Jump to content

Mitochondrial Eve

Members
  • Posts

    1,603
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    27

Everything posted by Mitochondrial Eve

  1. Although this is several months old, I have just come across this blog today by Bogdan Herzog about the occult meaning of Covid-19. It reminded me of the Wetiko mind virus although via a different tradition. https://bogdanherzog.ro/on-the-occult-meaning-of-the-term-covid-a-succinct-incursion-into-pattern-recognition/ The disease was given its name by the WHO on 11th Feb 2020 made up as follows - CO for corona, VI for virus, D for disease and 19 for when the outbreak was first identified. According to Herzog, Covid, when read from right to left as "Divoc" and transcribed into Hebrew, apparently means possession by an evil spirit (a dybbuk) and is derived from the Hebrew verb meaning "to cling" or "to adhere". In Jewish folklore, a dybbuk (a sinful spirit) takes over a victim's body targeting those in a state of emotional intensification and arousal. Its victim loses any self awareness and self control and becomes dispossessed of their identity. It won't have escaped anybody's attention that the entire Covid narrative has been about fear, wearing down the masses and depleting our spirit. Whilst in this weakened state of fear-based hyper-arousal, the virus can take hold. People no longer seem to have control over their senses and have been absorbed into collective group think of unprecedented levels. Some have observed that it is like the masses are under a powerful hypnotic spell. The (alleged) virus which causes Covid-19 can also be said to attach itself (adhere / cling) to the surface of cells, hijack them and then replicate and take over. So the similarities between how the virus is said to work is analagous to demonic possession. As for the meaning of 19, the author leaves this open to the reader to work out. One theory is that the 1 represents A in its respective position of the alphabet and the 9 equates to the letter I. When put together, the two letters obviously become Artificial Intelligence.
  2. Louise Hampton and some other protestors have been trying to raise awareness of Covid injections outside vaccination centres. This is a video recorded today from the Brentford site. Louise is reading out official UK Government Yellowcard statistics of adverse reactions. Apparently they changed the minds of 6 people.
  3. Controversial Dutch politician Thierry Baudet has apparently spoken out in Parliament about the Rockefeller Lockstep Document and exposes how its contents have come true with the Covid narrative. I hope that the translation in the subtitles is faithful to what he has actually said.
  4. The Hart Group, I believe, have been vocal about their objections towards Covid injections and other Covid measures including this open letter. Regarding the swine flu vaccine, the UK government were forced to pay out compensation for damage caused to children after the High Court rejected the government's appeal to withhold payments. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/feb/09/ministers-lose-fight-to-stop-payouts-in-swine-flu-jab-narcolepsy-cases Doctors for Covid Ethics are another similar group from various countries - including Professor Sucharit Bhakdi, Dr Mike Yeadon and Dr Wolfgang Wodarg - who have tried appealing to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the European Parliament about the dangers of the Covid injections. This has no doubt already been posted but it may be time for a reminder. On 18th May 2021, in anticipation that Covid "vaccines" for children aged 12-15 would gain approval from the European Medical Regulator, Doctors for Covid Ethics issued a notice of liability for harm and death to children on all Members of the European Parliament. The appendices links to the documents that support their concerns. https://doctors4covidethics.medium.com/notice-of-liability-for-harm-and-death-to-children-served-on-all-members-of-the-european-parliament-fe42ffdbf400 Here are the links to the documents in the appendices in the order presented. https://doctors4covidethics.medium.com/urgent-open-letter-from-doctors-and-scientists-to-the-european-medicines-agency-regarding-covid-19-f6e17c311595 https://doctors4covidethics.medium.com/reply-from-the-european-medicines-agency-to-doctors-for-covid-ethics-march-23-2021-d6760984dd06 https://doctors4covidethics.medium.com/press-release-doctors-and-scientists-accuse-medical-regulator-of-downplaying-covid-19-vaccine-d2431d5abdab https://doctors4covidethics.medium.com/rebuttal-letter-to-european-medicines-agency-from-doctors-for-covid-ethics-april-1-2021-7d867f0121e https://doctors4covidethics.medium.com/doctors-and-scientists-write-to-the-european-medicines-agency-warning-of-covid-19-vaccine-dangers-edfebb0419a7 https://doctors4covidethics.medium.com/doctors-for-covid-ethics-signatories-15878f9ff76 https://odysee.com/@Doctors4CovidEthics:d/Vaccine_Risk-Benefit:9
  5. I started a poll like this back before the forum was hacked and thought it might be interesting, over one year on, to see what views members have now. I have tried to cover the main theories of what may be going on so hopefully haven't missed anything glaringly obvious. But, if anyone has an different ideas, I would love to hear them.
  6. Jacques Attali denies the quote attributed to him saying that it is made up of "truncated sentences cherry picked from comments he made during an interview and later published in the book by the title L’Avenir de la Vie (the Future of Life) by Michel Salomon." But, according to this piece, he has advocated euthanasia and sees older people as a burden on society. He has said that the "human machine" should be brought to an "abrupt halt" rather than deteriorate gradually. https://www.lewrockwell.com/2021/05/bill-sardi/the-worlds-master-diabolitician-calls-the-shots-on-the-extermination-of-human-populations/ This is part of what he said apparently taken verbatim from his interview with Michel Saloman: He has attended Bilberberg meetings and is quoted as foretelling that pandemics may be used to control populations including via a global police force and global taxation. So whilst the quote may not be a verbatim depiction of things he has said, he does appear to hold the views attributed to him.
  7. This is the link to the House of Commons Health and Social Care Committee's oral evidence dated 17th April 2020. It is suggested that this forms part of the evidence that the government were stockpiling midazolam at least at the beginning of the pandemic as part of its "preparations for coronavirus". https://committees.parliament.uk/oralevidence/288/default/
  8. I do find it sad how distanced people are becoming. Whilst online communications certainly have some benefits - for example, this very forum remains a sanctuary of sanity for many during these difficult times and a place where ideas can be exchanged - it is really not a substitute for tangible, physical interactions. There is so much more to be gained - in terms of truly understanding and connecting with another - through the tone of somebody's voice, eye contact and their bodily / facial expressions. Plugging us into technology and AI is obviously a big part of the agenda as the ultimate form of social distancing. We are being increasingly forced to connect to the interweb to perform even some of the most basic functions. Yet this serves to disconnect us from each other and spirit. The world is becoming increasingly plastic, hysterical and exhibitionist with people creating fake versions of themselves for public display and approval. Max Igan has mused over our potential fusion with technology and believes that mankind have taken so easily to computer systems because of, he believes, the matrix simulation that serves as our reality - it is like second nature to us so we take to it like ducks to water. I wonder if plugging us in as such could change not only our neural pathways, but also the very fabric of the nature of this reality and what it is to be human. It probably goes without saying that, for those of us seeing through the narrative, it is important at this time to keep up more meaningful "real world" connections and to form new ones, where possible, with other like-minded people. Perhaps this is easier said than done which may be where online communities can help aid with that, at least for now.
  9. Welcome to the forum Kam H. And very well spotted - yes this guidance has now been updated as you suggest! I have looked back on wayback machine and it appears it was changed in late 2020. This snapshot from 18th November 2020 still shows it how it used to read. https://web.archive.org/web/20201118013808/https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download I think what must have prompted the update were the claims made by the CDC that they had isolated the virus in June 2020 and "deposited the virus into 2 virus repositories, making it broadly available to the public health and research communities". However, the paper submitted by the CDC has been heavily criticised. Closer examination reveals once again that the “isolation” process undergone cannot be said to amount to purification and has instead been compared by Jon Rappoport to “creating soup in a lab” . The Vero cells used to grow the virus in the tissue culture are from monkey kidneys which were then supplemented with heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum. A pancreatic enzyme called Trypsin was then applied along with antibiotics which are used to ensure that bacteria is not causing the cellular damage rather than a virus. Cell suspension was then added and mixed gently, and the inoculated cultures were grown in a humidified incubator and observed for cytopathic effects (cellular damage and death) after which the sample underwent extraction for confirmatory testing and sequencing. Once cytopathic effects are observed, it is assumed that it is the virus that is killing the cells rather than other aspects of the “isolation” process. However, Dr Andrew Kaufman questions the assumption that it must be the virus causing the cell death and points out how other ingredients within the “soup”, along with minimal nutrition, are more likely to be the cause. And, with no negative control experiment also completed – an experiment where the cell cultures are subjected to the same conditions but with the absence of the alleged virus – how can it be known whether it was the virus causing the cellular damage or some other aspect of the “isolation” process? It is also pointed out that, by adding ingredients to create a “soup”, the scientists are doing the opposite of isolation which, in ordinary language, means to separate from everything else. And, indeed “fetal bovine serum is a source of foreign genetic material and extracellular vesicles, which are indistinguishable from viruses” so how can we be satisfied that, when the mixture undergoes confirmatory testing and sequencing, genetic material is not being picked up from something other than a virus? And, what is more, the CDC study has also been heavily criticised by Dr Tom Cowan and Sally Fallon Morrell as it reveals that the alleged genome of SARS-CoV-2 - following the "isolation" of the virus - has been pieced together on a computer. This is what Dr Tom Cowan has said on the matter: Dr Andrew Kaufman, Dr Tom Cowan and Sally Fallon Morrell have recently issued a 'Statement of Virus Isolation' whereby they advise that, for all studies where it has been claimed that SARS-CoV-2 has been isolated, the methods section should be checked and, if Vero cells or any other culture method were used, this is not true isolation. The authors also advise that: On this basis, until proven otherwise, Dr Andrew Kaufman, Dr Tom Cowan and Sally Fallon Morrell conclude that the SARS-CoV-2 virus does not exist. Control Experiments Further to Dr Kaufman's criticisms above about the lack of a control experiment, virologist Dr Stefan Lanka has been undertaking such experiments, commissioned in a laboratory, into the cytopathic effect of SARS-CoV-2 and has publicly revealed his findings disproving the claims of virologists. As part of the control experiment, it has specifically been explored whether the claimed cytopathic effect of SARS-CoV-2, and by extension all viruses, can be induced without any infected material (an absence of a virus). Virologists do not perform these control experiments. It is claimed by virologists that, when viruses are grown in cell culture, the damage to and death of the cells shows that viruses are the culprit and therefore cause disease. This is part of the process involving "isolation" of the virus and is also considered as evidence for SARS-CoV-2 being a deadly disease-causing pathogen. In this experiment, the cells were exposed to fetal bovine serum and a small level of antibiotics. A then higher dose of antibiotics were administered after which damage to the cells started to become very apparent. The laboratory confirmed that this cytopathic effect is not virus specific and therefore cannot and must not be claimed as evidence of a disease-causing virus. The death of tissue cells in the test tube occurs in the same way without any infected material. Hopefully this helps to clear up the matter surrounding why the CDC's instructions for use have now been updated. But, at the same time, I would challenge the CDC's claim that SARS-CoV-2 has now been isolated.
  10. There are many sights and sounds which have captured me and which I have felt within the centre of my being. From haunting melodies which pierce me to the core, breathtaking landscapes and resplendent autumnal displays, the majestic magnificence of the tiger and the dazzling brilliance of the sun setting over ocean, to the simple anticipation of buds starting to show through. Such displays are wondrous to me and the feeling I have in response is precisely that - a feeling akin to an intuitive knowing that there is a higher order to this reality which I don't intuit as malevolent. I don't think feelings can be taught, or that a person can be told how to feel and then just feel that way about something. Feeling is an experience and a transcendence. So I think Nobby makes a good point that perhaps existence is for being (presence), rather than something that should be given over to too much thinking. Thinking - which is often based in the past or the future - can take away from the present and, whilst the mind makes a great servant, it also makes for a terrible master. Whilst I absolutely encourage learning and accumulating knowledge and believe that exchanges of ideas and beliefs are worthwhile, out of balance, this can become too cerebral and perhaps should be undertaken in conjunction with other experiences too like those involving the senses and stimuli, meditation and other practices. Returning to the point about this being a realm of harm, I was recently captured by the words of Antoine Bechamp which resonate with me and link back to some of the points of my previous post. He said that "nothing is lost, nothing is created... all is transformed. Nothing is the prey of death. All is the prey of life."
  11. Unless I have got the wrong thread, since starting to draft this reply last night (at my admittedly slow pace), some of ink's posts that I was responding to have now been deleted. However, I hope my memory serves me well enough to still reply to what is now gone. And hopefully my reply doesn't appear to be too off topic now. ink made a point about how grass is “not green” as it reflects, rather than absorbs into itself, the colour that we observe it to be. My thoughts, for what they are worth, are that the colour presented in an object is also dependent on the perception of the beholder, rather than just the nature of the object itself. Firstly, is the green that I see the same green that others see? Or could my green be blue to someone else and their green look red to me? Furthermore, grass appears green when viewed through the spectrum of white light. If it is dark, grass no longer appears green. Or, if grass is viewed for example through red light, it would appear black as there would be no green to reflect. And, to a colour blind person who cannot see green, grass would not appear green either. Then we have black and white objects. Black does not "reject" any colour whereas white "rejects" all. So does that mean that black is black? Or is black all colours of the spectrum? And would it mean that white is not white, nor any colour? So I think it is more complex than the grass “not” being green which was then extrapolated out to also mean that other sentient beings, including man and woman kind, reflect that which we will not absorb and therefore lack. However, some believe that we can project an image of ourselves and “fake it” until we “make it” and bring what we hope to be into existence – this may be how affirmations are said to work too. So perhaps projection (of what we lack) can allow for personal responsibility and empowerment and that we can be the change we want to see. But still, I think the beholder can perceive another being very differently to the way another sees them, and differently too to how the being sees themself. For example, the people on this forum don't see DI - and the energy he projects - as mad, whereas many of the general masses think he is. Each and every one of us will have our own individual opinion of him and also interpret his words and actions differently. Who is to say what he really "is" or "is not"? DI would of course say that he is everything that is, has been and ever can be. I take that to mean that there is the potentiality for everything within each and every being as we all come from the same force of creation. So linking that back to objects of varying colours, perhaps there is the potential for all possibility in each thing but some energies in some objects are projected outwards, whereas some are absorbed and drawn inwards, and these each give different characterisations – perhaps that doesn't necessarily mean that the outward projection is a rejection of, and lack of, the energy, but just a different form of expression. I don't believe that any energies are inherently positive or negative. There is a spectrum of potential - from the positive (usually seen as “good”) to the negative (usually viewed as “bad”) - within everything which I think is what the Masonic black and white chequerboard represents. For example, I don't think the symbols used by the elite are in and of themselves negative but rather this is driven by the intent that is put into them. Saturn as a (malefic) planet is often depicted as evil and can certainly express negatively as restriction, control, rigidity and even cruelty yet, on the positive side, it provides structure, order, responsibility and meaning. Whereas the Sun is thought to be an overwhelming positive symbol of warmth, optimism, life and clarity, it can also burn, blind and dry up what it touches. It depends on how energy is used and whether it is in balance. Some tarot cards - such as death or the tower cards - can look terrifying, but also have the potential for positive too such as transformation and a new lease of life in the case of the death card, or enlightenment, breakthrough or revelation when the tower card presents itself. Natural law also entails that everything has an equal and opposite reaction. The more an energy is pushed in a certain way, is there not also the creation of the energy at the opposite side of the spectrum in equal measure? For example, the more cruelty and brutality that is presented, the more empathy and compassion arises in response. There seems to be a fundamental natural law in play whereby everything is kept in balance like a swinging pendulum - the more force is applied in one direction, the more it will later swing back the other way. Whilst on the topic of natural law, Macnamara recently posted one of Mark Passio's presentations and I think he makes some interesting points including regarding transgressions of natural law. He believes that there are clear and objective rights and wrongs. He says that right behaviour is correct (in alignment with that which is true) and moral (in harmony with natural law) and does not result in harm to another sentient being. Whereas wrong behaviour is incorrect (not based in truth), immoral (not in harmony with natural law) and results in harm to another. The harms all result from theft – murder results in another person's life being taken, bodily autonomy is stolen through assault or rape or personal property may be taken. All rights are therefore property rights. Some points were previously raised about the use of words or spells which have now been deleted. But I would agree that we need to be careful with the words we use and not to speak untruthfully. Although Passio does not include lying to another specifically on his list of transgressions of natural law, he has said it is one that could be included as it robs the other person of their freedom to make an informed and accurate decision – it keeps them in ignorance and so this too is a form of theft. Regarding the meaning of the “G” encapsulated in the Masonic compass, he discusses what the “G” actually means. At lower levels, Masons are taught that it represents either “Geometry” or “God”. Within the middle echelons, the meaning is revealed as “Gnosis” (knowledge). But its true meaning, he says, which is learned above the 32nd degree is that of the “Generative” principle or “Genesis”. Underpinning this creation energy is Care which he describes as the lost principle. Although care is connected to love, it can be distinguished from it. What a person cares about, focuses on and gives attention to helps it to grow. But having said that, anything “negative” should not be ignored either as doing this only encourages ignorance which then grows. Passio says that most people don't care about what is happening in this reality hence why it is the lost principle - you have to care enough to develop knowledge, and then you need to care enough to put any knowledge gained into action. He describes a “unity consciousness” made up of the heart (emotions), thoughts (mind) and actions (wisdom through right action). The heart, and what we care about, is a pump and a generator – the centre of our being that is generating our experience – it is our spiritual currency and should be invested wisely. Those on the forum will already be fully aware of how the controllers adopt divide and rule tactics to keep us polarised. I think the chequerboard also represents this polarity through the black and the white, with those viewing from the top of the pyramid directing where our attention goes. Such divisions steer us away from our true spiritual currency and the “lost” generative principle of care making us less able to create our own reality whilst they manifest theirs. With the current pandemic narrative, my intuition suggests to me that the controllers are making a bid interrupt the cycle of life and death and natural law, and that transhumanism will be the end of life as we know it. I just hope that they are pushing it too far and too soon and that the pendulum will swing back before they achieve their aim.
  12. I am sure we all know that the controllers are not averse to changing their minds at the last minute and going back on their word but, according to this article, the UK government will be scrapping plans for (domestic) vaccine passports. Whilst this is good news, it doesn't necessarily mean that private companies won't be prevented from insisting their staff or customers are vaccinated or tested. https://www.reuters.com/world/uk/uk-vaccine-passport-plans-be-scrapped-telegraph-2021-05-30/ UK vaccine passport plans to be scrapped
  13. I know the protests aren't particularly popular on the forum, and the views here largely suggest that it is felt that we are in a huge minority, but I believe that the demonstrations are beneficial (even allowing for some element of possible controlled opposition) as people can form networks and realise that they are not alone. So I am glad that you were able to speak to people from all over the country and took some heart in this. As the sticker says below, "if the situation was hopeless, their propaganda would be unnecessary". I am sharing some pictures I took from the protest because I have been asked to. For me, the absolute highlight of the day was meeting Patrick Henningsen of UK Column / 21st Century Wire wearing the T-Shirt shown on yesterday's UKC broadcast. He was nothing like I expected! I thought he would be a larger then life character as he presents on UKC with great humour and fun. But the Patrick Henningsen I met was very shy which has made me warm to him even more. He said that this was his first demonstration and I noticed that he was incredibly keen on taking pictures of everything that was going on. A lovely guy and an absolute delight. Outside Downing Street
  14. Feeling a little mischievious, I thought I would create my own Ancestry profile for @Grumpy Owl.
  15. I have used Ancestry when researching my own family history so perhaps I can clarify some points here. It is been a couple of years since I properly used it so I might be a bit rusty. Firstly, this screenshot is of a "profile" record from someone's family tree of a person they are allegedly related to. When @Grumpy Owl asks for a link, I don't think you can just link to a family tree record meaning that others can then access it. You need to be signed up to Ancestry to create and view records on your family tree, and then I think you can only see your own profile records but not those in other people's trees. Whilst, as a paying member, you can search for "hints" from other people's trees and use this information if you want, I don't think you can actually view the image captured in the OP above from another person's tree. So what I think the OP's image is is a record that has been created in somebody's tree. That doesn't mean that the record is correct. I have thousands of such records in my tree and you can literally plug in any information you want about an "ancestor" - you can populate the date of birth, place of birth, death date, immediate family members etc, information of which then goes on to be listed under "Facts". Ideally you should source this info from Ancestry records (or records obtained via other means as Ancestry doesn't give full coverage) such as baptisms, burials, census or marriage records etc. You then link the info you have obtained to establish the facts back to the sources which substantiate those facts. So what I am saying is that anybody could have made that record up in their tree on Ancestry - including the date of death - and then spread it around as disinformation which I think is what has happened here. I also note that the sources linked to in the image are very light - just a Texas Birth Index and a US Public Records Index (undated). For a person who has lived from 1964 (and allegedly died in 2013), I would expect to have come across more sources to verify the alleged "facts" including the date of death. Therefore, this doesn't appear to be quality family tree research to me. I think it is disinformation.
  16. I understand that it is an apparently harmless chimpanzee adenovirus ChAdOx1 that has been genetically modified so that it cannot grow and replicate itself within human cells. The adenovirus is used as the vector (delivery system) to deliver the piece of genetic code for the SARS-CoV-2 antigen into the cells supposedly without causing disease. That is the mainstream thinking at least.
  17. until

  18. Yes I agree. I try and use the word "injection" more than "vaccination" but sometimes I echo the words used in reports, such as the one above, in the way they are presented. I think the injections are certainly doing harm, as evidenced in this thread, so any "risk reduction" - whether relative or absolute - would be a -% like you suggest. And all the figures will be manipulated to make the injections look more safe and effective by far than they actually are, whilst covering up harm and deterring people from making reports or keeping them in ignorance that they can. Good point.
  19. According to this report, only 19% of people in Hong Kong have received their first dose of the Covid injections and 14% have had two doses. Of health care staff, only a third have been injected. As a result, the jabs are close to reaching their expiration date and may have to be disposed of.
  20. This might be of interest to you TH.
  21. A report dated 21st April 2021 and published on the gov.uk website on 30th April 2021 shows that, in all vaccination tiers, there have been more deaths among those hospitalised who have been vaccinated compared to those who have not. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/982499/S1208_CO-CIN_report_on_impact_of_vaccination_Apr_21.pdf?fbclid=IwAR393aSyzoSO8G0y11gt6fTfXRl8r5S9ASbur_ChZh1XC_UKjLKMZHJ0xOQ
×
×
  • Create New...