theo102

If you can't describe what is wrong with it then you don't understand it.

No, that's from Ecclesiastes.

In the Quran Mohammed is called the seal of the prophets. This relates to the book that is sealed in Daniel and unsealed in Revelation. And the book is delivered to him that is not learned, saying, Read this, I pray thee: and he saith, I am not learned. Isaiah 29:12 Proclaim! (or read!) in the name of thy Lord and Cherisher, Who created- Created man, out of a (mere) clot of congealed blood: Quran 96:1-2 The apostle of Allah later said, 'He came while I was asleep, with a cloth of brocade whereon there was writing, and he said, "Read." I replied, "I cannot read it." Then he pressed the cloth on me till I thought I was dying; he released his hold and said, "Read." I replied, "I cannot read it." And he pressed me again with it, till I thought I was dying. Then he loosed his hold of me and said, "Read." I replied, "I cannot read it." Once more he pressed me and said, "Read." Then I asked, "What shall I read?" And I said this because I feared he would press me again. Then he said, "Read in the name of the Lord thy creator; who created man from a drop of blood. Read, thy Lord is the most bountiful, who taught by means of the pen, taught man what he knew not." Accordingly I read these words, and he had finished his task and departed from me. I awoke from my sleep, and felt as if words had been graven on my heart.' http://facweb.furman.edu/~ateipen/almusharaka/IbnIshaq-Excerpt2.htm

Baal means "Lord". Many deities were and are called "Lord".

American Moon "The most comprehensive documentary on the moon landing hoax" https://www.bitchute.com/video/eZramDBFkXRU/

The doctrine of two or three witnesses is related to the Islamic teaching that the testimony of a woman has only half the value of a man's. "Two or three" implies that not all witnesses have the same value of testimony. The Quran endorses the Moses, so that implictly endorses that doctrine.

Timelines https://canncon.substack.com/p/what-really-happened-in-uvalde

The first word of the verse is singular, the rest are plural. It's unusual to get a sentence with words having inconsistent number like this, and it only happens when the sentence has the word "elohim". If you were to translate it into English, then "Elohim said, 'let us make mankind in our image ...'" would be pretty close. You can get some insight into how there is a singular speaker by taking a look at the start of Exodus 20. The chapter break is in the wrong place, it doesn't make sense unless you read Exodus 19:25 first. https://biblehub.com/interlinear/exodus/19-25.htm https://biblehub.com/interlinear/exodus/20-1.htm https://biblehub.com/interlinear/exodus/20-2.htm

And indeed our antiquaries and early historians do all positively assure us, that our body of laws is of this compounded nature. For they tell us, that in the time of Alfred, the local customs of the several provinces of the kingdom were grown so various, that he found it expedient to compile his dome-book, or liber judicialis, for the general use of the whole kingdom. This book is said to have been extant so late as the reign of king Edward the fourth, but is now unfortunately lost. It contained, we may probably suppose, the principal maxims of the common law, the penalties for misdemeanors, and the forms of judicial proceedings. Thus much may at least be collected from that injunction to observe it, which we find in the laws of king Edward the elder, the son of Alfred.5 "Omnibus qui reipublicae praesunt etiam atque etiam mando, ut omnibus aequos se praebeant judices, perinde ac in judiciali libro (Saxonice, dom-bec) scriptum habeter: nec quicquam formident quin jus commune (Saxonice, folcnihte) audacter libereque dicant." ["To all who preside over the republic my positive and repeated injunction is, that they conduct themselves towards all as just judges, as it is written in the dome-book, and without fear boldly and freely to declare the common law."] INTRODUCTION, SECTION 3: Of the Laws of England

https://biblehub.com/interlinear/genesis/1-26.htm

No, this conflict is symbolised by the Staff of Asclepius (from the contest between Moses and the Egyptian magicians). There's a possible connection between the Sanctuary of Asclepius at Pergamon and the seat of Satan of Revelation 2:13. Pergamon is the northernmost of the seven "churches" of Revelation. Then he brought me to the door of the gate of YHWH's house which was toward the north; and, behold, there sat women weeping for Tammuz. Then said he unto me, Hast thou seen this, O son of man? turn thee yet again, and thou shalt see greater abominations than these. Ezekiel 8:14-15

The "He" is an artifact of translation. The text says "let us make man..."

The sacrificial lamb story started with some murderous priests led by Caiaphas and was amplified by Paul. Paul, as a Pharisee, was aligned with the priesthood and as an Edomite was aligned with Rome, so he was an ideal vessel for the cult. The Messiah gave plenty of hints about how to acquire the knowledge of the prophets, and the prophets gave plenty of hints about his role as a servant rather than a saviour.

https://www.betheresistancenz.com/post/nzme-pulls-facebook-post-after-being-inundated-with-horror-vax-stories

Try MMS. It's been reported to help prevent the spike proteins bind with ACE2 receptors, and I've read of a guy who used chlorine dioxide gel to cure a skin condition that he got from shedding.

Your idea about hate doesn't describe anything real.

No, because she was a Canaanite. Look up the curse of Canaan.

Mandatory masking ends in Alberta, covid threat downgraded, chief medical officer unable to provide evidence that sars cov 2 has been isolated. https://rumble.com/vkorz0-freedom-fighter-court-victory-ends-masking-shots-quarantine-in-alberta.html

The numbers used in the flat earth wiki for sun height and earth diameter mean that that sun can't get any closer to the horizon than about 22 degrees in their model. 12500 miles diameter, 5000 miles high -> minimum angle = arctan (5000/12500) = 21.8 degrees. https://www.rapidtables.com/calc/math/Arctan_Calculator.html

"Reason is the life of the law; nay, the common law itself is nothing else but reason... The law, which is perfection of reason." ~ Coke

You're making it about power when it should be about rights.

principal

It's one of the canonical texts of the Defender of the Faith of the Commonwealth nations, but it doesn't support Chrsitianity well because it talks about rewards based on works and there only being 12 apostles (Matthias replaced Judas, not Paul). ... by thy sorceries[pharmakeia] were all nations deceived. Revelation 18:23 https://www.blueletterbible.org/kjv/rev/18/23/t_conc_1185023

It should go without saying that you shouldn't believe everything you hear — especially if you hear it from the mainstream media. Here's a perfect example — it's a video of Barclay Crawford, the editor for the Daily Mail in Australia, one of the world's most visited English news sites. The leaked video was captured during a recent editorial meeting about the outlet's pandemic reporting, and it perfectly illustrates why many have lost their trust in the people we expect to report the news accurately. https://www.rebelnews.com/leaked_video_daily_mail_australia_caught_manufacturing_fake_news

That's true only if you're arguing human rights violations from enforced COVID treatments. The natural right to life still applies in common law countries, but the problem is ignorance. People tend to identify as persons or human beings, effectively forfeiting those rights for the illusion of security from the government.