zarkov

I have a link somewhere that showed emf applied to portions of the brain shut down moral decision making processes. iirc it was an MIT research finding. The corrolation to mob phone use where the same areas are targeted would therefore also possibly effect moral decision making processes, I would add that heavy metals in vaccines deleteriously effect growth, development and cause body wide mineral derrangement to occur. Similar mineral derangement occurs with mercury based fillings. I would estimate that the true purpose of vaccines and other methods for installing heavy metals in the human body is a crapshoot whereby a certain percentage of people who are susceptable to these effects are indeed effected. Mercury (Hg) is known to damage the myelin sheath that surrounds nerves. In arthur firstenbergs excellent book "the invisible rainbow" shows the transmission of hgh speed em nerve impulses takes place in the myelin sheath. Myelin sheath damage and dispruption via heavy metals could concievably cause a percentage of the population to exhibit psychopathic traits during develop and growth phase where permanent growth/development damage occurs. Mercury passes the bood brain barrier (BBB) rather easily where the high sulphur content of the brain and nerve tissue particularly the mylelin sheath, which provides a highly chemically attractive repository for such heavy metal insults. I believe that vaccination and mercury fillings are prime candidates intentionally contrived to bring about such and many other mental states of imbalance and the effects of Hg have been known for many centuries.

Thanks @seclorum I have been searching for a common law thread. Below posted from https://windowsontheworld.net/what-is-common-law/ WHAT IS COMMON LAW? There is a lot of misleading information which is being touted around as common law. The descriptions below are as accurate as it gets. The customs and traditions upon which it is founded have also been wrapped up in sound bites and are guaranteed to get the gullible and ignorant into trouble. Ever since the “Freeman” movement was injected into proceedings the courts have become wise to it and do not hear the arguments which are mainly irrelevant to all court proceedings. Only a knowledge of how a court works will have any effect. The worse aspects of common law are execution and all manner of cruel punishments. The best parts are the upholding of natural law and truth through tradition. As the court is directed by the judge a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but a good solid understanding of the court procedures and common law can help you win, if you know what you are doing. (Check out our archive for more) This short introduction is in the main from “The History of Common Law in England” by Sir Matthew Hale published in 1739. Sir Matthew Hale (1609 – 1676) attended Lincoln’s Inn to study the law. He became the chief justice of the Court of King’s Bench, There are two types of law: Lex scripta, the written law and Lex non scripta, the unwritten law. Not all laws have the original text available in writing. The unwritten laws have obtained their force by immemorial usage and custom. Written Laws are usually called statute laws or acts of parliament. Written up for the tripartate of King, Lords and Commons, Without the consent of all three, no such laws can be made. The monarchy with the advice of the parliament can make laws. There are two types of statutes: Those not in time of memory and those within time of memory. Time within the reign of Richard 1st was classified as within memory. Therefore within time of memory in a legal sense was from 6th July 1189. Because any time before this was presumed to be without beginning the laws previous to 6th July 1189 are part of common law through usage and custom. The first statute roll is The Magna Charta and is in The Tower (as at the time of writing in 1739). Leges non scripta or customary laws before William 1st the conqueror and in the time of Richard 1st. This is the legal limitation of time of memory. Those statutes extant in The Book of Magna Charta The first available record of a summons to parliament was during the reign of Edward 1st. The records before this have been lost or mislaid. The laws before memory are not only of course oral, they have been written and transfer from one age to another. A vast number of Legis non Scriptae are all allowed as the rule and direction of justice and judicial proceedings. Common law in its usual and proper acceptance is: The Law which proceedings and determination in the Kings Ordinary Courts of justice are directed and guided. (This is why common law is useful in holding court, you can steer the court into common law if you know what to do.) The various and particular customs of cities, towns and manors are thus part of the common law. The common law does determine what of those customs is good and reasonable and void. The common law gives to those customs that it adjudges reasonable, the force and efficacy of their obligation. The common law determines what is that continuance of time which makes such a custom and the limits and extensions thereof. It cannot be altered or changed by an act of parliament. Ecclesiastical and Civil law Neither canon nor civil law have any obligation as laws within this Kingdom as the Popes emperors made those laws. All strength that either the Papal or Imperial Laws have obtained in this Kingdom is only because they have been received and admitted either by the consent of parliament and are part of the Statute Laws of Kingdom are else by immemorial use or custom. Their authority is founded merely on their being admitted and received by us which alone gives them their authoritative essence and qualifies their obligation. There are three courts of note, wherein the Civil and in one of them the Canon and Ecclesiastical Law has been, with certain restrictions allowed in this Kingdom: 1 The Courts Ecclesiastical of the Bishops and their derivative officers. 2 The Admiralty Court 3 The Curia Militaris, or Court of the Constable or Marshal, or those persons commissioned to exercise that jurisdiction. (Neither the canon nor the civil law have any obligation within the kingdom, as they were at the time of writing not recognized as they were of foreign authority) The only inclusion of these laws would be by Act of Parliament and not derived from themselves. The courts of England are not bound by the courts of the Pope or Justinian. The only jurisdiction is therefore derived from the Crown. The sentence in Ecclesiastical courts is excommunication as at time of writing in 1739. (Henry V111 legitimatized the issue of common law writs of execution for heresy by burning in conjunction with the Ecclesiastical Court) The Civil Law is taken in as a director in exposition in court, especially of Wills and Legacies. The Admiralty was restricted to a thing done at sea but from 1296 courts were using the Admiralty jurisdiction on land and rebuked by the wig lawyers for it, yet these same lawyers were also using it for their own benefit. See The Development of Admiralty Jurisdiction and practice since 1800 (page 4). This was used until 1861 after which anything within the body of a country on land or sea was removed from the Admirals Court and declared triable only at common law. Various devices consisting chiefly of legal fictions were employed in the common law courts but writs of prohibition were issued against civilians who tried using Admiralty during the reign of Elizabeth 1 – James 1. Here are the other articles referred to in the show: Freeman V Legal Fiction Are Administrative Courts Unlawful? Are You a Pauper? Is a Birth Certificate a Death Certificate?

LOL out of likes - as soon as I saw that it reminded me of this We've been Munsoned

@Macnamara out of likes re: nhs - Fully agree - I think they know what is at stake and they are in the exact right place to be effective.

5G is as grave a concern as vaccines - both will deliver another crisis as has been outlined on this thread that will propel the current climate of fear. https://principia-scientific.com/how-we-are-winning-the-war-on-exposing-5g-dangers/ How We Are Winning The War On Exposing 5G Dangers Published on November 15, 2020 Written by BN Frank High-speed internet is achievable, safer and more secure with a wired internet connection (see 1, 2, 3). Research has already determined that 5G is biologically harmful. Cities worldwide AND entire countries have taken action to ban, delay, halt, and limit installation AS WELL AS issue moratoriums. Since 2018 there have been reports of people and animals experiencing symptoms and illnesses where 5G has been installed (see 1, 2, 3, 4). The majority of scientists worldwide oppose 5G until there are studies that say it is safe. Telecom executives HAVE NOT provided any. IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine recently published more damning research on exposure risks. A recently published radiation analysis for 5G deployment in Austin, TX raises more red flags. From Environmental Health Trust: Radiation Analysis in a Gradual 5G Network Deployment Strategy by Ahmad M. El-Hajj and Tarek Naous of the Electrical & Computer Eng. Department of Beirut Arab University A 2020 paper analyzed the radio frequency radiation environment that would result if a mmWave-based 5G network was fully deployed in Austin Texas. The researcher first mapped the pre-existing LTE nodes and then laid out the real world design for the densification of cell towers and signal repeaters which would be needed in the City in order to fully build out a mmWave-based 5G network. The engineers then simulated the RF power densities that would be experienced in the outdoor environments should the 5G mmWave antennas be installed and they compared these RF levels to power levels of the currently installed LTE network. The researchers created 2 heat-maps showing the simulated power densities before and after potential 5G deployment in Austin Texas. The researchers conclude that, “The presented results clearly show that the potential radiation levels that will be reached upon the roll out of 5G networks do not comply with all of the aforementioned exposure limits. This suggests that 5G mobile networks can not yet be classified as safe for the public, and demands serious considerations before using mmWave communications for 5G networks, given the potential harms it could afflict on the public.” On a governmental level, the exposure limits for the power density need to be revised using today’s data and approaches to bridge the gap between the thresholds specified by the different institutes and commissions. On a technological and scientific level, the radiation exposure constraint can open the door for innovative 5G solutions targeted to limit the health risks and economic barriers associated with this problem.” A. M. El-Hajj and T. Naous, “Radiation Analysis in a Gradual 5G Network Deployment Strategy,” 2020 IEEE 3rd 5G World Forum (5GWF), Bangalore, India, 2020, pp. 448-453, doi: 10.1109/5GWF49715.2020.9221314. Doctors and scientists have asked for 5G moratoriums on Earth and in space (see 1, 2). Opposition and warnings continue to increase about tens of thousands of satellites and similar vehicles being launched for blasting 5G and WiFi at Earth (see 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17), global surveillance, and other purposes. Other sources of wireless emit harmful radiation too. Last year, the World Health Organization cautioned that high levels of Electromagnetic Radiation exposure (aka “Electrosmog”) could lead to health issues in a significant portion of the population. Nevertheless, in August, President Trump reintroduced his proposal for a nationalized 5G network. The DoD wants to own it (with help from Google). The federal agency also wants to control the whole Electromagnetic Spectrum. Hence the “Race for 5G” has only sped up in the U.S. despite warnings and opposition. If you and your loved ones aren’t being exposed to it yet – you may be soon (see 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8. 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14). Brave – The Browser Built For Privacy Activist Post reports regularly about 5G and other unsafe technology. Read more at www.activistpost.com

Intentionally so - to demoralise as you already know. Just watched the ukcolumn news reel. B Gerrish stated that they estimated 7000 members working for the cabinet office but a listener apparantly informed them that those figures in reality are nearer 14,000 working for the cabinet. approx 1:03 into the news. I suspect that there is a vast number on top of the seventy seven brigade already out there on propagandisation projects.

95% protection! - we already have 99.95% natural immunity? Vaccines are redundant by default.

Succinct summation

More people I encounter (neighbours etc) are claiming that they no longer are able to watch mainstream media. A good sign that they are sickened by the demoralisation.

It seems the real trouble started in 1948 when they created the nhs. It marked the official consolidation of government oversight into our personal lives, effectively institutionalising external control over our individual personal health. I have nothing against real emergency services, setting bones, essential surgeries etc. That is a benefit to society. But I find it entirely obectionable that our self ownership has over time been infringed to the extent that we now apparantly have to adhere to authoritarian guidelines (gov or otherwise) with regard to our own health and wellbeing and is extended to other aspects of our lives such as our ability to provide for ourselves. This is and has always been about the issue of self ownership and self determination. If a neighbour arrived at your door and told you that they would forcefully inject you with some unknown and possibly toxic substance you would tell them to sling their hook. Or if they determined that you could not travel or work, they have no authority to exert such compulsion. Removing your ability to acquire what you need to live equates to theft and at worst murderous intent. As is the case with the delusion that voting is a fair process or that we have ever participated in a true democracy. No man can transfer rights that he does not posses to any other/s. Yet here we stand at the edge of a precipice where greater violation of our innate right to life and all that it encompasses hangs in the balance. Government, medical authoritarianism and global authoritarianism is anti-life from a moral stance and fields that position by default. ergo - Authoritarianiism is illegitimate by default. There are Millions in each country who want to live ordinary lives. All on the same side - many simply dont realise it yet. The alignment of minds is a slow process but it is inevitable in the face of oppression as it always has been. The common enemy is easy to identify - they dictate. Life has one objective. To live.

This is all part of AGW/Climate change. (AG21/30) The lockdown restrictions coincide with the new green deal - carbon emmissions down. 2 birds 1 stone The national health service was the worst thing to happen to this or any country. (with the exception of those skilled surgeons who save lives during emergency's, fix bones etc) People gave up their bodies and traditional knowledge of health for a chemical paradigm of toxicity. Health became a state sanctioned affair rather than the domain of the individual and in doing so heavily infringed our innate rght to self determination. http://www.webdc.com/pdfs/deathbymedicine.pdf This fully referenced report shows the number of people having in-hospital, adverse reactions to prescribed drugs to be 2.2 million per year. The number of unnecessary antibiotics prescribed annually for viral infections is 20 million per year. The number of unnecessary medical and surgical procedures performed annually is 7.5 million per year. The number of people exposed to unnecessary hospitalization annually is 8.9 million per year. The most stunning statistic, however, is that the total number of deaths caused by conventional medicine is an astounding 783,936 per year. It is now evident that the American medical system is the leading cause of death and injury in the US. (By contrast, the number of deaths attributable to heart disease in 2001 was 699,697, while the number of deaths attributable to cancer was 553,251.5) ------------------------ This info is for the US but would indicate that global "healthcare services" are responsible for a far greater number of mortalities than could ever have been suspected. The figures shown are conservative estimates.

from the comments beneath strikes a chord.

Our worlds got overturned at some point. Getting to that point was a different experience for each of us. Since then, we have taken on board all the twattery and lies. It has settled and connected in a way that makes sense to each of us and we for the most part appear to agree with what this shit-show is about. The masses have been brainwashed, intoxicated and denied nutrition. Traumatised. Some to despair. Its not really their fault that they cannot yet see that society is a "cultured" affair, based on parasitism. Now the masses have collectively been plied with fear and had lockdown restrictions applied to demoralise all. We are all being nudged in a specific direction. Engineered convention, expectation, aspiration. What a life! Devoid of meaning and worshipping at the state alter. Too much information at once is does not get past their defenses at all imho. As frustrating as it is, that is how it is. I dont see it as a negative. Man is an adaptable and morphic creature and responds like water to environment. We have adapted to the restrictions imposed during centuries of domination and we actually call it democracy lol. For most here this is predictable and incredulous. For conventional people its a systemic shock to their core. You cant force feed a baby no matter how good the food is.

Perception decepton. Thats a good summation for it. These oculist society minions are adept at this type of crappery. These and groups like these have been performing and organising these plans for centuries. Common purpose has many (well funded) fronts and has thoroughly infiltrated modern society though LGA's, regional assembly's and local councils and green sustainability groups (Sustainable development) who all provide ample twattery by way of sugar coated misery. All falls under the UN's communitarian agenda as per 21/30 Despite resistence to the AGW agenda the media has never relented on pushing the lies, & covid has been the nudge they needed to shift mass perception to the edge of the communitarian abyss. We have their playbook - we know what they want to achieve. We understand the nature of their deceptions and their methodology. Trying to reveal simple truths seems to be the way forward. that way people can build slowly a repetoir of resistance

More coverage from Ivor Cummins

Apologies for the long post Link and article below https://www.zoeharcombe.com/2020/11/sage-conflicts-of-interest/ SAGE conflicts of interest November 9, 2020 Executive summary * As late as March 11th, 2020, the UK government and medical officers issued practical and minimally disruptive advice to combat the spread of the novel coronavirus. * On March 16th, the now infamous Neil Ferguson/Imperial College paper was published predicting over 500,000 deaths in the UK and 2.2 million in the US if suppression measures were not introduced. * Stricter measures were announced on the day that paper was published, and the first UK lockdown was announced a week later, on March 23rd. US states variously followed suit. * The committee that has been advising the government throughout this period is called the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE). Ferguson was a member of this committee until he resigned in May for having broken lockdown rules. * This week’s note examines the key influencers on SAGE and their conflicts of interest: – Organisations invested in vaccines make money from vaccines. People who acquire natural immunity have less/no need for a vaccine. If people are locked in their homes, they have less chance of acquiring natural immunity. – Twelve out of 20 key influencers work for/have received funding from organisations involved in the Covid-19 vaccine. – There are four times more modellers/statisticians and experts in behaviour manipulation on the committee than there are virologists. There are no immunologists. * It doesn’t matter if a drug is good or bad. It matters that those who have a financial interest in that drug are conflicted if they give advice that protects the financial interest in that drug. Introduction Imagine that a new disease emerged. It presented less risk of death than a lightning strike for school-age children (Ref i), but it was particularly nasty for the elderly and those with pre-existing conditions. A committee decided that draconian measures – the likes of which had never been experienced or studied – should be imposed on the entire population until a drug to ease the disease outcome arrived. If you then discovered that the majority of the committee members had financial interests in the drug being developed, how would you feel? Background The conflicts that I am going to go through in this note are primarily related to vaccines, but this is a note about conflicts and not vaccines. The background to the issues is as follows… On March 11th, 2020, UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson, and the Deputy Chief Medical Officer, Dr Jenny Harries, held at briefing at Downing Street. A five minute video summarised the evidence and advice to the British people (Ref ii). The advice was stay home if you’re sick, wash your hands, protect the vulnerable, most people will have a mild illness, wearing face masks is “usually quite a bad idea“, and “big gatherings don’t have a big effect so we don’t want to disrupt people’s lives.” Dr Harries summed up the UK position by saying, “so, as a professional, I am absolutely delighted that we are following the science and the evidence.” The science has not changed, but the advice has. On March 16th, Neil Ferguson/Imperial College published a non-peer-reviewed paper which said that unless a suppression strategy were adopted “we would predict approximately 510,000 deaths in GB and 2.2 million in the US not accounting for the potential negative effects of health systems being overwhelmed on mortality” (Ref iii). Prime Minister Johnson announced stricter measures that day and then, a week later, on March 23rd, he announced that the UK would be put into lockdown for three weeks “to avoid the NHS being overwhelmed.” Professor Johan Giesecke is an infectious disease specialist and advisor to the Swedish government. He was the World Health Organization (WHO) leader of the revision of the International Health Regulations and he was the first Chief Scientist of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) a post he held between 2005-2014 (Ref iv). Just before five minutes into this interview (Ref v), Professor Giesecke explained the Sweden coronavirus strategy: “Herd immunity isn’t the strategy; it’s a by-product of the strategy. The strategy is to protect the old and the frail.” Giesecke summarised the policies introduced in Sweden as: there’s no lockdown. People are free to go out. There’s no police to stop you in the street. People are asked to stay inside but there’s no reinforcement. We have a rule that a crowd cannot be bigger than 50 people. The upper schools are closed. Schools up to the age of 15-16 are open. Nursing homes are closed to visitors. Sweden didn’t do nothing; therefore, but Sweden did treat their grown-ups like grown-ups. Giesecke then described the Sweden strategy as “It’s very similar to the one the UK had before there was a famous paper by the Imperial College by the modellers, that came out and the day after you made a U-Turn in England.” Giesecke said of the Ferguson/Imperial paper: “I don’t think any other scientific endeavour has made such an impression on the world as that rather [pause] debatable paper.” “It was very much so overly pessimistic.” In this context, there are two fundamental issues with the committee making decisions about lockdowns having vaccine conflicts: 1) Organisations invested in vaccines make money from vaccines. If people acquire natural immunity, they have reduced or no need for a vaccine and thus the potential gain for the vaccine company is reduced. 2) Locking people in their homes and other lockdown measures will reduce the number of people who acquire natural immunity. It’s that simple. As Giesecke explained, the Ferguson/Imperial paper had global impact, since its dire warnings were heeded around the world. Ferguson’s history of abysmally inaccurate models must be noted upfront. As just one example, in 2005, Ferguson predicted that up to 150 million people could be killed from bird flu. In fact, 282 people died worldwide from the disease between 2003 and 2009 (Ref vi). When challenged about his March 2020 Covid-19 model, Ferguson admitted that it was based on undocumented, 13-year-old, computer code that was intended to be used for a influenza pandemic, rather than a coronavirus. Ferguson refused to release his original code so that other scientists could check his results. When software engineers finally got hold of some of the code, they tore it apart in hours (Ref vii). In this context, let’s examine the key influencers who managed to get the UK into lockdown 1 and who have just succeeded in returning the UK to lockdown 2. Method The minutes from the SAGE committee meetings are available thanks to the efforts of businessman Simon Dolan. He has fought in the courts to ensure that the minutes are openly available, as part of his ongoing legal action that the measures imposed on the UK have been illegal and disproportionate (Ref viii). The minutes were finally published on Friday 29th May (Ref ix). I have gone through the minutes to get the list of attendees and then assessed the key influencers on the committee. This was done by attendance and importance. I examined the first 30 minutes, from meeting 1 on January 22nd, 2020 to meeting 30 on April 30th, 2020 (Ref x). This covered the important period from early discussions about the virus situation in China… to the Downing Street Briefings on 16th March and then the UK lockdown announcement on 23rd March… to the point where Johnson declared, in a briefing on 30th April, “we are past the peak of this disease” (Ref xi). There were 25 people who attended 5 meetings or fewer – 10 attending just 1 meeting during that 3-month period – whose influence would have been minimal. The key influencers were the 20 people who attended at least half (15 or more) of the 30 meetings I examined. I checked to see if these were still the key attendees in the more recent minutes (meeting 55, 3rd September and meeting 61, 8th October as examples) and they essentially were. The notable exception was that Ferguson resigned from the SAGE committee when it became known (on 5th May) that he had broken lockdown rules (Ref xii). He had attended every one of the first 30 meetings. The only other person with that 100% attendance record was Sir Patrick Vallance. Ferguson’s influence has not gone, however. He is a member of NERVTAG (The New and Emerging Respiratory Virus Threats Advisory Group), as are many members of SAGE (which means that the main committee is largely using a subset of that committee to advise itself). Additionally, Ferguson is still given airtime by the media to continue to issue his apocalyptic predictions. The details of the conflicts of these key influencers are below. The 20 key influencers In what follows: GCSA = Government Chief Scientific Advisor, CSA = Chief Scientific Advisor, CMO = Chief Medical Officer and LSHTM = London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. Please note that the references for the table are reported separately at the end of this note. Examination of the 20 key influencers on SAGE reveals the following: 1) 11 out of 20 work for the government (some hold government roles in addition to other roles). 2) 12 out of 20 work for/have received funding from organisations involved in the Covid-19 vaccine. Those 12 don’t include Vallance with personal pharmaceutical conflicts or Whitty with historical funding from the Gates foundation. Three work for Imperial College and two work for Oxford University – the two forerunners in the Covid-19 vaccine race in the UK – each receiving millions of pounds from government(s) (Ref xiii). Three more work for the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine with its own vaccine centre (working on Covid-19 among other vaccines). One works for UCL, which is working with Imperial on its vaccine. Two work for Wellcome/the Wellcome Sanger Institute and one has received funding from the latter. Two members have double conflicts – Peter Horby with Oxford University and Wellcome and Wendy Barclay with Imperial College and Wellcome. 3) Taking the major role only (to keep this totalling 20), 5 are Chief Scientific Advisors in government (2 of these are modellers/statisticians); 4 more are modellers/statisticians, 2 are experts in how to manipulate human behaviour, 3 are medical officers/directors, 3 hold senior roles in the 2 universities leading the vaccine race, and 3 work for/have been funded by Wellcome (as above, 2 of the university members also have conflicts with Wellcome.) 4) There are no immunologists among the key influencers on the SAGE committee. There are two virologists. Wendy Barclay has particular expertise in flu and works for Imperial College and her laboratory is funded by Wellcome. The other, Maria Zambon, also works for Imperial and has “specific interest in RNA viruses, antivirals and vaccines.” Zambon and Ferguson were named in a 2010 article exposing the fact that: “A third of the experts advising the World Health Organisation about the swine flu pandemic had ties to drugs firms, it has emerged.” Zambon and Ferguson are not the only SAGE members to have history of working together. As another example, Whitty, Ferguson, Farrar, and Edmunds collaborated on an Ebola paper entitled “Infectious disease: Tough choices to reduce Ebola transmission” (Ref xiv). The two behaviour experts among the key influencers have also collaborated on this controversial paper (Ref xv). The following extract from the paper has been widely cited as evidence to show how fear has been used to coerce UK citizens: “A substantial number of people still do not feel sufficiently personally threatened… The perceived level of personal threat needs to be increased among those who are complacent, using hard‐hitting emotional messaging based on accurate information about risk.” The paper has sections on coercion, compulsion and how to harness “social disapproval” to coerce people into doing what government wants them to do. Given that the media was interested 10 years ago when one third of the experts advising the WHO on swine flu had drug conflicts, the media should surely be interested now that 12-14 out of 20 have such conflicts (Ref xvi). It doesn’t matter if a drug is good or bad. It matters that those who have a financial interest in that drug are conflicted if they give advice that protects the financial interest in that drug. The advice emanating from SAGE is currently under scrutiny as never before. The Centre for Evidence Based Medicine, which has been an exemplar of rigour during the Covid-19 period, has highlighted the inaccuracies in the recent forecasts that have resulted in Lockdown 2 (Ref xvii). Slides broadcast on national TV on 31st October were revised downwards by the time the slides were published on line. The two main drivers of SAGE – Vallance and Whitty – were summoned to appear before the Science and Technology Committee on 3rd November where Vallance expressed regret for frightening people. But SAGE knows that people need to be frightened into compliance for their strategy to work, as the SAGE behaviour advisors documented in their academic paper. I wonder if that fear might turn to anger if people realise that the committee may not be the independent body that it has been assumed to be. References for the article Ref i) https://www.bmj.com/content/370/bmj.m3259 https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2020/06/09/school-age-children-likely-hit-lightning-die-coronavirus-oxbridge/ Ref ii) https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=227850301597915 Ref iii) https://www.imperial.ac.uk/media/imperial-college/medicine/sph/ide/gida-fellowships/Imperial-College-COVID19-NPI-modelling-16-03-2020.pdf Ref iv) https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/strategic-and-technical-advisory-group-for-infectious-hazards/members/biographies/en/index2.html Rev v) https://unherd.com/thepost/coming-up-epidemiologist-prof-johan-giesecke-shares-lessons-from-sweden/ Ref vi) https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2020/05/08/so-the-real-scandal-is-why-did-anyone-ever-listen-to-this-guy/ Ref vii) https://lockdownsceptics.org/code-review-of-fergusons-model/ Rev viii) https://www.theguardian.com/law/2020/may/16/government-legal-action-refusal-to-publish-sage-minutes-lockdown Ref ix) https://www.gov.uk/government/news/government-publishes-sage-minutes Ref x) The meeting minutes ceased being searchable from meeting 18 on the 23rd March, which made analysis more difficult. Ref xi) https://www.gov.uk/government/news/prime-ministers-statement-on-coronavirus-covid-19-30-april-2020 Ref xii) https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/05/05/exclusive-government-scientist-neil-ferguson-resigns-breaking/ Ref xiii) 17 May “So far the government has invested £47 million in the Oxford and Imperial vaccine programmes. But today I can announce an additional £84 million of new government funding to help accelerate their work… I can also confirm that with government support, Oxford University has finalised a global licensing agreement with AstraZeneca for the commercialisation and manufacturing of the Oxford vaccine.” https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/business-secretarys-statement-on-coronavirus-covid-19-17-may-2020 Ref xiv) https://www.nature.com/news/infectious-disease-tough-choices-to-reduce-ebola-transmission-1.16298 Ref xv) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7276722/ Ref xvi) https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-1302505/WHO-swine-flu-advisers-ties-drug-firms-Experts-linked-vaccine-producers.html Ref xvii) https://www.cebm.net/covid-19/the-innacuracoes-in-the-sage-models/ References for the table Ref 1 : https://www.gov.uk/government/people/patrick-vallance Ref 2: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/09/23/revealed-sir-patrick-vallance-has-600000-shareholding-firm-contracted/ Ref 3: https://www.imperial.ac.uk/people/neil.ferguson Ref 4: https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/business-secretarys-statement-on-coronavirus-covid-19-17-may-2020 17 May “So far the government has invested £47 million in the Oxford and Imperial vaccine programmes. But today I can announce an additional £84 million of new government funding to help accelerate their work… I can also confirm that with government support, Oxford University has finalised a global licensing agreement with AstraZeneca for the commercialisation and manufacturing of the Oxford vaccine.” Ref 5: https://www.gov.uk/government/people/christopher-whitty Ref 6: https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2008-03/lsoh-lso030408.php Ref 7: https://www.gov.uk/government/people/charlotte-watts Ref 8: http://strive.lshtm.ac.uk/people/charlotte-watts Ref 9: https://www.lshtm.ac.uk/research/centres/vaccine-centre/covid-19 Ref 10: https://www.lshtm.ac.uk/research/research-action/features/maths-maps-modellers-tackling-covid-19 Ref 11: https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2015/03/26/clare-wenham-and-john-edmunds-how-effective-is-this-years-flu-vaccine/ Ref 12: https://www.gov.uk/government/people/jonathan-van-tam Ref 13: https://www.kcl.ac.uk/people/james-rubin Ref 14: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7276722/ “A substantial number of people still do not feel sufficiently personally threatened… The perceived level of personal threat needs to be increased among those who are complacent, using hard‐hitting emotional messaging based on accurate information about risk” Ref 15: https://www.gov.uk/government/people/john-aston and http://www.csap.cam.ac.uk/network/john-aston/ Ref 16: https://www.isirv.org/site/index.php/council-members/11-antiviral-group/165-maria-zambon Ref 17: https://www.imperial.ac.uk/medicine/nihr-hpru-respiratory-infections/people/ and https://www.imperial.ac.uk/medicine/nihr-hpru-respiratory-infections/research-themes/influenza/ Ref 18: https://www.who.int/ihr/procedures/emerg_comm_members_20140616/en/ Ref 19: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-1302505/WHO-swine-flu-advisers-ties-drug-firms-Experts-linked-vaccine-producers.html Ref 20: https://www.gov.uk/government/people/angela-mclean Ref 21: https://www.kcl.ac.uk/people/brooke-rogers Ref 22: https://www.ndm.ox.ac.uk/team/peter-horby Ref 23: https://www.england.nhs.uk/author/professor-stephen-h-powis/ and https://www.ucl.ac.uk/news/headlines/2020/apr/profile-professor-stephen-powis Ref 24: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/news/2020/jul/covid-19-vaccine-trialled-healthy-volunteers Ref 25: https://www.sanger.ac.uk/external_person/peacock-sharon/ Ref 26: https://www.astrazeneca.com/media-centre/press-releases/2016/AstraZeneca-launches-integrated-genomics-approach-to-transform-drug-discovery-and-development-22042016.html#! Ref 27: https://www.gov.uk/government/people/carole-mundell Ref 28: https://wellcome.org/about-us/executive-leadership-team Ref 29: https://wellcome.org/about-us/teams/vaccines-team Ref 30: https://www.imperial.ac.uk/people/w.barclay Ref 31: https://www.ed.ac.uk/edinburgh-infectious-diseases/research/themes/disease-dynamics/andrew-rambaut Ref 32: https://twitter.com/arambaut/status/1254827417761431555?lang=en and https://www.cogconsortium.uk/about/ Ref 33: https://www.gov.uk/government/people/ian-diamond

Was just watching an old fema camp coffin youtube vid - Reading through some of the comments underneath & this one by King Yea Yea 1 Year ago https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m3zSDdm-SHI&lc=UgxGfqX9DWVXWwh_qqZ4AaABAg.8lVPGS6ZLmb8vGL8jAM-Rf

https://principia-scientific.com/top-pfizer-whistleblower-trashes-companys-vaccine-breakthrough-spin/#comment-41853 Top Pfizer Whistleblower Trashes Company’s Vaccine ‘Breakthrough’ Spin Published on November 10, 2020 Written by John O'Sullivan Yesterday Pfizer announced to much media fanfare that it has a breakthrough in the search for a reliable COVID-19 vaccine claiming studies showed it can prevent 90% of people contracting the virus. But respected former vice-president of Pfizer, Dr. Michael Yeadon, raises serious concerns. World stocks and shares are surging upwards after hearing the press announcement on Monday that the drugmaker has claimed a major victory in the war against a virus that allegedly killed over a million people, but has certainly battered the world’s economy. Reuters.com are reporting: But Pfizer has an enormous fly in the ointment of their corporate bragadaccio: former vice-president of Pfizer, Dr. Michael Yeadon, now coming to the fore as a prominent whistleblower of the global pandemic vaccine fraud. As reported on www.weblyf.com and other alternative media outlets, Professor Yeadon is exposing a host of junk science claims: Batting for Big Pharma is CDC and White House pandemic task force front man, Dr Anthony Fauci, who lauded Pfizer’s new claims, telling CNN: However, Dr Anthony Fauci – along with his boss at NIH – are among many key government medical advisers who are hardly impartial observers. They are heavily invested in Big Pharma vaccine shares. There are growing calls for a full investigation of this medical elite clique. Curiously, even Fauci admitted the COVID test Has a Fatal Flaw. Fauci knows dissent is growing and further admits it is “disturbing” that so few people want the new vaccine. As such governments like the UK are pushing through mandatory vaccine laws. But the most compelling opposition is among independent medical professionals. Over 30,000 medical doctors and related experts have signed the Great Barrington Declaration calling out proven irregularities and expressing grave concerns. Not only have governments and their ‘science advisers’ grossly overreacted to the pandemic, it has become very clear from the evidence that the claimed novel coronavirus has no more impact on global health than any normal flu bug. The need to roll out a trillion-dollar mass compulsory vaccination program using ‘rushed through’ vaccines is not only reckless, it may end up killing more people than the virus itself. Pointing to the fact evidence shows no mass winter vaccination program is warranted, Dr. Yeadon stated: So distressed by the way the UK government has pandered to the vaccine lobby on this key issue, Professor Yeadon wrote an open letter to Matt Hancock, the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care of United Kingdom, who has ordered his department to publish the proposed changes to the Human Medicine Regulations “to cover a potential roll-out of a vaccine”. Dr Yeadon’s letter to the UK Health Minister reads: As each week passes it becomes all too clear that the British government cares little about what independent medical experts say and is going all in on implementing their mass compulsory vaccination plan using the military, as stated in the controversial consultation document. In a separate Tweet about the UK’s plans Professor Yeadon lamented: Here at Principia Scientific International we are actively building a highly-qualified team of international experts presenting robust empirical and documented evidence exposing the scam. Central to the science we present is the inescapable fact that no laboratory anywhere in the world has been proven to have isolated, refined and reproduced the virus to the accepted standard. The COVID-19 Cart Is STILL In Front Of The Horse. We Argue That COVID19 Is Really A CDC Computer-Generated ‘Virus’ And The Shocking Admission From The United States’ Centers For Disease Control And Prevention (CDC) Which Admitted In An Official Document That: “No Quantified Virus Isolates Of The 2019-NCoV Are Currently Available…” Freedom of Information law (FOI) requests to several international government science agencies have revealed English-speaking nations have no such ‘gold standard’ proof of any such SARS-Cov-2 virus (the claimed cause of the pandemic). Admitting this key flaw is the UK and Ireland. Health Canada Has No Record Of ‘COVID-19 Virus’ Isolation. While a New Zealand university has been exposed for falsely claiming it has isolated the virus. The question we pose to the Big Pharma crony capitalists and their bought off friends in government is: how can you remotely claim to have a successful vaccine for a virus you haven’t even properly isolated and verified?

Hi John Steed, welcome to the forum. I have found invisible rainbow by Authur Firstenberg to be a very interesting and concerning book. An excellent read with logical rationalle appplied. https://lbry.tv/@survival-archive:6/The_Invisible_Rainbow_Arthur_Firstenberg_highlighted_24_June_2020:7 (Give the page time to load and then you can download the pdf version from the pdf page insert) Barrie Trower gives a lecture here discussing mobiles and the outcomes of using em radiative devices. Great presentation. I will post more as I trawl.

I was just thinking aout finding a similar type of list and presto here it is - thanks. Uk column has started a series of talks dsicussing the common law https://www.ukcolumn.org/article/dissidents-guide-constitution-episode-2-common-law Its an interesting subject where Natural Law is identified and acknowledged to some extent in common law. Common Law appears to be Law of the land whereas Statute Law is apparantly Law of the sea. (admiralty, maritime etc) Law society solicitors/lawyers state that statutes take precedence, but in a common law court with a jury statutes can be over-ruled by a common law jury. jury nullification! edit: To me it seems that the statute law system are the laws of invaders !

Because of the importance of administering it correctly to ministers and sage participants the syringe needle size needs to be adjusted proportionally with respect this incredibly large group of arseholes Something batton size might just do it and if they object then it can always double as a truncheon anaesthetic.

Damage control Some of Larken Rose's past comments "How weird is it that most people get this question wrong?: You're a customer in need of some product or service, and you get to choose one of the following: 1) A company tells you what it will do, and what the price is, and you can decide whether to take the deal. 2) A company will tell you what it will do, FORCE you to pay whatever price it demands, and then do whatever the hell it wants. Which of these arrangements is more likely to serve your interests?" 8 years ago "This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when he first appears he is a protector." (Plato) It was true two thousand years ago. It is still true today." "The myth of "authority," when wielded by tyrants, is not used just to deprive us of material wealth--which would be bad enough. Instead, what drives true tyrants is the desire to deprive their subjects of their HUMANITY, by replacing their free will and self-determination with the will of the tyrant. In short, "government" is the engine for love of dominion: the epitome of evil, and the opposite of humanity."

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8925735/The-1am-email-sent-ENTIRE-NSW-police-force-questioning-coronavirus-lockdown.html 'It's a global dictatorship!' The bizarre 1am email sent to the ENTIRE NSW police force questioning the state's 'oppressive' coronavirus lockdown The six-page open letter was addressed to NSW Police Commissioner Mick Fuller It was signed off by Senior Constable Alexander Cooney, a highway patrol officer He claimed he sought to 'raise the alarm that a global dictatorship is occurring' A disgruntled cop penned a six-page letter to the state's police commissioner laden with COVID-19 conspiracy theories and sent it to the entire NSW Police force at 1am. Titled 'Open Letter to the Commissioner: Tyranny of Government, or Best Interests of the People?', the document was sent on October 26, five months after NSW came out of lockdown. It was signed off by Senior Constable Alexander Cooney, a highway patrol officer from Coffs Harbour, north of Sydney, and called into questioned the legitimacy of the state's coronavirus response. 'Many members of the force are fed up with the approach to enforce oppressive rules placed upon the population in the name of COVID-19 and the looming mandatory vaccination,' the letter read. The full post

Mark Windows on communitarianism Clarity!

Agree - The law of force is the force of law. That is possibly what it may come to. I hope not and alternative means need to be arrived at. One thing is for sure. So many have woken up and inevitably most will at some point which is why they seem to be on a timed schedule. I cannot comprehend why, regardless of "pandemic", a risk assessment for a global lockdown was not in the forefornt of everyones minds. The economic fallout projection for global lockdowns is catestrophic even from a laymans persepctive. Millions upon millions wil die as a result of (selective) restrictions - it is a no brainer when global supply chains are considered. That should have been the end of the propsition in a normal rational world! But not these sick parasitic reprobates called politicians and expert authoritarians. Simply - to lock down for a lesser reason than the economy itself which is how we live, as one of the limitations to life is self provision! Possibly the most stupendously immoral choices I have ever witnessed by authoritarian decree in my life. If they knew the outcome and they do, then it is clearly intentional.