Jump to content

Autos Nomos

Members
  • Posts

    15
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Autos Nomos's Achievements

8

Reputation

  1. They, the multitudes who reason like this, are incapable of separating morality and beauty because their beings have been deeply politicized. So they can only think in terms of political power and social justice. As such they will be dictators when they get their hands on beauty, they will jealously point to a beautiful flower in the garden of a member of an elite and say 'this doesn't belong here with the '1 percent', it is not fair'. Beauty will have to submit to their pettiness and the logic of their political slogans, which are holy to them, it will have to be subjugated to their incapacity of disinterested appreciation. Not only will they jealously point to the beauty in the garden of an elite, their fairness is the fairness of continuous equalization, so they will divide beauty fair and try to chop of the head of anyone in possession or capable of creating more beauty than they have, that is, not because they recognize it, but when the word goes around of beauty being present, they will apply their equal and fair distribution logic to it. When the beauty has cost a lot of money, like that of architecture, they are of course the first to point their fingers at it, the unfairness! when the beauty is of a sort of which the production does not costs much financially, but is appreciated only by the few, they will say that it costs time, and that the creator of it has been wasting his time, that he should invest his time in making products which can be appreciated by the greater collective, preferably the greatest, the 99 percent. The logic of envy, which is based on the incapacity of disinterested appreciation expresses itself in a variety of forms. In the case of for instance religious architecture of which a lot has indeed been made by means of oppressing the people, of their blood an sweat, but it being centuries ago, they will still today, even when such practices have been long ago discontinued in that area, forbid people to enjoy the beauty, as they are moralists of envy. So they will intermingle with the few non political forum topics like this, to point with their moralist politicized finger. It is in place though as David Icke himself continuously enforces the democratic myth of the people being the good, the simple and honest, at worst being misguided, always victim, so he enforces the victim complex of those for which it is convenient. This forum is crammed with such types.
  2. You are politicizing beauty, by means of which you betray that you have no love for beauty itself. If you want beauty for the people, you should promote the art which dictators loved, art for the people, especially designed for them.
  3. Indeed the word modern is sometimes also used to indicate the period as far back as the renaissance, starting from the rise of science and art.
  4. The easiest way to take control over people and control them utterly is to leverage the second phase of democracy, where the people and their representatives have themselves taken little by little each others freedoms. When already, so to speak, there is a sign of regulation on every tree. Hence, the corona scare control., in this latest phase of democracy, which is the prelude to dictatorship already initiated by a thousand dictators of democracy, the rule of the people, 'elites', or 'the cabal' as they are called by some just have to give the enormous apparatus of control, created by the people, this enormous system of laws, regulations and procedures. of vast armies of bureaucrats and managerial classes, of an enormously large law and justice regulation system, of an addiction to technology, of the peoples materialism, a push. Thus, giving a push, the gigantic system of control, of regulation and propaganda already being in place, the peoples representatives, the peoples journalists, the peoples managers, the peoples snitch system already in place, the people and the peoples representatives will start to tumble over each other using their own regulation and propaganda apparatus to control each other, to convince each other trough their own propaganda apparatus, and to silence each other by means of their own rigid and overblown regulation system, each by their own means motivated by their own interests. And the managerial classes will head to work to eagerly to invent more procedural rules, and the already gigantic law enforcement apparatus will eagerly apply more control, and the bureaucratic justice system will frustrate opposition by overloading people with absurdities, and the inventors of newspeak with its euphemisms and slick language will head to work to derail any opposition by neutralizing any common sense left through abstract absurdities, and the corporate managerial class will take care of control of the work space, and the lower institutional establishments will add their jargon and procedures, all adding tons of paperwork of descriptions and regulations. At the point in time of the push, the people are psychologically already used to their hyper-regulated system, it being already the normal, and the people already created a multiplicity of interests in their own gigantic overly complex regulation and propaganda system, already being corrupted by these interests. Hence, the Orwellian state. Aside of the armies of controllers described above, the people themselves have already freely and willingly obtained the screens, they have voluntarily placed them in their living rooms, their bed rooms, the public space, the commercial space, the bigger the better, wide-screen high definition, the latest biggest size available. The people themselves have freely subscribed to the channels of propaganda, of entertainment loaded with propaganda alternating between entertainment propaganda and commercial propaganda every fifteen minutes. They have become obsessed with news, or 'reality porn', they are attached to screens like mindless zombies, they even carry little screens with them everywhere, screens by which they are obsessed. As consumerists they have already sold their personal information. All you have to do is to seize on this situation. Everything being in place. Then the people, being without self-reflection, used to blame the other start to blame the other in the form of 'elites', and so a small amount of people, consisting of those among the people who have been moving social-economically upward get the blame for the whole system. And so hardly anyone realizes that the system of control is built upon the broad foundation already created over the decades by the people and their representatives themselves. That no such intense control can be forged without the enormous control and regulations apparatus already being in place, without the democratic obsession with reality porn (news), and without the peoples obsession with technology and screens, no such fear and collective psychosis could be distributed on such a scale. Hence, from this historically unprecedented system of hyper-regulation and worship of technology already being created by the people, it is just a few easy steps to move on to final control. The people already being enslaved and ensnared by their own system of historically unprecedented regulation and ubiquitous means of propaganda, a dictatorship which no historical elites, kings or dictators have ever managed to create, and will never be able to create on their own, will, of course start shift the blame. Being used to their own cage, as hyper-regulated work-slaves and consumerist slaves, subject to hyper-regulation they will put the blame everywhere except the foundation which they have aided to create and even financed themselves through their consumerism, their obsession with news, and trough a thousand little dictators among themselves out to apply little forms of control, forbidding and regulating. As the people are the holy cows in a democracy, no fault is on them, no one dares to lay a finger on them at large.Moreover, as democracy is the bludgeoning of the people, by the people, for the people, they are all divided, if not shifting the blame to elites, then shifting blame on another, left, right or whatever comes in handy. Thus, the people, of which only a minority will be in forceful opposition, though divided as they all have their own theories and labels of who is finally responsible, never self-reflecting, never self critical, never having oversight on their own cage and their own little contributions, never changing the cause which will finally lead to dictatorship. Psychologically the opposition among the people will cling on to the easy slave-dictator model, always shifting the blame to some 'masters of control' model, masters who reside anonymously in dark corners, dark backrooms and high places, or at least far away and unreachable, sometimes even theories of masters who have throughout all history always enslaved the innocent holy cows of democracy, 'the people'. Opposition will explode into a thousand theories, all shifting the blame to mysterious sources,mysterious practices, and always 'establishments', never The people, never, The Holy Cows of democracy, being always victim. And so any common sense based approach which may attract an amount of intelligent and self-reflecting people will thus be derailed through a labyrinth of the much more attractive unreliable and highly speculative sensational theories, thus eroding the capacity of transformation of society itself through common sense intelligence. The sensational and attractive conspiracy and blame theories will become more widely known, and so through their simple good versus evil narrative will marginalize and overrule more common and practical sense based non blame theories. Imagination of the marginal opposition will be solely or mostly focused on the anticipation and publication of the sensational negative, positive imagination will be at large impotent, providing no powerful alternatives, result of a lack of self-reflection and vision, through the power of negative anticipation they will potently aid in the realization of what is negatively anticipated.
  5. https://www.y2mate.com/en23 I advise using an adblocker, else you might get porn adds thrown in your face. There are other sites offering download facilities too. They can be used for things which disappear, and which do not disappear.
  6. To add the final blow, the internet itself is about centralization and uniformization. What you find there is what is popular, which is more of the same, even the alternative media are more of the same. Basically the internet as a medium, and the computer means uniformization, it is a reduced experience, away from the richness of physical reality, the richness of the sensuous/spiritual reality and real individuality, into a bleak uniform world of poverty, aesthetically, mentally and in terms of culture. The industrial process, started over 150 years ago produces ever more of the same, computer technology produces more of the same, it is the product of standardized computer 'intelligence', which means centralization/uniformization both in terms of aesthetics and thought. Then people think they are different because the colour of their car is different, or its shape or size, or they have a different desktop background.., or a different colour of smartphone, or a different theme on their Wordpress site... This is al a laughing stock of course, superficial difference. In short, industrial technology and micro-technology has already for about one century and a half standardized and centralized the world. Imagine, on the internet you regularly have to prove to a 'robot' (a piece of code) that you are human.. contemplate on that... what it signifies.
  7. " TPTB are clearly working to try and 'centralise' the Internet, in order to 'control the flow' of information. " Wordpress, if used from Wordpress servers is already centralized... By any means, the ubiquitously present Wordpress system is already a functional and aesthetic uniformization (all the sites basically look like each other). This forum is also secured by cloudflare robot algorithms (which is one of the reason of being blocked messages). Al this is already highly charateristic of uniformization, dehumanizing algorithms and centralization, of which alleged 'TPTB' efforts to centralize are just the finishing tough of uniformization. In all respects, and all areas, their so called uniformization and centralization attempts are in every field little more than the finishing touch, considering that all Western societies are already hyper-regulated and bureaucratic to an extent and breath which knows absolutely no historical precedent, not even under the rule of dictators, kings and historical elites. Not ever in history has the arm of the state and institutions extended so far, not ever before has their existed such vast armies of bureaucrats, not ever before such armies of managerial classes. As such, revolting against a 'TPTB' is little more than the revolt of a caged bird, revolting against a smaller cage. The elites are possibly doing people a favour, instead of the slow hardly visible uniformization and centralization which is gradually accepted, which creeps on unnoticed over long periods of time, because the memory of most people does not go back further than a few decades, and their knowledge of history and consequently their big picture is based on democratic propaganda (falsified history), when the elites impose more centralization all at once, as a shock therapy.. the caged bird might for once become aware of his slavery...
  8. To throw some Schopenhauer into the mix. http://manteau.nl/philosophy/arthur-schopenhauer-on-the-metaphysics-of-the-beautiful-and-aesthetics Some might argue this is too much theory, but theory provides for ammunition in the form of reasoned arguments, which is very much needed these days. It also helps to clarify and intensify ones own vision.
  9. To provide a quote from Shiller on the importance and place of beauty.
  10. For those philosophically inclined (to provide a philosophical foundation) I would point to the works of Friedrich Schiller 'Aesthetical and Philosophical Essays'. http://manteau.nl/philosophy/schiller-aesthetical-and-philosophical-essays-introduction Inspirational are also the writings of Oscar Wilde, starting here, with his work 'Intentions': http://manteau.nl/philosophy/oscar-wilde-intentions-the-decay-of-lying Or in general, works and quotes of Oscar Wilde: http://manteau.nl/category/media/textual/oscar-wilde
×
×
  • Create New...