Jump to content

theo102

Members
  • Posts

    979
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by theo102

  1. On 3/12/2022 at 11:47 PM, Mr H said:

    Ty sorry I didn't see this post.

     

    What I am particularly interested in are the stories and myths they had, that have been copied and used by the Christian faith. I'm trying to trace back the bible to it's original sources - I think Eygptian mythology has played a huge role.

     

    The key symbol relating to Egypt and Christianity is the Staff of Asclepius. It relates to the crucifixion (John 3:14) and to the contest between Moses and the Egyptian magicians. This in turn goes back to the Abrahamic covenant and the role of blood sacrifice. In the Christian context the serpent represents the murderous priesthood.

     

  2. On 5/29/2022 at 5:59 PM, The OC said:

     

     
    unnamed.png.cc67de9fa9658239e24dee983bb5544a.png
     
    Beware The Church of The Red Beast 
     

     

    Edom = "red", Edom = Rome, Edom = Esau

    And I hated Esau, and laid his mountains and his heritage waste for the dragons of the wilderness.

    Malachi 1:3

    5.jpg
     

  3. On 6/6/2022 at 9:59 PM, Given To Fly said:

    Yesterday was Pentecost Sunday. The Holy Spirit descending upon the apostles, and subsequently all believers who give their life to Jesus.

     

     

    It wasn't what they thought it was.

    Awake, O sword, against my shepherd, and against the man that is my fellow, saith YHWH of hosts: smite the shepherd, and the sheep shall be scattered: and I will turn mine hand upon the little ones.

    Zechariah 13:7

     

     

  4. 10 hours ago, Kezzy said:

    Pick something specifically that you feel has not been debunked and debate why my response to it doesn't have merit. The claims made about Apollo have all been debunked, soundly many times, it is not my fault or anyone else's that you do not accept the response.

    Pure apologetics. You have no way of knowing what all the possible claims are.

     

    Quote

    Explain in detail why that is?


    Newtonian gravitation hasn't changed. If L1 wasn't where it was predicted to be based on that, then it's not a sufficient model to describe the forces that a rocket will experience going to the moon and back. If the model is wrong then that's news, but NASA never made that claim. Saying that it's unreliable is mere hand-waving, the difference between predicted and actual values were not insignificant.

  5. 15 hours ago, Kezzy said:

    It's comprehensive in that it repeats items that have been soundly debunked literally 20 years ago.

     

    Debunking means nothing other than that an apologist is trying to convince people that the material is of no value.

     

    The "adjustment" of Earth-Moon Lagrange L1 is the first clue that NASA can't be trusted to be up-front about the technical challenges of getting a man to the moon and back using the rocket technology of the 1960's.
     

  6. 4 hours ago, pi3141 said:

     

    The Quaran also endorses 'the book' and accepts doctrines derived from the book by scriptual interpretation as valid.

     

    The Quaran came along to bring the Muslims 'the message' and update the previous tachings and finalize Gods word.


    In the Quran Mohammed is called the seal of the prophets. This relates to the book that is sealed in Daniel and unsealed in Revelation.

    And the book is delivered to him that is not learned, saying, Read this, I pray thee: and he saith, I am not learned.

    Isaiah 29:12

     

    Proclaim! (or read!) in the name of thy Lord and Cherisher, Who created-

    Created man, out of a (mere) clot of congealed blood:

    Quran 96:1-2


    The apostle of Allah later said, 'He came while I was asleep, with a cloth of brocade whereon there was writing, and he said, "Read." I replied, "I cannot read it." Then he pressed the cloth   on me till I thought I was dying; he released his hold and said, "Read." I replied, "I cannot read it." And he pressed me again with it, till I thought I was dying. Then   he loosed his hold of me and said, "Read." I replied, "I cannot read it." Once more he pressed me and said, "Read." Then I asked, "What shall I read?" And I said   this because I feared he would press me again. Then he said, "Read in the name of the Lord thy creator; who created man from a drop of blood. Read, thy Lord is   the most bountiful, who taught by means of the pen, taught man what he knew not." Accordingly I read these words, and he had finished his task and departed from me. I awoke from my sleep, and felt as if words had been graven on my heart.'  

    http://facweb.furman.edu/~ateipen/almusharaka/IbnIshaq-Excerpt2.htm
     

     

  7. 4 hours ago, pi3141 said:

    Explain why Islam views women as inferior or second to men.

     

    The doctrine of two or three witnesses is related to the Islamic teaching that the testimony of a woman has only half the value of a man's.

    "Two or three" implies that not all witnesses have the same value of testimony. The Quran endorses the Moses, so that implictly endorses that doctrine.
     

  8. 8 hours ago, mazuzu said:

    The SERPENT is Jesus Christ

    Bollocks.

    Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell?

    Matthew 23:33
     

    For my death, which they think happened, (happened) to them in their error and blindness, since they nailed their man unto their death. For their Ennoias did not see me, for they were deaf and blind. But in doing these things, they condemn themselves. Yes, they saw me; they punished me. It was another, their father, who drank the gall and the vinegar; it was not I.

     

    The Second Treatise of the Great Seth

  9. 13 hours ago, pi3141 said:

    No other Gods have been mentioned, in the next verse God is referred to in the singular.

    The first word of the verse is singular, the rest are plural. It's unusual to get a sentence with words having inconsistent number like this, and it only happens when the sentence has the word "elohim". If you were to translate it into English, then "Elohim said, 'let us make mankind in our image ...'" would be pretty close.

    You can get some insight into how there is  a singular speaker by taking a look at the start of Exodus 20. The chapter break is in the wrong place, it doesn't make sense unless you read Exodus 19:25 first.

    https://biblehub.com/interlinear/exodus/19-25.htm

     

    https://biblehub.com/interlinear/exodus/20-1.htm

     

    https://biblehub.com/interlinear/exodus/20-2.htm

  10. And indeed our antiquaries and early historians do all positively assure us, that our body of laws is of this compounded nature. For they tell us, that in the time of Alfred, the local customs of the several provinces of the kingdom were grown so various, that he found it expedient to compile his dome-book, or liber judicialis, for the general use of the whole kingdom. This book is said to have been extant so late as the reign of king Edward the fourth, but is now unfortunately lost. It contained, we may probably suppose, the principal maxims of the common law, the penalties for misdemeanors, and the forms of judicial proceedings. Thus much may at least be collected from that injunction to observe it, which we find in the laws of king Edward the elder, the son of Alfred.5 "Omnibus qui reipublicae praesunt etiam atque etiam mando, ut omnibus aequos se praebeant judices, perinde ac in judiciali libro (Saxonice, dom-bec) scriptum habeter: nec quicquam formident quin jus commune (Saxonice, folcnihte) audacter libereque dicant." ["To all who preside over the republic my positive and repeated injunction is, that they conduct themselves towards all as just judges, as it is written in the dome-book, and without fear boldly and freely to declare the common law."]

     

    INTRODUCTION, SECTION 3: Of the Laws of England

  11. On 4/23/2022 at 4:12 PM, pi3141 said:

    Just like I have been trying to illustrate in this thread, Christianity, Judaism and onward into Freemasonry ALL draw their teachings from ancient Egypt.

    No, this conflict is symbolised by the Staff of Asclepius (from the contest between Moses and the Egyptian magicians). There's a possible connection between the Sanctuary of Asclepius at Pergamon and the seat of Satan of Revelation 2:13. Pergamon is the northernmost of the seven "churches" of Revelation.

    Then he brought me to the door of the gate of YHWH's house which was toward the north; and, behold, there sat women weeping for Tammuz.

    Then said he unto me, Hast thou seen this, O son of man? turn thee yet again, and thou shalt see greater abominations than these.

    Ezekiel 8:14-15

  12. On 4/28/2022 at 8:08 AM, mazuzu said:

    Tribes of Ephraim = Ephraimites

    Tribe of Manasseh = Manassehite (half tribe of manasseh)

     

    God called these tribes, removed from revelation

    Of the tribe of Manasses were sealed twelve thousand.

    Revelation 7:6 
    The half tribe of Ephraim is there as the tribe of Joseph, with Dan gone Ephraim and Manasseh are full tribes instead of half tribes.

  13. On 4/3/2022 at 10:42 AM, Unity8 said:

    Yeshua did not spend his life as some "sacrificial lamb" in order to appease some vengeful, angry deity.

    The sacrificial lamb story started with some murderous priests led by Caiaphas and was amplified by Paul. Paul, as a Pharisee, was aligned with the priesthood and as an Edomite was aligned with Rome, so he was an ideal vessel for the cult.

    The Messiah gave plenty of hints about how to acquire the knowledge of the prophets, and the prophets gave plenty of hints about his role as a servant rather than a saviour.
     

×
×
  • Create New...