.jpg.8081a54a3b74a5d1823dfac966666137.jpg)
.jpg.594f0ef23288ec5ab04539b2f8a8dbd4.jpg)
MarpatV2
-
Posts
466 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by MarpatV2
-
-
1 minute ago, RobinJ said:
Well maybe you should read the books that came out BEFORE the TV/ Films which then confirmed what he has been saying. Its clear you dont get it. Films/ TV/ music etc is all controlled by the lunatics in power. One of their modus operandi is to tell us what they are doing via these mediums. Therefore if you watch enough ( especially Sci-fi) drama etc and pay attention, you can see what they have planned which is now playing out. ALL main stream media & entertainment is a form of programming the people to accept what is coming.
Such as? The idea of a moon spaceship is pretty old. Reptilians were on TV in the 80's on a series called V. The Matrix came out before his books. Before that it was the Truman show and They live. Every time a film comes out people start trying to apply the theme of the film to life.
-
1 minute ago, Macnamara said:
The qatuor coronati freemasonic lodge that i mentioned earlier was named after 4 jews who infiltrated the roman craft guilds
That lodge also has ties to various fabians who were instrumental in creating the new age religion
There is no such thing as new age religion.
-
1 minute ago, Macnamara said:
No the catholics didn't just decide to have an inquisition. They were reacting to forces they saw as trying to undermine their entire civilisation. Usually they responded without murder by expelling the people they saw as a problem. Lots of places expelled jews and i would say that it is because of the actions of this sabbatean cult that I am trying to bring into the light of day. It is because of their actions that jews have faced persecution[/quote]
You are trying to twist people by using any form of deception and distortion you can. It wont achieve anything
1 minute ago, Macnamara said:
[quote]
No i think you support them because you are a sabbatean yourself[/quote]
How does that work. Im not jewish nor looking for the messiah
[quote]
But if you are making an argument for the use of force then you are making an argument for the most extreme kind of behaviour that is so feared by the media and the police. That is the implication of what you are saying there....that people should violently fight off people. That's a very hardline view! [/quote]
Force can be limted to what is actually necessary. You see everything in terms of extremes, which is common for the mentally ill.
-
3 minutes ago, Macnamara said:
I think that the creator endowed us all with natural law rights
I think that people have always moved around to a certain extent when left to their own devices and I have no problem with some movement.
What i'm talking about here is a deliberate PROCESS that has been carried out against humanity. The point that i am trying to make in this thread, albeit in a very piecemeal way is that when say black people speak about a process of 'colonisation' where they are dispossessed and culturally and sometimes physically genocided that the same process has also been carried out against white people for centuries
Its only being spun now that 'white people' are behind that process because people are becoming more aware of their history now and a certain guilty party want to try and hide their own role in that process and they do it by trying to place everything at the door of 'white people'
i think you are only anti-free speech because you have something to hide
The problem is that some people live in good areas and some dont, so they try to take a piece. Do you think people are just going to sit in some shitty desert or mountain if they hear there is fertile land and water sources elsewhere, especially when the survival of their people is at stake?
White people have invaded every part of the world. No point in denying it or trying to blame jews for it.
-
Its already happened yet they were too blind to see, lol
-
Just now, Truthspoon said:
As usual you're lying.
The Jews had infiltrated Christianity in Spain for their own purposes, and it was only as a result of this that the Church had to respond with the Inquisition to find the Jews who were trying to destroy the church from within.
However as we know, the Jews won the day because they created the Jesuits as a secret society which unless you were a Jew, it was impossible to advance.
lol, there you go again, blaming jews. Your theory sounds like a great excuse to go on a killing spree of anybody who might have jewish sympathies, origins, or heritage. The inquisition is a monstrous organisation of sick and twisted people.
Like I said before, if they have to assume a secret identity to survive then my sympathies are with them, not with those who would kill them for not converting.
-
23 hours ago, RobinJ said:
His mission is to wake people up to the oncoming tyranny- you should know that if your are here! By showing people parallels in film many do wake up, though some are so deep asleep they won't ever get there. Why are you here if you are so critical of him? Curious.
Just seems like a lot of his ideas come from the world of entertainment, whether books TV or film.
-
15 hours ago, EnigmaticWorld said:
Could also be a positive thing. A people that feels attached to their heritage will surely be harder to deracinate and destroy.
To a certain extent I agree. Bloody smut pushers poisoning my people do my head in.
This is true but how many wars have been fought over land because people believed they owned it? look at Jerusalem, all the killing done there by various religions who think they have a special claim. If its true that victory can only come from God then we must accept that he has rejected christianity, which was born there and defeated.
-
1 hour ago, Macnamara said:
i don't agree with what has been done to native peoples around the world but that colonialism has been carried out by a network of bloodline families
For example the western seaboard of africa was explored and then exploited (for slaves) by the order of christ which was a crypto-jewish knights templar order that renamed itself when the templars were persecuted in france
The crypto-jewish templars created the state of portugal and their grandmaster was henry the navigator who was one of those explorers
The triangular trade that was created across the atlantic of sugar, tobacco and slaves was completely dominated by that jewish network
One story that is not being told out there is that the templars also created the state of scotland.
That network was behind the dutch east india company and the east india company
Many of the 'white' people who moved were actually crypto-jewish converso 'protestants' (oftentimes they fled the spanish inquisition) or they were white people driven off their land by the network eg by the clearances (eg highland and lowland) or through deportations or as indentured labour (some places like australia or the carribean acted as penal colonies for prisoners, political or otherwise) so there is a more accurate version of history that is not being told here so that the network can demonise white people and blame them for everything to hide their own crimes
As for freedom of movement that would be a nice thing in the decentralised world that i would like to see but we don't live in that world at the moment. We live in a world shaped by the mercantalism of the sabbatean network and as a result of that people want to move in ways that they otherwise wouldn't naturally choose
As for natural law rights we have to consider the effects of our actions on others; for example can you just move into an area that someone else is living and farming and claim it for yourself? That would be theft
Lol, crypto jews. Some jews had to pretend they adopted Catholicism to avoid being murdered, which is not a bad reason. TBH my sympathies would be with such people as the catholic rulers of the time were just a bunch of vicious murderers. I would even support them if they did their best to undermined such a cruel and violent system.
Natural law doesnt recognise theft. Its recognises strength. Theft implies ownership and people dont own land unless they can hold it by force, if required.
If jews helped people travel around the world then so what? what is your big problem with that? you always seem to suggest that people have only been successful when they have had jewish help, which doesn't look bad for them. Maybe they are just smarter people?
-
1 hour ago, Macnamara said:
Genetics has destroyed the idea that groups came into britain and wiped out the people already there. They didn't, they just interbred with them
For example the anglo-saxons inter-bred with the celts and the vikings inter-bred with the gaels and so on. In fact iceland was settled by viking men and their gaelic wives
So many british people ARE native or indigenous, however you want to put it
I don't think it applies soley to christians no
I think ALL human beings have inalienable rights given to them by the creator regardless of their religion or non religion
you sound like the kind of person who is irked by people saying the truth
Lol, so you think the creator made you as a specific race in a specific location and gave you special status? Sounds like a lab experiment what you are claiming.
If I was irked by truth then I would find no issues with your posts.
-
1 hour ago, Macnamara said:
They are trying to create a technocratic world government run by them.
In order to do that they need to breakdown national sovereignty and national cohesion. This means undermining national homogenity because that brings cohesion to societies and the cabal don't want that. The cabal want divided, weak and alienated societies that are easier to impose central control over
Also they want to remove peoples ancestral claim to land and the way they do that is by destroying the target population demographically.
They also want to destroy christianity to remove the idea of God given rights. They want to destroy the family to make the state the provider of values to children. They want to destroy small businesses and self-sufficiency to make people helplessly dependent on their corporations and they want to destroy freedom of speech so that no one can point out all of these things they are doing
But surely you must see ancestry is an illusion? it doesnt give ownership of land or any right to it. Celts didnt originate in any part of the UK but came from eastern Europe. Hanging onto ancestral claims is just hanging onto the past, which could be detrimental.
So why do you claim christianity has God given rights? can you pick them out of the bible and explain why you think other religions dont have divine rights? are you claiming that adherence to certain religions gives divine rights, like kings use to claim their power?
I think you over exaggerate all of this to fit the narrative you want to believe. Free speech has limits as far as I'm concerned as there are too many people out there willing to use such freedoms to cause all sorts of problems. True free speech comes with responsibility yet people think it should allow them to say what they want without consequences.
-
1 hour ago, Macnamara said:
no but lets consider what two conspirators said. First of all we have the rothschild funded barbara spector who said that europe had to 'learn to be multicultural' and that it wouldn't remain 'monolithic' and then there was ex goldman sachs banker and UN migration chief (the late) Peter Sutherland who called for 'undermining national homogenity'
So imo what they are trying to do there is destroy ethnic 'homogenity' because when people in certain places look a certain way it becomes easy to point at them and say 'they look such-and-such' and when you can do that to a people you are by implication saying that they belong to that geographic area
For example if you said 'they look chinese' then you are by implication arguing that they have an ancestral claim to the land of china
So to undermine that they are seeking to undermine the 'monolithic' nature of places so that the populations in that place lose that ancestral claim
In the eyes of the conspirators that must be done in order to remake people into global citizens of their world government. They can't have people feeling like they belong to something else
You would say they look Asian, not Chinese.
I thought you were into freedom of movement, etc? if people are free to move where they want there is always the chance that white people may move away from colder climates and other ethnic minorities may move into those places. White people have been imposed on various places throughout the world, to severe detriment of native populations and yet white people complain about being replaced by foreigners. I think its just people who are afraid of outsiders.
-
1 hour ago, alexa said:
Jesus is called "son of God," while followers of Jesus are called, "sons of God". As applied to Jesus, the term is a reference to his role as the Messiah, or Christ, the King chosen by God (Matthew 26:63)
In the OT the Son's of God were the fallen Angels;
Sons of God in Genesis 6:1–4 were the fallen angels who engaged in unnatural union with human women, resulting in the begetting of the Nephilim.
Yes but they were still sons of God. Maybe not all of them fell either. Also, read Job, where the sons of God sit before the throne.
Messiah refers to any anointed king and jesus didnt fulfil the messianic prophecy. He didnt cause the jews to return to Israel nor build the third temple.
-
On 1/15/2021 at 9:13 PM, Maedros said:
It's a place for those who like satan, were untrusted with spiritual knowledge and had authority therein but rebelled, just like he did; so those who go there and dwell with him are like him even in the way they get there.
34 Concerning whom I have said there is no forgiveness in this world nor in the world to come—
35 Having denied the Holy Spirit after having received it, and having denied the Only Begotten Son of the Father, having crucified him unto themselves and put him to an open shame.
36 These are they who shall go away into the lake of fire and brimstone, with the devil and his angels—
37 And the only ones on whom the second death shall have any power;
38 Yea, verily, the only ones who shall not be redeemed in the due time of the Lord, after the sufferings of his wrath.
44 Wherefore, he saves all except them—they shall go away into everlasting punishment, which is endless punishment, which is eternal punishment, to reign with the devil and his angels in eternity, where their worm dieth not, and the fire is not quenched, which is their torment—
45 And the end thereof, neither the place thereof, nor their torment, no man knows;
46 Neither was it revealed, neither is, neither will be revealed unto man, except to them who are made partakers thereof;
Nothing like good old threats to keep the congregation in line.
How can Jesus be the only begotten son when the sons of God are mentioned in the OT? surely they were physical enough to have sex with human women.
-
6 minutes ago, alexa said:
Not at all, take the Liger for instance;
Ligers and tigons are hybrids, the offspring of the pairing of a lion and a tiger. Ligers have lion fathers and tiger mothers. They usually grow much larger than their parents, and female ligers (sometimes called ligresses) can sometimes have babies.
But its not like a domestic house cat carrying a lion cub is it?
-
1
-
-
Just now, EnigmaticWorld said:
Tough one, especially for me as I have a bi relative and I still love her like everyone else, so it's something that I have definitely thought about a lot. I guess that I don't feel like it's productive, I mean in the "be fruitful and multiply" sense. Besides that, I will just leave God to judge. I don't like some of the stuff people are pushing to kids, but I don't care what grown adults choose to do or identify as.
Like I said before, I'm sure the whole point of this 'law' was the upkeep of the tribal population to ensure survival, rather than being a divine command. If somebody said Rabbi Bob has just decided this is how they had to live they might tell him to get stuffed. Another thing is the diet laws. I think the whole point was to avoid getting ill from certain types of food rather than it being unclean. There have even been speculations that the relationship between David and Jonathan was a bit too close.
-
6 minutes ago, EnigmaticWorld said:
Depends. I think churches should be free to practice how they wish as long as they're not harming anyone. I can understand the argument about Christians imposing views on people, but people shouldn't impose their views on churches either, so it goes both ways I guess.
What about if you hate the sin, but not the sinner? I guess you could argue that you don't see certain things as a sin, but then changing the church to suit your beliefs shouldn't worry you anyway.
So you see homosexuality as a sin?
-
51 minutes ago, Truthspoon said:
As we shall soon see, when you divert from sound moral laws which the religions have taught us, and engage in mass exhibitions of ritualised obscenity such as homosexuality or transgenderism, and not only make this normal but give these people dominant status, then hell won't be something for the next world, it will be the reality for this one.
Morality is nothing more mysterious than simple cause and effect.
Sound for you maybe but repressive for people who are homosexual. I take it you feel that they are an abomination and should change then? you refer to them as being obscene. You use your religion to justify your dislike of them. You see hell as a place of homosexuals? maybe its just something raging to get out of you?
-
Just now, Truthspoon said:
Reposting.
Ok I'm done with you now.
I've proved you wrong time and time again.
https://www.truthspoon.com/p/hidden-rituals-of-old-gods.html
The following extract from Walter Burkert and John Raffan's excellent book Greek Religion: archaic and classical, depicts the institutionalisation of the myth pederasty Gods such as Poseidon and Zeus, into civil life:"Fully fledged initiation rituals are known from Dorian Crete and from Sparta. For Crete, the principal source is a fourth century report by Ephorus, who already attests the decline of the custom. Men are organised in clubs which meet regularly for communal meals (syssitia) in the men's hall (andreion) at public expense. Boys who have outgrown childhood are first summoned to the men's hall in order to perform menial services; clad in simple robes they sit on the floor. What appeared as a scandal to the other Greeks was the institutionalized homosexuality: a man from the men's hall would carry off a beautiful boy, as Zeus carried off Ganymede. For the chosen lad this actually meant a distinction. The man made known his intention in advance, and the boy's relatives arranged for a mock pursuit that ended at the men's hall. Presents were then distributed, and the man with his boy, accompanied for some distance by his now gift-leden pursuers, retired in some place in the countryside for two months. The days were spent in hunting and feasting. Finally the lover had to present the boy with a warrior's robe, an ox, and a wine cup; thus he was dismissed, being now famous, kleinos."But you haven't. Im posting info that the rabbis themselves say passing through the fire is not child sacrifices. You come up with the standard belief of a minister.
Reposting doesnt mean you're right.
So some Greeks had some weird rituals. What are you getting at?
-
Just now, Truthspoon said:
Lol...that's all you've got. Idiot.
Pretty intolerant of you. Lets face it, the idea of child sacrifices to moloch is a bible story that the rabbis themselves say is an initiation and not a sacrifice. You want to believe the worst possible example because it suits your belief.
-
1 minute ago, Truthspoon said:
Ba'aal IS Molech. Both words mean Lord.
Molech comes from Malek, Lord.
No, Moloch means king.
-
4 minutes ago, Truthspoon said:
https://www.truthspoon.com/p/hidden-rituals-of-old-gods.html
Human sacrifice was carried out extensively in the ancient world, for example, upon the death of high ranking Egyptian dignitaries, those who served them on life were ritually murdered that they might continue to serve them in death. Carthage, the ancient rival to Rome's power in modern day Tunisia, was widely criticised in the ancient world for the existence of Tophets (roasting places) were children were sacrificed to Bal. It is reported by Diodorus Siculus that: "There was in their city a bronze image of Cronus (Saturn) extending its hands, palms up and sloping toward the ground, so that each of the children when placed thereon rolled down and fell into a sort of gaping pit filled with fire."
“They have built the high places of Tophet, which is in the valley of the son of Hinnom, to burn their sons and their daughters in the fire; which I did not command them, nor did it come into My heart. - Jer 7:31”
Matthew Henry, born in 1662, was a presbytarian minster and was famous for his Bible commentaries, as he comments on Jeremiah chapter 7 verse 31 which highlights the abominable acts of the pagan Canaanites in their service to Baal:They have particularly built the high places of Tophet, where the image of Moloch was set up, in the valley of the son of Hinnom, adjoining to Jerusalem; and there they burnt their sons and their daughters in the fire, burnt them alive, killed them, and killed them in the most cruel manner imaginable, to honour or appease those idols that were devils and not gods. This was surely the greatest instance that ever was of the power of Satan in the children of disobedience, and of the degeneracy and corruption of the human nature. One would willingly hope that there were not many instances of such a barbarous idolatry; but it is amazing that there should be any, that men could be so perfectly void of natural affection as to do a thing so inhuman as to burn little innocent children, and their own too, that they should be so perfectly void of natural religion as to think it lawful to do this, nay, to think it acceptable. Surely it was in a way of righteous judgment, because they had changed the glory of God into the similitude of a beast, that God gave them up to such vile affections that changed them into worse than beasts. God says of this that it was what he commanded them not, neither cam it into his heart, which is not meant of his not commanding them thus to worship Moloch (this he had expressly forbidden them), but he had never commanded that his worshippers should be at such an expense, nor put such a force upon their natural affection, in honouring him; it never came into his heart to have children offered to him, yet they had forsaken his service for the service of such gods as, by commanding this, showed themselves to be indeed enemies to mankind." - Matthew Henry
Child sacrifice was also practiced in Arabia before the arrival of Mohamed and Islam, as is made clear from of the Qu'ran surah 6 verse 137:"Thus were the idol worshipers duped by their idols, to the extent of killing their own children. In fact, their idols inflict great pain upon them, and confuse their religion for them. Had GOD willed, they would not have done it. You shall disregard them and their fabrications."The opinions of a minister do not count as proof.
-
1 minute ago, Truthspoon said:
https://www.truthspoon.com/p/hidden-rituals-of-old-gods.html
The following extract from Walter Burkert and John Raffan's excellent book Greek Religion: archaic and classical, depicts the institutionalisation of the myth pederasty Gods such as Poseidon and Zeus, into civil life:"Fully fledged initiation rituals are known from Dorian Crete and from Sparta. For Crete, the principal source is a fourth century report by Ephorus, who already attests the decline of the custom. Men are organised in clubs which meet regularly for communal meals (syssitia) in the men's hall (andreion) at public expense. Boys who have outgrown childhood are first summoned to the men's hall in order to perform menial services; clad in simple robes they sit on the floor. What appeared as a scandal to the other Greeks was the institutionalized homosexuality: a man from the men's hall would carry off a beautiful boy, as Zeus carried off Ganymede. For the chosen lad this actually meant a distinction. The man made known his intention in advance, and the boy's relatives arranged for a mock pursuit that ended at the men's hall. Presents were then distributed, and the man with his boy, accompanied for some distance by his now gift-leden pursuers, retired in some place in the countryside for two months. The days were spent in hunting and feasting. Finally the lover had to present the boy with a warrior's robe, an ox, and a wine cup; thus he was dismissed, being now famous, kleinos."I see you keep editing your earlier posts to bring them into line with your later posts.
-
5 minutes ago, Truthspoon said:
Jeremiah 19:5
They have built high places to Baal on which to burn their children in the fire as offerings to Baal--something I never commanded or mentioned, nor did it even enter My mind.Ezekiel 20:26
And I pronounced them unclean through their gifts--the sacrifice of every firstborn in the fire--so that I might devastate them, in order that they would know that I am the LORD.Leviticus 20:2
Again, thou shalt say to the children of Israel, Whosoever he be of the children of Israel, or of the strangers that sojourn in Israel, that giveth any of his seed unto Molech; he shall surely be put to death: the people of the land shall stone him with stones.Deuteronomy 12:31
Thou shalt not do so unto the LORD thy God: for every abomination to the LORD, which he hateth, have they done unto their gods; for even their sons and their daughters they have burnt in the fire to their gods.Deuteronomy 18:10
There shall not be found among you any one that maketh his son or his daughter to pass through the fire, or that useth divination, or an observer of times, or an enchanter, or a witch,Ba'al is not molech. Maybe burning with fire is symbolic for some form of dedication to a fire god? maybe they were given a brand of some sort?
Isnt it odd that Abram was basically going to kill his own first born until he was told to stop? banging his sister as well, is that a good thing?
Giving seed to molech, as stated before, was about impregnating pagan women.
Those parts of deuteronomy were only attested to after the Babylon exile, when the jews sort to reform their religion and get rid of 'foreign' practises.
If the rabbis are saying that it wasnt about child sacrifice, using those same rules, then why are you trying to push that it is?
Note that molech is only mentioned a few times in the bible and NOWHERE else.
Is there an agenda to reduce the White European population?
in Politics & Social Engineering
Posted
I guess you just invert the truth