Jump to content

Beaujangles

Members
  • Posts

    2,353
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Posts posted by Beaujangles

  1. 5 hours ago, XelNaga said:

    "What are the demographics of women who had abortions in 2019?

     

    In the District of Columbia and 47 states that reported data to the CDC in 2019, the majority of women who had abortions (57%) were in their 20s, while about three-in-ten (31%) were in their 30s. Teens ages 13 to 19 accounted for 9% of those who had abortions, while women in their 40s accounted for 4%.

     

    The vast majority of women who had abortions in 2019 were unmarried (85%), while married women accounted for 15%, according to the CDC, which had data on this from 41 states and New York City (but not the rest of New York)."

     

    Hmm...

     

    Well they are not going to be in their 50's 60's 70's or 80's are they! 

    It makes sense that a larger amount were in their 20's. It also makes sense that many are unmarried as marriage is not a given for a committed relationship. So basically rules out any connection on that account. Over 40's are less likely to get pregnant and women can unexpectedly  on early menopause or perimenopause fall pregnant after a few yews of scant periods. Not sure what you find unusual. I am not surprised that teens would be a lesser percentage based on the range, compared to the 19 - 40 age group accounting for the 88% of abortions. 19 -40 year olds would be the productive years with the late 30's trailing off somewhat. Whats the surprise?

    • Haha 2
  2. 7 hours ago, novymir said:

     

    I don't give a fuck what you or anyone else does.....do what thou wilt....I won't be a party to it.

     

    If you want freedom....you're in the wrong world....DUH!

     

     

     

     

    Thats the point though , isnt it? You don't need to be a party to anothers choice. Make your own choices and others will make theirs.

     

    The reason it seems the wrong world for freedom, is because choice is being removed systematically. Dictating is always going to be contrary to freedom.

    • Haha 1
  3. 5 minutes ago, novymir said:

    Yes, it's illusion, it's not real...but it's a sick illusion, a satanic illusion, not worth supporting.

     

    Diabolicism is unacceptable to me. In any way, shape, or form, and is completely illegitimate and invalid,  it is to be completely and permanently ERASED-DELETED from my mind and Being.

    Nothing of Real value is ever lost, damaged, or destroyed, BY GOD, TRUTH RULES REALITY FOREVER.

     

    "

    The Abortion Culture

    by Jon Rappoport, No More Fake News
    October 27, 2021

     

    From Worldometers.info: “According to WHO [World Health Organization], every year in the world there are an estimated 40-50 million abortions. This corresponds to approximately 125,000 abortions per day.”

    “In the USA, where nearly half of pregnancies are unintended and four in 10 of these are terminated by abortion, there are over 3,000 abortions per day. Twenty-two percent of all pregnancies in the USA (excluding miscarriages) end in abortion.”

    In researching my current series of articles on abortionin which infants are removed, alive, from the womb, and their organs cut out, killing them—for medical research—I’ve come across information about what I would call the culture of abortion."

    https://truthcomestolight.com/the-abortion-culture/

     

     

     

    The above is not truth based on hospital abortion procedures. People wanting to control others bodies reeks of the control culture we are living in. Divide and conquer. make others the enemy for having a different opinion. But ok with choice for vasectomies and sterilizations. OK with test tube conceptions (where they dispose of many) - OK with two mommies and two daddies (choice) But a woman must not have choice over her own body...(she can deliver it and hand it over to two transexuals)...but not make a decision about what goes on with her own body. 

     

    The 'culture' that stands out to me is the Culture of Oppression.

  4. 5 hours ago, XelNaga said:

    Baby killing is so wrong, on so many levels, it's totally ridiculous to even discuss it.

     

    People who defend this shit just show how low level of a civilisation are we.

     

    It's disgusting, people prefer fucking around with random strangers than lives of unborn children.

     

    I guess we, as a civilisation, deserve an asteroid, a really big one 😅

     

    Here we go again...how many times do you have to be informed that pregnancies are not usually with 'random strangers'. I find this train of thought very hangup -py.

  5. 2 hours ago, Orange Alert said:

     

    I have met a whole load of decent people who are unvaxxed and planning to be self sufficient, but I have often found them to be naive, wishful thinkers.   I wish them the very best and I will help where I can at arms length.  There are very few who understand the seriousness of the situation and can be trusted to be dependable in a tight situation.

     

     

    I hae many many unvaxxed who are willing to die for their cause, and in unlikely places. Doctors, dentists, churchgoers, even teenagers. We should not be quick to hold up the white flag. Remember the acorn.

    • Like 2
  6. 7 minutes ago, Tinfoil Hat said:

    Well you'd hardly admit you were, yet you're here all hot headed and big mouthed implying people you know sod all about are cowards unless they join in with you on a public forum plotting terrorism. While, ironically commenting on the low IQ of others.

     

    If you're genuine you'll need to learn to box a bit cleverer.

     

    To be fair i havent seen any inciting of or plotting terrorism here. But yes there does seem to be a pandemic of Low IQ (lol Just my opinion of course)

  7. Just now, Captainlove said:

    By reading alot of posts on this thread tonight,it seems everyone for themselves is going to be the only way.

     

    I think it may come to that if large groups of people lay down and get walked over, injected and muzzled. What can we do but step over them in the end if they refuse to see the truth?  I feel sad when I see people muzzled, jabbed and clueless. I wish I could help them....but when they wont listen its draining....and after all the choice is theirs. We can lead them to water so to speak.

    • Like 1
    • Sad 1
  8. 5 minutes ago, spideysensei said:

     

    Yep, the resistance will have to be local and organic. I just don't think you can risk putting it online. And i'd be wary of joining any such online organisations for obvious reasons.

     

    I agree... this forum is not the place to gather the troops so to speak. It is a place of 'like minds' ( for the most part).

     

    But yes, in local areas eyes and ears should be peeled. There will be people who claim it was their idea and want accolades... but at the end of the day...we all should know that like minds must stay alert locally... 

  9. 7 minutes ago, Golden Retriever said:

    Good comment

     

    Bjorn knows strong men are needed to fight tyranny, but he obviously doesn't advocate violence on Youtube!

     

     

     

    Agreed... I havent seen any calls for violence in this forum... but its clear people have had enough of being beaten down with bullshit claims of a pandemic.

  10. 21 minutes ago, spideysensei said:

     

    Because that's essentially what you're asking of people, to overthrow the system somehow. It's dangerous territory is all i'm saying, you risk getting shut down and spending your life in jail as a terrorist, and what's more the majority of people will side with the gov because they're so indoctrinated.

     

     

    How will they be initiated into the codewords in the first place? That info will be available somehow, you can't trust private messages either. You risk being infiltrated also.

     

    No, not overthrow 'the system'. The 'system' is corrupt. What does the 'system' do when regular people engage in corruption? They jail them, they use many tactics. Meanwhile they carry on unabated and get worse. The corrupt 'system' needs to be replaced. 'They' however manipulate currencies and pay people to do their bidding. Police, Mercenaries, Media, Celebs etc etc...

     

    Yes, I believe this forum is infiltrated... I believe I have an idea who a few of them are. Watch who clicks like and triggers discord and who loves to stir and then play dumb...etc...

     

    But people have their own areas where they live.... they know people... they know who is not following the narrative. They can form 'Book Clubs' 'Swinger Groups' lol... for instance and meet up. In Canada and the USA there are groups...why do you think they are ramping up gun control? They know there will be resistance eventually. Covid is not a disease... its a symbolic virus that infects the structure of humanity and brought in to break it down. It looks for the weak links and each weak link creates a path.... but when there is resistance the path is blocked or pushes back. Look how simple it was in Canada last week to cause chaos... The internet went down....affected banks...people couldnt get cash out. Affected phones, courts, grocery stores...everything... That should tell us how valuable the internet is to them. Its a kill switch. 

     

    I didnt see anyone suggesting violence. I must have missed it... Covid is why we are here and covid is why we are discussing a way to resist what is happening to us. People have freedom to associate, speak, and to resist peaceably...This thread has posted many posts about resisting jabs...resisting mask wearing and simply resisting... and yes I am all for it....and I think thats what people here are saying...how to get rid of the covid BS...by proactively resisting....albeit peaceably.  

    • Like 3
  11. 6 minutes ago, Gurualvin said:

    And i will state now most on here, and some of the internet, are nothing more than Keyboard Warriers prove me wrong, or go silent which is normally the case.

     

    Remember some are here just watching us. Never doubt for a minute that 'they' gain intel from critical thinkers. Thats why we need to take tips from them. Some people on here dont like it if you know someone off the forum...but the truth is...we need to know at least if a person is bonafide. Thats why 'they' do their evil in secret. They know what would happen to them if they were blatant....Explains why there are snipers on rooftops at Bilderberg meetings now....now that they are becoming more transparent as they think they have it all in the bag.

  12. 11 minutes ago, Gurualvin said:

    Yes i agree with you entirely, it is very disturbing, So it just leaves the people that can see through them. it will be down to 'us' in the years to come to stop this satanic madness! We really have to take responsibility, dont forget it is also for the children.

     

     Yes and the children are very important. They need guidance through this bullshit. Teaching them how to question and to watch and learn. How to listen and decipher. How to see through people etc etc....body language....all skills of survival. 

     

     

    Side note:  Watching people flee Canada is interesting. Now Trudeau has put a halt on actioning immigration applications.

  13. 1 minute ago, spideysensei said:

     

    How will they organise, on what platform? I just think you have to be very careful with organised threats of violence or power grabbing.

     

    Why would it need threats of violence? or power grabbing? Power grabbing is what started this off in the first place.

     

    Look at how 'they' organized themselves and take a few tips...

     

    Codewords, colours, symbols etc

  14. 3 minutes ago, Gurualvin said:

    The people who still have a brain functioning to organise together and deal with them on mass.

     

    When you consider 1 in 10 people have an IQ insufficient to join the military ( and they will take what they can get) It's safe to say that 3 to 4 out of 10 have IQs high enough to just function. The other half of humanity must have varying degrees of functioning ability and maybe only some can critically think regarding most things.

     

    To think we have to rely on those who are unable to see through the past 2 and half years is a daunting thought. I think we have to organize or at least network to the fullest because relying on dumblefarts to help is futile obviously...from the recent observations in this 'BS covid era'

  15. 23 minutes ago, Ethel said:

     

    MY AGGRESSION ISN'T PASSIVE. IF YOU'RE GOING TO BERATE ME, DO IT PROPERLY.

     

    I gave you my opinion....clearly you dont like it. I did not berate you I made my observations and my opinion known...which believe it or not, I am allowed to do. Thank you for your capitals Ethel. Cuts no ice with me unfortunately... I was born too near the woods to be frightened of owls.

  16. 4 minutes ago, Ethel said:

     

     

    All of this, and yet you're the one who cannot formulate a response without launching various personal ad hominem attacks against my character.

    I notice you have taking each section and made it out of context to my actual post. Not helpful and is a sign of passive aggression. Just an observation.

     

    Your previous posts have displayed a lot of vehement profanity also. This is for all to see.

     

    Here is what I actually said:

     

    I didnt say YOU were!!! I said you or anyone....= generally. Trying to manipulate people to feel guilty is not a nice thing to do...in my opinion.

     

    Yes I am aware and have said exactly that in my own posts that people have a right to their opinions.. Maybe you didnt read them through thoroughly.

     

    I disagree with what you say..and as yet you haven't substantiated any of your opinions past what you believe. This here ^^^ is a very judgmental view of others which is wrong in my opinion in so many ways. Again my opinion. (Shouldnt have to keep saying it for point to get across, but feel here it is necessary)  Post whatever you like. I have seen abortions take place and you are exaggerating and displaying a lack of self control in your anger. Your personal situation may have brought this about, but I am not going to agree just to make you feel better. I do not mean that in any way other than I understand that personal situations may influence peoples feelings.  Get angry all you like, try to demean others views all you like...but such judgmental ism has no place in my debate regarding a woman's choice. It is her choice. I certainly dont seek to change anyones mind. I speak only for the right of each individual woman to make their own choice.

     

     

    Your viewpoint is certainly not harm -free, violence free or peaceful. It also does not respect others lives, situations or circumstance. It is also not pacifistic, when you consider the anger directed through words and posts to others. I see aggression...and sometimes passive aggression.  Those are the facts as I see it...and in your own words... you can deal with that.. Maybe think about it first as I feel you are oblivious to your own aggressiveness towards others. I feel you will no doubt claim otherwise and thus belie your posts. But I have no desire to debate you further as I feel there would be no reasoning or point. 

  17. On 5/10/2022 at 7:06 AM, skitzorat said:

    I

    A big part of me is like: biology 101: no one is not taught the basics in their teens these days. There are only about 4-6  days of a woman's 28 days "ovulation" cycle when her egg can get fertilized. With all the birth control, with all the education, why do so many woman "not know" or "can't control" their condom-free sex-life for 5 days of a month and have to rely on abortions in such VAST numbers? 

     

    Obviously The State is killing us enmasse at the moment but in a more sain world; should the State not step in and say you can't "kill" that 10/12 week developing Human inside you? Just as The State says we can't put old people down when they're broken and sick an "inconvenience" and why The State doesn't allow murder.

    Where does bodily autonomy end?

     

     

    I don't understand what you're saying here?

     

    Beyond my point of 6-8 weeks (above,) is it not societies business to protect the vulnerable? The sanctity of life?

     

     

     

    It actually isnt true that a woman can only conceive in a 4 -6 day window. I can attest to that as two of my children were conceived at either end of the cycle, nowhere near ovulation. People being human dont spend their days planning every last minute. Also good to be aware that conception can take place without actual penetration. To expect couples to monitor every last drip while in the throws of human embrace and while experiencing normal human feelings is a lot to ask, in my opinion. Most people use a form of contraception..but even that can be fallible. The constant berating of women who seek abortions I find rather grating. The impact of a womans pregnancy can have far reaching consequences and lie within many parameters. It is hard to generalize these situations. If a man gets a vasectomy...are his sperm not alive and wriggling? Surely we should be protecting the sanctity of life and rule out vasectomies if we are to believe life itself is to be protected.

     

    Society is a man made creation. People are what we are ... and each one of us holds differing beliefs. Therefore in my opinion each woman should have the choice. Our neighbours, politicians and virtue signallers should not be getting involved in a womans body or her own personal choices. Thats my take on it.

    • Like 1
  18. 1 minute ago, Diesel said:

    True being born is the first breath but I believe life begins at conception. Yes I have spoken with older women who look back with regret on abortions. As you get older you spend time reflecting on your life.

     

     

    I also know older people who do not feel as you suggest. Which brings me back to choice. We make choices. Sometimes people have regret and sometimes they dont. But imagine being forced to do something you do not want to do. What effect and impact do you think that would have on someone?

  19. 9 hours ago, Diesel said:

    If you ask an old lady her regrets of life, if applicable abortion will be in the top. Life begins at conception. 

     

    Are you suggesting you know a lot of old ladies who've had abortions?  Posting a line does not make it true...

     

    Being born is taking the FIRST breath and being able to do so.

  20. 8 hours ago, Ethel said:

     

    I'm not "deciding" for anyone. I'm expressing an opinion. I haven't forcibly tried to prevent women from entering into abortion clinics, nor have I stood outside of one with a placard, shouting abuse. I've never tried to stop anyone.

     

    I didnt say YOU were!!! I said you or anyone....= generally. Trying to manipulate people to feel guilty is not a nice thing to do...in my opinion.

    8 hours ago, Ethel said:

     

    It's a thread, people debate. This forum is full of debates.

     

    Yes I am aware and have said exactly that in my own posts that people have a right to their opinions.. Maybe you didnt read them through thoroughly.

     

    8 hours ago, Ethel said:

     

     

    Everyone debates hoping they will be able to change each others minds, otherwise why would they bother debating? I am not interested in playing devil's advocate for killing babies, why would I? As for the video, the reason you have an issue with that is because you know it makes every pro-choicer look terrible. It displays carnage, and you know that makes the pro-abortion camp look like ruthless barbarians. The video stays. I'll post some more, if you like. 

     

    I disagree with what you say..and as yet you haven't substantiated any of your opinions past what you believe. This here ^^^ is a very judgmental view of others which is wrong in my opinion in so many ways. Again my opinion. (Shouldnt have to keep saying it for point to get across, but feel here it is necessary)  Post whatever you like. I have seen abortions take place and you are exaggerating and displaying a lack of self control in your anger. Your personal situation may have brought this about, but I am not going to agree just to make you feel better. I do not mean that in any way other than I understand that personal situations may influence peoples feelings.  Get angry all you like, try to demean others views all you like...but such judgmental ism has no place in my debate regarding a woman's choice. It is her choice. I certainly dont seek to change anyones mind. I speak only for the right of each individual woman to make their own choice.

     

    8 hours ago, Ethel said:

     

    Also, I am not the one who needs to "weigh up multiple viewpoints" because my viewpoint is harm-free, violence-free, peaceful, respects the value of life, and is pacifistic. Yours sees the greatest and most magnificent species which ever existed binned in a dumpster. Those are facts, deal with it.

     

    Your viewpoint is certainly not harm -free, violence free or peaceful. It also does not respect others lives, situations or circumstance. It is also not pacifistic, when you consider the anger directed through words and posts to others. I see aggression...and sometimes passive aggression.  Those are the facts as I see it...and in your own words... you can deal with that.. Maybe think about it first as I feel you are oblivious to your own aggressiveness towards others. I feel you will no doubt claim otherwise and thus belie your posts. But I have no desire to debate you further as I feel there would be no reasoning or point. 

     

     

  21. 2 hours ago, XelNaga said:

    Well, I guess that is the thing we disagree about the most. It's not just a "woman's body = woman's choice", simply because, it takes two to make a baby. Fathers should also have a saying in that decision, it is fathers child as well. And also, I guess if we asked the baby does he/she wants to be aborted, he/she would probably say "hell no" 😅

     

    It may take two to make a baby... and even a test tube in some cases! ...but at the end of the day the fetus grows within the mother...it is connected internally to the mother, it feeds and grows only from the mother.I dont agree that fathers should have an ultimate say at the non viable stage. It is not a child at the non viable stage. It is different when it becomes viable. This is why this whole debate is without substance re choice or not in my opinion.. The womans body is hers...what is within her is hers until such time as becomes a separate entity. You wouldnt be able to ask the fetus what it wanted because it is not viable pre 20 weeks ..therefore it does not breathe, does not speak and does not operate as a separate entity. So that train of thought is a non starter... much like the rest of the hypothetical discussions surrounding the subject.

     

    2 hours ago, XelNaga said:

     

    Perhaps I'm just old fashioned, or raised too morally (I'll be 34 this year, so not too young and not too old), but I'm of the opinion that people should not fuck around, period. You only fuck with partners you choose wisely, partners that you at least see a future with (you never know how things will turn out, of course). I have never had a "one night stand" in my life, and whenever I liked a girl that I met and saw that I could have sex with her the first night, that was always the end of it. I want a lady, not a ho. Sorry, but that's just the way for me. If any of my previous girlfriends got pregnant, I would marry her, and that's it. One needs to stand behind his deeds till the end.

     

    I personally dont see you have been raised too morally from your posts. In fact I see the posts of someone who makes quick judgments without looking at the whole picture....possibly naivety. At 34 you have a fair bit of living to do and experiences to witness. Maybe when you advance in age you may be able to make a more panoramic set of opinions.

     

    2 hours ago, XelNaga said:

     

    I find it ridiculous how many people use birth control things, it's like a direct way of saying "I wanna fuck around with random people withiut consequences".

     

    As far as rape goes, that is probably one of the worst things that can happen to a person. That mother would probably have a certain level of hate or animosity towards her child her entire life. The child itself would be a constant reminder of the, probably, worst experience of her life. And that is no life for either of them. It's like a "mercy killing". For example, I'm generally against murder of course, but, if I got to a situation where I had a chance to kill one person, and that way save many innocent people from being killed, I would kill him without hesitation.

     

    I agree rape is a terrible thing to happen to anyone. But if you are going to preach about the sanctity of nonviable life then why make excuses for a conception from rape? There are other options if you are willing to continue a pregnancy to term. You cant say poor fetus that is not viable in one breath and then say well except for some. Thats hypocrisy. Calling that kind of abortion a 'mercy killing' is again a contradiction to your claim for the sanctity of non viable life.

    I  think you may have a hangup about loose women....just my opinion. Abortions are not sought solely by people who 'fuck around'... that is a very stunted viewpoint in my opinion... many decent women seek abortion and for a variety of reasons.

     

    2 hours ago, XelNaga said:

     

    PS: science has recently discovered a first being on Earth that lives without breathing. Compared to it, fetus is 100% a living being 😁

     

    I think you are attempting to compare two different species. Sorry to piss on your parade 😉

    • Thanks 1
×
×
  • Create New...