Jump to content

epsom

Members
  • Posts

    265
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by epsom

  1. Don't be abusive, Looney. Your statement says nothing and you are making yourself look foolish. I am well aware how the globalists/ elite/ illuminati/ deep state control things----and you need to do a lot more research on this topic, particularly Russia----who are the only country of importance that is NOT controlled by them. Why do you think the west/ USA are pushing for war for fucks sake?. Once they have control over Russia---game over. Another silly comment from someone who thinks they have the whole picture.
  2. Shouldn’t we all be discussing the Russians and their current project to clear the malicious deep state out of their immediate neighbour’s land? Where the western deep state backed Ukrainian military has been bombing their own people in the Eastern Ukraine since 2014 ( 14,000 dead so far )…where DS Biden is laundering $billions for his, Kerry and Pelosi's families?. ....and maybe a few words about the US’s 6 Bio Warfare labs purposely placed on Ukraine’s land?... … Or NATO’s failure to obey the conditions of the Minsk agreement over the last 8 years? (by not moving their operational area further east to build up a threat against Russia)?… Maybe a few words about the Alliance of Nations military ( White hats ) warning of this escalation 2 Yrs ago ?…is no one ' over the pond' worried about Obama’s opportunity to Push his puppet Biden to order a U.S. retaliation against Putin (Now doing the White Hat’s work) …as that would lead to a nuclear war which NATO & the USA would lose within one hour as they have NO defence against the Hypersonic ballistic nuclear missiles which Russia possesses in large numbers? …Just Asking ? …(Particularly as we in the U.K. are in the firing line too!) … Nuclear War means ( conservative estimate ) 100 million dead, initially and circa a further 300 million abandoned to die of radiation poisoning, starvation & suicide...…
  3. I am quite aware who Schwab's boys are----but you need to see the bigger picture. You have a lot to learn......it's not as black and white as you seem to think.
  4. WHY TAKE SIDES, WHEN IT'S ALL THE SAME WEB? - DAVID ICKE DOT-CONNECTOR VIDEOCAST https://www.bitchute.com/video/oXt9q3yL09Ah/ Ukraine has killed over 14,000 people in Donetsk and Luhansk regions in 8 years----and hardly anyone knows about it. THAT's why they are asking Russia for help ( and other reasons). Same old western propaganda and warmongering ( oh.... you remember WMD in Iraq?). The majority of the public will fall for this propaganda----but, to be honest, I am sick of it all. I am 67 and we are here for a very short time on this planet----I plan to enjoy what life I have left. If the self styled "elite" want to de-populate, digitise and whatever else they want to do to the world (see WEF and Nazi Klaus Schwab) then so be it. The Nazis did NOT lose WW2---they lost the battle--and the Nazis are now flourishing under different guises. THIS is their 4th Reich. Yes---I think it is VERY likely WW3 will start---and Russia will strike first, because if they don't, the US installed Ukraine regime and all the military installations and biolabs they have there will flourish---it is basically a US state. Ukraine are targeting and destroying the US military installations and biolabs---NOT the people--although there will inevitably be innocent victims. The US can and have invaded countries on countless occasions and nothing is said...... hypocritical or what? Russia are the last big country to NOT have been taken over by the globalists----if the USA/ west (Soros, WEF, Schwab etc) win this war, then game over---globalists will have won. Putin and Russia are the ONLY country fighting for humanity----if Russia win----then it's game over for the globalists. I have recent video footage of alleged strikes by Russian troops killing civilians from mainstream media in Spain. It turns out that the footage was from a video game! There are many other instances of false/ dis-information from MSM in the same vein. David talks about not taking sides----and usually, I would agree with him--but in this instance, I would side with Putin for the reasons I give above. If you watch Putins speech of a few days ago (it is available on YT---he gives a clear history of Russia and the reasons he cannot stop and watch more people being killed by the corrupt and US backed Ukraine against the two regions that have been asking for his help for the last 8 yrs. It's NOT just about that, however---if the US/west/Nato get a foothold in Ukraine, that will pave the way for more countries to join Nato---which will threaten Russia of course. Can you blame Putin for wanting to keep these warmongering/ WEF nazis out of his backyard?. Maybe Putin is humanities last hope--to rid the world of the Schwab/ Soros and the globalists. Others may disagree with me---but that is what freedom of speech is all about.
  5. epsom

    UKRAINE

    Don't know if there is a thread for this, so I will post the topic here. WHY TAKE SIDES, WHEN IT'S ALL THE SAME WEB? - DAVID ICKE DOT-CONNECTOR VIDEOCAST https://www.bitchute.com/video/oXt9q3yL09Ah/ Ukraine has killed over 14,000 people in Donetsk and Luhansk regions in 8 years----and hardly anyone knows about it. THAT's why they are asking Russia for help ( and other reasons). Same old western propaganda and warmongering ( oh.... you remember WMD in Iraq?). The majority of the public will fall for this propaganda----but, to be honest, I am sick of it all. I am 67 and we are here for a very short time on this planet----I plan to enjoy what life I have left. If the self styled "elite" want to de-populate, digitise and whatever else they want to do to the world (see WEF and Nazi Klaus Schwab) then so be it. The Nazis did NOT lose WW2---they lost the battle--and the Nazis are now flourishing under different guises. THIS is their 4th Reich. Yes---I think it is VERY likely WW3 will start---and Russia will strike first, because if they don't, the US installed Ukraine regime and all the military installations and biolabs they have there will flourish---it is basically a US state. Ukraine are targeting and destroying the US military installations and biolabs---NOT the people--although there will inevitably be innocent victims. The US can and have invaded countries on countless occasions and nothing is said...... hypocritical or what? Russia are the last big country to NOT have been taken over by the globalists----if the USA/ west (Soros, WEF, Schwab etc) win this war, then game over---globalists will have won. Putin and Russia are the ONLY country fighting for humanity----if Russia win----then it's game over for the globalists. I have recent video footage of alleged strikes by Russian troops killing civilians from mainstream media in Spain. It turns out that the footage was from a video game! There are many other instances of false/ dis-information from MSM in the same vein. David talks about not taking sides----and usually, I would agree with him--but in this instance, I would side with Putin for the reasons I give above. If you watch Putins speech of a few days ago (it is available on YT---he gives a clear history of Russia and the reasons he cannot stop and watch more people being killed by the corrupt and US backed Ukraine against the two regions that have been asking for his help for the last 8 yrs. It's NOT just about that, however---if the US/west/Nato get a foothold in Ukraine, that will pave the way for more countries to join Nato---which will threaten Russia of course. Can you blame Putin for wanting to keep these warmongering/ WEF nazis out of his backyard?. Maybe Putin is humanities last hope--to rid the world of the Schwab/ Soros and the globalists. Others may disagree with me---but that is what freedom of speech is all about.
  6. PCP Update, Blind Man’s Bluff In Ukraine & The End of COVID-1984 Posted on 26th February 2022 by The Bernician https://www.thebernician.net/pcp-update-blind-mans-bluff-in-ukraine-the-end-of-covid-1984/?mc_cid=20c40990ba&mc_eid=334dd4fff3
  7. https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/01/02/following-complaints-from-customers-a-uk-covid-test-provider-admits-tests-cannot-be-used-to-diagnose-covid/ Following Complaints from Customers, a UK Covid Test Provider Admits Tests Cannot Be Used to Diagnose Covid BY RHODA WILSON ON JANUARY 2, 2022
  8. https://www.saveusnow.org.uk/covid-vaccine-scientific-proof-lethal/ Covid Vaccine Scientific Proof Lethal Post published:5 January 2022 COVID-19 Vaccines: Scientific Proof of Lethality Post published: 5 January 2022 at https://www.saveusnow.org.uk/covid-vaccine-scientific-proof-lethal Over One Thousand Scientific Studies Prove That the COVID-19 Vaccines Are Dangerous, and All Those Pushing This Agenda Are Committing the Indictable Crime of Gross Misconduct in Public Office
  9. Alex Jones Here With A Critical Sunday Show -- Share This Link Now To Warn Others of the Coming COVID Camps! On today's LIVE SUNDAY SHOW, I'll break down how and why several blue states are laying the groundwork for the deployment of "strike teams" to round up unvaccinated residents and detain them in COVID "internment camps."
  10. IF EUA (emergency use only) were to go away, all EUA products would have to come off the market---and that does not just mean vaccines, it means all testing, pcr tests and surgical masks are EUA also. To keep EUA going, they have to maintain a state of emergency---which is why "variants" come along at regular intervals to scare people shitless. While EUA (Emergency Use Authorisation is still in use, manufacturers cannot be sued and are immune from prosecution----HOWEVER, the reason is that they are pushing for kids to get vaxxed is that they can still use the EUA.. Once covid shots are fully approved, manufacturer has full liability....AND CAN BE SUED. NOTE--PCR is Finished! The US ‘Centre for Disease Control’ ( CDC ) withdrew the authority for its use on the 31st December 2021..... Their test results & enquiry highlighted the fact that the PCR test was incapable of distinguishing between any coronavirus, thereby declaring it ‘unfit for purpose’. This obviously means that all cases of Covid 19 are to be ignored....and the whole scam of the “ PCR Covid test Kits” ( ordered by that name in 2017/2018 when there was NO COVID ) is now out in the open....So Boris, Whitty, Vallance ,Ferguson and the gang have been perpetrating a massive FRAUD! **** I was told this was not a complete pull from the market, but that the PCR "tests" were to be a maximum of 23 cycles of amplification--as opposed to 45. Anyone confirm this?
  11. Midazolam Murders | PUB Lay Charges In Magistrates Court Posted on 21st December 2021 by The Bernician https://www.thebernician.net/midazolam-murders-pub-lay-charges-in-magistrates-court/
  12. None of the 4 main vaccine companies products will complete their experimentation stage until late 2022 / early 2023. ( BTW. Being in the experimental stage allows them to "mess /change’ the product at will… and changes have been found in them to date. This can mean that they can alter the constituent levels of the poisonous elements to suit their agenda. There are reports of the Booster shot being much stronger. That being said, I find it difficult to know how they can be APPROVED before the experimental trials have finished.
  13. Judge Rejects FDA's 75 Year Delay On Vax Data, Cuts To Just 8 Months BY TYLER DURDEN FRIDAY, JAN 07, 2022 A federal judge has rejected a request by the FDA to produce just 500 pages per month of the data submitted by Pfizer to license its Covid-19 vaccine - and has ordered them to produce 55,000 pages per month. Assuming there are roughly 450,000 pages, that means it will take just over eight months for the world to see what's under the hood. Attorney Aaron Siri, who represents the plaintiff in the case, has provided this stunning update via his blog, Injecting Freedom: On behalf of a client, my firm requested that the FDA produce all the data submitted by Pfizer to license its Covid-19 vaccine. The FDA asked the Court for permission to only be required to produce at a rate of 500 pages per month, which would have taken over 75 years to produce all the documents. I am pleased to report that a federal judge soundly rejected the FDA’s request and ordered the FDA to produce all the data at a clip of 55,000 pages per month! This is a great win for transparency and removes one of the strangleholds federal “health” authorities have had on the data needed for independent scientists to offer solutions and address serious issues with the current vaccine program – issues which include waning immunity, variants evading vaccine immunity, and, as the CDC has confirmed, that the vaccines do not prevent transmission. No person should ever be coerced to engage in an unwanted medical procedure. And while it is bad enough the government violated this basic liberty right by mandating the Covid-19 vaccine, the government also wanted to hide the data by waiting to fully produce what it relied upon to license this product until almost every American alive today is dead. That form of governance is destructive to liberty and antithetical to the openness required in a democratic society. In ordering the release of the documents in a timely manner, the Judge recognized that the release of this data is of paramount public importance and should be one of the FDA’s highest priorities. He then aptly quoted James Madison as saying a “popular Government, without popular information, or the means of acquiring it, is but a Prologue to a Farce or a Tragedy” and John F. Kennedy as explaining that a “nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people.” The following is the full text of the Judge’s order, a copy of which is also available here. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT PHMPT, Plaintiff v. FDA, Defendant, No. 4:21-cv-1058-P ORDER This case involves the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”). Specifically, at issue is Plaintiff’s FOIA request seeking “[a]ll data and information for the Pfizer Vaccine enumerated in 21 C.F.R. § 601.51(e) with the exception of publicly available reports on the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System” from the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”). See ECF No. 1. As has become standard, the Parties failed to agree to a mutually acceptable production schedule; instead, they submitted dueling production schedules for this Court’s consideration. Accordingly, the Court held a conference with the Parties to determine an appropriate production schedule.[1] See ECF Nos. 21, 34. “Open government is fundamentally an American issue” – it is neither a Republican nor a Democrat issue.[2] As James Madison wrote, “[a] popular Government, without popular information, or the means of acquiring it, is but a Prologue to a Farce or a Tragedy; or, perhaps, both. Knowledge will forever govern ignorance: And a people who mean to be their own Governors, must arm themselves with the power which knowledge gives.”[3] John F. Kennedy likewise recognized that “a nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people.”[4] And, particularly appropriate in this case, John McCain (correctly) noted that “[e]xcessive administrative secrecy . . . feeds conspiracy theories and reduces the public’s confidence in the government.”[5] Echoing these sentiments, “[t]he basic purpose of FOIA is to ensure an informed citizenry, [which is] vital to the functioning of a democratic society.” NLRB v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co., 437 U.S. 214, 242 (1977). “FOIA was [therefore] enacted to ‘pierce the veil of administrative secrecy and to open agency action to the light of public scrutiny.’” Batton v. Evers, 598 F.3d 169, 175 (5th Cir. 2010) (quoting Dep’t of the Air Force v. Rose, 425 U.S. 352, 361 (1976)). And “Congress has long recognized that ‘information is often useful only if it is timely’ and that, therefore ‘excessive delay by the agency in its response is often tantamount to denial.’” Open Soc’y Just. Initiative v. CIA, 399 F. Supp. 3d 161, 165 (S.D.N.Y. 2019) (quoting H.R. REP. NO. 93-876, at 6271 (1974)). When needed, a court “may use its equitable powers to require an agency to process documents according to a court-imposed timeline.” Clemente v. FBI, 71 F. Supp. 3d 262, 269 (D.D.C. 2014). Here, the Court recognizes the “unduly burdensome” challenges that this FOIA request may present to the FDA. See generally ECF Nos. 23, 30, 34. But, as expressed at the scheduling conference, there may not be a “more important issue at the Food and Drug Administration . . . than the pandemic, the Pfizer vaccine, getting every American vaccinated, [and] making sure that the American public is assured that this was not [] rush[ed] on behalf of the United States . . . .” ECF No. 34 at 46. Accordingly, the Court concludes that this FOIA request is of paramount public importance. “[S]tale information is of little value.” Payne Enters., Inc. v. United States, 837 F.2d 486, 494 (D.C. Cir. 1988). The Court, agreeing with this truism, therefore concludes that the expeditious completion of Plaintiff’s request is not only practicable, but necessary. See Bloomberg, L.P. v. FDA, 500 F. Supp. 2d 371, 378 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 15, 2007) (“[I]t is the compelling need for such public understanding that drives the urgency of the request.”). To that end, the Court further concludes that the production rate, as detailed below, appropriately balances the need for unprecedented urgency in processing this request with the FDA’s concerns regarding the burdens of production. See Halpern v. FBI, 181 F.3d 279, 284–85 (2nd Cir. 1991) (“[FOIA] emphasizes a preference for the fullest possible agency disclosure of such information consistent with a responsible balancing of competing concerns . . . .”). Accordingly, having considered the Parties’ arguments, filings in support, and the applicable law, the Court ORDERS that: 1. The FDA shall produce the “more than 12,000 pages” articulated in its own proposal, see ECF No. 29 at 24, on or before January 31, 2022. 2. The FDA shall produce the remaining documents at a rate of 55,000 pages every 30 days, with the first production being due on or before March 1, 2022, until production is complete. 3. To the extent the FDA asserts any privilege, exemption, or exclusion as to any responsive record or portion thereof, FDA shall, concurrent with each production required by this Order, produce a redacted version of the record, redacting only those portions as to which privilege, exemption, or exclusion is asserted. 4. The Parties shall submit a Joint Status Report detailing the progress of the rolling production by April 1, 2022, and every 90 days thereafter.[6] SO ORDERED on this 6th day of January, 2022. [1] Surprisingly, the FDA did not send an agency representative to the scheduling conference. [2] 151 CONG. REC. S1521 (daily ed. Feb. 16, 2005) (statement of Sen. John Cornyn). [3] Letter from James Madison to W.T. Barry (August 4, 1822), in 9 WRITINGS OF JAMES MADISON 103 (S. Hunt ed., 1910). [4] John F. Kennedy, Remarks on the 20th Anniversary of the Voice of America (Feb. 26, 1962). [5] America After 9/11: Freedom Preserved or Freedom Lost?: Hearing Before the S. Comm. on the Judiciary, 108th Cong. 302 (2003). [6] Although the Court does not decide whether the FDA correctly denied Plaintiff’s request for expedited processing, the issue is not moot. Should the Parties seek to file motions for summary judgment, the Court will take up the issue then.
  14. In Court, Facebook Admits ‘Fact Checks’ Are Pure Opinion Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola STORY AT-A-GLANCE - “Fact checks” are nothing but a biased censoring mechanism, and now we have proof of this fact, thanks to a lawsuit brought against Facebook by journalist John Stossel In court documents, Facebook admits that fact checks are “statements of opinion” and not factual assertions Facebook recently censored a whistleblower report published by The British Medical Journal (BMJ), one of the oldest and most respected peer-reviewed medical journals in the world, variably labeling the article as “False,” “Partly false” or “Missing context.” Some users reported they could not share the article at all The fact check inaccurately referred to The BMJ as a “news blog,” failed to specify any assertions of fact that The BMJ article got wrong, and published the fact check under a URL containing the phrase “hoax-alert” The BMJ calls the fact check “inaccurate, incompetent and irresponsible.” In an open letter addressed to Mark Zuckerberg, The BMJ urges Zuckerberg to “act swiftly” to correct the erroneous fact check, review the processes that allowed it to occur in the first place, and “generally to reconsider your investment in and approach to fact checking overall” We’ve long suspected that fact checking organizations are nothing but a biased censoring mechanism more interested in manipulating opinion than establishing actual facts, but now we have absolute proof, thanks to a lawsuit brought against Facebook by journalist John Stossel.1,2 In 2020, a Facebook fact checker called Science Feedback slapped “False” and “Lacking context” labels on two videos posted by Stossel. The videos featured Stossel’s interviews with experts who discussed the negligible role of climate change in the 2020 California forest fires. While they did not deny climate change is real, they proposed there were other, likely more contributing factors, such as poor forest management. Why were his videos flagged as misinformation? According to Facebook fact checkers, Stossel was “misleading” people when he claimed that “forest fires are caused by poor forest management, not climate change.” But according to Stossel, he never actually made that claim. According to Stossel, the labels damaged his reputation as an investigative journalist and resulted in a loss of followers. Interestingly, when Stossel contacted Science Feedback about its fact checks, two reviewers agreed to be interviewed. With regard to the first video that got flagged, they admitted they’d never even watched it. In the case of the second video, a reviewer explained that they “didn’t like [his] tone.” As noted by The New York Post:3 “That is, you can’t write anything about climate change unless you say it’s the worst disaster in the history of humanity and we must spend trillions to fight it.” “The problem is the omission of contextual information rather than specific ‘facts’ being wrong,” the fact checker told Stossel, who says:4 “What? It’s fine if people don’t like my tone. But Facebook declares my post ‘partly false,’ a term it defines on its website as including ‘factual inaccuracies.’ My video does not contain factual inaccuracies ... I want Facebook to learn that censorship — especially sloppy, malicious censorship, censorship without any meaningful appeal process — is NOT the way to go. The world needs more freedom to discuss things, not less.” Facebook Claims Fact Checks Are ‘Protected Opinion’ So, Stossel sued for defamation, and this is where it gets good, because to defend Facebook, its lawyers had to at least temporarily resort to telling the truth. In their legal brief, they argue that fact checks are protected under the First Amendment because they are OPINIONS, not assertions of facts! Commenting on the case, climate change blogger Anthony Watts writes:5 “Facebook just blew the ‘fact check’ claim right out of the water in court. In its response to Stossel’s defamation claim, Facebook responds on Page 2, Line 8 in the court document that Facebook cannot be sued for defamation (which is making a false and harmful assertion) because its ‘fact checks’ are mere statements of opinion rather than factual assertions. Opinions are not subject to defamation claims, while false assertions of fact can be subject to defamation ... So, in a court of law, in a legal filing, Facebook admits that its ‘fact checks’ are not really ‘fact’ checks at all, but merely ‘opinion assertions.’ This strikes me as public relations disaster, and possibly a looming legal disaster for Facebook, PolitiFact, Climate Feedback and other left-leaning entities that engage in biased ‘fact checking.’ Such ‘fact checks’ are now shown to be simply an agenda to suppress free speech and the open discussion of science by disguising liberal media activism as something supposedly factual, noble, neutral, trustworthy, and based on science. It is none of those.” Facebook Censors The British Medical Journal Stossel is far from alone in being censored these days. In the video above, he points out other noteworthy experts who have been censored for their opinions and educated stances, such as environmentalist Michael Shellenberger, once hailed by Time Magazine as a “hero of the environment,” statistician and environmentalist Bjorn Lomborg, once declared “one of the most influential people of the 21st century,” and science writer John Tierney. “ As Facebook has now admitted in court, these so- called fact checks are nothing more than a declaration of preferred opinion. They’re statements of approved narrative. They have nothing to do with the verification of facts.” Of course, I am no stranger to censorship either, having been falsely labeled as one of the “biggest misinformation agents” on the entire internet when it comes to the COVID jab. In these times of Orwellian Doublespeak, I consider this one of most significant achievements I have ever achieved. Think about it for a moment. The entire mainstream media has agreed that I am the most influential spreader of the truth about COVID on the internet. Even my friend and major freedom fighter, Bobby Kennedy, was only No. 2. I couldn’t be more delighted with their award. I might even have it inscribed on my tombstone. Most recently, Facebook even censored The British Medical Journal (BMJ) over an article that highlighted potential problems with Pfizer’s COVID jab trial, and The BMJ is one of the oldest and most respected peer-reviewed medical journals in the world! In early November 2021, The BMJ published a whistleblower report6 that claimed there were serious data integrity issues in the Pfizer COVID jab trial. The article was censored by Facebook and labeled variably as either “False,” “Partly false” or “Missing context.” Some users reported the article could not be shared at all. The Facebook fact check of The BMJ article was done by Lead Stories, a Facebook contractor. The headline of its “fact check” rebuttal read: “Fact Check: The British Medical Journal Did NOT Reveal Disqualifying and Ignored Reports of Flaws in Pfizer’s COVID-19 Vaccine Trials.”7 ‘Inaccurate, Incompetent and Irresponsible’ Fact Checking In response, The BMJ has slammed the fact check, calling it “inaccurate, incompetent and irresponsible.”8,9,10 In an open letter11 addressed to Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg, The BMJ urges Zuckerberg to “act swiftly” to correct the erroneous fact check, review the processes that allowed it to occur in the first place, and “generally to reconsider your investment in and approach to fact checking overall.” As noted by The BMJ in its letter, the Lead Stories’ fact check:12 Inaccurately referred to The BMJ as a “news blog” Failed to specify any assertions of fact that The BMJ article got wrong Published the fact check on the Lead Stories’ website under a URL that contains the phrase “hoax-alert” Lead Stories refused to address the inaccuracies when contacted by The BMJ directly. The BMJ also raises “a wider concern” in its letter: “We are aware that The BMJ is not the only high quality information provider to have been affected by the incompetence of Meta’s fact checking regime. To give one other example, we would highlight the treatment by Instagram (also owned by Meta) of Cochrane, the international provider of high quality systematic reviews of the medical evidence. Rather than investing a proportion of Meta’s substantial profits to help ensure the accuracy of medical information shared through social media, you have apparently delegated responsibility to people incompetent in carrying out this crucial task. Fact checking has been a staple of good journalism for decades. What has happened in this instance should be of concern to anyone who values and relies on sources such as The BMJ.” Fact Checkers Are as Biased as They Come When it comes to fact checking, it’s high time everyone understood that fact checks are not done by independent, unbiased parties who are sifting through facts to make sure a given piece is accurate. As Facebook has now admitted in court, these so-called fact checks are nothing more than a declaration of preferred opinion. They’re statements of approved narrative. They have nothing to do with the verification of facts. As reported by the New York Post:13 “The Post has faced this same gauntlet too many times. In February 2020, we published a column by Steven W. Mosher asking if COVID-19 leaked from the Wuhan Lab. This was labeled ‘false’ by Facebook’s fact-checkers. Of course, those supposed ‘independent’ scientific reviewers relied on a group of experts who had a vested interest in dismissing that theory — including EcoHealth, which had funded the Wuhan lab. When Twitter ‘fact checked’ and blocked The Post’s stories about Hunter Biden’s laptop as ‘hacked materials,’ what was the basis? Nothing. It wasn’t hacked; the company’s staff just wanted an excuse. Guess they didn’t like our tone. In both these cases, our ‘fact checks’ were lifted, but only after it no longer mattered.” The New York Post also points out that “The fact-check industry is funded by liberal moguls such as George Soros, government-funded nonprofits and the tech giants themselves.”14 Science Feedback, for example, received seed funding from Google.15 Journalism’s icon, the Poynter Institute — which runs the International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN) — also funded Science Feedback to build what Poynter describes as “a database of fact checks and of websites that spread misinformation the most.” In a round robin of circular funding, IFCN’s revenues come from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Google, Facebook and government entities such as the U.S. Department of State.16 To top it off, Science Feedback’s crowdfunding is run through the University of California, Merced, so they can avoid taxes in the United States.17 Fact Checkers Protect the Technocratic Agenda One of the primary funders of the fake fact checking industry that The Post failed to mention is the drug industry. NewsGuard and other fact checking organizations are loaded with Big Pharma conflicts of interest, and their bias in favor of the drug industry is undeniable. Fact checking organizations are also clearly influenced by technocratic organizations such as the World Economic Forum, which is leading the call for a Great Reset. NewsGuard, for example, is partnered with Publicis,18 one of the world’s largest PR companies that has a huge roster of Big Pharma clients, and Publicis in turn is a partner of the World Economic Forum. NewsGuard also received a large chunk of its startup capital from Publicis. No doubt, Big Pharma and The Great Reset are tightly intertwined and work together toward the same goal, which is nothing less than world domination and the enslavement of the global population under a biomedical police state. PR Posing as Free Press Has Unleashed Fake News Pandemic Publicis actually appears to be coordinating the global effort to suppress information that runs counter to the technocratic narrative about COVID-19, its origin, prevention and treatment — suppression and censorship that has been repeatedly aimed at this website specifically. It is part of an enormous network that includes international drug companies, fact checkers and credibility raters like NewsGuard, Google and other search engines, Microsoft, antivirus software companies like Trend Micro, public libraries, schools, the banking industry, the U.S. State Department and Department of Defense, the World Health Organization and the World Economic Forum. Mind you, this is not a comprehensive list of links. It’s merely a sampling of entities to give you an idea of the breadth of connections, which when taken together explain how certain views — such as information about COVID-19 and vaccines — can be so effectively suppressed and erased from public discourse. To understand the power that PR companies such as Publicis wield, you also need to realize that PR has, by and large, replaced the free press. This has had a devastating effect, and I don’t think I’m overstating the matter when I say that it is PR masquerading as news that gave birth to the whole “fake news” phenomenon. However, in true Orwellian double-speak, these same fake PR-news pushers claim everyone else is peddling fake news. They want us to believe their PR is the truth, even though its typically devoid of data and flies in the face of verifiable facts. China’s Hidden Influence In addition to fact checkers doing the bidding of Big Pharma and the technocratic elite, the public is also being deceived and manipulated by Chinese propaganda. In a December 20, 2021, New York Times article,19 Muyi Xiao, Paul Mozur and Gray Beltran details how China manipulates Facebook and Twitter to further its own authoritarian aspirations. According to Xiao, Mozur and Beltran, China’s government has “unleashed a global online campaign” to bolster its image and suppress accusations of human rights abuses. To that end, it hires companies to flood social media with fake accounts that are then used to advance China’s agenda worldwide. This includes creating content on demand, identifying and tracking critics that live outside of China, running bot networks to flood social media with tailored propaganda messages to steer discussion and more — strategies referred to as “public opinion management.” Disturbingly, while the Chinese government has long hunted down dissenting voices inside the country and forced them to recant, they’re now hunting Chinese dissenters worldwide. Any user who has connections to the mainland can find themselves in a situation where their family members in China are detained or threatened until or unless they delete the offending post or account. People of Chinese descent who live in other countries may also be detained by police if they return to mainland China, based on the opinions they’ve shared online. China Aims for More Sophisticated Propaganda According to the documents the trio obtained, the Chinese police are also working on more sophisticated propaganda maneuvers. For example, rather than relying on bot farms and fake troll profiles to create an appearance of public opinion, they’re looking to grow popular accounts that have an organic following, so that these accounts can later be taken over by government to push whatever propaganda is desired at that time. These are known as “profiles for hire.” As explained in the article, “The deeper engagement lends the fake personas credibility at a time when social media companies are increasingly taking down accounts that seem inauthentic or coordinated.” Facebook Itself Is an Opinion Management Tool Of course, Facebook and Twitter lend themselves to this kind of manipulation because they are essentially “public opinion management” tools. Even if they didn’t start out that way (and that’s a big if), they’ve certainly grown into it. There can be no denying that both platforms have been instrumental in censoring information about COVID-19 on behalf of the drug industry and global technocracy. As reported by The National Pulse,20 email correspondence between Dr. Anthony Fauci and Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg reveals Zuckerberg even agreed to send Fauci reports on Facebook users’ sentiments to “facilitate decisions” about COVID-19 lockdowns. An April 8, 2020, email from Zuckerberg reads in part:21 “... If we’re looking at a prolonged period of tightening and loosening shelter restrictions around the country, then if there are aggregate, anonymized data reports that Facebook can generate to facilitate these decisions, for example, we’d be happy to do this ... We’ve kicked off a symptom survey, which will hopefully give a county-by- county leading indicator of cases to inform public health decisions. If there are other aggregate data resources that you think would be helpful, let me know ...” As noted by The National Pulse, this is a “stark example” of how Big Tech corporations and government agencies collude and use user data to restrict our freedoms and liberties.22 Government Colludes With Big Tech to Circumvent Constitution Indeed, aside from this, we’ve also had clear examples of politicians colluding with Big Tech to censor on behalf of the government, in clear violation of the U.S. Constitution. This is why I sued U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren. In early September 2021, Warren sent a letter23 to Andy Jassy, chief executive officer of Amazon.com, demanding an “immediate review” of Amazon’s algorithms to weed out books peddling “COVID misinformation.”24,25,26 Warren specifically singled out my book, “The Truth About COVID-19,” co-written with Ronnie Cummins, founder and director of the Organic Consumers Association (OCA), as a prime example of “highly-ranked and favorably-tagged books based on falsehoods about COVID-19 vaccines and cures” that she wanted banned. As a government official, it is illegal for her to violate the U.S. Constitution, and pressuring private businesses to do it for her is not a legal workaround. Since she willfully ignored the law, Cummins and I, along with our publisher, Chelsea Green Publishing, and Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who wrote our foreword, sued Warren,27 both in her official and personal capacities, for violating our First Amendment rights. The federal lawsuit, in which Warren is listed as the sole defendant, was filed November 8, 2021, in the state of Washington. ‘Fact Checks’ Are Brainwashing Attempts Is there a fact checking organization you can rely on? The simple and direct answer is no. They all exist for a single purpose — to metaphorically “shout over” anyone whose views differ from the officially sanctioned narrative on a given topic and suppress the truth that interferes with the implementation of their agenda. It’s like two people trying to have a conversation about something while a third person keeps interjecting, screaming at the top of their lungs “THINK THIS! SAY THIS!” Who needs that? They’re useless. By reading them and giving them any credence, all you’re doing is filling your head with propaganda and increasing your likelihood of falling into the pervasive mass delusional psychosis we’re seeing all around us. It’s just one big brainwashing attempt. With any amount of luck, Facebook’s court admission that fact checks are mere opinion pieces will end up triggering the fact blockers’ demise. Sources and References 1 wattsupwiththat.com John Stossel Lawsuit against Meta Platforms (PDF) 2 WND December 10, 2021 3, 13, 14 New York Post December 14, 2021 4 New York Post December 13, 2021 5 wattsupwiththat.com December 9, 2021 6, 11, 12 The BMJ 2021;375:n2635 7, 8 Reclaim the Net December 17, 2021 9 Medscape December 20, 2021 10 ZeroHedge December 20, 2021 15 Science Feedback Partners, Funders & Donors 16 Poynter IFCN Transparency Statement 17 Influence Watch Science Feedback 18 Twitter Publicis Health Media April 27, 2021 19 New York Times December 20, 2021 (Archived) 20, 21, 22 National Pulse December 14, 2021 23 Warren’s letter to Andy Jassy September 7, 2021 24 National Interest September 12, 2021 25 The Guardian September 13, 2021 26 New York Times September 8, 2021 27 Chelsea Green November 8, 2021
  15. VAERS COVID Vaccine Adverse Event Reports https://openvaers.com/covid-data Of course, FuckBook "FACT CHECKERS" say this is not reliable! Even after this: Facebook Claims Fact Checks Are ‘Protected Opinion “Facebook just blew the ‘fact check’ claim right out of the water in court. In its response to Stossel’s defamation claim, Facebook responds on Page 2, Line 8 in the court document that Facebook cannot be sued for defamation (which is making a false and harmful assertion) because its ‘fact checks’ are mere statements of opinion rather than factual assertions. Opinions are not subject to defamation claims, while false assertions of fact can be subject to defamation ... So, in a court of law, in a legal filing, Facebook admits that its ‘fact checks’ are not really ‘fact’ checks at all, but merely ‘opinion assertions.’ This strikes me as public relations disaster, and possibly a looming legal disaster for Facebook, PolitiFact, Climate Feedback and other left-leaning entities that engage in biased ‘fact checking.’ Such ‘fact checks’ are now shown to be simply an agenda to suppress free speech and the open discussion of science by disguising liberal media activism as something supposedly factual, noble, neutral, trustworthy, and based on science. It is none of those.”
  16. SOME of the truth on gov website!
  17. A pharmacist can’t answer basic questions about the vaxx he is giving out
  18. SOME VERY INTERSTING ARTICLES AND JOURNALS-----RECOMMENDED. https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/ https://www.cdc.gov/csels/dls/locs/2021/07-21-2021-lab-alert-Changes_CDC_RT-PCR_SARS-CoV-2_Testing_1.html?fbclid=IwAR2vSLb-eTJrhBpZDWvoagEnI6MQhZtanwbqAYEfTA5e-nYGBX2Fgo7DXWM https://vaccineimpact.com/2021/34337-deaths-3120439-injuries-following-covid-shots-in-european-database-as-uk-public-data-show-35-deaths-213-hospitalizations-among-booster-triple-vaccinated/ https://doctors4covidethics.org https://aflds.org/?fbclid=IwAR12SSnVrE7EvKcc4SGL-348l0fGjTGmle2dsYzPgITTsCzeI4Hal5m_PlU https://www.infowars.com/posts/fda-now-says-pfizer-clinical-data-will-take-75-years-to-release/ https://phmpt.org/pfizers-documents/
  19. FAUCI ADMITS JABS MAKE CHILDREN WORSE!! Hasn't anyone arrested that fucking creep yet??..... he is full of SHIT----first, masks dont work, then they do, then wear four..... He is a LIAR regarding gain of function research in Wuhan.........now-----"vaccines" make kids WORSE??...... HE IS AN INSTITUTION LIAR, BANKROLLED BY GATES----AND EVERYONE KNOWS IT----EXCEPT BOUGHT AND PAID FOR MAINSTREAM MEDIA! https://www.facebook.com//videos/227319082877961
  20. IRREFUTABLE EVIDENCE: The COVID-19 Vaccines Are Killing People! Dec 30th 2021 https://banned.video/watch?id=61ce30c51411b24430a1daee
  21. They mean..... "...catch a cold". Anyone with any intelligence to do their own research will see moronic/omicron is about as dangerous as a mild cold-----and THAT is from the doctors at the heart of it in Sth Africa.
  22. FRIAR ALEXIS BUGNOLO - IT'S TIME TO ACT NOW https://www.bitchute.com/video/ZIAU7eRq1D6z/
×
×
  • Create New...