Jump to content

Ed8

Members
  • Posts

    108
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Ed8

  1. I did search it - not a single news article. Looked at her Facebook - she's been posting since last week. Not a single comment on any of her facebook posts about condolences. It's important to me because there's so much fake shit out there (especially in the telegram groups you refer to) and this forum seems to sift through that BS (for the most part). So the way it works is you post things that are true or provide the source when that truth is uncertain. Don't copy and paste random crap from telegram groups and pass it off as fact. And if you do post fake news, at least have the decency to retract it, rather than defend it.
  2. Sorry but if you're gonna post stuff in the forum at least cite your sources and maybe check it's legit.
  3. Source? She posted only last week and looks alive to me. https://m.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1311852590
  4. If the vaccines cause pathogenic priming, wouldn't we expect people's antibodies to be dangerously off the scale when encountered with a new virus, rather than being much lower?
  5. I've just read the original paper, found here: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)01290-3/fulltext#sec1 Everyone on the study had received at least one dose of the Pfizer vaccine, so there was no control group. The study also found that those who had two doses produced more antibodies: "In the case of single-dose recipients, our data show that NAbTs are significantly lower against B.1.617.2 and B.1.351 VOCs relative to B.1.1.7, implying that although a single dose might still afford considerably more protection than no vaccination, single-dose recipients are likely to be less protected against these SARS-CoV-2 variants. These data therefore suggest that the benefits of delaying the second dose, in terms of wider population coverage and increased individual NAbTs after the second dose, 7 must now be weighed against decreased efficacy in the short-term, in the context of the spread of B.1.617.2. Worldwide, our data highlight the ongoing need to increase vaccine supply to allow all countries to extend second-dose protection as quickly as possible." Putting the video into context, the guy means antibodies were 5.8x lower against the Delta variant when compared to the original Covid-19. He's not saying the vaccines don't work or are harmful. Basically they're lining Everyone for top ups and boosters.
  6. Would be good to understand further context behind this study, but if it is what I think then yes, it does seem that all vaxxed are now immunodeficient?
  7. I understand what you're saying but it's not a question of IQ with these people. It's something else. The woman I used to sit next to at work, who I spent 8 hours a day with since the start of the fake pandemic, I used to send her loads of info trying to wake her up, point out inconsistencies in the narrative, direct her to statistics which showed it to be a scam, everything. Not only did none of it get through, but she actually ended up volunteering at a vax centre! She's a smart woman in every other respect, good at her job etc. So it's not IQ. It's more an unwavering belief that the government has people's best interests at heart. I don't think the spell can be broken with these people. Needless to say it was very draining and disheartening seeing everything I told her and everything I sent hit a brick wall. Thankfully all my close family have thus far refused the jab, so my efforts are better placed continuing to support them and others that have refused. I've started a local SITP group. A lot of refusers are feeling heat to get jabbed, be it from family or work, so i think it's important that they have people around them so they feel supported. Know they are not alone and lift each others energies. The double jabbed though, are lost causes.
  8. Aren't we past the point of waking people up now? If you've been double jabbed then the deed is done - it's the ultimate submission to the agenda. Only severe injury could possibly turn them (and even then it's unlikely). We've had a year and a half of this now and if you've been double jabbed then you've had your chance to research, ignored the warnings and chosen your side. What's the point in engaging with them? It really just brings down your own energy. Only worthwhile engaging with those who have thus far refused the jab imo. Strengthening their resolve, giving them support and resources to continue to resist.
  9. https://www.doncasterccg.nhs.uk/your-care/coronavirus-latest-news-and-information/covid-19-vaccine/?doing_wp_cron=1610721513.2385270595550537109375
  10. I don't think they're scum, but I'm not too bothered about them either. For example, take a loyal, friendly, intelligent dog who always try to show kindness and do the right thing - may be the family best friend. Then take your standard double jabbed, double masked NPC, the kind that comes up to you in a shop hassling you about masks and comments on Facebook calling for vax passports. Who of these two would you rather live? The latter are a menace to society and humanity?
  11. On the subject of ADE, its Winter in Uruguay and Chile now (although not particularly harsh Winters) and about 50% of their countries are vaccinated. https://www.forbes.com/sites/roberthart/2021/05/29/some-countries-with-the-highest-vaccination-rates-are-facing-a-surge-in-covid-deaths-and-infectionsexperts-say-complacency-is-partly-to-blame/ "Uruguay has endured the highest Covid-19 death rate in the world per capita for several weeks, despite having one of the world’s most successful inoculation drives, a common situation in a number of other highly vaccinated countries like Bahrain and the Maldives."
  12. All the evidence thus far, suggests to me that the vaxxed will be depopulated. This recently from Dolores Cahill repeating what she has said previously about ADE: I agree it seems counterintuitive to destroy those loyal to the govt and their agenda, but as we have all seen, the vaxxed are the elderly, the disabled, the painfully feeble-minded - TPTB have no use for them.
  13. https://www.ukcolumn.org/community/forums/topic/china-belief-re-pregnancy-after-vax/
  14. I think you're right. We see in Israel and large swathes of America now, they have dropped nearly all the restrictions. Nauseating propaganda pieces from over there suggest things will get close to normal for us from 19th July I suspect the narrative will be that vaccines have broken the link between infections and hospitalisations. However, I don't think this will be the end of it. They still need to vaccinate kids, keep of the pretence of a global pandemic to get other countries vaxxed (the G7 have targeted end of 2022 to vax the planet), roll out their booster jabs and turn the screw on the unvaxxed. Nigeria is a highly populated country with low vaccination rates, so my bets are on a Nigerian variant hitting shores here and around the globe in September 2021, for the shitshow to continue.
  15. Sounds like you're in denial because, for some reason, you took the vax. Ample evidence out there that the vax is a slow kill weapon to further a depopulation agenda. This isn't about money - it's much bigger than that. Even so, the Pfizer share price is below where it was in 2018 and we've since been in a rampant bull market, which tells you what analysts think of their "golden goose".
  16. He seems desperate to dim the sun at some point. Mentions this a lot. A Snowpiercer type scenario
  17. Possibly. But his posts let you know where he'd like to take things, or where things are going. When the fake pandemic very first hit, he began talking in really enthuastic terms about mrna vaccines, and the need to inject the entire planet. Here we are.
  18. Here's Bill Gates' reading list published yesterday https://www.gatesnotes.com/About-Bill-Gates/Summer-Books-2021?WT.mc_id=20210614100000_SummerBooks2021_BG-TW_&WT.tsrc=BGTW Some excerpts of his takes on the books are quoted in italics: Lights Out: Pride, Delusion, and the Fall of General Electric. "The truth is that businesses, even the giants of industry, are just as susceptible to mistakes as any nonprofit. Anyone who wants to avoid the mistakes made by GE should read this book." It seems like this might be a primer for the, "I just made mistakes excuse" when everyone starts croaking from the vax. Under a White Sky: The Nature of the Future. "I’m glad that smart writers like Elizabeth are reminding us of the risks of trying to intervene in nature. But I wish she had also explored whether the risks are worth taking, or what the alternatives might be. For example, there are many things we can do about climate change aside from dimming the sun, as I wrote in my book this year. (Geoengineering gets just a few paragraphs out of 230 pages.) Similarly, gene drive isn’t just for toads. As I explained in this post a couple of years ago, it could be a powerful way to control the species of mosquito that spread malaria. Our foundation is funding some exciting work in this area, and we’re also part of the global conversation about its pros and cons. I’m glad there’s a vigorous debate going on in the global health community about the use of this technology. I suspect I’m more of an optimist than Elizabeth is. I don’t think it’s inevitable that humans will keep degrading the environment forever. As the standard of living rises, population growth levels off and people start devoting resources to preserving and cleaning up the environment. We’re also developing new ways of understanding the impact we have on nature—including computer models that can predict how mosquito populations will respond to various attempts to kill them off. Despite these reservations, I still recommend reading Under a White Sky. Elizabeth has a breezy, easy-to-read style, and her book is a good reminder that we need to watch out for the unforeseen effects of our actions. Even though that’s only half the story, it’s an important half." Are we the mosquitos?! A Promised Land. I don't read anything into his review of this. He's just sucking up to Obama. The Overstory. "Powers is interested in the damage humans can do to something that has otherwise withstood hundreds of years of change. It’s a fascinating idea for a book, although I don’t subscribe to his idea that the world started off in this positive state and has been going downhill since we came along. I think the relationship between people and nature is a bit more complicated than The Overstory suggests. (I wrote more about this in my review of Under a White Sky.) The novel has a pretty negative view of humanity. That didn’t make me enjoy it any less. On the contrary, I loved following Powers’ characters as they became more and more passionate about their love for trees. There was something pure about the way they set aside their individual needs for a greater cause, even as several of them make choices that I strongly disagreed with—including the decision to commit acts of ecoterrorism. Near the end of the book, Powers writes that “the most wondrous products of four billion years of life need help.” The Overstory may not have convinced me to move to a remote forest so I can live in a canopy, but it did make me think differently about my relationship with the trees right outside my window." I think Bill sees himself as a martyr. He knows that ultimately the shit will hit the fan for him, but that the depopulation of earth was a greater cause. An Elegant Defense: The Extraordinary New Science of the Immune System: A Tale in Four Lives. "The best-known example of this type of drug is Humira. I have friends who take it and describe it in glowing terms compared to other treatments they’ve been prescribed. It’s made up of synthetic antibodies that dial down the production of a protein that’s thought to be at the root of a dozen major autoimmune disorders, including Crohn’s disease and ulcerative Colitis. (Incidentally, the term monoclonal antibody, which includes drugs like Humira, is abbreviated “mab,” which is why the generic name of so many new drugs ends in that suffix. You’ll notice it in most of the pharmaceutical ads you see on TV or in print.)" Could he now be gearing up the development of drugs to combat the myriad of auto-immune disorders that will be caused by the gene-based vaccines. Essentially, people will need to take expensive daily medication just to function normally.
  19. Just read this on a betting forum I follow from one of the members: "Hope everyone is ok. I'm number 7 of 8 positive pcr covid tests (mine came back today) from 17 people at work in our maintenance dept. I've had both jabs so got nothing out of the ordinary happening, apart from being stuck at home with the Euros & Copa America on TV for 10 days. Just keeping everyone informed about the importance of keeping careful out there if you're out & about etc. Out of the 8 of at work that have Covid 7 of us all had both jabs or 1. The lad that got it first refused his jab, he was really bad last week, then said starting to feel better over the weekend. He's put on our whatsapp group he's right ruff again now today. How I feel regarding my symptoms is I'd be in work, it's like having a very minor cold & cough. It just goes to show how important it is to be aware how all viruses spread, & to get vaccinated." So it seems this delta variant is literally a common cold. I won't bore you with the responses to this guy, only to say that the vast majority are still utterly brainwashed by it all. Hopelessly inured.
  20. A family friend of mine, an intelligent 22 year old guy, is on the fence about getting the vax. Here's the message I sent him today, with what I think to be persuasive and authoritative pieces of info. I'll let you know what he decides: Heard you're still unsure about taking the vax, so I thought I'd let you know why I think best to avoid it. Serious concerns about its safety have been raised by a number of renowned professors. Please see here: https://doctors4covidethics.medium.com/urgent-open-letter-from-doctors-and-scientists-to-the-european-medicines-agency-regarding-covid-19-f6e17c311595 On a risk/benefit analysis it just doesn't make sense, especially for someone of your age: https://www.ukcolumn.org/article/banned-paper-doctors-risk-versus-benefit-assessment-of-covid-jabs?fbclid=IwAR3uzLlkdGr9DAkQU02AAwaWUOapKqxhU8Axhbt3eRhtrL3BhiCfcPWjdGQ Here's a video of Michael Yeadon, ex-VP of Pfizer summarising his thoughts on everything that's going on. Its 57 minutes long: https://rumble.com/vg4inv-michael-yeadon-full-interview-planet-lockdown.html?fbclid=IwAR0aam4tmKohUyFjg2G06kZulTR4dPaFK0Dajo_vhn5YD-fBhC8zHNI7Deg Here's professor Sucharit Bhakdi hypothesising that auto-immune disease could be caused by these vaccines (5 min video): https://153news.net/watch_video.php?v=1N9B7D2WSHYM&fbclid=IwAR3cTX4tBMePBGFD2xi6zoaiqmAysjeWP8YuhwrFDcMIk07Wd1gOxlXCLo0 Please see the adverse reaction reports on the gov.uk own website. Go to "COVID-19 vaccine Pfizer analysis print" and "COVID-19 vaccine AstraZeneca analysis print". As of today, 406 people killed by Pfizer and 863 killed by Astrazeneca vaccines. Many of whom young and healthy who didn't need the vaccine. Thousands of vaccine injuries include blindness and spontaneous abortion. These aren't being reported by the BBC and mainstream media (renowned professors like Yeadon and Bhakdi above are being censored too): https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions Why is all this happening? Can only speculate, but it's well known that people like Bill Gates (the largest private funder of the WHO, GAVI and Covid vaccine research) think the world's population needs to reduce: https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/billionaire-club-in-bid-to-curb-overpopulation-d2fl22qhl02?fbclid=IwAR31TQFo3dhi-60SrBb1lOAB-yDyAFO-Sp-1Zf9hmsl-EpqbUH_nVsXuPiU Professor Dolores Cahill thinks the vaccines will cause premature deaths in those that take it: https://m.facebook.com/freedomislandofireland/posts/120085296807306 What are your thoughts? Once you see it, it feels strange watching people volunteer for this genocide. For further resources check out UK Column News, Delingpod or Corbett Report, all of whom I like to view (all are banned on YouTube etc
  21. The slippery BBC have now removed that sentence. But not before all the youngsters had read it
  22. Even if every one of those 832,577,446 had had both doses, it still wouldn't reach 2,092,863,229 vaccines administered
  23. Hmm the figures don't make sense? 2,092,863,229 vaccines administered, 832,577,446 persons vaccinated with at least one dose https://covid19.who.int/ Am I missing something?
  24. Wouldn't get anywhere. And BBC would argue they're technically correct - although reports of these spontaneous abortions were documented via the Yellow Card scheme, the vaccines weren't "shown to cause" them. You really need to have highly attuned verbal reasoning skills to see through the BBC crap.
  25. Disgusting propaganda and outright lies from the BBC here: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-57273875 "...there are no documented cases where the vaccine has been shown to cause problems in pregnancy." A quick search on the yellow card scheme tells you there have been 149 spontaneous abortions reported following the vaccines. https://yellowcard.ukcolumn.org/yellow-card-reports#[object Object] Sickening to the core.
×
×
  • Create New...