Jump to content

bflat

Members
  • Posts

    601
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by bflat

  1. I actually feel pretty handcuffed on what I can even say here, but it would be great if this could somehow get to David. @GarethIcke?
  2. Look up "replicable." And see the post you literally just quoted. I literally just described the method, as this must be done so those who follow can, in fact, have a chance to either replicate or not replicate the results. Keep in mind, the results will be the raw footage timestamped side-by-side. I hate giving ammo to nasa trolls, but I have issues both with Eric and also his idiot mod who goes by shpankme (or something close). Eric was the guy who gave us the Zetetics and all of their work, but how the hell did he even learn of it? And I love his presentations, but his idea of a research forum is far different than mine. Dude? We in?
  3. Hi, Theo, it's been too long, lol. This is for observational purposes that can then be replicated. That is all.
  4. Folks, why would they have to continue to fake the 24 hour sun if it existed? Think!
  5. γνῶθι σεαυτόν or "Know thyself" is probably the most famous of the Delphic maxims. It was first attributed to the Greek god, Apollo. Apollo was their god of music, harmony and light. γνῶθι σεαυτόν was carved into the entrance of the temple named for Apollo at Delphi, centuries before Christ.
  6. Trolling a fake moon landing thread with off topic idiocy? Golly gee, who would do that? Who benefits perhaps? @Messenger, It's not like a "former scientist for Lockheed Martin" could possibly be controlled opposition. You funny! Deathbed confession... hah!
  7. Oh, this is getting exciting! Here's my plan. We need to sink up on four days, both the following two equinoxes and the two solstices. That would be ideal. If you could just be available for the solstices, that would be fine as well. We need to set our cameras up identically, angled up at 180 degrees. We will use spirit levels to make sure our lenses are pointed correctly. On the next available of the four (or two) days: Or very close to the above we will start recording just prior to first light and we will stop recording just after darkness. That's really it. I will then put the two shots together in one video, side-by-side, and we'll compare. What say you?
  8. Sorry to our ufo, ssp believers, but space, as this [near] "infinite vacuum" is 100% a man made construct. CHANGE MY MIND! If this can be done without the use of logical fallacies such as, but not limited to: Argument from authority - Wikipedia <---You can't just freemasons say this is true Fallacies of Presumption <---You can't assume something NOT PROVEN and then base everything off that Reification (fallacy) - Wikipedia <---YOU CAN'T MAKE SOMETHING UP AND TREAT IT AS REAL False premise - Wikipedia <---Obvious (at least should be) False equivalence is a logical fallacy in which an equivalence is drawn between two subjects based on flawed or false reasoning. I will be the first to admit that I was wrong. Keep in mind: Fallacy... a failure in reasoning which renders an argument invalid Good luck!
  9. If you could only leave out your crazy, because some of your other thoughts seem spot on.
  10. For anyone interested in this topic, please give yourself about seven minutes to watch this video: Bottom line? This is exactly what we see in all their fake, purposely deceptive videos claiming a 24 hour Sun!
  11. @Basket Case I was just wondering if you've had the time to ask any young child, or several hopefully, about our little discussion here. I'm guessing they all got it, yes?
  12. Has anyone posted even a shred of evidence that Antarctica exists as a continent at the bottom of a ball? As far as I know, the only man who has crossed Antarctica and lived to tell about it, Admiral Byrd, one of the most respected explorers our world has ever seen, claimed that when he accomplished this rare feat, he saw a continent the size of America that no other man had ever seen. Please just think on that... if even for a moment.
  13. Why is there no evidence that any of these programs exist? I, for the life of me, cannot figure out who but nasa, freemason shills would promote such ideas, or those who simply fell for it.
  14. Please stop being so damn sensitive. It is hardly insulting. Ask any child what happens when you blow up a balloon, pinch the end with your fingers so the air remains trapped, and then let go. Children get this. I promise! You have been "politely" trolling. It is passive aggressive and useless. Whether you can get this or not is not even important, ut these ridiculously off topic posts only come in bunches after you guys are getting beaten over the head with horizons that are IMPOSSIBLE ON YOUR BALL and more recently the obvious problems with EMERGENCY LANDINGS. These are two of the five points from the OP that still have not been touched on in any reasonable way. The plethora of trolling is unmistakable and sad. Totally different and this shows your bias perfectly. Multiple posters mention anti-gravity tech and there is not one damn thread for this! How is this NOT trolling? You are completely misrepresenting a picture that we all can see. There is a valve there and pressure gauges on top that show clearly how the 2nd law works when a physical barrier is removed. Equilibrium, as I have been explaining is the ONLY possibility. I covered this, how is this not trolling? YES! Again... EXACTLY! Equilibrium, as I have been explaining is the ONLY possibility. <---- physical law - cannot be broken
  15. Any of y'all familiar with this speech knows how important it is. For those who have taken the deep dive into this topic and have never seen this, you will soon know why. I will be posting two links. The first is known as the "full" version and is the actual speech. The second is known as the "safe" version, The link is for anyone concerned that they, themselves may be a victim and possibly triggered. I came across this years ago. I shed many tears as I read this. I suggest reading it in parts as it is quite long and amazingly detailed. Good luck. Herein is the lecture by D.C.Hammond, originally entitled "Hypnosis in MPD: Ritual Abuse," but now usually known as the "Greenbaum Speech," delivered at the Fourth Annual Eastern Regional Conference on Abuse and Multiple Personality, Thursday June 25, 1992, at the Radisson Plaza Hotel, Mark Center, Alexandria, Virginia.... Full version here: http://tinet.nl/public/browse-online/raven1-eleanor-white/grenfull.htm Safe version here: http://tinet.nl/public/browse-online/raven1-eleanor-white/grensafe.htm
  16. RE: Why would a mod come on here to explain away a physical law, let alone something that is obvious to young children? And to be clear, this same mod deleted the thread where members were posting evidence regarding anti-gravity tech. Crap! The 2nd law cares of containers NOT. It simply explains what happens when different pressure systems sit next to each other with no firm barrier. Exactly! Whatever you say, but this has nothing to do with how EVERY pressure gradient MUST find equilibrium. BS The 2nd law is universal and unchangeable until you show us!
  17. Hey, thanks for responding, but this post is riddled with misunderstandings. 1) No one has claimed "a suck effect;" we are talking about two barrierless pressure systems reaching equilibrium as they must do based on the second law. It is not a hypothesis or a theory like gravity. It is a scientific law and I believe where the confusion lies is here. In our everyday life we know that laws can be and even are constantly broken. This DOES NOT work with scientific LAWS. THEY CANNOT BE BROKEN (by definition). 2) Deep space, as mentioned several times is claimed to be a 10^-17 torr vacuum. What torr is this imagined exosphere? And why does it not reach equilibrium with our supposed "infinite vacuum of space?" 3) The 2nd law does not care how infinitesimal the difference seems to you. The fact is that equilibrium must be reached.
  18. This is from a teaching link: Energy flows from a higher pressure to a lower pressure (expansion). https://www.ftexploring.com/energy/2nd_Law.html
×
×
  • Create New...