Jump to content

Bombadil

Moderators
  • Posts

    4,592
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    18

Posts posted by Bombadil

  1. 1 hour ago, Mitochondrial Eve said:

     

    No worries. Here is how it works.

     

    1) Find the first post you want to quote and select the "quote" option to the bottom left of the post which will bring up the text for you which can be edited down if you only want to quote some and not all of the content (see example above).

    2) Type your response to the quoted text beneath the quote box.

    3) Press return once or twice to start a new paragraph.

    4) Find the next post you want to quote from and select "quote" as per point 1) - this can be the same or different quote from that used first time - for example, you may want to re-quote the same post but respond to a different sentence or paragraph. This will bring up the quoted text in line with where you started your new paragraph.

    5) Type your response to the quoted text beneath the quote box.

    6) If more quotes are needed, repeat steps 3) to 5).

     

    Alternatively, you can use the + button next to 'Quote' which is a multi-quote function. This stores the quotes you select with the + and they should all appear in your reply box. You can then insert your responses where you want around the quote boxes.

     

     

    Are we not source energy and, as DI explains it, just here having an experience as Mr H or Eve? We may be programmed to believe the experience as Mr H or Eve is limited - that matter comes with boundaries in order to be defined and definable - but DI may say this is part of the illusion and that we are still infinite and expanded awareness.

     

    Do we forget who we are out of choice and is this material existence source choosing to experience all evolving possibilities for good or bad? Or are we at the behest of Archontic entities and trapped within an illusory matrix as some traditions, including the Gnostics, would have us believe? I don't know the answer to this - I am agnostic about most things - and so only see my way forward as trying to make the most of my own sphere and achieve wellbeing.

     

    If we are infinite source energy, albeit with perceptually imposed limitations in terms of amnesia and conditioning, surely we still possess original creative potential and, with it, agency and choice? How can we be, on the one hand, infinite source energy which entails all possibility but on the other not possessing personal responsibility?

     

    Granted, our material existence appears to be highly paradoxical. It reminds me of the Hermetic principle of polarity, which The Kybalion expounds upon, where everything is considered dual whereby opposites are simply different degrees of the same thing - e.g. cold is the same thing as hot but just at a different degree of temperature and good and evil are also opposing poles of the same thing. This suggests there is no separation and through this "it is possible to change the vibrations of hate to the vibrations of love, in one's mind, and in the minds of others". Applying this to your dilemma, lack of agency must surely, to exist, also have its opposing energy of free will.

     

    Regarding changing thoughts, my personal experience is that it is possible to think up (create) a substitute thought in place of one that feels misaligned with where I want to be. This is not a thought I feel has just popped into my mind but is self directed. Perhaps an example would help, albeit this won't be an example personal to me.

     

    Imagine a scenario where somebody has ended up in debt and is beating up on themselves for their predicament and in a low emotional and vibrational state.

    • To move into a better feeling state, they could instead choose to feel angry with the company that is chasing them for their debt - anger feels better than guilt and despair and is incrementally not too much of a leap to get to.
    • After feeling angry for a while, they could look for someone to blame - maybe their accountant has made a mistake that has caused their situation or they followed the advice of some "guru" who turned out to be a con artist.
    • From blame, perhaps some hope can be found if thoughts are directed that way. They could hope to find a better accountant or other professionals that can help with the situation such as debt or financial advisors.
    • Above hope could come feeling of empowerment in bringing the situation back under control. Learning has come from the experience and budgets are better managed.
    • This may be stretching it now for some, but perhaps this individual could reach a state of joy in repaying their debt in that it now represents empowerment to them and trusting that the finances are flowing.

    Thanks Eve. Saved me explaining it!

  2. 50 minutes ago, Mitochondrial Eve said:

    Herman the Cat was an expert mouser who served in the US Coast Guard in the 1940s and was even given his own identification card complete with pawprint.

     

    image.png.6b9628ac7a6c05867d4c10cc29f396ca.png

     

    The original New York Times article (Jan 15th 1943) can be seen here and his appointment was also captured on film.

     

     

    I have tried suggesting that my mum's two Norwegian forest cats follow in Herman's footsteps but they cannot be persuaded away from their life of luxury...

    It would be nice if the world could find more time for things like this nowadays. My Grandads regiment had a pet rabbit during world war 2 called supper. They never ate it apparently!

    • Like 1
  3. MOD NOTE: I appreciate how much there is to discuss on the subject of Israel. Especially with the current world events taking place. What I hope you can all appreciate, even if you disagree, is the difficulty in determining by moderators what is allowed to be discussed. Or maybe more in how to word posts in a way that is acceptable. I spent a few hours going through various legal documents that give definitions of anti semitic actions. In fairness, with my limited legal understanding, it seems that it is virtually impossible to discuss anything without potentially running afoul of one thing or another. The Forum rules are clear on what is acceptable but I understand that many things can be argued not to be breaking these rules. It's not easy, but considering the situation if we ignore too much, we have to err on the side of caution.

     

    One of my best suggestions would be not to group everyone the same. By stating "The Jews" it implies everyone. This is clearly not the case. I personally know Jewish people who despise what goes on in their name. This can be said for any subject on the Forum.

     

    Hope you all understand.

    • Like 3
    • Thanks 3
  4. 35 minutes ago, jack121 said:

     

     

    So many chemtrails in the sky, i don't know  where to look. Brought to you by your unelected dictator sellout sunak

     

     

    I can see the cliffs above Portreath from where I live. Yexterday in the sky above me, first real nice day this year with visible blue sky, I counted 19 trails. At the same time.

  5. 19 minutes ago, Nip said:

     

    And yet, they double-down ! Madness !

    Remember the vast, vast majority of people will support this regardless of any push back or info exposed. They are not doubling down just progressing in a logical manner approved by the masses imo.

    • Like 4
  6. MOD NOTE: So everyone is clear. If anyone posts anything clearly and unarguably antisemitic etc they will receive an instant ban. No debate or discussion beforehand. This is as instructions from admin. That doesn't mean nothing can be discussed it just means don't label everyone the same. There are plenty of Israelis who don't follow the party line on their government actions. So attack the actions not the people.

     

    No Replies.

    • Like 2
  7. 53 minutes ago, pi3141 said:

    But the Jews are like the Freemasons

    And every other race, religion or group with any sense. Logically anyone would support whatever suits their beliefs. In fact the only ones who don't tend to be white. Asides from nutjob groups that is.

    • Like 2
  8. 3 hours ago, LastOneLeftInTheCounty said:

    I didn’t know they offed Anthony Bourdain, he was really cool I loved his foody programmes.


    What was he about to expose? The usual? 

     

    He was working with Chester Benington and Chris Cornell to expose horrendous child abuse. Go figure! Both supposedly offed themselves.

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 2
  9. 55 minutes ago, shabbirss said:

     

    agreed.
    and since jerusalem is a holy site for 3 religions, would be best if neither christian nor muslim nor jewish controlled those holy areas, jerusalem,dome of the rock, al aqsa, etc..

     

    How it would be done I don't know but maybe Jerusalem needs to be a separate autonomous zone. It would resolve the issue but the problem is that regardless of consensus individuals and groups who don't approve will just carry on as usual.

    • Like 1
  10. 7 hours ago, Campion said:

     

    Thanks Bombadil, and it mentions this forum as well as David. Worth a read! 

    Basically were all indoctrinated in some quasi religious cult like malarky. If I remember she equates us with ISIS but that might be from something else I read.

    • Like 2
    • Haha 2
×
×
  • Create New...