epsom

I have posted the following comment on various YT channels today---because I am sick to death of the what this country has become---- I doubt if they will be seen (except by me) or replied to, as that is what normally happens to my comments ( many others have the same problem also).... We in the UK have for DECADES gone on about the dictatorships in Nth Korea and other countries, and how that kind of thing (speech censorship etc) would NEVER be allowed to happen in Britain ---because it is an absolutely ALIEN concept here....... We would NEVER allow our "politicians" to get anywhere near that level of, well DICTATORSHIP....... would we?. Well, now we have an anti British, lying, two faced PM, a Muslim London mayor, a police "service" which are the peoples enemy, planned open borders which allow illegal immigrants galore (by design---in order to make it easier to control people. It has been the agenda of the WEF/Bilderbergers/globalists for many decades---(No countries, just regions), attack on free speech, Islamic/Muslim councils--especially in the North, a mainstream media which is funded by woke billionaires and who seldom tell the truth, a "king" who hates Christians and loves Islam, ..... I could go on and on...... BUT..... WHY are we ALLOWING this to go on?.... WHY is Starmer being ALLOWED to do this?..... WHERE is the opposition?. OUR FOREFATHERS/MOTHERS FOUGHT TO STOP THE NAZIS IN WW1 AND WW2----STARMER AND EVERYONE COMPLICIT IN THIS TREASONOUS ACT AGAINST OUR COUNTRY AND THE MEMORIES OF THOSE THAT GAVE THEIR LIVES SHOULD BE ASHAMED AND IN JAIL.....................and that includes the police, especially the woke brigade. We cannot wait until Reform get in--that will be too late ( who believes ANY politician anyway?)..... so something needs to give....and fast.

This is just an example of what I mean.... if you don't think that is odd, well. MANY of my comments on similar channels (as I have referred to earlier) are the same... SOME I can see and have "likes", but the majority don't.... There are 2,401 comments on that video..... and I have scrolled down a LONG way... and I have found NONE that have had no "likes"..... You may have to click on the image to get a bigger view:

That was one of my comments----some of them can be seen etc.... but the one I am talking about and which is on that video is this: ""Everyone has to ask.... WHY are those "in charge" ANTI-BRITISH?. Yes.... it started with Blair, but the mass immigration policy has been around and an agenda for far longer.... it was a policy of the "new world order" that there would be no Nation states, hence, no borders worldwide......... this policy was/is so that the people could much more easily controlled. No one is going to tell me that EVERYONE involved in NOT stopping the small boats doesn't know EXACTLY what they are doing (probably orders from Davos, the Bilderbergers, WEF etc)...... The fact that all Starmer has to do is declare a STATE OF EMERGENCY regarding illegal immigration (and then the ECHR is irrelevant), but is not doing anything about this means that STARMER IS AIDING AND ABETTING HUMAN TRAFFIC----ie, he is a HUMAN TRAFFICKER! ALL those politicians who have committed TREASON need to be shunned, avoided---even members of the treasonous politicians families..... and this goes for those at the top of the so called "police"--who have become an enemy of the indigenous British people. Khan is ANTI-BRITISH---there is no way on Earth that he would be continually re-elected if it wasn't for the Muslim vote---he should be NOWHERE NEAR OUR COUNTRY. We have Muslim/Islamic councils cropping up all over the north of England---with Sharia law being demanded by them... Charles has become ANTI-BRITISH and ANTI-CHRISTIAN---preferring instead, to celebrate foreign holidays instead of our Christian ones. This needs to STOP, and we need to peacefully protest as much as we can to get our country back."" Can you see that one?.... and do you see what I mean when I say that it has no "likes"/ replies etc?

Thanks for reply, Grumpy Owl..... Here is a fairly recent comment by me, which I can see, but has no "likes" and no replies etc...... Other comments which were posted at the same time as me have "likes" in the 500 and more range......... The name I use on comments is JOHN SMITH.....

Hi all, For quite a while now, the majority of my comments on YT ( on channels such as Godfrey Bloom, GB News, TalkTV, Redacted and similar) are either seemingly not seen by anyone ( as there are no "likes", when others who have posted at the same time received 100's of "likes") or only seen by me...sometimes, they disappear altogether from my YT comment history! Could this have anything to do with the fact that my comments are usually comparatively lengthy?..(not all, but many). Here is an example of one I posted a few days ago on one of the channels mentioned above: ""Everyone has to ask.... WHY are those "in charge" ANTI-BRITISH?. Yes.... it started with Blair, but the mass immigration policy has been around and an agenda for far longer.... it was a policy of the "new world order" that there would be no Nation states, hence, no borders worldwide......... this policy was/is so that the people could much more easily controlled. No one is going to tell me that EVERYONE involved in NOT stopping the small boats doesn't know EXACTLY what they are doing (probably orders from Davos, the Bilderbergers, WEF etc)...... The fact that all Starmer has to do is declare a STATE OF EMERGENCY regarding illegal immigration (and then the ECHR is irrelevant), but is not doing anything about this means that STARMER IS AIDING AND ABETTING HUMAN TRAFFIC----ie, he is a HUMAN TRAFFICKER! ALL those politicians who have committed TREASON need to be shunned, avoided---even members of the treasonous politicians families..... and this goes for those at the top of the so called "police"--who have become an enemy of the indigenous British people. Khan is ANTI-BRITISH---there is no way on Earth that he would be continually re-elected if it wasn't for the Muslim vote---he should be NOWHERE NEAR OUR COUNTRY. We have Muslim/Islamic councils cropping up all over the north of England---with Sharia law being demanded by them... Charles has become ANTI-BRITISH and ANTI-CHRISTIAN---preferring instead, to celebrate foreign holidays instead of our Christian ones. This needs to STOP, and we need to peacefully protest as much as we can to get our country back."" This happens again and again. I am not interested in "likes", by the way, but it gives an indication if the comment has been viewed etc. Anyone else have this problem?.

The fact is that the people who DID vote Labour voted on the policies in the manifesto---------AND THE MANIFESTO HAS TURNED OUT OUT TO BE A TISSUE OF LIES AND U TURNS. In other words--the people were CONNED. Does the new government have to put manifesto pledges into action? The short answer in constitutional terms is no – government is not legally bound to implement any manifesto commitment. The courts have been clear on this and there are sensible reasons to justify this position. The observations of Lord Denning from 1981 still ring true today: "A manifesto issued by a political party - in order to get votes - is not to be taken as gospel… It may contain - and often does contain - promises or proposals that are quite unworkable." There is no law that has been passed to make a manifesto legally enforceable---THIS HAS TO CHANGE, or what is the POINT of a manifesto?. IN OTHER WORDS, THEY CAN LIE WITH IMPUNITY--AND NOTHING CAN BE DONE ABOUT IT.

That is absolutely ridiculous. The Gov are supposed to work for the people----the people voted them in (albeit 20% of the population). If they (he) has been placed into power on the basis of a completely fraudulent manifesto--and continued lies, one after the other, doing exactly the opposite to what he SAID and what the people wanted, then that is TREASON ( especially with the Brexit betrayal) and malfeasance in public office. The people voted him IN---so we should be able to vote them (or HIM) OUT.

Yeah, you are quite right, Bombadil----nothing will change. Although I predict that Starmer will be gone sooner rather than later.....and I suspect it would have to do with his rent boy and other nefarious parts of his private life.

IS THERE A PETITION YET TO GET STARMER TO RESIGN? HE IS NOT FIT TO BE A PRIME MINISTER FOR MANY REASONS---ALMOST ALL OF THE MANIFESTO THAT PEOPLE VOTED FOR HAS BEEN A COMPLETE LIE. THAT IS A CRIMINAL OFFENCE. THEY HAVE MISLEAD THE PUBLIC. Misleading the public can be a crime, particularly if it involves false or misleading information intended to deceive or defraud. The specific crime can vary depending on the context and the intent of the person making the misleading statement. Some examples include fraud by false representation, the false or misleading information offence, and misconduct in public office. Misconduct in Public Office: This involves a breach of duty or abuse of power by a public official, which could include making false statements or misleading the public. The WHIP system has to be abolished, as it stops MP's from voicing what they REALLY think. They are blackmailed into toeing the party line---or get suspended or thrown out. That is BLACKMAIL. THERE IS A HUGE AMOUNT OF VIDEO/ DOCUMENTARY PROOF THAT HE HAS SAID ONE THING BEFORE ELECTED, AND HAS DONE THE COMPLETE OPPOSITE WHEN IN POWER. HE SAID HE WOULD NOT RAISE TAXES. HE TOLD TRUMP AND VANCE THAT THE UK HAS FREEDOM OF SPEECH---BUT IMPRISONS THOSE FOR HURTY WORDS! HE SAID THAT THE WINTER FUEL ALLOWANCE WOULD REMAIN. HE SAID IN 2024 THAT WE WOULD NOT GO BACK INTO THE EU. HE IS NOW TAKING US BACK IN THROUGH THE BACK DOOR WITHOUT ANY CONSENT FROM THE PEOPLE. HE IS ANTI-BRITISH. HE HAS STATED THAT DAVOS IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN PARLIAMENT. HE GAVE AWAY THE CHAGOS ISLANDS..... AND WE PAY FOR IT. HE SAYS HE WILL "SMASH THE GANGS"----HE HAS NOT AND ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION GOES UP AND UP. HE HAS ACTUALLY SAID THAT HE IS "NOT A POLITICIAN", BUT A LAWYER. ( he got THAT right!) HE SAYS THINGS WHICH PEOPLE WANT TO HEAR---THEN BACKTRACKS 180 DEGREES. There are many more instance of Starmer lies and U-turns----THERE HAS TO BE CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS INTO THIS DICTATOR AND TRAITOR. ( this comment won't be seen on YT, where I posted this comment a number of times---mine hardly ever are).

Yeah, I noticed that also. I don't watch much TV anyway, but when I do, the adverts go OFF immediately. I really hope these advertisers are shooting themselves in the foot, as a LOT of people are sick to death of this virtue signaling woke shit.

I am an Eskimo who has just arrived in UK and have been watching your TV adverts.... I was not aware that white people are a minority now and that every relationship is mixed race. ( just to point out that I am not an Eskimo, but that IF I was, then that would be the impression I would get from TV adverts)...

Thanks, Matak88, I had a feeling that it might be CGI.... How can I delete my post?.

https://www.facebook.com/reel/850156240220191?

What Stalin/Starmer is doing is NOT legal or lawful. He is supposed to be a lawyer?. Well, we are supposed to protected against unjust "laws" that are made up ad hoc----and we are supposed to be protected against a dictatorship. Labour did NOT get a landslide---far from it. Over 60% of people did NOT vote for them----which does NOT give Starmer carte blanche to act like a dictator. Is the UK still bound by ECHR? Brexit was about leaving the EU. It did not impact the Council of Europe, so the UK still has to follow the ECHR and judgments from the European Court of Human Rights. Article 5--THE RIGHT TO LIBERTY AND SECURITY You have the right to liberty. If you are arrested, you have the right to know why. If you are arrested you have the right to stand trial soon, or to be released until the trial takes place. Article 7--NO PUNISHMENT WITHOUT LAW You cannot be held guilty of a crime if there was no law against it when you did it. Article 9--FREEDOM OF THOUGHT, CONSIENCE AND RELIGION You have the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion. You have the right to practise your religion at home and in public and to change your religion if you want. Article 10 ‐ FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION You have the right to responsibly say and write what you think and to give and receive information from others. This includes freedom of the press. Above are a few of the important ECHR rights--- WE ARE STILL BOUND BY THEM. Where are the REAL lawyers, with GUTS, that can use the ECHR?. STARMER IS COMMITING TREASON---IN MANY WAYS. IT WILL NOT END WELL FOR HIM OR LABOUR IF THIS CONTINUES. *****Is the UK Government removing the Human Rights Act? The Rights Removal Bill is dead As it turned out, the Justice Secretary already had a date in parliament on 27th June 2023 to share something important about our Human Rights Act: just hours before our event, he confirmed that the Government will no longer be pursing the Bill of Rights Bill. Can the UK parliament break human rights? Parliament is responsible for making the laws in the UK. When Parliament makes laws it doesn't have to follow the Human Rights Act. This means it can make laws which go against or are incompatible with the Human Rights Act. Are ECHR and HRA the same? At the outset, it is important to explain that the HRA stands independently of the UK's membership of the ECHR and the Council of Europe, because it is a UK law passed by our parliament.

What Stalin/Starmer is doing is NOT legal or lawful. He is supposed to be a lawyer?. Well, we are supposed to protected against unjust "laws" that are made up ad hoc----and we are supposed to be protected against a dictatorship. Labour did NOT get a landslide---far from it. Over 60% of people did NOT vote for them----which does NOT give Starmer carte blanche to act like a dictator. Is the UK still bound by ECHR? Brexit was about leaving the EU. It did not impact the Council of Europe, so the UK still has to follow the ECHR and judgments from the European Court of Human Rights. Article 5--THE RIGHT TO LIBERTY AND SECURITY You have the right to liberty. If you are arrested, you have the right to know why. If you are arrested you have the right to stand trial soon, or to be released until the trial takes place. Article 7--NO PUNISHMENT WITHOUT LAW You cannot be held guilty of a crime if there was no law against it when you did it. Article 9--FREEDOM OF THOUGHT, CONSIENCE AND RELIGION You have the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion. You have the right to practise your religion at home and in public and to change your religion if you want. Article 10 ‐ FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION You have the right to responsibly say and write what you think and to give and receive information from others. This includes freedom of the press. Above are a few of the important ECHR rights--- WE ARE STILL BOUND BY THEM. Where are the REAL lawyers, with GUTS, that can use the ECHR?. STARMER IS COMMITING TREASON---IN MANY WAYS. IT WILL NOT END WELL FOR HIM OR LABOUR IF THIS CONTINUES.