pi3141

Revealed: Keir Starmer edited manual on interpreting human rights laws that prevent Britain from deporting small boat migrants By HARRIET LINE, DEPUTY POLITICAL EDITOR 00:15 11 Sep 2025, updated 07:55 11 Sep 2025 Snip In the book, a copy of which was obtained by GB News, a sentence written by Sir Keir reads: 'Above all else, the HRA [Human Rights Act] represents a new way of thinking about law, politics and the relationship between public authorities and individuals. 'Its potential is enormous; its effectiveness depends on the combined willingness of all of us to approach decision-making from a human rights perspective.' The Prime Minister faced criticism last night for his failure to tackle migration. Reform UK leader Nigel Farage told GB News: 'Keir Starmer was a key figure in turning the Human Rights Act and ECHR into the overriding force in British law that it is today. He says he wants to reform human rights laws but he wrote the how-to manual on how to use human rights laws.' Snip The report states: 'The ECHR has mutated from a shield against tyranny into a sword against sovereignty, often wielded to frustrate democratic government, override parliamentary intent, and paralyse effective policymaking on the most sensitive questions of law, borders, and national security.' Link - https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15086583/Keir-Starmer-edited-manual-human-rights-laws.html Did we really need the Human Rights in our British society to be improved or strengthened by EHCR? I never felt oppressed before EHCR came in to effect. So now, we have to question, if neither Europe or Britain were run by oppressive regimes at the time, was these laws ever meant to improve our way of life? Or was it so the lawmakers and politicians had a new way, with legal cover, to renegotiate how power deals with us. The EU original statement was a triumph for the working people, but the changes, additions and implementation of it has ended in - The report states: 'The ECHR has mutated from a shield against tyranny into a sword against sovereignty, often wielded to frustrate democratic government, override parliamentary intent, and paralyse effective policymaking on the most sensitive questions of law, borders, and national security.'

Lloyds Bank becomes the latest ‘for profit’ registered social landlord May 29, 2025 Is shared ownership the new, secure investment product to replace ground rents? For profit social housing means profits go to shareholders, not to improve stock or build more (but then, like leasehold, tenants find there is nothing ‘shared’ when it comes to paying the bills) By Martin Boyd Martin is chair of LKP and the taxpayer-funded Leasehold Advisory Service Lloyds Bank has always been involved in many aspects of the property sector. They once found themselves in dispute with the Tchenguiz group over loans linked to ground rent investments. They have provided funds for developers, they have provided mortgages under various names and have owned various estate agency firms. In 2021 they entered the build to rent market and as of the start of May this year have become the latest in a line of new “for profit” social landlords. Lbg Equity Investments Ltd (LBGEIL) is a 100% subsidiary of the bank that in turn owns a set of subsidiaries some of which are now directly in the property market. LGEIL has a loan facility with the bank of £8 billion. In the past, it has been know as LB Mortgages Ltd and before that TSB Mortgages Ltd Citra Living Ltd, trading as Lloyds Living, is an LBGEIR subsidiary which now owns 3,500 rental homes. It now enters the marked as a for profit social landlord. Since 2021 Citra Living has purchased 50I homes from Barratts and in 2023 completed another purchase of 604 new homes at a cost of £168.4 million. Citra Living Ltd (CLL) borrowing facility with LBGEIL is £840 million of which £324 million has been drawn down leaving them with over half a billion to invest. CLL owns their properties via various subsidiaries: Citra Living Development (no1) Ltd -formed 2022 Citra Living Development (no2) Ltd -formed 2024 Citra Living Properties (No1) Ltd -formed 2021 Citra Living Properties (No2) Ltd – formed 2023 The ownership of the individual sites potentially sits under a further layer of subsidiaries such as Citra Living The Rise Cardiff Ltd, Citra Living Wharf Street Ltd etc but these companies have yet to file accounts. The ownership of Citra Living Broadside is less clear. This “entity has re-domiciled from Luxembourg to Jersey”; it uses the same mainland address as the Lloyds Bank and the other Citra Subsidiaries. It should also be noted that in 2024 Lloyds entered into agreement with Barratt and Lloyds Banking Group in a £150m joint venture with Homes England that will to build new homes. The combined venture, known as the MADE Partnership. Link - https://www.leaseholdknowledge.com/lloyds-bank-becomes-the-latest-for-profit-registered-social-landlord/ Apparently there 80 companies registered as for profit social landlords with agreements with house builders to buy new builds and probably agreements with government to house people. Profits funneled offshore. Seriously, we are sliding into facism, back to being serf's on the Land. Starmer said Labour is the party for business and the worker. Business first.

It's the start of facism. They don't care who they rent to, they'll be looking very long term. When they have 50000 homes they can bargain better insurance and home maintenance deals. I know Lloyds will insure themselves but what if Tesco get in on this. They'll call up Lloyd's offer them 50,000 homes to insure, all with same ovens, heating systems and rules to tenants. So they'll get cheaper insurance. Same as mortgages. They won't buy 1 house off a new build estate, they'll buy 10, or all of it. Get a deal on finance. Contract a maintenance company to handle all their properties. They won't care how much homes cost, if you look 100 or 200 years ahead, what's the rental yield. If this continues we'll all be renting from big businesses, working for big businesses, living in houses with identical restrictions. They could ban snakes as pets. Woks for cooking. They could implement any restrictions they choose on health and safety or insurance reasons. We will be told how to live by our employers. We will see houses never coming to market and if they do it'll 4 times what its worth because of the long-term rental potential to big business. Again, throw in an offshore company and all the wealth generated by that business is sucked out of our economy to unknown bank accounts. There would be zero accountability. Lloyds, by your side, until we're under their boot. This is corporate takeover. Again, where us the monopoly commission? Businesses should not have total influence over people's lives like a company should not be allowed to aggressively dominate a market. Labour are not who we think they are. They're just not, they do not represent the common worker.

Hallelujah to that.

This is the thing with Islam, they are very good at PR. Right now Palestinian women and girls can go to school, speak publicly and not wear a veil. But once they've cemented their control, it all changes.

Lloyds 'the landlord' signs another megadeal to build more rented homes Nigel Lewis June 12, 2025 Lloyds has taken the next step towards becoming one of the UK’s biggest private landlords by expanding its portfolio to more than 6,000 homes. The bank, which likes to say it's 'by your side' in its horse-heavy adverts, has for several years now been keen to be people's landlord too. Lloyds Living – the banking group’s property firm – has agreed another big property deal with Barratt Redrow, the UK’s largest housebuilder, as part of its build-to-rent partnership with the firm. The 598 two, three and four-bedroom single family homes will be in 11 new and existing Lloyds Living sites including Berkshire, Oxfordshire, Buckinghamshire, Kent, Cheshire and Gloucestershire. The first homes are expected to be available to rent from July in Abingdon, Finchampstead (main image) and Crewe, with the rest delivered by the end of 2027. Link - https://www.landlordzone.co.uk/news/lloyds-the-landlord-signs-another-megadeal-to-build-more-rented-homes What happened to the monopoly commission? Banks owning their customers homes and taking a cut from every card transaction and managing the wages paid in. Facism can be reduced to Corporate Rule. If banks are our landlords, off shore multinational companies our employers, it won't be good for us, let's put it that way. It made me laugh over the weekend in the news, Laura Kuensberg questioning Farage on his tax affairs and how they don't relate to normal people.... Coming from a BBC employee who encouraged all their employed talent to go Freelance so they could avoid tax. How many normal people Freelance at Tesco for tax purposes?

Can we reinstate the Rwanda plan? I'd really like to go.

In terms of her stance on Israel and Gaza, she has been seen with “Free Palestine” placards, including at a Palestine Solidarity Campaign rally, and she abstained on the vote to proscribe Palestine Action earlier in the summer. Her stance on Palestine Action will be in the spotlight now that she is taking over the helm from Yvette Cooper, who was responsible for the ban. Snip However, she has abstained from several key votes on Israel-Gaza related topics, including a Scottish National Party call for “Ceasefire in Occupied Gaza” Amendment in November 2023, a call for suspension of arms sales to Israel in March 2024, and she did not sign a letter urging the UK to uphold ICC arrest warrants against Israeli officials. Link - https://www.jpost.com/international/article-866646 Feels like we're in a cartoon now. On the one hand you could argue with her at the helm there can be no accusations of racism. On the other hand, a person's decision is largely based on personal experiences. If your atheist you'll default to science, religious and you'll default to religion. British or not she will feel a huge responsibility to help Muslims and be seen to be doing the right thing by Islam. That's not putting British first is it. A religious judge sitting on a case will always be guided by his faith. A politically ideological judge will always be influenced by their ideology. If women feel oppressed being forced to wear the veil or burka, come to the UK where there is the same sharia law, although not legally enforceable, and you can pressured into wearing the veil by the Muslim Council of Britain to conform with the same oppression you fled from. You could appeal to the Home secretary if you feel oppressed but they will tell you you should be a good Muslim and your free to follow your own interpretation of Islam while protecting the right of hardline Muslims to abuse and ostracise that person in their local community. That'll encourage social cohesion. Clown town. If the Muslim Council of Britain want to demand a city be under Islam with Sharia law so British Muslim are free to practice Islam without restrictions. In line with their human rights as laid out by EHCR, now is the time.

Yeah, knowingly or not, it looks like he'll push through questionable policies. He came as the voice of reason, but how did he get that platform in the first place.

This is exactly what's wrong with the world. Pagan horsesh*t.

It should do. But i bet your right.

Armed Forces called in to 'restore UK's borders' and close migrant hotels The Defence Secretary says the Armed Forces have been drafted in to help 'restore control of our borders'. By Michael Knowles, Home Affairs and Defence Editor 10:51, Sun, Sep 7, 2025 Updated: 14:39, Sun, Sep 7, 2025 Military planners are scrambling to find barracks to house asylum seekers and “accelerate” the closure of migrant hotels, John Healey has confirmed. The Defence Secretary said the Armed Forces have been drafted in to help “restore control of our borders”. Snip An estimated 1,000 people arrived in the UK by small boat over the course of yesterday (Saturday) and French authorities said 24 people were rescued while trying to cross the Channel. Link - https://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/2105420/Migrants-hotel-asylum-seekers-Healey-Labour-crisis A 1000 people in a day. 365 days a year. They lost control of borders 4 or 5 years ago. It's been happening since 2014. Small numbers at first, with women and children. We remember the tragedies. Nobody argued if women and children were drowning trying to reach our shores, it meant they must need our help. Desperate for our help. Now it's all young men. 1000 a day.

Starmer to move migrants to military barracks to face down Farage threat 08:27, 07 Sep 2025, updated 12:36, 07 Sep 2025 By GREG HEFFER, POLITICAL CORRESPONDENT and CAMERON ROY iKeir Starmer is ready to move Channel migrants to former military barracks to ward off the threat posed by Nigel Farage. The Prime Minister has told his reshuffled Cabinet to 'go up a gear' after making sweeping changes to his ministerial ranks following Angela Rayner's resignation on Friday. Link - https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15074065/Panicking-Keir-Starmer-ready-leave-Labour-MPs-feeling-queasy-human-rights-overhaul-asylum-seekers-barracks-bid-ward-Nigel-Farage-threat.html FFS Thousands of men of unknown backgrounds of fighting age to be put up in former military barracks, in other words, a stronghold. That's a clever idea. Some military guy in the states is saying extreme Islam is simple to understand, they want the destruction of Israel and a worldwide Islamic caliphate under Sharia Law, everybody converts to Islam or is put to death. It's a simple ideology that all Muslims are aware of. The conflict to force change is called Jihad and is a prophetic war among Muslim and infidels or unbelievers that they believe will happen. They just waiting for the signs like Christian rapturists to signal end times and the start of Jihad. Putting 100's of thousands of men with these beliefs in areas they can secure and defend is totally stupid. If China and Russia give the nod, Iran will declare Jihad and every Muslim in the world knows they are to forcefully conquer all infidels and unbelievers and instigate Islamic rule wherever they are.

Capitalism. Always go after highest profit. It distorts our society. If it was used wisely we'd be ok, but they just can't help themselves. Look at Rayner, as soon as she had the chance, she abandoned her principles and sought out tax avoidance to grow her wealth. Starmer's free glasses. Erosion of workers rights to zero hour contracts and outsourced or agency personnel so the company has no obligations to its staff. Microsoft for instance, virtually all freelancers who sign away rights to code or solutions they invented and are on fixed term contracts with no guarantees. The drive for ever more profit over social and environmental cohesive policies is killing us all.

Yes I agree. I think this is being used to prop up a failing economy. House prices have been out of control for decades. Everyone believed they were getting wealthier. Well yes that was true, but if when the time comes to sell nobody can afford to buy your house, then what. We've seen the economics of outsourcing as a savior to a declining economy. That was false. We've seen property changed from a home to an income stream. Our economic wealth has been artificially inflated and now the best game in town is be a landlord for the government. The tax payer gives the government money and the government give it to outsourced councils, outsourced landlords and outsourced military and energy providers and outsourced council workers like dustbin collectors. Labour want more people to invest in stocks and shares to boost the economy and supplement our earnings. In other words we'll pay you a little bit but if you invest it with us you'll get a liveable wage. If you lose it..... We won’t own houses, rent it from a private landlord paid by the tax payer. If you own it put it in trust so you don't technically own it for tax purposes. Buy or rather lease your car on PPI. Pay per mile to drive. Which we already do because fuel is taxed, so the more you drive, the more tax you pay. There's nothing left to inflate, nothing left to outsource or sell off, not much left to tax. Houses can't get much more expensive and builders have used all the ways to make them cheap and barely suitable. If you buy a new home with garage, chances are you won't fit a car in the garage, cheaper to build them smaller but higher price for property if it has one. That's if you can buy the house, now they sell leasehold so they can claim it back and sell it again in the future.

Saw this, putting it here. It's within the threads direction of ineptitude. In 2009, the paedophile, Jimmy Savile was interviewed under caution by police in Surrey and Sussex. Subsequently, the police referred 4 cases to the CPS alleging that Savile had raped at least three learning disabled girls under the age of 16. The CPS, after receiving the files from the police, refused to prosecute Savile, and dropped the claim, citing 'insufficient evidence'.. After Savile's death, and despite multiple attempts at high level cover ups, we now know he abused at least 500 known victims over a four decade period. Why am I sharing this with you? Why should you even be interested? Because the man in charge of the CPS at the time. The man that decided that there was 'insufficient evidence' to charge Saville, is now the 'leader' of the UK Labour government Party. 'Sir' Keir Starmer..

Japan Builds Coin-Sized Generator That Pulls Power from Air September 1, 2025 MSM Riham Japan has unveiled a breakthrough that could reshape the way we think about energy. Engineers at Kyoto University have developed a coin-sized generator that harvests electricity from moisture in the air. Unlike solar panels or turbines, this tiny device works 24/7, rain or shine, producing a continuous flow of clean power. The secret lies in a layered nanofilm that absorbs water vapor and converts it into an electric current. Early field tests in Southeast Asia’s rice paddies proved the generator could power sensors and transmitters for months without maintenance—an achievement that traditional batteries or solar setups often fail to match. Public reaction has been filled with awe, with many calling it a glimpse of the future. Energy analysts say the technology could be revolutionary for remote communities, disaster relief, or even wearable tech. One social media user described it as “free Wi-Fi energy, but for electricity.” If scaled up, this technology could transform walls, tents, or even clothes into self-powered systems—quietly drawing energy from the environment around them. Imagine a world where charging your phone or running small electronics doesn’t depend on outlets at all. The age of electricity from thin air might be closer than we think. Link - https://geeksaroundglobe.com/japan-builds-coin-sized-generator-that-pulls-power-from-air/ Hope this is true.

As billions are spent buying up flats and houses for asylum seekers, with locals moved out... How long until a group of small boat migrants are moved into a home in your street? A special report by SUE REID 00:03, 06 Sep 2025, updated 10:20, 06 Sep 2025 By SUE REID At the heart of a seaside town on Lincolnshire's east coast, three big Victorian houses stand just a few yards from each other on the same long road. Until recently, they contained flats for Skegness people of all ages who paid £500 or so a month to live in them. Today all that has changed. The former renters are no longer there. The new residents, we have discovered, are 21 young Somali and Afghan men, some fresh off the Channel boats, who told the Daily Mail – as they smoked cigarettes in the gardens – of their delight at having a free roof in their newly adopted country. If this sounds an extraordinary reversal of fortunes for Skegness locals, it is a microcosm of what is happening across the country. In a giant snub to British people, a secretive government operation is under way to scatter thousands of asylum seekers (and some genuine refugees) across working-class communities, leafy suburban avenues, historic market towns and even in £450,000 new-build houses on smart private housing estates bought with taxpayers' money. Faced with fierce, flag-waving public rebellion over the thousands still in 200 migrant hotels, the Home Office has now switched strategy. Whitehall mandarins are under orders to give the newcomers, including young foreign men under the age of 30, homes on our streets instead. This Daily Mail investigation shows that the landscape of Britain is being changed in real time. What has been dubbed 'Operation Scatter' by social media critics is likely to be the next flashpoint in the furore now rocking the country over uncontrolled immigration and unguarded national borders. The Home Office refused to answer the simplest of questions: we asked how many houses in multi-occupation (HMOs), like those in Skegness, are being given by the Government to migrants who have been moved from hotels or have recently arrived on our shores. Then, in a dark moment for freedom of speech, the Home Office demanded I send its media department the headline for this article before publication. I was also asked to provide the theme of our investigation, including any criticisms it might be making. When I refused (I had merely asked for one set of figures), saying that I doubted any British newspaper would agree to this demand, the response was: 'You'd be surprised.' My Home Office conversation made it crystal clear that migrant housing is a highly sensitive issue for Sir Keir Starmer's regime. It is already struggling to accommodate 300,000 asylum seekers – many of them economic migrants blatantly cheating the system – who are waiting for a verdict on their initial claims or appeals. Arriving, too, are thousands of Afghans (and soon it will be Gazans) who might be deserving but are also lured by generous resettlement programmes offered by the UK despite our deep financial woes. We travelled the country to find out whether or not so-called Operation Scatter really does give preference to foreign newcomers while a total of 1.4 million households in England and Wales languish, sometimes for years, on council or social housing waiting lists. First stop was an East Sussex housing estate, near a pretty lake, with two pristine homes, where many Britons would love to live. Both are owned by the local Wealden District Council, which bought them for a total of £825,000 in October last year to house Afghan families. This council has twice refused to tell the Daily Mail the total number of properties, including HMOs, it has bought or made available for migrants and refugees. In February this year, it had almost 1,300 households, many of them local families, on its waiting list. Yet we know through government Land Registry records that the lakeside new-builds were purchased for £375,000 and £450,000 – with the council named as the proprietors of both. A four-hour drive north brings us to a terraced house in a cul-de-sac in the port of Grimsby, Lincolnshire. Worth £85,000 on the open market, according to local estate agents, it is perfectly priced for first-time buyers or a young family with children. But that's off the cards. According to the Land Registry, the four-bedroom property is leased for the next seven years to Mears, one of the Government's three giant providers of immigration housing. The other two biggest firms are Clearsprings Ready Homes and Serco. Like Mears, they have been awarded multi-billion-pound contracts signed off by the Tories. This house in Grimsby is home to three young migrant men, two Afghans and a Yemeni. One has recently come in on a Channel boat. Another has moved from a Sheffield hotel facing a wind-down. Abdul, from Afghanistan, told me he is appealing his failed asylum claim and hopes to bring his mother to Britain. He said she 'doesn't like having her face covered with a veil' in a country now ruled by the Taliban. But it's in Skegness where we find one of the most glaring examples of Operation Scatter's injustice. When I visited the three Victorian houses occupied by Afghan and Somali men living rent-free, I did a search of the official records, including Companies House, the Government's register of British businesses. I discovered that these properties were bought last year by a local firm which installed new kitchens, garden security lights, fences and freshly painted front doors – after the previous residents were told to leave by their landlord. The lucky new residents – asylum seekers, failed asylum seekers and three who told me they are student visa overstayers – are delighted to be allocated houses in Britain. 'I am so pleased,' said one 29-year-old Afghan man when we chatted at the window of the biggest of the houses, which was sold at auction for £120,000 last year through property giants Savills. He struggled with English so we used a translation app on his mobile phone to understand each other. 'Asylum? I hope for that and now I wait for the result,' he said. 'Your country gives me a living allowance. I am no rent. I only leave Skegness when I travel to London to see my immigration lawyer who is dealing with my case.' Further south in a commuter town, a half-hour train ride from London, we discovered a three-bedroom house with a large garden and off-street parking. It's conservatively estimated to be worth £350,000, say estate agents. This week, a local council allocated it to an Afghan family through a government-sponsored refugee settlement programme. Electoral records show that, until earlier this year, it was home to five adults, including a woman of 70. These people had English-sounding names including Smith. It is unclear whether the council has bought the property or if it was already on its books as a rental property for social housing. The Daily Mail has chosen not to identify the council concerned or the address of this house. But on Tuesday, the family was delivered to its new home in a people carrier. The mother, in a hijab, used her mobile phone to film one of the children running excitedly up the steps into their new home. The properties we identified this week are housing 35 people and are worth at least £2million. Yet they are only a snapshot of a fast-moving situation as migrants begin to leave the 200 remaining hotels still costing us £5million a day. Nearly 29,000 have arrived this year on Channel boats, according to the BBC. More than 50,000 have reached these shores since Labour came to power. Angela Rayner, until yesterday the housing secretary, has said all of Britain must take a fair share of newcomers. Last month, she said social housing should be allocated to migrants as well as to long-term British residents. At a contentious Court of Appeal hearing last month, the Home Office thwarted an earlier injunction ending migrants' stays at The Bell Hotel in Epping, a ruling that provoked yet more protests. The public mood worsened when Bridget Phillipson, the Education Secretary, said the Home Office had a duty to protect asylum seekers from destitution. Their wellbeing, she made clear to Sky News, outweighed the safety concerns of local communities who believe, after a spate of sex attacks, that young foreign men on our streets and in our hotels are a danger to girls and women. Yet on the Government goes, deaf, it seems, to the mounting concerns. Earlier this year, the Home Office issued a clarion call for 5,000 properties in order to house up to 20,000 migrants. Ministers now plan to expand existing deals with councils to buy, lease or rent properties with at least two bedrooms to house, on average, four migrants each. Government contractor Serco has already issued an urgent appeal to private landlords to help provide accommodation. 'We are responsible for 30,000 asylum seekers in an ever-growing portfolio of 7,000 properties,' it chirruped during a national campaign last year. 'Our operation model is based on leasing from landlords, investors and property agents with Serco acting as the tenant.' According to the Home Office, nearly 70,000 migrants are already in private or council accommodation, which includes the properties found by the Daily Mail. Four townhouses for migrants have also come to light in a Suffolk village. They have been bought by the local council for £300,000 each and include ensuite bathrooms, underfloor heating and electric vehicle charging points. At one lovely bungalow in a seaside resort – sold in 2023 for £195,000 to Hong Kong investors when the owner, a pensioner, died – we found migrants living there for short periods before they are relocated by the Government. A neighbour said: 'Migrants were in there very recently. One man went out every day to work at the local car wash. This lovely bungalow was cared for by the pensioner, now it looks tired with the garden overgrown. The empty spells [between migrants] are wasted money because the landlord's rent has to be paid using our tax.' The upshot is that discontent is spreading. It is not only so-called Right-wing rabble-rousers and the women's protest group Pink Ladies who are demanding an end to the crisis. In Portsmouth, Reform councillors say 55 HMOs now house hundreds of migrants – even though the council was never informed about the migrants' existence by central government. The situation was only discovered when constituents complained to city hall that they were being evicted from their rental homes. An inquiry found landlords had signed lucrative contracts with government immigration housing providers – and got rid of their existing tenants to make way for the new arrivals. In Labour-run Basildon, Essex, the council has voted to rigorously vet all the HMOs on their patch. Highlighting public disquiet, council leader Gavin Callaghan wrote a hard-hitting article on the Socialist-leaning Left Foot Forward website warning that 'raw emotion' is sweeping working-class communities due to the 'unfair' policy of helping migrants jump the queue. He wrote that 'charlatan operators, including Mears, Serco and Clearsprings', are going 'door to door, asking private landlords to evict local families who have paid their rent for years so that their property can be converted into asylum-seeker HMOs. 'Overnight, a landlord can go from earning £22,000 to £60,000 a year in rent,' he said. A family of four or five can suddenly find themselves homeless. 'They turn up at the council, desperate,' said Cllr Callaghan. 'We stick them in temporary accommodation, often a single hotel room miles away from the schools, jobs and community they know. 'Meanwhile, they watch their family home handed over to six, seven, eight men who have just got off a small boat and are awaiting an asylum decision. If that doesn't make your blood boil, nothing will.' Link - https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15070869/billions-spent-buying-flats-houses-asylum-seekers-special-report-SUE-REID.html So an Afghan asylum seeker can possibly bring his mum over because she doesn't like being made to wear a veil, he'll probably argue it's against her Islamic beliefs and human rights, our government will give sanctuary to the oppressed lady while watching thousands of women being told to wear the veil on our own streets. What will happen when a Muslim mayor demands the government back the hijab or veil in Islamic areas and force asylum seekers given asylum because they reject the veil to wear it here to conform with their British Islamic neighbors who do follow an extreme interpretation of Islam and Sharia Law like they do in Afghanistan? This situation is indefensible. We give sanctuary to people fleeing oppression from extreme Islam while giving extreme Islam a legally protected space in our society. Does that make sense to anybody? We are seeing the rise of extreme or ridiculous situations because of our laws and policies.

So where did the story come from? And why.

Greens elect as new leader an ex-hypnotherapist who said he could help women increase the size of their breasts using their minds By DAVID WILCOCK, DEPUTY POLITICAL EDITOR 11:19 02 Sep 2025, updated 13:32 02 Sep 2025 Snip He also said his party would 'take on power and wealth' in the UK. 'We listen to the poorest communities, whether the migrant communities, disabled communities, the trans community, working-class communities, whoever needs us to have their back, we will be there. 'We will be there to amplify their voices, to listen to the most marginalised and minority communities, to speak with them, not for them, and challenge truth to power, to take on power and wealth in this country.' Link - https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15057483/Green-Party-boob-whisperer-Zack-Polanski-new-leader-Corbyn.html So in other words, they are not there for the majority, they are there to put the rights of the minority over the majority, the rights if immigrants over the population. They will offer net zero solutions far worse than anything Miliband can dream of. They will use minority views to suppress the majority as we have seen with previous governments but these people will turbo charge it because they are advertising their party as intending to specifically put rights og minorities over the majority. As far as science is concerned, these oeople don't have a clue. Seriously deluded and dangerous people. God help us if they get into power, everything Labour or rather Fabian society is trying to do slowly and by stealth, the Green's will unashamedly roll out at lightning speed. Their academic people are corrupt - don't forget that government advisor who worked at a university ripping down posters protesting liw traffic neighborhoods because she lived there and advised the government LTN's are the greatest thing. They are corrupt, ideological dangerous and scientifically inept people. And that's not even taking into account economic or military policies.