Jump to content

Kala Namak

Members
  • Posts

    366
  • Joined

  • Last visited

2 Followers

Recent Profile Visitors

430 profile views

Kala Namak's Achievements

211

Reputation

  1. I agree with this. The majority of folks are currently heavily influenced by the powerful MSM propaganda machine, and anybody that is even mildly sceptical of what they're being told comes under heavy scrutiny, which is why the quality of the evidence supporting the case against the tyrants needs to be higher and attention to detail is important. Unfortunately it can be a bit of a ball ache checking every little detail, but that's what the opposing forces will do anyway, so we have to beat them at their own game, while staying united and not splitting off into too many "Peoples Front of Judea" factions. I am encouraged to see more and more people waking up, and although there are still too many compliant folk obeying orders for my liking, I am optimistic and think we're heading in the right direction.
  2. Thanks for this. I was in the middle of searching for where the quote came from when I saw your post. I tend to be vary careful nowadays and try not to repost something before checking because "there be trolls in them thar hills", sitting there waiting for any slip up so that they can rubbish, discredit and dismiss anyone who doesn't buy the official bullshit narrative.
  3. Thanks for that. I presume that you updated the spreadsheet yourself to get the red numbers and the totals. If it's not too much of a hassle could you also share the source of the data you used to get the Adverse Reaction numbers and the increase numbers.
  4. Well I suppose between them and psychopath sponsors, they are subjecting humanity to pain similar to Cock and Ball Torture... while pushing the cock and bull official narrative.
  5. Close but not Carling. Her name is Helen Ball (singular...as in Bobby, not Ed) which doesn't quite work, which is a shame.
  6. ...followed by another 12 inch extended mutant variant remix released on 1st June 2021... Prior to this year, the definition appears to have been pretty consistent since the 2006... "a preparation of killed microorganisms, living attenuated organisms, or living fully virulent organisms that is administered to produce or artificially increase immunity to a particular disease" If you control the language, you control the argument If you control the argument, you control information If you control information, you control history If you control history, you control the past He who controls the past controls the future. – George Orwell 1984
  7. I just checked on the wayback machine myself and the before and after April 2020 dates do not match what I found. Looks like the dodgy definition "remix" happened sometime between the 18th and 26th January 2021...
  8. Apparently the Stanford study that was cited has been retracted for the following reasons :- The Editorial Committee concluded that the author’s hypothesis is misleading on the following basis: 1. A broader review of existing scientific evidence clearly shows that approved masks with correct certification, and worn in compliance with guidelines, are an effective prevention of COVID-19 transmission. 2. The manuscript misquotes and selectively cites published papers. References #16, 17, 25 and 26 are all misquoted. 3. Table 1. Physiological and Psychological Effects of Wearing Facemask and Their Potential Health Consequences, generated by the author. All data in the table is unverified, and there are several speculative statements. 4. The author submitted that he is currently affiliated to Stanford University, and VA Palo Alto Health Care System. However, both institutions have confirmed that Dr Vainshelboim ended his connection with them in 2016. A subsequent internal investigation by the Editor-in-Chief and the Publisher have determined that this article was externally peer reviewed but not with our customary standards of rigor prior to publication. The journal has re-designed its editorial and review workflow to ensure that this will not happen again in future. Retraction notice to “Facemasks in the COVID-19 era: A health hypothesis” [Medical Hypotheses 146 (2021) 5] (nih.gov)
  9. Cheers, I saw that tweet. On the one hand I do get a bit annoyed when stuff is removed and people cancelled for non-compliance with the "official narrative". On the other hand, the fact that they are getting increasingly desperate with their attempts to cancel people shows that there are folks that have something major to hide and that hopefully the truth will out and more people will see this debacle for the fraud that it is. I have big respect for people like Rancourt that put themselves out there and are strong enough to stand behind what they say even they are opposed by aggressive fascist numpties like Kyle Johnson, and yes I agree with you, imo Rancourt did win that argument. DKJ disqualified himself with his bad behaviour imo.
  10. Thanks, I was never really away, and usually peek in here at least once a day, just haven't posted that much. I'm trying to stay positive and to look for some light at the end of the covid tunnel, can't really see that much at the moment if I'm honest. Hopefully more people are waking up and the momentum shifting, but right now the overwhelming majority are compliant, and imo that's not great.
  11. Thanks for posting that. It is a good video imo, however I'm usually a bit put off by "MUST WATCH" and I also prefer to go to the original creators video... ...and thanks to that I have a bunch of other good quality videos to watch. Kate Wand - YouTube Unfortunately there are not enough hours in the day to watch all the stuff I want to watch and read. I may need to clone myself.
  12. Thanks for the link. I've saved my own copy because stuff like this has the uncanny ability to "disappear" all of a sudden. I vaguely remember the video being quite a hard watch as David Kyle was very shouty. Looking forward to reading what the update is.
  13. That link to Denis Rancourt's report appears not to be working, there is however an article here that appears to cover the same points, which I found referenced in a detailed point by point rebuttal, or as the author David Kyle Johnson puts it, a "Complete Debunking" (10,000+ words long, not read it yet) Rancourt's article includes a youtube video of a debate between them which I remember watching last year and as I recall, it was very very heated...
  14. I hadn't heard of PANDA before I stumbled across the Nick Hudson video. They have Dr Sam Bailey on the team, and I like her content. I'll be keeping an eye on them and looking forward to some more good quality stuff. The Team - PANDA (pandata.org)
×
×
  • Create New...