Ok, I can understand that.
IMO I would not be flaming, and I would be offering polite constructive criticism with timestamps and links to back up what I am saying, for discussion purposes. I am all for facts and logic and am happy to proven wrong and admit I am wrong if shown good evidence.
For example if I was to show that David icke did link 5G to this virus in various clips, but then I also showed he called the alternative media idiots for ever suggesting he linked 5G to the virus, would that be considered flaming?
I know if the situation was reversed I would be happy for the chance to debate out some points in depth, it is normally people without any points that ban and block in my experience.