder, Adam Weishaupt, was one such notable Jesuit, as Pierre Trudeau was reportedly to have been as well. None, however, have been as culturally influential, perhaps, than Pierre Tielhard de Chardin -- coiner of pretentious neologisms, moronic disbeliever in the supernatural, anti-capitalist, deluded evolutionist, benighted heliocentrist, proto-transhumanist, eugenicist, and misguided proponent of linear human progress, toward what in his grand vision for the world he dubbed the 'Omega Point,' a time he envisioned of panoramic apotheosis and insanity for all. ('Tielhardism' arguably being Jesuitism at its most masterfully insidious form.)