Jump to content

pirate

Members
  • Posts

    136
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by pirate

  1. Originally, it all went over the world's head...until some of us took a closer look...these people have been a voice in the wilderness Architects & Engineers for 911 Truth
  2. Fear of the masses are their stocks & bonds.
  3. You better believe it...and GW was only elected as US President because of that vote count fraud down in the state of Florida where GW and Marvin's other brother Jeb was the..err Governor...Al Gore won the election but he wasn't the War President the Cabal wanted.
  4. Original Source - www.express.co.uk 9/11 mystery solved: World Trade Center building didn't collapse due to fire – study finds ONE of the towers during the 9/11 terror attacks did not collapse due to a fire, a shocking study has claimed. By Luke Hawker PUBLISHED: 03:40, Mon, Sep 9, 2019 | UPDATED: 19:04, Fri, Jan 24, 2020 9/11: Witnesses discuss the collapse of Tower Seven On September 11, 2001, 2,996 innocent civilians were killed during one of the deadliest attacks in American history. On 8.45am, a hijacked American passenger Boeing 767 crashed into the north tower of the World Trade Centre in New York City. The aircraft loaded with 20,000 gallons of jet fuel struck near the 80th floor of the 110-story skyscraper. Just 18-minutes later a second Boeing 767 - United Airlines Flight 175 hit near the 60th floor of the south tower. Less than two hours after the first tower was hit, at 9.59 am, the south tower collapsed in just under 10 seconds - 29 minutes later the north tower collapsed to the ground - just 102 minutes after being hit. However, the mystery surrounding the third tower known as Tower Seven (WTC7) has been central to many conspiracy theory’s because the skyscraper fell to the ground without being hit by a plane. The 47-storey third tower, located 110 meters (350 feet) away from the World Trade Centre, collapsed seven hours after the twin towers. On September 11, 2001 the twin towers were struck by two passenger aircrafts (Image: GETTY) Researchers have dismissed the findings of Government officials in 2008 that the building fell due to “uncontrolled building fires”. Following an extensive four-year study at the University of Alaska, using four extremely complex computer models, Dr. Leroy Hulsey, Dr. Zhili Quan, and Professor Feng Xiao found the “fire did not cause the collapse”. In their report, it says: “The principal conclusion of our study is that fire did not cause the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11, contrary to the conclusions of NIST [National Institute of Standards and Technology] and private engineering firms that studied the collapse. “The secondary conclusion of our study is that the collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building.” On 8.45am a hijacked American passenger Boeing 767 crashed into the north tower of the World Trade Centre (Image: GETTY) Meanwhile, a leading conspiracy theorist has also dismissed the official's findings, Robert Korol, a civil engineering professor and joint author of the Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, claims the destruction of the tower was caused by “controlled demolition”. Theorists have also been sceptical about the occupants of the building as two of the floor were believed to be home to the secret service. Mr Korol said: “I just couldn’t understand how those buildings collapsed. It didn’t make sense. He added: “Indeed, neither before nor since 9/11 have fires caused the total collapse of a steel-framed high-rise — nor has any other natural event, with the exception of the 1985 Mexico City earthquake, which toppled a 21-storey office building. “Otherwise, the only phenomenon capable of collapsing such buildings completely has been by way of a procedure known as controlled demolition, whereby explosives or other devices are used to bring down a structure intentionally.” READ MORE: 1,100 victims of World Trade Center attack still not identified Aerial footage of the collapse of the twin towers (Image: GETTY) The leading professor also claims the fires would have not been strong enough to burn through the steel structures. He added: “The fires were on the upper floors, there’s little chance the heat would have spread down and caused the steel columns, or the connectors or floor beams, to sufficiently weaken and collapse in the twin towers. “Also they were treated with a fire retardant which would have insulated them.” In 2008 The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) in charge of the official report concluded fire was the explanation for the collapse. DON'T MISS REVEALED: US ambassador to UK’s wife almost died in 9/11 [INSIGHT] As an Al Qaeda spy I never expected the horror of 9/11 [ANALYSIS] British 9/11 terror attacks survivor preparing to return to New York [INSIGHT] The twin towers collapsed 102 minutes after being struck (Image: GETTY) NIST lead investigator Shyam Sunder said: “WTC 7 collapsed because of fires fuelled by office furnishings. It did not collapse from explosives or from diesel fuel fires. "This is the first time that we are aware of, that a building taller than about 15 stories has collapsed primarily due to fires.” He added: "What we found was that uncontrolled building fires, similar to fires experienced in other tall buildings, caused an extraordinary event, the collapse of WTC7." The full report will be from the University of Alaska will be available between September 16 and September 30. * The University of Alaska study was funded by Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, an non-profit organisation promoting a controlled demolition conspiracy theory around the September 11 attacks. This should have been made clear within the original article and we are happy to clarify this.
  5. The Morning of September 11th 2001 and The Events That Unfolded at Ground Zero in New York City, Changed The World Forever...9/11 - We Remember!
  6. Hi Carlos, stay with it...you are bang on dude.
  7. The Worlds "Climate", people, is NOT a Computer Program, it does change, With or Without help.
  8. Hey fishy, i suppose you reckon the people seen hanging out of gaping holes in the burning buildings was CGI as well then...and BTW, what you doing on this forum then, if you love the queen so much.
  9. If none of the footage can be trusted from that day, then we got nothing to analyze... Just a f****ng blank screen then.
  10. The WTC WAS DEMOLISHED...but the planes HAD TO BE THERE AND BE SEEN AND HEARD HITING THE BUILDINGS...the planes were real planes...to suggest it was some sort of trick imagery/hologram/camera trick is just real plain Dumb...and as for nobody died in the buildings is even dumber....Dumb & Dumber.
  11. Genuine "Truthers" will not even debate the no planes at the WTC Complex because it's a damm lie and pure stupidity.
  12. NO PLANE at the Pentagon... NO PLANE in the field at Shanksville 2 PLANES at WTC.
  13. It's rather complicated who the Jews actually are. I'm guessing you already know the Jews are but one of The Twelve Tribes of Israel, you being to Israel and that. The modern day Jews, mainly come from European Jewish stock, who are actually not, strictly speaking, genetic Jews but, Jewish converts known as The Khazarian Jews, who shun the Tora, claiming it is merely a man made text as opposed to the Talmud which they claim is the genuine word of God. The Khazarian blood line has been traced to Caucasoid and Mongoloid origins. The Talmudic Jews hate Jesus with a vengeance because He called out the Sadducees and Pharisees for being hypocrites and liars. Please see links below for more in depth study... Texe Marrs is particularly learned on this and many other related subjects Texe Marrs - Khazarian Jews Understanding The History Of Khazarian Jews Sadducees & Pharisees Hope this helps.. it's a huge subject with a complicated history.
  14. This is due to...err, to the speed of sound, as mentioned in the video that ink posted. And you can leave litter for all the fake shit that you have been LED to believe... The planes aren't even an issue any more mate...leave it alone and maybe we can talk about some important FACTS. If you mention planes again I will block your comments...do you have any other hangups about the facts.
  15. We are deeper than the abyss, try to unravel yourself, figure youself out, find the truth in yourself amongst the lies, separate the light from the dark, sort the smiles from the frowns.
  16. The towers were demolished this we agree on, the planes were just an initial focal point and a rational of the buildings falling....and you mention ""asking people to disbelieve their own eyesight""...well, EYE WITNESS accounts of planes are too numerous to mention....see inks post above to set your mind straight.
  17. Well put...good post rideforever THE GREATEST STORY NEVER TOLD...CLICK HERE It was an horrific chapter in human history... TO UNDERSTAND WW2 ONE MUST FIRST EXAMINE THE END OF WW1. The Treaty of Versailles.
  18. You're bang on there mate...the plane issue on the whole is a mute point as well...mishy and others have made some good points about mini nukes thermite etc, these points are the nitty gritty of how the buildings were brought down and it is imperative that we get these facts across to those still ignorant of these important facts.
  19. It is still vitally important that we focus on how the buildings were brought down however when people are still banging on about no planes and empty buildings etc after all these years ..elephant in the room..? Who benefited is largely a mute point...there are several vids on that subject, but the most important subject is still HOW the building's were turned into dust...the planes were just an initial focal point/distraction but caused minimal damage...if and when it is proved how the building's were brought down, the official narrative will in turn be dust. We have to prove the crimes were committed first, then go after the suspects.
  20. Good post but, it is well known who benefited, and I started this thread highlighting one of the main beneficiaries... Lucky Larry Silverstein, the owner of buildings 1, 2 & 3 but was sidetracked by bullshit about no planes involved, I will not be drawn into such drivel.
  21. And they could have added a bullshit blip or two into your head. And that cluesforum should be renamed clueless forum if that's what they're telling you. There is an abundance of LIVE VIDEO, SHOT ON THE DAY, and information from hundreds of eye witnesses who saw and heard planes that day...granted they weren't the actual passenger planes everyone thought they were but purpose built military planes built specifically for the job. The no planes theory is a psyop designed to distract you from the actual facts...the title of this thread is... "The Facts of WTC PLANNED & CONTROLLED DEMOLITION"
  22. Here is a small sample of the radar data for that day... http://pilotsfor911truth.org/WTC1.html
  23. Yeah I've heard that a million times... Of course there were planes, don't fall for the smokescreen of no planes...thousands of people who were actually there saw and heard planes.
  24. Yes, all of that and, ideas have been put forward for years about how the reinforced part of the building could have been used as the command centre to remotely fly in the planes that hit the Twin Towers, Operation Northwoods style. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods http://www.911review.com/precedent/century/northwoods.html https://www.ae911truth.org/evidence/videos/category/25-9-11-experts-speak-out-individual-chapters
×
×
  • Create New...