Oakwise

Leonard Cohen wrote that song. Didn't he willingly take part in some twisted isolation, sensory-deprivation experiment?

From the article: "I didn't have an underlying health condition that was expected to trigger a reaction," said Coun Akhtar. "But the flu-like snuffles and muscle ache kicked in, followed by a horrendous fever. When I closed my eyes to lay down I felt like the top of my scalp was melting and sliding down my face. It was horrible. "I was really struggling with my breathing, I was so short of breath. So we called the ambulance and I was taken straight to A&E. "My fever remained and the temperature shot up to 40°c. It was this combination of symptoms that made the A&E team suspect that I might have Covid-19 or a reaction to the vaccine. "That was the scariest bit, when they said that they suspected I might have Covid and put me into isolation." That's what I've been saying. The adverse reactions are causing extra pressure on the NHS which is then being blamed on covid and used to scare people into accepting more and more intrusions on their civil liberties. I wish people would wake up.

Yeah, but then we'll all end up like Winston from Nineteen Eighty-Four doing our daily jerks in front of the telescreen.

Sorry to hear about your uncle. Just out of interest, have they had the new experimental vaccine recently?

Emperor's new clothes.

You're welcome. I'm bit more optimistic. I feel that it is possible to ascertain some truths, particularly about the real inner-workings of civilisation. Regarding your other question: It would be more apt to ask 'Is this a pandemic?' and then look at all the available data (and I don't mean only the cherry-picked stuff emanating from the government echo-chamber; I mean look at the counter-arguments that are based on other data sources). You're concerned about the ostensible NHS crisis. But there are many other possible factors to take into account. It's not a clear-cut case of saying, 'Some NHS trusts are overwhelmed, therefore it's a SARS-2 pandemic'. Are there other causal factors? Is the reporting fully contextualised? etc. etc. There is a lot of irrational fear out there. Some people are so afraid of catching the virus that they wear flimsy masks thinking it's protecting them from viral pathogens. But the masks are not designed to stop those microbes. They are useless at that. The whole strategy is based on the 'nappy theory' i.e. that wearing masks might catch some of the droplets and therefore prevent the spread of the virus (this claim is contested). And the 'nappy theory' is predicated on the 'asymptomatic spread theory' which has scant supporting evidence; indeed, the evidence shows the opposite i.e. that asymptomatic spread is highly unlikely. So one has to ask: Is there any need at all for healthy people to cover their face? The sad irony is, you think you're protecting yourself by wearing masks all the time, but by doing so you increase the risk of bacterial overload which could lead to a nasty respiratory infection. Irrational fear is not based on reason. It's based on murky assumptions. This can lead one to live in a state of near permanent anxiety. And we know how damaging stress can be to our health.

And I assume that the 'vaccine culture' is one component of a new socio-economic paradigm that's being engineered into existence? Does the formation of a new vaccine culture give the elite ideologues new capabilities? If so, what are they?

That's based on an over-generalisation of 'conspiracy theorist' which itself is a poorly defined term. I do, however, agree with you about putting all things up for examination. But don't confuse all conspiracy theories with direct allegations of covert collusion, allegations that are supported by a mountain of evidence. Sadly, conspiracy (i.e. covert planning) is the norm throughout the history of civilisation. It's a logical part of statecraft i.e. for their power, wealth and privilege, rulers depend on their subjects staying within the parameters of the social structure. This is a problem that is solved by planning. Naturally, this is done behind closed doors by the ruling class. Plato, the ancient Greek philosopher, observed this behavioural truth: So it's not a question of, 'is there a conspiracy?', it's a question of 'What are the ambitions of the current crop of power-lovers?'

That's because you fail to understand how the world really works. You're like the ancients who took things at face value and logically concluded that the sun goes round the earth because that's how it appears. We say to you, that's an illusion and it is in fact the opposite. You then laugh and say how can that be. We say it's because the earth is spinning on its axis as it revolves around the sun and so creates the illusion of the sun going round the earth. You say, don't be lunatic, how would things stay on the planet if we're spinning around? We reply, there's a hidden force called gravity. It's at this point you dismiss us as crazy gravity theorists. In that same way, you watch the news and conclude that it's all moving east to west around the earth and therefore it all works such and such. When in reality there are hidden factors that you're unaware of and not taking into account. As for motive, you're dealing with high society ideologues who already know fabulous wealth. It's not about wealth. It's about the execution of a strategy that aims to revolutionize global civilisation according to their own ideologies. This is not unusual since the 20th c. is full of elite ideologues with grand visions for how society should be. The pattern is continuing into the 21st c. Globalisation of economics also means the globalisation of power. The trend for this century is the attempted unification of world governance in a new economic paradigm (see The Great Reset, Fourth Industrial Revolution). The problem is that it needs to evolve into being as per the Fabian strategy i.e. gradually through a seemingly natural dialectic process. Unfortunately, however, this can be too slow, so at certain points you would need catalysts to act as accelerants. So this current event has the strategic purpose of accelerating social change. Indeed, you can't 'build back better' without a certain amount of destructivity. This is just a short summary. It's a complex thesis that would take many pages to elucidate. I suggest you do your own study into the evolution and true nature of civilisation. Actually study the behaviours of those sorts of people who love power. You'll find that conspiratorial tactics are part of how they behave. All the best.

Totally agree with you. So the situation could be: Usual winter pressure on some hospitals Added pressure from lockdown / mask-wearing damage On top of that, added pressure from adverse events related to the mass roll out of an experimental vaccine (thanks to UK Column et al. we know the gov. was planning for the potential of mass adverse events) Add it all up and what have we got?

That's exactly why the roll out of an experimental vaccine that correlates with the ostensible rise in hospitalisations should be investigated. Iatrogenic factors are a very concrete reality. The UK gov. claims that around 1.5 million people have had one of the jabs so far. All it would take is a small percentage of adverse reactions (severe enough to get people worrying) to create a rush on some NHS trusts. And that's not taking into account the potential for medium and long-term iatrogenic harm to those participating in this 'emergency' experiment. So when you talk about "people's health", it works both ways.

We could also be seeing an epidemic of adverse vaccine reactions. The anecdotal evidence is piling up. The estab. can blame it on covid. They can say, 'See, we told you covid was bad.' A bit like that priest from Father Ted, the one who would smash up perfectly good furniture and say, 'See, Father, I toldya it was shoddy workmanship!'

This is very sad. There is a blatant correlation between the increase in hospitalisations and the roll out of the vaccine. Just check the stats from 12th December onwards. Only the other day I spoke to a cabbie friend who said he had a woman rushing to hospital because she became ill a few hours after having the covid jab. Our local hospital was one of those with ambulances supposedly queuing up outside. Say if a thousand people in the area got the jab. All it would take is 50 adverse reactions in a short space to cause a rush on at the hospital, on top of the usual winter pressures (notwithstanding the fall out from lockdown and mask wearing). This correlation between vaccine roll out and increased hospitalisations needs to be thoroughly investigated. We could be looking at the biggest medical crime in the known history of our species.

Don't give up people. 'Communication and conviction - got to kick until it breaks'

It may have something to do with the time of year. It's cold, icy, wet etc. I also suspect that's why the clapping thing failed to materialise: Who wants to stand out in the cold banging pans, clapping like a seal? Ironically, the protest moved to Clapham Common lol

On the back of that, I wonder how many people will develop symptoms just through the sheer power of autosuggestion?

Well, indirectly, yes. The policies are set at the top and they're just doing their job.

Seems to me like they want us to be afraid, man. Or maybe we just like being afraid?

I think you nailed it, mate.

She's old school. I remember being introduced to her back in 2004 (?) via Michael Ruppert's The Truth and Lies of 9/11. It actually reminds me of the old days of internet truthing. It's such a shame that Michael Ruppert isn't with us today. We could do with his voice from the wilderness:

Well, it's not inconceivable that under the cover of covid certain high ranking officials could be assassinated via anthrax. Inhalation anthrax has the same symptoms and since hospitals are on high alert for covid, it's possible that cultures won't be grown in the path lab. It would just go down as a covid death. I wouldn't be surprised if something like anthrax is used on the population. It's a tough bacteria that can survive being released into the wild. It's not contagious so it can be easily controlled e.g. certain areas can be targeted and all symptoms would be classed as covid. It's also worth noting that in Huxley's Brave New World, the controllers used anthrax to break down the old system and introduce the new scientific dictatorship.

Anthraxed? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthrax#Lungs