jesuitsdidit

And recent changes to protect integrity of UK re NI are not interfered with.

Add At no time does UK have to abide by EU rules containing Socialist claptrap. Added expenses are reduced to a minimum. Once we have completed the transition and re-establishment process, ~20 years?, we can look at what we can afford in terms of better worker rights but not now. We will be standing on our own feet in the world and do not need extra burdens. The EU is not free to impose such burdens upon us.

If EU want up to 10 years access to UK waters we can accede. This means EU boats have access to UK waters taking 10% less each year over 10 years. UK continues to trade with EU on current terms but aims to reduce trade with EU by 10% per annum down to the level it expects to exist once it has fully left. So for example, if current trade with EU is £100bn PA and in 10 years time it's expected to be £60bn then we have to reduce annual trade by 4bn£ PA, over a 3 year average. We continue to trade on current terms but are freed from EU constraints and can pursue Trade Agreements around the world and start trading with those countries without penalty as we would once we have left. Our annual fees would reduce by 10% PA, as laid out in the Accession Treaty, but this amount is halved to account for the access to fishing. So if our current annual fee is £10bn our 2021 fee would be £9bn but is halved to £4.5bn. Our 2022 fee would be £8bn but is halved to £4bn. If we can complete withdrawal before 10 years then our fees are recalculated to a greater reduction in fee on an equivalent annual basis and receive a reimbursement for monies overpaid. If we leave before 10 years fishing continues for 3 years ie we give 3 years notice but fishing does not continue beyond 10 years. So if we leave after 5 years fishing continues for a further 3 years = total 8 years. The remaining 3 years amount declines by 10% per annum. If we are unable to decouple within 10 years we continue to pay 20% current fee pa and EU have access to waters taking 10% current amount. 1 years notice is given to EU fishermen. Fishing does not continue once we have left.

Re: Critical information about Covid 19 thank you OP Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79723142 Thanks, I just want to get this information to as many people as possible! We don't need to be headed into pens and vaccinated like animals. We should have choices!!! There is now credible worldwide scientific evidence that ivermectin which has been used worldwide since the 1970s effectively works for both treatment and prophylaxis of Covid 19. We don't have to destroy economies by unnecessary lockdowns. We don't need to rush vaccines into production and distribution, we have an effective alternative treatment!!! We've had it all along. I have been following this for months now, and we now have it published by a group of very honest and courageous doctors in the US and Europe !!!!!!!! It has been published by doctors in other countries for months now!!! The problem is, that in the USA and Europe, doctors can be muzzled more easily. https://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message4615364/pg1?regp=bm9fMTYwNzI4MjA2NQ==

From New York Post article above The stunning anti-vax response follows an August survey of MTA workers that showed only 30 percent of 645 respondents were definitely willing to be vaccinated. Thirty-eight percent were unsure and 32 percent said they would not take the vaccine, according to the poll of Transport Workers Union members conducted by the NYU School of Global Public Health. If the survey results become the reality, it would mean thousands of NYC’s first responders and other essential frontline workers would continue to be vulnerable to the virus and remain potential spreaders. The FDNY announced last week it would not make the vaccine mandatory for its members, a policy expected to be followed by all city agencies and even hospitals. The data comes as Trump pandemic advisor Dr. Anthony Fauci said that most healthy Americans should not expect to be vaccinated before the spring, as the first shots are rolled out to health care workers, the elderly and the medically vulnerable

Links Breaking news! more then half of first responders will not get the covid19 vaccine! and it will NOT be mandatory in NY State! https://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message4616183/pg1 According to the CDC, there is no flu season https://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message4616160/pg1 Professor Sir John Irving Bell was talking about the #COVID mRNA #vaccines when he had a huge Freudian slip of the tongue that gave their game away "These vaccines are unlikely to completely sterilize the population" https://twitter.com/EpiWhisp/status/1329621642897592321/video/1… 5:42 AM · Nov 20, 2020 Critical information about Covid 19 https://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message4615364/pg1?regp=bm9fMTYwNzI4MjA2NQ==

https://healthandmoneynews.wordpress.com Menu Warnings of Infertility Come Directly With Pfizer Vaccine Quick Summary: Documents with warnings about the vaccine are now available… Patients Version / Doctor’s Version and the Doctor’s Version…… NOW THAT’S WHAT I CALL A CORONA CHRISTMAS In Loving Memory of Freedom RIP by Clive Maund The period from 1945 to 2019 was for many a “Golden Age” –… Will the U.S. Government Bribe the Public to Take the New Experimental COVID Vaccine by Offering $1500 in Stimulus Funds? In a story published at CNBC yesterday titled: Would you be willing to get a Covid vaccine in exchange for… Fox News: Corona Virus – False Alarm- Vaccines Are Dangerous! There is zero science behind Lockdown, social distancing, Vaccination, and mandatory masking and are not necessary — Do not believe… On Camera Trump asks Pompeo- “Why were we not told Coronavirus is a Live Exercise” @realDonaldTrump is mad that the deep state took control through Continuity of Government, there has been a coup? pic.twitter.com/GcrjNNvVsc #Covid_19…

Note The rollout will not initially include a mandate. A “soft” rollout will most likely be how the first doses will be dispensed. Those first doses are to be dispensed to healthcare workers and people considered to be at high risk of becoming infected. As production continues and more doses are available the pressure to be injected will increase. Draconian measures, with Australia being used as an example of draconian, are not considered to be useful at this time in the US. However, if “vaccine hesitancy” should continue to be a problem then a mandate is not out of the question. A recent article in the NEJM bears this out. “Noncompliance should incur a penalty” and notes that it should be a “relatively substantial” one. It suggests that “employment suspension or stay-at-home orders,” should be issued, but that fines should be discouraged because they can be legally challenged, and “may stoke distrust without improving uptake.” RT reported on this and opined: Whatever they do, authorities should avoid flaunting their relationship with vaccine manufacturers, the paper recommends – a tall order, given that President Donald Trump’s “Operation Warp Speed” vaccine development initiative is helmed by Moncef Slaoui, the former head of pharma giant GlaxoSmithKline’s vaccine division who had to quit the board of directors of Moderna – a frontrunner in the vaccine race – to take the job. Slaoui notoriously was forced to offload over $10 million in Moderna stock after its value briefly skyrocketed following the announcement of promising early trial results. A more in depth look at who Slaoui is and what his goals are is available here.

Of course, but we can't prove they are corrupt until they provide the evidence which is why you have to write to them. I am not writing because I want to know their views. I am writing so I can prove that they are incompetent.

Apparently in USA 51% will refuse Vaccine So maybe UK is rushing to vaccinate before the fact that Americans are refusing hits the news?

Auto response received Thank you for your e-mail. Please accept this as an acknowledgement of your email. Your enquiry is very important to me. When emailing, please include your full name, address and contact telephone number. Please be advised we can only deal with constituents from Birmingham Hall Green due to strict Parliamentary protocols. If this information is omitted from your email please resend the email. We aim to get a response to you within 14 working days. Due to current Coronavirus crisis we are receiving an exceptionally high volume of emails, meaning response times may be delayed. I will respond to your enquiry as soon as possible. Thank you for your patience UK Parliament Disclaimer: this e-mail is confidential to the intended recipient. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. Any unauthorised use, disclosure, or copying is not permitted. This e-mail has been checked for viruses, but no liability is accepted for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this e-mail. This e-mail address is not secure, is not encrypted and should not be used for sensitive data.

Sell-outs or stupid.

Rubbish. The Virus ended in June.

From what I understand the reason nobody has ever made a Coronavirus Vaccine before is that whilst the Vaccine is often received by the body once the individual comes into contact with the Wild Virus the reaction is often fatal.

Just sent to my MP Would be good if at least 5 people could do the same. We need to get at least one reply. Dear XXX I have concerns about the roll out of the Pfizer Vaccine. Could you please answer the following questions. Who will be ensuring the vaccination teams follow proper procedure? Who will be ensuring that there is "informed consent". What is the correct procedure in cases where consent cannot be given? Should we be having monitors/advocates in care homes to ensure correct procedure and no coercion? Should we be contacting care homes to ask what safeguards are in place to ensure correct procedure? Who is responsible for ensuring correct procedure? Will there be records kept of every vaccination given and whether informed consent was obtained? Yours sincerely Name Address

What are you saying?

4. Lockdown 'could kill 75,000 over five years' - that's the OFFICIAL projection of non-COVID deaths caused by missed cancer diagnoses, cancelled operations and health impacts of a recession. The virus death toll? 42,000 By Ben Spencer and Simon Walters for the Daily Mail Published: 22:00, 25 September 2020 | Updated: 08:11, 26 September 2020 Nearly 75,000 people could die from non-Covid causes as a result of lockdown, according to devastating official figures buried in a 188-page document. The startling research, presented to the Government's Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (Sage), will further increase pressure on Boris Johnson to hold back on introducing further coronavirus restrictions. The document reveals 16,000 people died as a result of the chaos in hospitals and care homes in March and April alone. It estimates a further 26,000 will lose their lives within a year if people continue to stay away from A&E and the problems in social care persist. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...rojection.html 5. 6. Covid-19: politicisation, “corruption,” and suppression of science BMJ 2020; 371 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m4425 (Published 13 November 2020) Cite this as: BMJ 2020;371:m4425 When good science is suppressed by the medical-political complex, people die Politicians and governments are suppressing science. They do so in the public interest, they say, to accelerate availability of diagnostics and treatments. They do so to support innovation, to bring products to market at unprecedented speed. Both of these reasons are partly plausible; the greatest deceptions are founded in a grain of truth. But the underlying behaviour is troubling. Science is being suppressed for political and financial gain. Covid-19 has unleashed state corruption on a grand scale, and it is harmful to public health.1 Politicians and industry are responsible for this opportunistic embezzlement. So too are scientists and health experts. The pandemic has revealed how the medical-political complex can be manipulated in an emergency—a time when it is even more important to safeguard science. The UK’s pandemic response provides at least four examples of suppression of science or scientists. https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425 7. Press release MHRA awarded over £980,000 for collaboration with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the World Health Organisation MHRA today announced a partnership worth over £980,000 to improve the safety monitoring of medicines in low and middle-income countries. Published 15 December 2017 From: Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency https://www.gov.uk/government/news/mhra-awarded-over-980000-for-collaboration-with-the-bill-and-melinda-gates-foundation-and-the-world-health-organisation 8. Public health England document admits that their PCR test does NOT test for infectious viruses: 9. A global team of experts has found 10 FATAL FLAWS in the main test for Covid and is demanding it’s urgently axed. As they should 1 Dec, 2020 18:59 Among the fatal flaws that totally invalidate the PCR testing protocol are that the test: is non-specific, due to erroneous primer design is enormously variable cannot discriminate between the whole virus and viral fragments has no positive or negative controls has no standard operating procedure does not seem to have been properly peer reviewed https://www.rt.com/op-ed/508383-fatal-flaws-covid-test/ 10. Portuguese Court Rules PCR Tests As Unreliable & Unlawful To Quarantine People November 18, 2020 A Portuguese appeals court has ruled that PCR tests are unreliable and that it is unlawful to quarantine people based solely on a PCR test. The court stated, the test’s reliability depends on the number of cycles used and the viral load present. Citing Jaafar et al. 2020, the court concludes that “if someone is tested by PCR as positive when a threshold of 35 cycles or higher is used (as is the rule in most laboratories in Europe and the US), the probability that said person is infected is less than 3%, and the probability that said result is a false positive is 97%.” The court further notes that the cycle threshold used for the PCR tests currently being made in Portugal is unknown. The threshold cycles used in PCR tests in India is between 37 and 40, which makes the reliability of the PCR test less than 3% and the false positive rate as high as 97%. https://greatgameindia.com/portuguese-court-pcr-tests-unreliable/ 11. Dr. Peter Hotez Addressing House Science, Space, and Technology Committee Hearing on Coronavirus March 5, 2020 Excerpt: "When I say scientific challenge, one of the things we are not hearing a lot about is potential safety problems of coronavirus vaccines. This was first found in the 1960s with respiratory interstitial virus vaccines done in Washington with the NIH and Children's National Medical Center. Some of those kids who got the vaccine did worse and I believe there were two deaths. What happens with certain types of respiratory virus vaccine, to get immunized and when you are exposed to the virus you get this paradoxical enhancement phenomenon. We don't entirely understand the basis of it, that we recognize there's a real problem with certain respiratory virus vaccines. That killed the program for decades and now the Gates foundation is taking it up again, but then we start developing coronavirus vaccines. We noticed laboratory animals that they started to show some of the same pathology that resembled what it happened years earlier. This is going to be problematic..." 12. Immune Enhancement Studies have suggested that coronavirus vaccines carry the risk of what is known as vaccine enhancement, where instead of protecting against infection, the vaccine can actually make the disease worse when a vaccinated person is infected with the virus. The mechanism that causes that risk is not fully understood and is one of the stumbling blocks that has prevented the successful development of a coronavirus vaccine. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-vaccines-insight-idUSKBN20Y1GZ 13. BMJ Sounds the Alarm: COVID-19 Vaccine Trials Cannot Tell Us if They Will Save Lives By BMJ October 21, 2020 None of the current trials are designed to detect a reduction in any serious outcome such as hospitalizations, intensive care use, or deaths. Vaccines are being hailed as the solution to the covid-19 pandemic, but the vaccine trials currently underway are not designed to tell us if they will save lives, reports Peter Doshi, Associate Editor at The BMJ today. https://scitechdaily.com/bmj-sounds-the-alarm-covid-19-vaccine-trials-cannot-tell-us-if-they-will-save-lives/ 14. Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon request a stop of all corona vaccination studies and call for co-signing the petition December 1, 2020 The concerns are directed in particular to the following points: The formation of so-called “non-neutralizing antibodies” can lead to an exaggerated immune reaction, especially when the test person is confronted with the real, “wild” virus after vaccination. This so-called antibody-dependent amplification, ADE, has long been known from experiments with corona vaccines in cats, for example. In the course of these studies all cats that initially tolerated the vaccination well died after catching the wild virus. The vaccinations are expected to produce antibodies against spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2. However, spike proteins also contain syncytin-homologous proteins, which are essential for the formation of the placenta in mammals such as humans. It must be absolutely ruled out that a vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 could trigger an immune reaction against syncytin-1, as otherwise infertility of indefinite duration could result in vaccinated women. https://2020news.de/en/dr-wodarg-and-dr-yeadon-request-a-stop-of-all-corona-vaccination-studies-and-call-for-co-signing-the-petition/ 15. Former Chief Science Officer for Pfizer Says "Second Wave" Faked on False-Positive COVID Tests, "Pandemic is Over" Updated on September 29, 2020 Ralph Lopez In a stunning development, a former Chief Science Officer for the pharmaceutical giant Pfizer says "there is no science to suggest a second wave should happen." The "Big Pharma" insider asserts that false positive results from inherently unreliable COVID tests are being used to manufacture a "second wave" based on "new cases." Dr. Mike Yeadon, a former Vice President and Chief Science Officer for Pfizer for 16 years, says that half or even "almost all" of tests for COVID are false positives. Dr. Yeadon also argues that the threshold for herd immunity may be much lower than previously thought, and may have been reached in many countries already. In an interview last week Dr. Yeadon was asked: "we are basing a government policy, an economic policy, a civil liberties policy, in terms of limiting people to six people in a meeting...all based on, what may well be, completely fake data on this coronavirus?" Dr. Yeadon answered with a simple "yes." Even more significantly, even if all positives were to be correct, Dr. Yeadon said that given the "shape" of all important indicators in a worldwide pandemic, such as hospitalizations, ICU utilization, and deaths, "the pandemic is fundamentally over." Yeadon said in the interview: "Were it not for the test data that you get from the TV all the time, you would rightly conclude that the pandemic was over, as nothing much has happened. Of course people go to the hospital, moving into the autumn flu season...but there is no science to suggest a second wave should happen." Survival Rate of COVID Now Estimated to be 99.8%, Similar to Flu, Prior T-Cell Immunity The survival rate of COVID-19 has been upgraded since May to 99.8% of infections. This comes close to ordinary flu, the survival rate of which is 99.9%. Although COVID can have serious after-effects, so can flu or any respiratory illness. The present survival rate is far higher than initial grim guesses in March and April, cited by Dr. Anthony Fauci, of 94%, or 20 to 30 times deadlier. The Infection Fatality Rate (IFR) value accepted by Yeadon et al in the paper is .26%. The survival rate of a disease is 100% minus the IFR. Dr. Yeadon pointed out that the "novel" COVID-19 contagion is novel only in the sense that it is a new type of coronavirus. But, he said, there are presently four strains which circulate freely throughout the population, most often linked to the common cold. https://hubpages.com/politics/Pfizer-Chief-Science-Officer-Second-Wave-Based-on-Fake-Data-of-False-Positives-for-New-Cases-Pandemic-is-Over 16. The Great Barrington Declaration The Great Barrington Declaration – As infectious disease epidemiologists and public health scientists we have grave concerns about the damaging physical and mental health impacts of the prevailing COVID-19 policies, and recommend an approach we call Focused Protection. Coming from both the left and right, and around the world, we have devoted our careers to protecting people. Current lockdown policies are producing devastating effects on short and long-term public health. The results (to name a few) include lower childhood vaccination rates, worsening cardiovascular disease outcomes, fewer cancer screenings and deteriorating mental health – leading to greater excess mortality in years to come, with the working class and younger members of society carrying the heaviest burden. Keeping students out of school is a grave injustice. Keeping these measures in place until a vaccine is available will cause irreparable damage, with the underprivileged disproportionately harmed. Fortunately, our understanding of the virus is growing. We know that vulnerability to death from COVID-19 is more than a thousand-fold higher in the old and infirm than the young. Indeed, for children, COVID-19 is less dangerous than many other harms, including influenza. As immunity builds in the population, the risk of infection to all – including the vulnerable – falls. We know that all populations will eventually reach herd immunity – i.e. the point at which the rate of new infections is stable – and that this can be assisted by (but is not dependent upon) a vaccine. Our goal should therefore be to minimize mortality and social harm until we reach herd immunity. The most compassionate approach that balances the risks and benefits of reaching herd immunity, is to allow those who are at minimal risk of death to live their lives normally to build up immunity to the virus through natural infection, while better protecting those who are at highest risk. We call this Focused Protection. Adopting measures to protect the vulnerable should be the central aim of public health responses to COVID-19. By way of example, nursing homes should use staff with acquired immunity and perform frequent PCR testing of other staff and all visitors. Staff rotation should be minimized. Retired people living at home should have groceries and other essentials delivered to their home. When possible, they should meet family members outside rather than inside. A comprehensive and detailed list of measures, including approaches to multi-generational households, can be implemented, and is well within the scope and capability of public health professionals. Those who are not vulnerable should immediately be allowed to resume life as normal. Simple hygiene measures, such as hand washing and staying home when sick should be practiced by everyone to reduce the herd immunity threshold. Schools and universities should be open for in-person teaching. Extracurricular activities, such as sports, should be resumed. Young low-risk adults should work normally, rather than from home. Restaurants and other businesses should open. Arts, music, sport and other cultural activities should resume. People who are more at risk may participate if they wish, while society as a whole enjoys the protection conferred upon the vulnerable by those who have built up herd immunity. On October 4, 2020, this declaration was authored and signed in Great Barrington, United States, by: Dr. Martin Kulldorff, professor of medicine at Harvard University, a biostatistician, and epidemiologist with expertise in detecting and monitoring infectious disease outbreaks and vaccine safety evaluations. Dr. Sunetra Gupta, professor at Oxford University, an epidemiologist with expertise in immunology, vaccine development, and mathematical modeling of infectious diseases. Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, professor at Stanford University Medical School, a physician, epidemiologist, health economist, and public health policy expert focusing on infectious diseases and vulnerable populations. https://gbdeclaration.org/ The mRNA vaccines from BioNTech/Pfizer contain polyethylene glycol (PEG). 70% of people develop antibodies against this substance – this means that many people can develop allergic, potentially fatal reactions to the vaccination. The much too short duration of the study does not allow a realistic estimation of the late effects. As in the narcolepsy cases after the swine flu vaccination, millions of healthy people would be exposed to an unacceptable risk if an emergency approval were to be granted and the possibility of observing the late effects of the vaccination were to follow. Nevertheless, BioNTech/Pfizer apparently submitted an application for emergency approval on December 1, 2020. Send this list to your MP. Ask if there is anything he/she disagrees with.

Who will be ensuring the vaccination teams follow proper procedure? Who will be ensuring that there is "informed consent". What is the correct procedure in cases where consent cannot be given? Should we be having monitors/advocates in care homes to ensure correct procedure and no coercion? Should we be contacting care homes to ask what safeguards are in place to ensure correct procedure? Who is responsible for ensuring correct procedure? Will there be records kept of every vaccination given and whether informed consent was obtained? Send these questions to your MP.

If UK in a position to decouple before 5 year mark then fees stop, UK departs. Fishing rights for EU fleets continue at 20% reduction per annum as a gesture of goodwill.

Agreement contains possiblity to extend beyond 5 years if things move slowly during decoupling. Extended years on basis of 20% fees/quotas per annum. Could possibly be increased say to 30% if this is more equitable. I have no fixed idea of suitable % for additional years. It could be as high as 50%. Obviously higher percentage works against UK as means more GBP spent and more fish lost. I assume negotiating teams can use common sense to fill out details.

I don't think UK should offer 10 year decoupling period unless UK feels that is what they need. My feeling is 5 year decoupling should be sufficient / preferable.

There could be restraints on what UK can and cannot do during decoupling but these should not be unduly burdensome and on the basis that the UK is in process of preparing a new framework for itself and its businesses and nothing should happen to hinder that. As and when UK finds satisfactory trade deals elsewhere and no longer needs to adhere to existing arrangements should be free to withdraw from contracts within EU.

My feeling is that the 5 year decoupling period is better for the UK. We should obviously be free to move forward with our new program and not hampered by EU conformities. It's solely to allow our businesses the time to adjust. It is not intended that the UK use this freedom to profit unfairly from having "one foot in both camps" during the decoupling period. This should be guaranteed by the UK. So we would still have access to the Single Market but be free to trade under our own terms around the world. We would be unlikely to profit unduly during the 5 year decoupling as these new contracts would take time to bed in. UK could furthermore give guarantees not to exploit this as our position would be for the explicit purpose of allowing our businesses time to adjust and we should respect the good grace of the EU in allowing us to do this. Mechanism to be established to oversee fairness and proper functioning of the decoupling process.

X Zacklee

The effect is we find out which ones are doing their job. Then we can start picking them off. They are the weak link in the system and they need to be exposed. You (plural) provide the responses* and I will do the demolishing. * or lack thereof