Jump to content

theo102

Members
  • Posts

    979
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by theo102

  1. It's not as simple as that. From Blackstone: The manner of making these statutes will be better considered hereafter, when we examine the constitution of parliaments. At present we will only take notice of the different kinds of statutes; and of some general rules with regard to their construction.53 First, as to their several kinds. Statutes are either general or special, public or private. A general or public act is an universal rule, that regards the whole community: and of this the courts of law are bound to take notice judicially and ex officio [officially]; without the statute being particularly pleaded, or formally set forth by the party who claims an advantage under it. Special or private acts are rather exceptions than rules, being those which only operate upon particular persons, and private concerns: such as the Romans entitled senatus-decreta [Senate decrees], in contradistinction to the senatus consulta [Senate acts], which regarded the whole community:54 and of these (which are not promulgated with the same notoriety as the former) the judges are not to take notice, unless they be formally shown and pleaded. Thus, to show the distinction, the statute 13 Eliz. c. 10. to prevent spiritual persons from making leases for longer terms than twenty-one years, or three lives, is a public act; it being a rule prescribed to the whole body of spiritual persons in the nation: but an act to enable the bishop of Chester to make a lease to A. B. for sixty years, is an exception to this rule; it concerns only the parties and the bishop's successors; and is therefore a private act. Statutes are also either declaratory of the common law, or remedial of some defects therein. Declaratory, where the old custom of the kingdom is almost fallen into disuse, or become disputable; in which case the parliament has thought proper, in perpetuum rei testimonium [as its lasting testimony], and for avoiding all doubts and difficulties, to declare what the common law is and ever has been. Thus the statute of treasons, 25 Edw. III. cap. 2, does not make any new species of treasons; but only, for the benefit of the subject, declares and enumerates those several kinds of offense, which before were treason at the common law. Remedial statutes are those which are made to supply such defects, and abridge such superfluities, in the common law, as arise either from the general imperfection of all human laws, from change of time and circumstances, from the mistakes and unadvised determinations of unlearned (or even learned) judges, or from any other cause whatsoever. And this being done, either by enlarging the common law where it was too narrow and circumscribed, or by restraining it where it was too lax and luxuriant, has occasioned another subordinate division of remedial acts of parliament into enlarging and restraining statutes. To instance again in the case of treason. Clipping the current coin of the kingdom was an offense not sufficiently guarded against by the common law: therefore it was thought expedient by statute 5 Eliz. c. 11. to make it high treason, which it was not at the common law: so that this was an enlarging statute. At common law also spiritual corporations might lease out their estates for any term of years, till prevented by the statute 13 Eliz. before-mentioned: this was therefore a restraining statute. 1. There are three points to be considered in the construction of all remedial statutes; the old law, the mischief, and the remedy: that is, how the common law stood at the making of the act; what the mischief was, for which the common law did not provide; and what remedy the parliament has provided to cure this mischief. And it is the business of the judges so to construe the act, as to suppress the mischief and advance the remedy.
  2. theo102

    Common Law

    You've got to assert status otherwise they will just treat you like a normal person.
  3. theo102

    Common Law

    From Black's 5th edition:
  4. Then there's the Kabba and teffilin.
  5. The doctrine of the resurrection stared with Caiaphas and was developed by the writer of the gospel of John based on false testimony about the destruction and rebuilding of the temple. This doctrine was then developed by Paul, who falsely claimed to have been appointed as a minister and a witness on the road to Damascus. Luke 24 44 And he said unto them, These are the words which I spake unto you, while I was yet with you, that all things must be fulfilled, which were written in the law of Moses, and in the prophets, and in the psalms, concerning me. 45 Then opened he their understanding, that they might understand the scriptures, 46 And said unto them, Thus it is written, and thus it behoved Christ to suffer, and to rise from the dead the third day: Hosea 6 2 After two days will he revive us: in the third day he will raise us up, and we shall live in his sight.
  6. The Oden Yinon plans describes the Zionist aspiration for the land that Theodor Herzl wrote about: "From the Brook of Egypt to the Euphrates." This is the same land that is described in Genesis 15 as the inheritance of the descendants of Abraham. Semitic Muslims often identify as descendants of Ishmael son of Abraham, which would make them an obstacle for the Zionist agenda for "Greater Israel".
  7. Because the Messiah would never endorse the prophets that endorsed YHWH, right? But if ye had known what this meaneth, I will have mercy, and not sacrifice, ye would not have condemned the guiltless. Matthew 12:7
  8. What's your point? You're avoiding the issue of endorsement by prophecy.
  9. You have no proof. There's no reason to believe a word you say.
  10. Why then would Jesus endorse him indirectly by quoting his prophets?
  11. How do you know that Muslims are doing this, as opposed to people who are called Muslims? In Judaism you've got Edomites, Khazars, and Askenazis, in Christianity you've got Pharisees/Saduccees, and in Islam you've got Wahabbism and Sunni extremism (eg ISIS).
  12. That's from John. He didn't know the truth. Jesus answered and said unto them, Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up. John 2:19 But found none: yea, though many false witnesses came, yet found they none. At the last came two false witnesses, And said, This fellow said, I am able to destroy the temple of God, and to build it in three days. Matthew 26:61 And wisdom and knowledge shall be the stability of thy times, and strength of salvation: the fear of YHWH is his treasure. Isaiah 33:6 The fear of YHWH is the beginning of knowledge: but fools despise wisdom and instruction. Proverbs 1:7
  13. Christians' worship on Sunday goes back to Constantine's "venerable sun" decree of 321CE. I don't know of anything connecting Jesus to the sun other than the son/sun homonym, which is pretty weak IMO.
  14. He doesn't say that they control the world, only that they influence the elites and pop culture. Jah is a corruption of Yah, a shortened form of the tetragrammaton, the name of the deity of the Abrahamic religions. The Masonic checkerboard pattern is symbolic of the conflation of positive and negative forces. The Satan of Judaism is not the same as the Satan of Christianity, and while the cult of Sol Invictus is sun worship and is associated with Christianity, the Abrahamic religions themselves don't involve sun worship. Satanism, as associated with Saturn/Chronos worship, is connected to a curse from the Torah for people who didn't keep the law where they eat their own children (Leviticus 26:29).
  15. Do you have a link for any of those?
  16. So you have no point to make. Got it.
  17. If that were true it would make a difference.
  18. Your conflation of payback with rape doesn't mean that I've changed my tune. Payback implies that the punishment is related to the crime, rape does not.
  19. It can simply increase their notoriety.
  20. The belief that you're controlled by some nefarious force has the effect of causing you to act as if you are a servant of that force.
×
×
  • Create New...