.jpg.8081a54a3b74a5d1823dfac966666137.jpg)
.jpg.594f0ef23288ec5ab04539b2f8a8dbd4.jpg)
pirate
-
Posts
136 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by pirate
-
-
OK...so what would you call a person who views child pornography on the internet but has never sexually abused children in person..?
-
OK...so what would you call a person who views child pornography on the internet but has never sexually abused children in person..?
28 minutes ago, Eldnah said:Ok start with
1) A Paedophile has a sexual attraction to children - it is in fact their sexual preference.
2) Paedophilia is the reason a paedophile abuses children - it isnt the abuse of children -
3) Sexually abusing a child doesnt automatically make someone a paedophile ( it sounds wrong I know but ill see point 1)
4)Some if not most Paedophiles are well aware paedophilia is wrong
Some of those will seek help and some will resist the urge in their own and so will never abuse children -
Hence some Paedophiles may never harm children,
5) Child abusers
Some of course will abuse a child close to them - these need locking up until cured and until they've served their sentence
Some Paedophiles do not see anything wrong and think its natural -
- Its these that really need identifying and helping because they are a massive risk and without treatment always will be. I would argue locked away until cured is the solution for these but once cured release them -
Tragically many in this group are themselves victims of abuse it creating a vicious cycle - its these im thinking of when i say unpleasant intolerance -
The last group are the real sexual predators who search out children - this group should never be released - and if convicted of travelling abroad should have to stay in their prisons.
6) Then there's people who aren't paedophiles but sexually abuse a child - which i know just doesnt seem to make sense
The individuals sexual preference isnt a child - the child was just convenient - these are probably the worst because theres no reason other than power and gratification - these are nothing more than predators on vulnerable idividuals there is no cure for this and so never release them
Example
Man convicted of serious crime (not involving children) - on his release his wife said not living with me - he is a danger to women
Sibling takes him in.
He abuses his niece (under10)
Eventually the child speaks up
Man back in jail for child abuse - no rehab or treatment programme no psychiatrist because he isnt a paedophile just a nasty abusive bastard who preys on females
The above isnt a made up example its what happened
-
So, I will take it really slowly with you...
Explain this statement...
A Paedophile may never abuse children
-
Apparently they think they've "debunked" yet another simple truth that slipped out that day.
Now have a look at this analysis in the link below...
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/silverstein_pullit.html
Just one of many verifying that the term "Pull It" in demolition speak means...err...to pull a building down or demolish it...
why would the FDNY need Lucky Larry's permission to pull out the firefighters who they now claim were in building 7...no firefighters were in building 7.
-
Facts are often repeated when Cognitive Dissonance is in play.
-
bflat...thanks for that, interesting info.
-
THE OWNER OF WTC BUILDINGS 1, 2 & 7, LARRY SILVERSTEIN, ADMITTED ON CAMERA HE GAVE THE OK TO "PULL" (DEMOLISH) BUILDING 7, can't understand why there are any further questions concerning building 7...and NIST just make it up as they go along.
-
General Wesley Clark...
-
You're making allsorts of assumptions about me based on my response to your dim witted statements. You either work THE PAEDOPHILE INFORMATION EXCHANGE or you're simply a useful idiot... Do you realise you are trying to normalise this crap and I'm getting angrier every time I have to reply to your silly nit picking about what the letter of the law says...f**k the law, the law ain't doing jack about this, it's the very law you speak of and bozos like YOURSELF who make no difference whatever in stopping this issue.
PS...I know someone who thinks she's a thinker and yet never had an original thought enter her mind...go away and annoy someone else, I'm done here.
-
This is the last response from me to you as you're obviously quite dim.
-
TO KNOW THYSELF, IS, TO KNOW THE WORLD, AND ALL THAT IT CONTAINS.
Don't know if anyone else has uttered these words, but, for me, it is one of the most important questions of human life....
TO KNOW THYSELF...
BE BRUTALLY HONEST WITH YOURSELF,
BE JUDGEMENTAL OF YOURSELF,
CHASTISE YOURSELF,
QUESTION YOURSELF,
BE ANGRY WITH YOURSELF,
AND THOU MIGHT KNOW THYSELF.
Squander self reflection...
And thou squander self.
-
ELDNAH....
TO KNOW THYSELF, IS TO KNOW THE WORLD, AND ALL THAT IT CONTAINS.
-
What's really sad and criminal about this f**k**g subject/problem, is, there are individuals like "Eldnah" who are willing to play semantics with such an important, damaging problem of these modern day times... and I say, problem of modern day times, because none of this sick shit should ever be justified in 2020 and beyond.
Looking forward to your reply...Eldnah.
-
BILL, THE GATES OF HELL, NEEDS A .50 CAL IN THE BACK OF HIS NECK.. Then, all the happy people sing and The Children are Free.
-
2
-
-
If they would only leave the weather to it's own devices, it would be just the weather...but instead they have engineered, monotonized, politicised and propagandized one of the most valuable natural assets of the planet...wake up or rain on you!
-
1
-
-
The only disabilities I see here are disabilities of thought, like poor old Eldnah...check this out Eldnah...Peadophiles and Child Sexual Abusers all rolled into one...CONTRALAND
Looking forward to your reply Eldnah..?
-
Hey sickofallthebollocks, we fell for it because what took place on 9/11 was so shocking to witness there was too much information to take in at the time, and the deep state already had their "facts" prefabricated. It was only when we revisited the so called "facts" with the help of structural engineers, architects, demolition experts, firemen, pilots, and first hand witnesses who were there that we woke up and realised it was an inside job. None, and I mean none, of the official statements put out by the US BUSH ADMINISTRATION and the corrupt MSM bear any resemblance to the reality of 9/11...that for me was and is the catalyst for today's world of lies and twisted half truth's.
That day, and the month's that followed were the blueprint of bullshit that we are now afflicted with.
-
1
-
-
BTW Eldnah, before you tout the "grown ups" statement, start thinking like a grown up...and please enlighten me, in your opinion, what exactly is a paedophile and what's the difference between a paedophile and a sexual child abuser..?
-
Eldnah...you seem a little confused, and I must say, it's silly statements like...
"A Paedophile may never abuse children
A non paedophile may sexually abuse children or look at child pornography"
that facilitate this sick shit to continue...
I ask you, if, in your opinion, A Paedophile may never abuse children, then he ain't a Paedophile then is he...and if a non paedophile does sexually abuse children then he IS a paedophile...
I'll give you an example of how utterly ridiculous your argument is...
I know two men, one of them is a a bricklayer who doesn't lay bricks, the other man lays bricks but is not a bricklayer.
I know another two men,
The first is a racing driver who's never raced in his life, the second races professionally every weekend and yet he's not a racing driver.
I also know of a famous boxer who makes fairy cakes for a living, he's a really nice guy who hates the site of blood...where's your head at..?
-
WTC Building 7 Primed for Demolition Prior to the day of September 11th 2001.
There is a video of "Lucky Larry" Silverstein, the owner of the WTC Complex, where he says he had a conversation with The New York Fire Dept that went something like this..."The Fire Chief rang me and said that he thought Building 7 was so badly damaged that it would be safer to "Pull It", and I replied, because there had been such loss of life that day, to go ahead and "Pull It".
There's 3 important points here...
Point 1:
To pull a building, is a term used in the Demolition Industry, referring to the Controlled Demolition of a building, so, whatever anyone says now regarding building 7 that says anything other than the fact building 7 was brought down deliberately, is arguing with what was said on the day, by the owner of the building.
Point 2:
To demolish a building in a controlled manner requires several weeks, even months in some cases, to plan and carefully weaken the structure of the building and strategically place explosives to safely and successfully bring the building down. It is impossible for this to have been carried out on the afternoon of 9/11 while the building was on fire, building 7 was already primed for demolition prior to that day.
Point 3:
When the hell did Fireman include demolition as part of their portfolio.
-
3
-
-
WTC Building 7 Primed for Demolition Prior to the day of September 11th 2001.
There is a video of "Lucky Larry" Silverstein, the owner of the WTC Complex, where he says he had a conversation with The New York Fire Dept that went something like this..."The Fire Chief rang me and said that he thought Building 7 was so badly damaged that it would be safer to "Pull It", and I replied, because there had been such loss of life that day, to go ahead and "Pull It".
There's 3 important points here...
Point 1:
To pull a building, is a term used in the Demolition Industry, referring to the Controlled Demolition of a building, so, whatever anyone says now regarding building 7 that says anything other than the fact building 7 was brought down deliberately, is arguing with what was said on the day, by the owner of the building.
Point 2:
To demolish a building in a controlled manner requires several weeks, even months in some cases, to plan and carefully weaken the structure of the building and strategically place explosives to safely and successfully bring the building down. It is impossible for this to have been carried out on the afternoon of 9/11 while the building was on fire, building 7 was already primed for demolition prior to that day.
Point 3:
When the hell did Fireman include demolition as part of their portfolio.
-
1
-
-
Look, a Paedophile IS a Child Abuser IS a Paedophile...if these sick sexual urges are not carried out physically, then no physical child abuse has taken place, however, online virtual abuse may have taken place which obviously involves physical abuse which is the hidden sexual abuse of children, child abuse manifests itself in many ways, sexual abuse is but one form of abuse, but, probably the most damaging.
-
Hey folks...been listening to Mr Icke for quite a while now...like years. My first wake up call was the 911 Conspiracy, the 911
Conspiracy facts as opposed to the so called "911 Conspiracy Theory". For me and millions of other like minded people the World over, 911 is the catalyst for the dark modern day world in which we find ourselves. That infamous day was the start of the current "alternative truth" agenda that the Deep State now peddles about almost all aspects of our lives. I look forward to debating with you all, stay safe...and informed.
"It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled"
Mark Twain
The Facts of WTC PLANNED & CONTROLLED DEMOLITION
in 911
Posted
All the Evidence you need from the Professionals...
EVIDENCE - 9/11: Experts Speak Out | Individual Chapters - video gallery
These people have been working tirelessly for the past 19 years trying to open a new investigation.