theo102

Nuclear threats are relevant because of the tension between the U.S. and Russia over Ukraine and because of the developing situation in Syria. The Roswell "weather balloon" occurred around the time that the U.S. was first developing and testing nuclear weapons.

It's highly populated, so there are lots of witnesses to the nighttime activity. This supports Trump's goal of declassification, since the current federal response doesn't have good optics.

You're not hijacking it, Project Blue Beam involves a contest power between the Abrahamic religions and the state, and the state has religious prejudice against theistic law. Ignoring the facts about the theistic nature of the common law doesn't help you much. From Blackstone:

Judges that are employed by the Crown have an interpretation of statutory law that is shaped by the Crown's religion. From the coronation oaths: That's incorrect. I've show the theistic origins of common law here: https://forum.davidicke.com/index.php?/topic/37257-uaps-in-new-jersey-usa/&do=findComment&comment=567101

Codification of common law is simply a restatement. From Blackstone: Statutes are also either declaratory of the common law, or remedial of some defects therein. Declaratory, where the old custom of the kingdom is almost fallen into disuse, or become disputable; in which case the parliament has thought proper, in perpetuum rei testimonium [as its lasting testimony], and for avoiding all doubts and difficulties, to declare what the common law is and ever has been. Thus the statute of treasons, 25 Edw. III. cap. 2, does not make any new species of treasons; but only, for the benefit of the subject, declares and enumerates those several kinds of offense, which before were treason at the common law.

Common law covers bother crimes and civil disputes. English common law originated with King Alfred the Great. Because one of the theories involves a psyop to deprive people of their rights relating to operation of remote-controller flying machines called drones.

Mike Adams @ 16:24 "The antichrist is believed to be a figure that would operate from Jerusalem" In that day will I make the governors of Judah like an hearth of fire among the wood, and like a torch of fire in a sheaf; and they shall devour all the people round about, on the right hand and on the left: and Jerusalem shall be inhabited again in her own place, [even] in Jerusalem. Zechariah 12:6 "The Greater Israel Project" In the same day YHWH made a covenant with Abram, saying, Unto thy seed have I given this land, from the river of Egypt unto the great river, the river Euphrates: Genesis 15:18\ https://libquotes.com/theodor-herzl/quote/lbm7n7u The Jewish state associates with descendants of Esau (the Edomite Jews). Esau sold his inheritance to his brother Jacob, the father of the twelve tribes of Israel. "Zionist influence is global" Globalist ambition is described by the watchman Habakkuk: Yea also, because he transgresseth by wine, [he is] a proud man, neither keepeth at home, who enlargeth his desire as hell, and [is] as death, and cannot be satisfied, but gathereth unto him all nations, and heapeth unto him all people: Habakkuk 2:5

Balance of probabilities only applies to civil matters. Criminal law is relevant when the is malicious intent and a related action, eg carrying out a psyop for a nefarious purpose. Military tech can be used for an honourable purpose: https://www.army.mil/humanitarian/

I'm attempting to interpret current events based on common law principles. One of these principles is the presumption of innocence, so I'm presuming that the intent of the operators of the "drones" is honourable until there is evidence for the contrary. Evidence of a psyop is H. R. 8610, timed to replace existing legislation that expires on December 25th. https://www.zerohedge.com/political/nj-drone-invasion-just-time-congress-reauthorize-orwellian-law Can you describe the narrative and the purpose?

No, they just closed the base for a while. Wright Patterson was were the Roswell bodies were taken, according to the legend.

No, I'm working on the presumption that whoever is operating the "drones" has anticipated that classification/secrecy is likely to become a non-issue, so it doesn't matter to them how many people are aware that they are active. Sort of, like compliance through shock. For example, when during 9/11 people were so shocked that they didn't question the "war or terror". It's a valid point that they can't have their "cake" of ignorance and also "eat" it by knowing that there is no threat. But the inconsistency may simply be a consequence of having to maintain the tradition of denying that UFOs represent extraterrestrial beings rather than being part of a psyop like Project Blue Beam. Project Blue Beam is based on the idea that the state is the saviour in the face of an alien threat, which of course doesn't work with the claim that no threat exists.

1 & 2 makes sense in anticipation of Trump's promise to declassify relevant information. 3 makes sense in terms of an agenda that seeks to prevent Trump from changing the status quo - i.e. continue the old policy regardless of the dissconnect in government messaging. The disconnect could cause uncertainty or fear.

High radiation counts in New York... https://www.gmcmap.com/

Can you find it on a star map? https://stellarium-web.org/

I haven't settled on a preferred theory yet. New stuff coming in all the time.

From you.com: Although the nuclear weapons themselves were accounted for through international agreements, concerns were raised about nuclear materials and technologies that could potentially be misappropriated or sold on the black market. Maybe the technology and materials were used by a rogue state to produce weapons that were not subject to any non-proliferation treaty. Flying low will still interfere with helicopters that are transporting people to hospital. The mysterious drones that have been flying over the Northeast led to shutting down the runways of Stewart International Airport Friday night, prompting Gov. Hochul to demand the feds step in. (NY Post)

Maybe the USSR didn't get them all. Zelensky's appeals don't mean that they never had them. Unlikely since Iran has disavowed producing them. But they have the infrastructure to do so. There could be other sources. Particle density diminishes according to the inverse square law (like light), so the closer to the ground the better.