MarpatV2

Germans never had that capacity though

But we had radar too, searchlights were used at night as well as nighfighters equipped with early radar. Do you think they would risk aircraft and lives to knock a few monuments down when they could destroy targets essential for the war effort?

|Maybe some werent in the specific target area? some would survive by chance. Many, like St Pauls and the Palace, did get hit by bombs. The Germans didnt have the capacity for heavy carpet bombing in the war as their bombers were of the medium type and not suitable.

Well it was legal. His drug use was nothing in comparison to what people do now. Do you know christianity may have started as a magic mushroom cult?

Lol, wave. So its OK for you to have your little christian prayer group here but you want others to get the boot? So where did you disappear to after the forum died? get black bagged or something?

lol, so it is you Wave. You style is so obvious. Why have you chosen a totally different name after the forum hackign disaster? trying to distance yourself from all the dodgy stuff you used to post? You are wrong about Churchill, simple as that. You want to think he is the bad guy and Hitler was doing a good thing. Aw, you going to try and tarnish me with the pedo brush are you? you bring the subject up when its not relevant then try to label others with it. Satanic priest. They even admit they dont worship satan. Lol Your beliefs are a joke. Look at what you write. Its all 'I believe this or I believe that'. In freemasonry, if you dont go through the proper channels to get your degrees they dont count. Its as simple as that. Believe what you will though. So you are going to try and blame western degradation on a jewish sect? isnt that the same sort of thing Hitler and chums were saying? Christianty is finished man. They murdered their way around the planet to gain power. They dont deserve to survive with their sick dogmas.

Interesting. It would seem that you are saying that Churchill was acting from the point of evil and the nazis were the good guys. You said they used the symbols of light. That explains a hell of a lot about your claims.

There is a podcast talking about his time in Berlin when he just did art. Apparently Germer gave him some German medicine to control his asthma, so heroin wasn't needed at that time. The problem was that he couldn't get that stuff in Britain, so he eventually ended up having to use heroin again.

And?

Nobody mentioned kids except YOU. Thelema certainly DOESNT approve of it as children have their true will too. We are all stars after all. Why on earth do you feel the need to drag things down to that level? The new aeon will come whether you like it or not. Wanting to hold onto a repressive religion from the past wont stop life marching on and growing. It will just make you increasingly irrelevant. I understand the fear though. You have been conditioned to think the bible is the truth and that anything against it must be evil. The people who created the bible and that mentality did so to control the behaviour of the populations.

Those Romans really knew how to write books to control the people. The bible is an awesome work of pseudographia.

The sign of Typhon is a V with both arms up, not the fingers. Crowley went through the AASR degrees in an unregistered lodge, so they didnt count. They may have given him the knowledge of the degree but outside of that he would have had no right to anything in a recognised AASR lodge. This pissed him off greatly. Thelema, Crowleys system, is about individual freedom and liberty whereas Judaism in any form is about community living and cohesion. They are not compatible. Crowley would have loved to be responsible for the destruction of the church, especially as his fundy mother terrorised him in the name of christianity. Thelema is about giving people the methods to gradually release a person from their mental and emotional bonds, often forced upon them by religious dogmas. Clearly bible thumpers see this as a threat to their power and authority and will call it dark, etc. Personally I think christianity has had its day. So much evil has been done it its name that any 'wine' it contained has been contaminated. I get that people who feel christianity is the only truth feel threatened by all this sort of thing but thats just a sign of their emotional insecurity, which shows when they have to try and bash people over the head with their bible quotes. All this sabattean stuff is BS man. I have read what they are about but I think you just use the word because you can somehow tie negative connotations into it. Mark Passio might call those people unenlightened but I would put my cash on him being unelightened too. The fact that he claims to be a priest of satanism speaks for itself. I think such people are pretentious posers trying to be all dark and badass. What you have to understand is that some taboos are false and have made peoples lives miserable. Therefore one step to breaking out of that is breaking the relevant taboo. Sex before marriage was once a massive things but now it isnt. Labelling things as sinful only serves to repress people through making them feel guilty, mainly for natural behaviour. Again, those bonds need smashing. Criticism of the bible is a big taboo for many yet its important to do so to really know whats going on. How many people have suffered mental and emotional strain because they cant have a wank due to the story of Onan? You have to many unfounded beliefs that dont really fit together. Is that you Wave?

Are people not free so have sex if they please, as long as its consensual? Morality IS relative. Different cultures have different views as to what is acceptable behaviour. In thelema freedom also requires discipline, so that a person does not interfere with the will of others . Crowley covered such a point as you mention. The killer removes the right of a persons will to live their life and as such is to be punished. In thelema personal liberty is not about abusing and killing others. Its about being free from the mental and emotional prisons life puts us in.

What is this place, a congregation for christians?

But that isnt in the bible is it, so was probably written quite late to fill in gaps in the standard narrative

Lol, yeah, how awful that he espouses individual liberty. I find it odd that you are against it.

Crowley wrecked the Gold Dawn. Churchill didnt use the typhon sign either. It may have been Crowley just having a joke about giving him the V sign, as he was a joker. Are you suggesting that the nazis were actually the power of light battling against darkness manifest in Churchill? Crowley was not recognised by UGLE as a freemason, which is why he began to trash freemasonry in his books. Lol, so you go down the whole route of trying to tie Crowley down to some dark group with a jewish basis? how original, not. I suggest you go an learn something about what the illuminati were all about. They had no time for magic and occultism and were quite against it.

They sign up to developing their true, unique, individual spiritual will. Read Liber Oz o see wat Crowleys idea on liberty is. I cant see many people disagreeing with it.

The info isnt hard to find but you are best off reading it on an occult site, not a site trying to prove the occult is all evil because the bible said so.

Not only that but how many people describe greys has having such noses. Crowley said the large head symbolised great intelligence, etc. He said it was symbolic of what the entity is. The prominent forehead meant it had high spiritual attainment.

Those signs are not universal and come from the Golden Dawn system. Isis mourning is more of an L shape, with one arm up and one out, so its not a nazi salute. Freemasonry is not even on the cards with this. Still got Crowley down as a bogey man?

As far as I know Lam was an entity Crowley contacted after one working. Crowley describes the image as symbolic of what the being is rather than an actual image.

Aren't being used by who? they are the individuals rights under the law of thelema.

Yeah, I didnt listen as I dont have any interest in satanism. The 4 pillars of thelema are life, light, love and liberty. If you have a problem with that then I dont care. The people who bang on about the 'truth' are often those who dont really know it and have to push the version they want to be true. Also, Crowley isnt my prophet. I never said at any point that he was.

So he has an opinion on Thelema. So what? does being an ex satanist somehow make him credible? you do realise satanism and Thelema are not the same? satan is not mentioned once in the Thelemic book of the law.