.jpg.8081a54a3b74a5d1823dfac966666137.jpg)
.jpg.594f0ef23288ec5ab04539b2f8a8dbd4.jpg)
pi3141
-
Posts
3,044 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
26
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by pi3141
-
-
Rapist who 'married' a 15-year-old girl in sharia law ceremony attended by her social worker is jailed alongside seven other grooming gang members for a combined 91 years
A rapist who married a 15-year-old girl in a sharia law ceremony attended by her social worker has been jailed alongside seven other grooming gang members.
Raja Zulqurnean, 42, married the then-schoolgirl in Bradford, West Yorkshire in the early 2000s after she was placed into the foster care of his family, a court heard.
In May this year, Zulqurnean was found guilty of ten rapes and nine indecent assaults and sentenced to 18 years in jail.
He was also given a lifetime restraining order and Sexual Harm Prevention Order, and will remain on the sex offender register for life.
However, his sentence was increased from 18 years to 23 years after being referred to the Court of Appeal for being unduly lenient.
On Friday, a Bradford Crown Court Judge Ahmed Nadim jailed seven more of the victim's attackers after they were convicted of multiple counts of rape and sexual abused.
Prosecutors said she was groomed and sexually exploited by 18 known men in the Bradford area, but claim that figure is 'just the tip of the iceberg' as many more of her abusers have never been identified and brought to justice.
One of the girl's social workers is said to have even attended the Islamic wedding ceremony which saw the minor get married against her will.
An investigation into her abuse was launched in 2019 after Anna reported the abuse to police.
Zulqurnean, alongside Mohammed Imran Akram, 42, Mohammed Shezhad Hussain, 39, Basharat Khaliq, 45, Wajid Hussain, 42, Mohammed Naheem, 39, Nadeem Ali, 39, and Safraz Ahmed Latif, 40 combined were sentenced to 91 years behind bars.
Judge Ahmed Nadim on Friday told the convicts: 'Each of you appear before this court because you have contributed to inflicting profound and sexual harm upon a child at a time when she was between the age of 13 and 15.
'You deliberately chose to prey upon and exploit a vulnerable girl. She was neglected, unstable, and desperate for care and affection.
'Each of you in different ways weaponised her needs for your own sexual perverted gratification. It is undeniable that the systems that meant to protect [the victim] that is her parents, the social services, and the police, failed her to differing degrees.
'In evidence before me she expressed a strong distrust and animosity towards the police and the social services stating that they should be in the dock with the defendants.
As far as these men are concerned, they have done nothing wrong, they have acted on accordance with Islam and Islamic law.
The girl, being British, is not a Muslim.
Muslim men can do anything they like to non believers or infidels.
If a Muslim man returned home and his Muslim wife had evidence he had cheated, that would be adultery and a crime in Islam.
If a Muslim man returns home having gang raped a non Muslim, there is no crime, the wife or indeed the parents, will think nothing of it.
No crime, because non Muslims are worthless, so there is no sin or crime in raping or brutalizing a non Muslim.
This IS their belief.
The Home Secretary in control of protecting us, is a Muslim.
She puts her faith, this faith, before everything she does.
She will protest that this is UK and everyone should follow our laws, but in her heart, these Muslim men have not committed a crime against their faith.
Who the hell was this social worker?
Vulnerable children in the care system experiencing this. Social workers witnessing a Sharia wedding of a minor to a foreign man.
FFS.
But Labour and our Home Secretary will not doubt say im racist because I'm appalled at this.
Khan is doing his best to cover this sort of thing up, because again, in his mind, there is no sin or stain on a Muslim man, the fault lies in the Kafir, her provocative dress sense and because her parents abandoned her, bring married off to a Muslim nan is preferable to bring in the care system, however that Muslim man treats her.
If she was Muslim, Khan would have to take a different view, because a Mudlim man treating a Myslim women this way would be questionable, not necessarily un-Islamic, because the male is the woman's owner or keeper, she us his property, so it would need questioning.
But a non believer, a street rat whose parents have abandoned her, that's different.
This is the reality of their religion.
-
1
-
-
5 hours ago, numnuts said:
Eh? It was two weeks prior to the post I have just quoted. *confused*
2 weeks and 1 year.
First post September 13th 2024
Second post September 27th 2025
Its at the top of the Forum topics.
So nobody else posted in that year.
-
Israeli minister invites Tommy Robinson to visit after Manchester attack
Anti-Semitism tsar brands far-Right activist a ‘courageous leader on the front line against radical Islam’Telegraph
This is embarrassing.
Starmer calls Robinson a thug.
Yet Israeli minister has invited Robinson to go to Israel.
Historically the 'Far Right' hate the Jews, Starmer condemns Tommy Robinson as a Far Right Violent Thug and Racist a long with over 100,000 members of the public.
And yet for all their moralising and anti racist rhetoric we get from Labour - the Deputy PM gets heckled by the Jewish community, Starmer was obviously to ashamed to go to the vigil, and Israel condemn Starmer then invite the far right racist thug, Tommy Robinson, for an official visit to Israel to thank Tommy for his efforts.
They are not thanking Starmer or deputy PM Lammy or the Home secretary or Foreign secretary.
As far as I'm concerned that tells us everything we need to know about this Labour government under Starmer.
Labour under Starmer are wolves in sheep's clothing.
They use newspeak or their mediaspeak (who teaches them) to not answer questions.
They use personal or racist smears to silent dissent.
They pay protesters to protest in favour of Labour’s immigration policy to influence media coverage.
They fail to condemn large percentage of pro Palestine protesters as violent, while condemning a large group of protesters because a small, tiny in comparison, percentage of people got arrested
Khan refuses to answer questions and tell the truth about London grooming gangs and crime.
Yet Starmer has full faith in Khan.
We have the head of a company refusing a contract because there was no mandate from the public, it wasn't in manifesto and is undemocratic.
This is a business leader teaching Starmer basic politics.
Labour have to go.
They've shown us the left are rabid, out of control liars who use political and social engineering as well as racial slurs to uphold their political position.
Wolves in sheep's clothing.
-
Britain offered home to Syrian family of killer who repaid the favour in cold blood
Syrian-born surgeon appears to regret son’s ‘heinous act’ but joyously greeted massacre of Jewson Oct 7 2023
A day after Jihad al-Shamie had driven his car at speed at Jewish worshippers and then stabbed at them in a frenzied, murderous assault, his father posted on Facebook a short statement expressing his “profound shock”.
In a 124-word statement, Faraj al-Shamie said he and his family “strongly condemns this heinous act, which targeted peaceful, innocent civilians”. It was a show of contrition seemingly fitting of a Syrian-born doctor who has spent years working overseas as a trauma surgeon, often in hostile environments.
Except that on Oct 7 2023, in the hours after Hamas terrorists stormed Israel and slaughtered almost 1,200 people and took 250 civilians and soldiers hostage, the father appeared to show not a shred of humanity for the Jewish victims of that atrocity.
On the same Facebook page where he said how sorry he was about the Manchester attack, he had posted, some two years earlier, praise for the Hamas fighters, describing them as “Allah’s men on earth”
Telegraph
-
Perhaps Starmer could ask China to run it for us.
They have experience, they run their own Digital ID scheme, Starmer wants investment from them, so agree to pay them to run our ID in return for greater investment by China in UK's infrastructure?
Like a 1 in 1 out deal.
We give you money, you give money back and everyone's a winner.
-
Palantir UK boss rules out contract bids for digital ID over 'undemocratic' concern
Fiona Brown
Fri 3 October 2025 at 1:27 pm BST
2 min readUS spyware firm has ruled out helping the UK Government implement digital ID over concerns the legislation is “undemocratic”.
Palantir Technologies, a software company which has previously been linked to the IDF, said it would not be participating in the roll-out and warned it was a “programme that needs to be decided at the ballot box”, according to reports from The Times.
Due to its contracts with the Ministry of Defence (MoD) and its specialism in data management, as well as £1.5 billion in UK investments announced last month, Palantir was thought to be a possible bidder as digital IDs are set to become mandatory.
The firm’s UK boss Louis Mosley said, however, that Palantir would not bid for contracts and criticised the UK Government’s decision to implement the IDs.
Speaking to Times Radio, Mosley said the firm had “a policy that we will help democratically elected governments implement the policies they have been elected to deliver”, but added that since digital IDs were not on the Labour Party’s manifesto for the 2024 general election and therefore hasn’t seen “a clear resounding public support at the ballot box”, it “isn’t one for” Palantir.
Mosley went on to say that he had “personal concerns” over the scheme and the potential abuses it could face, as well as the “technical necessity” for its implementation.
We have all had the experience of engaging with parts of government where the online experience leaves something to be desired. It needs improvement”, he added.
The Palantir boss went on to highlight the number of unique ID forms most UK citizens already possess – including passports, driving licenses, tax codes and National Insurance numbers – and how there was “no way” for the Government to move between each form.
-
1
-
-
Hence if Gazans are as responsible for Hamas actions, they are not innocent, they are enemy combatants on a battlefield.
Hamas put them there, but that is the reality.
Edit: don't tell me they are unarmed.
There are videos of civillian women in burkhas firing mortars out of buildings.
-
Labour secretly sabotaged China spy trial
Ministers’ decision not to describe Xi’s regime in court as an ‘enemy’ led the case to collapseLabour secretly sabotaged the trial of two alleged spies after refusing to brand China an “enemy”, The Telegraph can disclose.
Prosecutors dropped charges last month against Christopher Cash, 30, and Christopher Berry, 33, who were accused of passing information about the Government’s foreign policy to a high-ranking member of the Chinese government.
At the time, Sir Keir Starmer’s spokesman said that it was “extremely disappointing” that the two men would not face trial, adding that the charges were “gravely concerning”.
But The Telegraph can now reveal that the case collapsed because ministers withdrew a star witness who had been tasked with testifying that China was an “enemy” of the UK.
Under the Official Secrets Act 1911, Mr Cash and Mr Berry were accused of collecting and passing information that would be “directly or indirectly useful to an enemy"
However, Labour ministers told prosecutors they were no longer willing to describe China as an enemy in court, causing the case to collapse in early September.
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) had previously been assured by the Conservative government that a senior civil servant would give evidence to establish that Beijing was an enemy of Britain, which was required for the prosecution to succeed.
Plans were also laid for intelligence officials to testify in a closed court to protect their identity.
Dan Jarvis, the Labour security minister, told Parliament last month that the CPS decision to drop the case was “independent” from the Government and it was “not for any government minister to speculate on the reasons behind it”.
He told MPs: “Many members will be as extremely disappointed – as I am – that there will now not be a trial.”
Ministers ‘must come clean’ about withdrawal of witness
Alicia Kearns, a Conservative MP who employed Mr Cash, said the decision to withdraw a witness raised “serious questions about constitutional impropriety”.“In the public interest, the Government must disclose ministerial involvement, and come clean on whether any government witnesses were withdrawn,” she said.
“Starmer must answer: was it no longer in the public’s interest to prosecute, or more likely he and his Labour Government don’t have the mettle to defend the British people and our great democracy?”
Priti Patel, the shadow foreign secretary, said the Government’s decision to withdraw a witness was “deeply alarming” and called for ministers to explain why the case had collapsed.
“This really creates serious questions for the Government, and calls for them to be much more transparent and honest about their entire involvement in this case,” she said.
“At the same time, we need to recognise that China is a threat to our country and an adversary.”
-
Thanks for the tip. I often find answers on Reddit but never joined.
I have now.
If this site had successfully ported over all the threads and info on the old site, this place would be huge, filled with old threads that people could spend hours browsing.
A repository for information and research as well as commentary on past events and news etc.
Unfortunately, it didn't happen and there's really not much on here for new people to browse through.
No wonder it's so quiet.
It lost members and input as well as vast amounts of historical information and research.
-
I'm sure everyone on this Forum has been looking at this sort of stuff, and what Islam is, but I thought it worth putting here just in case someone doesn't know whats been going on.
-
David Lammy 'finished' as TalkTV star demands he 'resign immediately'
It comes after Deputy PM David Lammy accused Nigel Farage of 'flirting with the Hitler Youth' on the BBC earlier today
Snip
A TalkTV guest waded in on the deputy prime minister after he accused Nigel Farage of "flirting with the Hitler Youth" on the BBC earlier today. David Lammy was forced to apologise after his astonishing allegation, which Mr Farage dismissed at the time as "complete baloney".
On the BBC, Lammy reasserted that Labour thinks Reform UK's vow to end indefinite leave to remain and deport people in the UK without citizenship is racist "because it is". He later rowed back on his claims that Nigel Farage "flirted with Hitler Youth" and said he was "happy to clarify" his comments.
On TalkTV, barrister Steven Barrett has urged that David should "resign immediately."
He added: "I want Merseyside Police to launch an investigation into the Labour Party for a large number of offences. I think it's disgraceful. I have friends in the Labour Party. They are utterly shocked."
From - The Express.
I also think the PM and others have acted unlawfully as well as irresponsibly.
They have slandered large numbers of the public and Farage.
They have also lied about the cause and ongoing issues with immigration.
Now we see 10 years ago Starmer using the racist slur against a member of public and then later lying about the encounter to spin it entirely differently, saying he realized the left got it wrong on immigration.
Then he spent all his time in opposition opposing any attempts to redress.
Before finally coming into power, blaming the last government for the situation and refusing to fix it and calling anyone who disagrees racist.
How is that the actions of an honest man?
-
Sadiq Khan refuses to call for cancellation of pro-Palestine protest
Mayor of London defended right to ‘peaceful and lawful’ demonstration but said people should be ‘mindful of the appalling terror attack’The same argument applies to Khan.
Any Christian Mayor would cancel the protest. But he's putting his preference for his religion above what Londoners or British public want.
If you criticise him, Starmer will call you a racist far-right thug.
They tried to cancel the big demo 24 hours beforehand, in fact they did.
100,000 people protested, 26 arrests.
Most were from the opposition but media aren't reporting that.
Starmer called it Far Right thuggery.
Last night on a Palestinian protest, 40 arrests were made, mostly for attacks on Police.
So by my reckoning, there needed to be 200,000 protesters last night to equalise those figures and Starmer should have been on the news today condemning the thuggery taking place.
Given that there was nowhere near 200,000 people, the 40 arrests, by the same measure that 26 arrests from 100,000 is disgraceful thuggery, he should be utterly condemning the protests last night.
Starmer, the Home Secretary and Mayor Khan should not be allowing any more Palestinian protests on the grounds of public order and safety. And Police safety.
But they are not doing that.
Khan says they have the right to peaceful protest, but last night was not peaceful.
Hence there's good reason to believe tonight's marches will be peaceful.
If the Mayor and the Prime Minister or the Home Secretary can not forsee that this may not be peaceful, despite all the past protests, how can they be fit for the positions they hold.
-
No I don't follow Jesus, but it's the views put forward.
Our Home Secretary says her religion is the most important thing in her life and drives everything she does.
How can that be compatible with running the UK?
Every time she faces a moral decision her religious views will appear in her mind first, then she has to make a conscious decision to put that reaction completely aside, remind herself of this society laws and views and historical decisions, and then make a decision that may run in opposition to her beliefs.
Will she not be considered a bad Muslim by other Muslims if she does that?
Will that not affect her decision?
The Government has recognized Palestine before anyone ceasefire and while Hama still hold hostages.
The UK's historical position is we don't negotiate with terrorists.
As Home Secretary she should have voiced opposition to recognizing Palestinian state until a ceasefire or at least the release of hostages, but that would have been negotiating, which we don't do.
So the proper stance, historical stance, which we've always been told is the moral stance, would be to not recognize the state until a formal resolution has been achieved.
The proper Muslim stance would be to recognize Palestine and give Hamas an advantage as soon as possible.
Which she did.
That is not a Home Secretary acting in the UK's historical fashion.
It is putting her religion in front of the British people's interests and the government's historical position in these situations.
Starmer has done the same.
The ex head of our legal system has, on his own volition, disregarded decades of British diplomacy and Law, and if you disagree, your racist.
They are dangerous.
-
1
-
1
-
-
David Lammy heckled at Manchester synagogue vigil
David Lammy was heckled as he was introduced at the Manchester synagogue attack’s vigil on Friday.
Attendees chanted “shame on you” and accused the Deputy Prime Minister of having “blood on his hands”.
Mark Adlestone, chair of the Jewish Representative Council in Greater Manchester, was eventually compelled to intervene, saying: “All right, we’ve heard enough. We know how you feel.”
Telegraph
How can the government expect to continue.
No doubt our Home Secretary would get the same treatment.
If they don't represent the majority, if they don't listen to the majority, and if they've lost the confidence of an electorate they supposedly represent, they cannot continue.
The UK has always stated they will not negotiate with terrorists.
Yet this government have accepted the demands of Hamas, a terrorist organisation, without even attempting to negotiate the return of a single hostage, let alone a ceasefire.
They simply accepted the terrorists demands.
Our Home Secretary was on Free Palestine demonstrations.
Watched as, and she knows, thousands of immigrants with a vastly different philosophy to this country, have been allowed to enter.
The Manchester attacker grew up here, in the UK, yet Islam still radicalized him.
How much has Islam radicalized the men turning up on boats.
Our Home Secretary knows, intimately, the reason, the answer as to what radicalized Muslims believe.
She knows their beliefs and ideology is not compatible with Western values.
Yet she goes to Free Palestine demonstrations, is happy to be pictured holding the flag and has made no significant change, or speech, about stopping the boats, rooting out and returning the extremists that she knows is among them.
She hasn't addressed the Intelligence the ISIS fighters are among them.
Once again, we're being lied to or gaslighted by politicians.
They know the ugly truth, but refuse to do the sensible thing, and accuse us of Islamophobia and Racism to cover up there true ideology.
They are wolves in sheep's clothing.
I really want someone to publicly ask Home Secretary Mahmood - what is the punishment for Homosexuality in Islam?
Will she speak out against the modern Islamic interpretation or does she believe it.
My guess is she would do an Yvette Cooper and refuse to answer on the basis she would lose her job.
-
1
-
-
Starmer and our home secretary say if you don't want these people in this country you are racist, far right and not decent.
Kurdish illegal immigrants in taxpayer-funded hotel are jailed for terrifying machete attack on shop owner as judge tells them: 'It is not what we are about in this country'
A gang of illegal immigrants who stormed a high street armed with machetes and brutally attacked a shop owner have been jailed.
Hana Hassan, 22; Yosef Shaban, 24; Osama Qadir, 21, and Dawan Mantik, 28 - all Kurds from Iran and Iraq - arrived in Britain on small boats.
The four were part of a larger mob of 12 who 'rallied the troops' after a dispute in a nightclub days earlier.
They targeted fellow Kurd Kurwan Ali and his friends at his shop in Bournemouth, Dorset, in a 'ferocious and frighteningly violent attack', leaving one victim with life-threatening lung injuries.
At the time of the attack Hassan was living in the taxpayer-funded Britannia Hotel, which was the focal point of local protests over the summer.
The hotel has been plagued with violent migrant residents. Last month a court heard asylum seeker Shkar Jamal, 24, threatened a man with a snooker cue outside the troubled hotel - before then skipping his sentencing hearing to eat fish and chips.
In another incident, a drunken Turkish migrant staying at the Britannia stabbed a man with a broken bottle. Despite the attack - and accusations he was in a terrorist group in his home country - Halil Dal, 30, will not be deported from the UK.
Of the latest gang of migrants to be hauled into court, two of the men, Ahmed Omar and Rahel Omer, have already fled the country.
As he jailed Hassan, Shaban, Qadir and Mantik for a combined 22 years, Judge Paul Dugdale said their behaviour was, 'not what we are about in this country'.
Starmer accused me of being racist': Joyce who became centre point of PM's conference speech reveals what REALLY happened
Starmer credits her with sparking his realisation that the Left had 'got it wrong' on immigration.
His anecdote about meeting retiree Joyce Todd became the centrepiece of his leader's speech at the Labour Party
So it is little short of extraordinary that Mrs Todd's recollection of their 2015 meeting during canvassing in Oldham is so different to that of the Prime Minister's.
Because she insists that the meeting was actually so fraught that it lasted less than 15 minutes before she demanded that he got out of her house because he accused her of being a racist.
From the big questions around immigration down to trivial details such as whether or not she served him Rich Tea biscuits, 79-year-old Joyce is unequivocal.
'Keir Starmer is a liar,' she insisted in an exclusive interview. 'He still doesn't get it.'
Mrs Todd's elevation to the national stage, which took her by surprise, came after Sir Keir told the story on Tuesday of how an encounter with her ten years ago had made him rethink the party's attitudes to the increasingly difficult question of immigration.
'Soon after I became an MP, I went to Oldham for a by-election up there,' the PM recalled. 'I was taken to a street to meet a woman, who I was told had strong views on immigration.
'I knocked on the door, she invited me in, we had a cup of tea, and a Rich Tea biscuit, and then as we sat there, she got her photo album out and showed me pictures.'
It is at this point that Mrs Todd's recollection of what happened diverges from Sir Keir's. 'There were no Rich Tea biscuits,' she told us.
And there was certainly no looking through a photo album. He was sat on one armchair, I was sat in another, and his staff were on the sofa, and we had a cup of tea – but there were no biscuits or photo albums.'
But Mrs Todd's objections to Sir Keir's account are much graver when it moves on to more substantive matters.
Sir Keir told his party: 'They [the pictures] were of the wedding of her Asian neighbour. She was proud that she was her friend… I started thinking 'What is going on here?'.
'Then we finally got to it, and she told me how some men from Eastern Europe had recently moved into her street. They sat on her wall, didn't put their rubbish out at the right time and spat on the ground. To her, that broke the little but important rules of her street. She didn't like it.
Then I realised what was really happening was that she was an ordinary working-class woman, from Oldham, a Labour voter, and she felt that she had to prove to a Labour politician that she wasn't racist before she could even bring up the issues in her community.'
But Mrs Todd recalls the meeting in the front room of her £130,000 terraced house unfolding differently. 'I don't know why he said I got my photo album out and showed him pictures of me at an Asian wedding because I didn't,' she insisted.
And she told how the meeting culminated in her being insulted over her views on immigration.
Mrs Todd, a retired trade journalist, explained how she came to meet Sir Keir, who had been elected an MP the previous year.
She said: 'I was on a panel called The New Deal for Communities and the council thought it would be worth him meeting me as I have very forthright views.
'I'm certainly not a racist. But that's what he accused me of during our chat.
'I told him that we had a problem on the street with Eastern European men spitting and just making a nuisance of themselves… I told him about these issues, and he said: 'Mrs Todd, I think you could be racist'.'
'I told him no, I wasn't – and that I had Asian friends, and I had been to lots of Asian weddings and events, and we buy Christmas presents for Asian children.
This is all he's got, accusations of racism towards anyone.
Not only that, he uses the encounter by twisting it around and lying about what happened.
I will accuse you of anything I choose and then lie to twist the truth to make it seem like I understand what people are telling me, I will then go on to do the opposite of what I have fantasised.
-
2
-
-
The YK government has always had a strict policy regarding terrorists.
We DO NOT negotiate with terrorists.
Hamas is a terrorist organisation.
Hamas is holding hostages.
Under UK and International protocol, the UK should NEVER recognize a Palestinian state while they hold hostages.
We DO NOT negotiate with terrorists.
So what happened when Starmer recognized Palestine?
He did not call for the release of hostages as condition for recognizing the Palestinian state.
So there was no negotiating.
He just recognised Palestine, while they hold hostages, without any conditions.
This is a surrender to terrorism.
This is a complete reversal or rather sell out of UK long standing policy.
He's legally trained, head of CPS, and here he is, without any conditions, accepting the terms set by terrorists.
He has made comments that people are racist, far right thugs, he says we need to move towards decency.
Yet his version of decency is to smear and lie, pay protesters to skew media stories and accept terrorists demands without argument and to reverse decades of policy.
On his say so.
If you don't agree, your racist.
The hypocrisy of this government is truly astounding.
On the upside, I think this will wake, and has woken, a lot of people.
On Question Time an audience member asked about the government labeling protesters as Far Right.
The Government spokesperson did their best to avoid answering with the usual media speak.
We got News presenters openly calling this out, and calling for Starmer to go.
Israel placing the blame for the attack directly at Starmer, our ever so moral PM who uses political dirty tricks and smear campaigns to silence opposition to his deranged ideology.
He wants Angela Rayner back, he says she paid a hefty price.
As the Ex head of the Crown Prosecution, having found a government official fiddling taxes, thinks that after standing down for 1 month, the offender should be given their job back.
Can we ALL expect the same treatment?
If I fiddle taxes, should there be the appearance of justice and then i can carry on in my business as if nothing happened?
Thats how 'moral' this man is.
If it's true that Tony Blair's son is involved with the company managing the Digitsl ID, and Tony Blair, ex Labour PM who pushed for Digital ID, had indeed got shares in that company and stands to profit, that is a conflict of interest.
If Tony Blair is in anyway involved financially in a Labour government run scheme, not only is it a conflict of interest it also Politicizes the scheme.
Blair can influence the company to be less helpful to opposition governments.
If this is true, and Starmer pushes ahead, that again is an example of his morals, his inability to recognise simple decency, that giving billions of pounds and control to a Labour supporter and ex Politician who called for the exact same scheme.
It's like the Starmer telling us he's given the go ahead for a new runway and motorway widening scheme that his newly acquired concrete company will be supplying the concrete.
It smacks of corruption and nepotism.
Again, that's how 'moral' this man is.
Same with Tony Blair, if he had any morals, ge could recommend Digital ID if he believes it helps, but he would instruct any company he is directly involved with, from bidding or accepting the contract.
But from what I can see of the Left, they scream very loudly for something they know very little facts about, and any disagreeing response are met with personal smears 'racist' 'bigot' 'terf' because they simply have no grasp of the facts and little capacity to reason.
In an interview a Left wing lesbian was told if Hamas took over, she would be put to death. Her response was 'it doesn't matter, if that happened then I would consider it my turn to go, I support Hamas because it's the right thing to do'
Ok.
What about the other Lesbian's?
Do they feel the same way?
And the Gays, and the Christians and Hindus and atheists and all the other Americans subjected to Islamic rule having their life's turned upside down?
Its the right thing to do and if all those people were executed alongside her, she would be telling them 'it's the right thing to do'
As i say, some of these people have no capacity to reason or think out their ideology.
Starmer is the same, as is Blair.
They think they are do morally superior they can do what they like.
Dangerous people.
-
1
-
2
-
-
The Government has responded - we will not listen to you or your concerns.
Response -
The Government has announced plans to introduce a digital ID system which is fit for the needs of modern Britain. We are committed to making people’s everyday lives easier and more secure, to putting more control in their hands (including over their own data), and to driving growth through harnessing digital technology. We also want to learn from countries which have digitised government services for the benefit of their citizens, in line with our manifesto commitment to modernise government.
Currently, when UK citizens and residents use public services, start a new job, or, for example, buy alcohol, they often need to present an assortment of physical documents to prove who they are or things about themselves. This is both bureaucratic for the individual and creates space for abuse and fraud. This includes known issues with illegal working and modern slavery, while the fragmented approach and multiple systems across Government make it difficult for people to access vital services.
Further, there are too many people who are excluded, like the 1 in 10 UK adults who don’t have a physical photo ID, so can struggle to prove who they are and access the products and services they are entitled to.
To tackle these interlinked issues, we will introduce a new national digital ID. This is not a card but a new digital identity that will be available for free to all UK citizens and legal residents aged 16 and over (although we will consider through consultation if this should be age 13 and over).
Over time, people will be able to use it to seamlessly access a range of public and private sector services, with the aim of making our everyday lives easier and more secure. It will not be compulsory to obtain a digital ID but it will be mandatory for some applications.
For example, the new digital ID will build on GOV.UK One Login and the GOV.UK Wallet to drive the transformation of public services. Over time, this system will allow people to access government services – such as benefits or tax records – without needing to remember multiple logins or provide physical documents. It will significantly streamline interactions with the state, saving time and reducing frustrating paperwork, while also helping to create opportunities for more joined up government services. International examples show how beneficial this can be. For instance, Estonia’s system reportedly saves each citizen hours every month by streamlining unnecessary bureaucracy, and the move to becoming a digital society has saved taxpayer money.
By the end of this Parliament, employers will have to check the new digital ID when conducting a ‘right to work’ check. This will help combat criminal gangs who promise access to the UK labour market in order to profit from dangerous and illegal channel crossings. It will create a fairer system between UK citizens and legal residents, crack down on forged documents, and streamline the process for employers, driving up compliance.
Further, it will create business information showing where employers are conducting checks, so driving more targeted action against non-compliant employers.
For clarity, it will not be a criminal offence to not hold a digital ID and police will not be able to demand to see a digital ID as part of a “stop and search.”
Privacy and security will also be central to the digital ID programme. We will follow data protection law and best practice in creating a system which people can rightly put their trust in. People in the UK already know and trust digital credentials held in their phone wallets to use in their everyday lives, from paying for things to storing boarding passes. The new system will be built on similar technology and be your boarding pass to government. Digitally checkable digital credentials are more secure than physical documents which can be lost, copied or forged, and often mean sharing more information than just what is necessary for a given transaction.
The new system will be designed in accordance with the highest security standards to protect against a comprehensive range of threats, including cyber-attacks.We will launch a public consultation in the coming weeks and work closely with employers, trade unions, civil society groups and other stakeholders, to co-design the scheme and ensure it is as secure and inclusive as possible. Following consultation, we will seek to bring forward legislation to underpin this system.
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology
Blair, Blair, Blair
Sorry I mean,
Blah, Blah, Blah (we're not listening)
They are telling us it's about inclusion, and making our lives easier as well as stopping migration and illegal working.
Which is bullsh*t
-
1
-
-
Israel blames Starmer after synagogue terror attack
Suspect shot dead after killing two people in car and knife rampage at Yom Kippur service in ManchesterSnip
As news of the outrage spread, Gideon Sa’ar, the Israeli foreign affairs minister, issued a scathing statement blaming the British Government for allowing anti-Jewish hatred to take hold and flourish.
Posting on X, he wrote: “The truth must be told: blatant and rampant anti-Semitic and anti-Israeli incitement, as well as calls of support for terror, have recently become a widespread phenomenon in the streets of London, in cities across Britain, and on its campuses.
Snip
But in what appeared to be a further criticism of Sir Keir, Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel’s prime minister, wrote on X: “As I warned at the UN: weakness in the face of terrorism only brings more terrorism. Only strength and unity can defeat it.”
At the United Nations, Mr Netanyahu addressed world leaders, including Sir Keir, who had just recognised a Palestinian state, telling them: “You can’t appease your way out of jihad, and you won’t escape the Islamist storm by sacrificing Israel. To overcome that storm, you have to stand with Israel. But that’s not what you’re doing.”
From Telegraph
The name of the attacker was 'Jihad'
Jihad Al-Shamie
-
Be surprised if we don't see a call for a vote of confidence in Parliament tomorrow.
-
Suicide belt-wearing' Manchester attacker WAS an Islamist terrorist, it can be revealed
A knifeman who went on a 'barbaric' rampage slaughtering two people at a synagogue is an Islamist terrorist, it can now be revealed.
Snip
Speaking in Manchester tonight near the synagogue, Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood said she was 'horrified by the antisemitic terrorist attack'.
'My prayers are with the victims and the families of all of those who are murdered here today,' she said.
-
Our home secretary.
-
1 hour ago, Anti Facts Sir said:
Quite what makes those stabbed today more deserving of outrage and emergency response....?
They thought he had a bomb, are you talking about street violence or people walking into churches and stabbing kids?
There is a difference.
-
1
-
-
Starmer’s hysterical demonisation of Farage will only help propel Reform to power
So long as the Reform leader continues to stand up to genuine racists and extremists, his advance to No 10 appears unstoppableWelcome to Sir Keir Starmer’s Britain, home of post-truth politics. Rattled, desperate and staring extinction in the face, the Labour Party has given up on any last semblance of morality, any residual commitment to distinguishing right from wrong.
From now on, the ends justify the means, however demeaning. Starmer, leading by example, appears to have authorised his supporters to say anything, however false or inflammatory, however dehumanising or ad hominem, to damage Nigel Farage, now officially the Left’s political enemy number one. It’s the politics of the gutter, a detestable, unforgivable normalisation of a culture of lying, just weeks after Charlie Kirk’s murder. One doesn’t have to be a Reform member to be aghast at this shattering of our democratic norms, or to be outraged that the Government has cut Farage’s security detail.
Starmer’s final roll of the dice has unleashed a carnival of smears against the Reform leader, including a toxic reductio ad Hitlerum, accusations that his immigration policy is racist, that he himself is “almost worse than that” (according to the Home Secretary), and a dishonest conflation of the views of genuinely hateful fringe maniacs at the extremes of our society with those of Farage. The Left’s knee-jerk response to attempts at limiting immigration has always been to cry “racist”, but this feels more sinister than usual.
One Labour MP claimed, irresponsibly, that Reform wants to “deport half the wonderful people who work in [the NHS].” Starmer himself described the small boats crossing the Channel with illegal migrants as “Farage boats”, claiming wrongly that the crisis has been caused by Brexit.
From the Telegraph
Starmer and his Government have stocked the flames of hate, they've polarized people.
Starmer is not fit to lead, the Home Secretary is not fit for her position.
To see a British government descend to the depths these people have, paying fake protestors, labeling huge crowds as 'racist', recognizing a terrorist controlled state, smear tactics with false accusations, from ethnic minority ministers who should know better, it's hard to see how this can end well.
Starmer and Labour have vowed to fight to change our country, but they don't tell us what it will look like other than we'll be 'decent' and 'fair' and presumably not racist anymore.
Because according to Labour large parts of the general public are racist.
-
1
-
-
White privilege
White privilege, or white skin privilege, is the societal privilege that benefits white people over non-white people in some societies, particularly if they are otherwise under the same social, political, or economic circumstances.[1][2]With roots in European colonialism and imperialism,[3] and the Atlantic slave trade, white privilege has developed[4] in circumstances that have broadly sought to protect white racial privileges,[5] various national citizenships, and other rights or special benefits.[6][7]
Link - https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_privilege
The NHS has been a special benefit for white people in Britain for a long time.
Many hospitals were built during British colonial and Imperial times.
As a National service It mainly served white British citizens, for a long time.
No other country has a National Health service like the NHS.
The NHS is an example of white privilege.
The NHS is a racist institution.
If you use or work for the NHS, without acknowledging your white privilege, you are racist.
Prove me wrong.
Remember, we are Globalists now, Multicultural and inclusive.
Nationalist's are racists.
Anything benefitting from colonial times must be torn down.
So under our new Global status, why should WE have an NHS?
Why should we have that special benefit when others don't?
How does having a special benefit within our nation, that others of similar economic and social systems do not, how can it not be white privilege and hence racist?
-
1
-
Rapist who 'married' a 15-year-old girl in sharia law ceremony attended by her social worker is jailed alongside seven other grooming gang members for a combined 91 years
in Today's News
Posted
Yeah, it's finished, it's run it's course and here we are, like Rome.
The leaders fiddle, and now lie and focus on political ideology rather than the fundamental problems with our system.
We view the extremes as normality.
Lying political leaders, corrupt businesses and media, so many laws legislating everything and yet nothing gets fixed.
Broken economies, traditions and nations.
So it is finished.
My belief is that a new world will rise from the ashes.
It mustn't be 'their' world.
Our leaders, political, business and scientific have shown they are incapable of building a world we want to live in.
Saw a Muslim immigrant on TV, she was given a converted shipping container as temporary accommodation.
She was complaining it wasn't good enough and it wasn't large enough to bring her family over. We must do better.
Meanwhile there are ex service men on the streets in the cold and many others homeless.
And look what those same 'morally superior' Islamic folk do to our people and young girls.
But we're racist if we complain.
I want to know who this social worker was - a crazy liberal lefties or a Muslim.
I can't see it being any other type. An atheist would not watch a 15 year old married into a religion. I can't believe that, for a social worker to witness that, they are deluded lefties or Muslim.
Either way, that is supposed to be our 'Care' system.
Again, this is an example of why this world is finished, these extremes are somehow normal.
Our care system can take a girl from her parents and hand her over to rapists instead!
I mean WTF!
But what is happening to the care system, social worker and grooming gangs as a result?
London Mayor Khan refuses to acknowledge or answer questions about grooming gangs
Care system does not change, social worker not charged.
Starner and Mahmood will tell us to be tolerant or we're racist. While writing up a new Islamophobia law allowing prosecution of anyone who criticizes and tell the public its on the name of decency and tolerance.
Then we'll get a speech that mistakes happen but they are working to fix it by introducing anti whistleblower laws so we won't have to hear about it in the media.
I don't think the people are going to take this crap much longer.
Starmer had unwittingly exposed all this injustice, corruption, political tactics and a broken system with political leaders who feel they are above the common people and should prioritize businesses regardless of the damage they do.
Sorry for the rant.